Use this case study to shape your answer to the question: what should i do in those situations where my convictions are in direct opposition to other people's expectations.
It had been a long evening for John. What had started out as a privilege had turned into a disaster.
John seemed to have already insulted and upset the Professor by refusing an aperitif and then some wine. As they sat in the living room after the meal, Professor Piaget set a glass in front of John, ready to pour some of his prized Brittany cider. John wondered if it was right for him to continue on a course of action that seemed to be alienating his host. Or would it be all right just this once to forget all that teaching in Bible College, forget his alcoholic father, and forget even what the Smiths would think and say? Would it be all right to drink a little cider (which did not contain much alcohol anyway)?
Earlier, John had spent two summers in France. Now, in obedience to what he felt to be the will of God, John had returned to that country and had entered the beginning French course at the University of Nantes. He was living in a dormitory where he hoped to develop relationships with French students. He also made friends with the Smiths, an American missionary family who were starting a church in Nantes.
John had just graduated from a conservative religious college in the U.S. that took a strong stand against drinking alcoholic beverages. That total abstinence stand was OK with John. Because John's father was an alcoholic, he knew firsthand the suffering that alcoholism could bring. In his conversations with the Smiths, John was sad to learn about some missionaries who had started drinking wine to be hospitable to the French and who had wound up as alcoholics.
One day, John, along with three other foreign students, received an invitation from his professor. Professor Piaget was graciously opening his home to them for dinner. John had heard that it was a real privilege for students to be invited to a professor's home in France.
When the night arrived for the dinner, John's missionary friends, the Smiths, loaned him their car so that he could pick up his Japanese friend, Isao. As they arrived at the Piagets' house, the students were excited. Little did John suspect that this dinner would turn out to be a problematic experience.
Dr. and Mrs. Piaget were very cordial. John spoke less French than anyone there, but everyone was patient with him. After all the students arrived, Professor Piaget offered everyone an aperitif (a type of cocktail). Wanting to be a good witness for his Lord, John refused the alcoholic drink. John thought the professor seemed ill at ease because, for a moment, Dr. Piaget appeared not to know what to do. After an uneasy silence, the professor offered John a lemon drink. As the awkwardness of the moment passed, John breathed a sigh of relief.
When dinner was served, John partook heartily. But when Dr. Piaget began filling the guests' glasses with the customary wine, John politely refused his share. This time, the professor appeared to feel awkward and even somewhat angry at this young foreigner for refusing his hospitality. Though the professor offered John a Coke as a substitute drink, the atmosphere had changed. Due to the length of French meals and people's thirst, the host had to go get more wine. Again, John was the only one to refuse it.
When dinner was finished, everyone sat around the table talking. Mrs. Piaget cleared the remains of dessert and coffee off the table. It had been a great time for everyone except for John and perhaps his host.
John began asking himself several questions:
These questions and more had run through John's mind throughout the meal, particularly now, when everyone else was enjoying the relaxing conversation.
Eventually, Professor Piaget excused himself. After a few minutes, he reappeared carrying a tray. On it was a large flask surrounded by a neat circle of glasses. The professor began to tell his guests how good Brittany cider was. Then, he noted, especially for John's benefit, that the cider contained only a little alcohol. The professor set glasses in front of everyone and began to pour.
As his professor moved closer to him, John became anxious.
Holding a glass, Professor Piaget paused in front of John. At that moment, John . . .
Seven steps to effective case study discussion
This case study is a revised version of one by Dennis Teague in Case Studies in Missions, edited by Paul and Frances Hiebert, Baker Book House. It may be reproduced only upon payment of a 35-cent royalty per copy to Baker Book House, P.O. Box 6787, Grand Rapids, MI 49516 USA
How did Howard Culbertson react when faced with similar situations in Italy? [ ] [ ] |
Refusing alcoholic beverages in cross-cultural situations can sometimes be challenging due to cultural norms and expectations. However, there are several polite and respectful courses of action for someone committed to a no-alcohol lifestyle:
By employing strategies like these, you can navigate cross-cultural situations gracefully while maintaining your commitment to a no-alcohol lifestyle.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Email citation, add to collections.
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
Affiliations.
Mature minor consent only became available in Australia in 2007. There is neither an explicitly defined protocol, nor a clear definition evident in the literature relating to use of the mature minor concept in health research. Due to difficulties in defining fixed age ranges to varying levels of maturity and vulnerability, there is a lack of clarity surrounding when it might be reasonable and ethical to apply for or grant a waiver for parental consent. This paper describes the challenges faced and solutions created when gaining approval for use of mature minor consent in a respondent-driven sampling (RDS) study to explore the social norms and alcohol consumption among 14-17-year-old adolescents (n = 1012) in the community. The University's Human Research Ethics Committee granted mature minor consent for this study, and the techniques applied enabled recruitment of adolescents from community-based settings through use of RDS to achieve the required sample. This paper has relevance for research that requires a waiver for parental consent; it presents a case study for assessing mature minors and makes recommendations on how ethical guidelines can be improved to assist human research ethics application processes.
PubMed Disclaimer
Full text sources.
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Engaging in conversation practice related to case studies about problems such as alcohol addiction can help learners to develop their communication skills, expand their vocabulary, and improve their grammar and pronunciation in the context of a specific topic.
Students can learn how to express themselves more clearly, listen actively, and respond appropriately to various scenarios involving alcohol addiction. They can also learn how to use relevant terminology, idiomatic expressions, and phrasal verbs in discussing alcohol addiction.
Steven is a 43-year-old man who has been struggling with alcohol addiction for several years. He started drinking in his early 20s as a way to socialize with his friends and alleviate stress from work. Initially, he would only drink on weekends or during special occasions, but over time, his drinking gradually increased in frequency and quantity.
After the birth of his child, Steven started drinking more heavily as a way to cope with the stress and demands of parenthood. He found it challenging to balance the responsibilities of being a new father with his job and other commitments, and he often turned to alcohol as a way to escape from his problems.
Steven’s alcohol consumption has caused significant problems in his personal and professional life. He has lost his job twice due to showing up to work drunk and has strained his relationships with his family and friends. Despite these issues, Steven has found it challenging to quit drinking. He has tried going to AA meetings, detox programs, and therapy sessions, but none of these attempts have been successful.
As Steven’s drinking continued to escalate, his relationship with his wife began to suffer. She became increasingly concerned about his behavior and the impact it was having on their family. They argued frequently, and his wife threatened to leave him if he didn’t quit drinking.
If Steven fails to quit drinking, it is likely that his relationship with his wife will deteriorate further. She may lose patience with his behavior and decide to leave him, which would have significant emotional and financial consequences for their family. Steven knows that he needs to quit drinking for the sake of his marriage and his family, but he is struggling to find the strength and support he needs to overcome his addiction.
Gregory is a qualified TEFL teacher who has been teaching English as a Foreign Language (ESL) for over a decade. He has taught in-person classes in Spain and to English learners around the world online.
We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.
51 samples of this type
While studying in college, you will certainly have to compose a lot of Case Studies on Drink. Lucky you if linking words together and organizing them into relevant content comes easy to you; if it's not the case, you can save the day by finding an already written Drink Case Study example and using it as a model to follow.
This is when you will certainly find WowEssays' free samples database extremely helpful as it includes numerous professionally written works on most various Drink Case Studies topics. Ideally, you should be able to find a piece that meets your criteria and use it as a template to develop your own Case Study. Alternatively, our competent essay writers can deliver you an original Drink Case Study model crafted from scratch according to your personal instructions.
Red Bull was established by Dietrich Mateschitz in year 1985. Company introduces energy drink exclusively in Austria in year 1987. After five years of exclusive operation in Austria Market, Company expanded its business in European market. Company decided to slowly enter into foreign markets in order to create buzz and anticipation. This paper intends to analyze brand equity and other related aspects of Red Bull.
Red bull marketing strategy {type) to use as a writing model, marketing strategy.
Don't waste your time searching for a sample.
Get your case study done by professional writers!
Just from $10/page
Recommendation i: innovative promotion strategy.
It is evident that Snapple drink was misinterpreted by the Quaker management, once the decision to turn it from “fashion” to “lifestyle” brand was taken on the top management. While the sales of the Snapple soft drinks fell as consumers felt betrayed and believed that the natural and family brand was “sold out”, people still feel good about the old Snapple experience, based on the following values:
Good case study about dr. pepper, introduction, cola wars: coke and pepsi 2010 case study examples, antitrust law case study examples, youre beautiful america academic case study examples, marketing plan for coca cola plus protein, sample case study on competition in energy drinks, sports drinks and vitamin enhanced beverages, good case study about international business strategy, international business strategy, the pepsi ultimate taste challenge 2012 academic case study samples, the pepsi ultimate taste challenge 2012: social enough, good example of healthy potion business simulation case study, free workout and diet plans case study sample, free alcohol addicts case study example, good cappuccino wars: case analysis case study example, quench case study, good example of case study on the problem statement.
This case study describes the most important issue facing Coca-Cola’s ongoing expansion in China in 2014.The most important strategic issue facing Coca Cola's current development is localization of the company. Localization of the company plays a crucial role in its growth China. Localization refers to the adaptation to the needs, preferences and tastes of the Chinese people. Coca-Cola faces a strategic issue in customizing its products to the needs of the local people in China.
Example of case study on decision essay: pepsi refresh project.
This decision essay will critically evaluate the case study titled ‘Pepsi Canada: The Pepsi Refresh Project’ so as to identify the prevailing issues and to develop a potential course of responsive action. The decision essay will use the state-and-prove model to structure the paper.
Write by example of this corporate case study case study, organizational ecology, good case study on sowk 503 – summer 2015, target customers case study, alcohol in young teens case study sample, part 1: evidence selection, free case study about cases, free case study on elements of business, element of business.
Introduction Business functions and operations can be defined on a basis on relevant rationale within which an establishment is projected through specific operational models. In order to enhance business success, important attributes need to be out into consideration through major enhancement of integrating the required reasoning and well guided measures in the overall business structure. In this analysis, we discuss the ideal business elements and how they are relevant in a business and its overall performance levels.
Case study on global and u.s alternative beverage industry.
PepsiCo is a worldwide manufacturer, marketer and distributor of beverages and food dealing in many brands. Some of the brands include Tostitos, Mountain Dew, Doritos, Tropicana, Pepsi, and Gatorade among others (Thompson et al., 2012). The brands of the company are sold in many countries around the world. In the year 2009, the company registered the highest sales of beverages in the world having a global market share of 26.5%. PepsiCo is the second largest beverage company in the whole world. The paper analyses the global and U.S alternative beverage industry.
Pediatric case study case study examples, pediatric case study.
Part I. Cultural and Family Assessment
Example of case study on risk for ineffective breathing patterns direct effect of the toxicity of alcohol, question 1: evidence of substance abuse disorder, cola wars continue coke and pepsi in 2010 case study examples, good a case study of management of excessive drinking on the family case study example, perfect model case study on strategy tripod and mne strategy-structure approach, leaders and leadership: exemplar case study to follow, question one, good example of culture case study, sample case study on major case study: importance of bladder filling and rectal emptying prior to prostate radiation, free case study about huskey strategic analysis, husky strategic analysis, social history: drinks alcohol and smokes approximately 60 packs of cigarettes annually. case study.
Presentation: 52 year old male presents with complaint of wet cough and intermittent fevers for one week. Symptoms have progressively worsened with onset of back pain over the last two days. Previous Medical History: No health insurance and has not seen provider for five years. History of Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Diabetes Mellitus-2 controlled with diet.
Relevant demographic information case studies example, issues in psychology: hypothetical case study in two-stage life development, food industry case study example, ingredient branding: the food industry, example of purton vs. marriott case study, case study on snapple, sample case study on commuincation, communication, fiji water case study examples, learning orientations case study examples, my views as a teacher, management case study sample, analyzing case study about adolph coors in the brewing industry, culture overheads case study examples, culture overheads, case study on coca cola promotional strategy.
Select TWO products from the list of product categories below and using the teaching materials and any additional research explain what you think would be an appropriate promotions strategy for both them. In doing so compare and contrast the two promotions strategies explaining why you think they would be similar or different.
Executive summary, free case study on more information about affiliation research grants conflict of interest.
Reed’s Inc. is a leader in making natural carbonated soft drinks in United States. Brewing drinks in an old-fashioned manner with fresh ingredients gives the company an edge in terms of quality and taste of products. Reed’s Inc. operates in beverages industry under the soft drinks segment. The strategic group it operates in is natural foods segment. Product, distribution channel, communication and improving cost efficiencies are keys to a successful domestic and international marketing strategy for the company.
Impacts of a borderless society case study example.
Impacts of a Borderless Society Breakfast: Orange juice, eggs, toast, butter, jam, bacon, tea Breakfast: The orange juice was made with oranges from Florida, freshly squeezed. The eggs came from my Mom’s friend’s farm. My Mom made the bread and the butter was from Wisconsin. Someone my Mom knows made the jam. I think the bacon came from Nebraska but that may be where it was packaged or where the package came from (the label wasn’t very clear). The tea was from Sri Lanka.
Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]
Use your new password to log in
You are not register!
By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .
Now you can download documents directly to your device!
Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.
or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone
The sample is NOT original!
Short on a deadline?
Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED
No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline
You have full access to this open access article
116 Accesses
Explore all metrics
The complex risk factors of liver injury have prevented the establishment of causal relationships. This study aimed to explore the effects of antidepressant class, cumulative days of medication exposure, presence of comorbidities, and the use of confounding drugs on the risk of antidepressant-induced liver injury.
The population-based case–control study sample included individuals registered on the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database between 2000 and 2018. Hospitalized patients with suspected drug-induced liver injury were considered as cases, while control subjects were matched 1:1 by age, gender, and index date (the first observed diagnosis of liver injury). Multivariable regression models were performed to evaluate the association between antidepressants and liver injury.
The findings showed that antidepressant users exhibited a higher risk of liver injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12–1.20), particularly those prescribed non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (NSRIs; aOR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.10), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.16–1.29), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs; aOR 1.18; 95% CI 1.13–1.24), and others (aOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.14–1.42). Moreover, cases exhibited a more significant proportion of antidepressant usage and longer durations of treatment compared with controls. The risk of liver injury was higher in the first 30 days of use across all classes of antidepressants (aOR 1.24; 95% CI 1.18–1.29).
SSRIs or SNRIs are commonly used to treat depression and other psychological disorders, and consideration of their potential effects on the liver is essential.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
This population-based study revealed an increased risk of liver injury among individuals using antidepressants, notably selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and other non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (NSRIs). |
A 1.24-fold higher risk of liver injury was linked to early stages of antidepressant use, emphasizing the need for cautious monitoring during the initial 30 days. |
Understanding the heightened risk of liver injury associated with commonly prescribed antidepressants like SSRIs and SNRIs underscores the importance of considering potential hepatic effects in patient care strategies. |
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a relatively rare occurrence, with an incidence rate ranging from 1 per 10,000 to 100,000 individuals [ 1 ]. A recent study in France reported that DILI had an incidence rate of approximately 14 per 100,000 person-years, of whom 12% required hospitalization and 6% died [ 2 ]. Despite this, there is limited evidence extrapolating the overall incidence of DILI to Taiwan. Prospective studies conducted in Taiwan reported an incidence of 768 cases per 100,000 person-years for statin-induced DILI [ 3 ], as well as an incidence of 31.6 cases per 10,000 persons for antifungal agent-induced DILI, exemplified by fluconazole [ 4 ]. Given the high prevalence of hepatitis in Taiwan and the clinical presentation similarities with DILI, accurate diagnosis is often complicated, suggesting that reported incidence rates might underestimate the true prevalence.
The risk factors for DILI include age, gender, presence of comorbidities, drug interactions, and drug dosage [ 5 ]. Evidence suggests that age can increase sensitivity to and limit the metabolism of hepatotoxic drugs in humans [ 6 ], with drug efficacy and metabolism rates significantly differing in children and elderly individuals compared with adults [ 7 ]. One study found that females exhibited a higher risk of adverse drug reactions, potentially due to differences in metabolism rates and medication dosage between genders [ 6 ], although this was contradicted by another study that reported observing the opposite results [ 8 ]. Drug interactions and the presence of comorbidities can also increase the risk of DILI, with Bell and Chalasani demonstrating that patients diagnosed with hepatitis types B and C and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) exhibited an increased risk of being diagnosed with DILI [ 9 ]. Concurrent use of other hepatotoxic drugs was also identified as a risk factor for DILI [ 10 ].
In Japan, 60% of DILI occurs within 30 days of commencing medication usage, while 80% occurs within 90 days of commencing usage [ 11 ]. Several other studies have also shown that acute DILI may develop within 1–3 months of commencing medication usage [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Some studies have shown that approximately 1.28–4 patients per 100,000 patient-years require hospitalization for antidepressant-induced liver injury (AILI). In particular, the incidence rates of AILI associated with nefazodone and tricyclic/tetracyclic antidepressant usage are approximately 28.96 and 4 patients per 100,000 patient-years, respectively [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have also been shown to lead to asymptomatic mildly abnormal liver function in approximately 0.5–1% of patients, while monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) usage resulted in AILI in approximately 3% of patients [ 17 ]. However, diagnosis of AILI is challenging as it is primarily based on exclusion, suggesting that the incidence rates may be underestimated [ 18 ].
DILI primarily has two pathophysiological types, as follows: (1) idiosyncratic: dose-independent, unpredictable, occurs as a consequence of either immune-mediated liver damage (immuno-allergic idiosyncratic DILI) or direct cellular injury (metabolic idiosyncratic DILI); and (2) intrinsic: dose-dependent, predictable, occurs as a consequence of drug accumulation [ 17 ]. Most pathophysiological types of AILI are either immune-allergic or metabolic idiosyncratic DILI, with the majority being of the hepatocellular type and fewer being the cholestatic or mixed types. Moreover, acute hepatocellular injury and jaundice have a mortality rate of approximately 10% [ 17 ]. Although there are reports of hepatotoxicity linked to adverse reactions from antidepressants, extensive studies conducted in Taiwan exclusively centered around the occurrence of liver cancer, reporting a low incidence and mortality rate [ 19 , 20 ]. This contrasts with other research exploring the mechanisms of liver injury, revealing a notable research gap concerning the impact of diverse antidepressant drug treatments and their dose–response relationships on the risk of hepatotoxicity.
Therefore, this nationwide population-based study aims to assess the risk of AILI associated with different pharmacological classifications and the duration of antidepressant use. The investigation relies on data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database from 2000 to 2018.
This population-based, case–control study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) database, which was established in 1995 and covers more than 99.6% of the Taiwanese population. The National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) contains claims data (e.g., registry of beneficiaries, clinical and hospital care records, drug prescriptions, and other medical service records) from the NHI database and is reviewed annually. Additionally, data from the Longitudinal Generation Tracking Database (LGTD 2005), which contains approximately two million individuals randomly selected from the NHIRD, was also used. The clinics and hospitals recorded diagnoses using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, and Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM). Patient confidentiality was protected through data pseudonymization (wherein all original identification numbers were replaced with encoded serial numbers to enable linkage to claims data) implemented by the Taiwanese government prior to the release of data for research.
The study population included individuals aged 20 years or over who did not have any history of relevant code from ICD-9-CM [ 21 ] of malignant neoplasms (140–239); viral hepatitis A, B, or C infections, other viral hepatitis infections (070.0–070.9), or carriers of the hepatitis virus (V026.1–V026.9); infectious mononucleosis and cytomegalovirus and coxsackie virus infections (573.1–573.2); cholelithiasis (574.0–574.9); chronic liver disease; cirrhosis; alcoholic liver disease; liver abscess; portal pyemia; hepatic coma; portal hypertension; hepatorenal syndrome; chronic passive congestion of the liver (571.0–573.0); and liver disorders during pregnancy (646.7) between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2018.
Cases were patients hospitalized with the diagnosis code of suspected DILI during the study period based on the ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CM, and the previous study, including disorders of bilirubin excretion, acute and subacute necrosis of liver, liver cirrhosis, chronic liver disease (nonalcoholic), hepatic coma, hepatitis (non-viral), other disorders of the liver, and other specified disorders of the biliary tract [ 3 , 4 , 21 ]. A control individual free from liver injury was randomly selected for each case, matching (1:1) on age, gender, and the index date (the first observed diagnosis of liver injury in the case).
The antidepressants included in this study were monoamine oxidase A inhibitors (MAO-AIs), non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (NSRIs), SSRIs, and SNRIs. Medications not included in the aforementioned classes were classified as other antidepressants (i.e., trazodone hydrochloride, oxitriptan, mirtazapine, and agomelatine, etc.). The cumulative exposure to antidepressants was defined as the total number of days before the index date that the patient was prescribed antidepressants. Patients were categorized into groups (i.e., 1–30 days, 31–90 days, and 91+ days) based on their cumulative exposure to antidepressants to allow examination of the association with the risk of liver injury. Non-users were those who had never used antidepressants before the index date.
Factors such as the use of other medications and a history of comorbidities have been shown to be related to liver injury and, therefore, were considered confounders in the current analysis (Table 1 ). Medications causing liver damage were prescribed for >90 days a year before the index date, including anti-tuberculosis agents, statins (or fibrates), antibiotics, antifungals, anti-epileptics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and other potential hepatotoxic agents (i.e., acetaminophen, amiodarone, and methotrexate) [ 22 ]. Comorbidities were defined as the presence of chronic renal failure, hyperthyroidism, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease, and renal failure.
Descriptive statistics were compared between the cases and controls using the Student’s t -test or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables, respectively. Crude and multivariate logistic regressions were used to compare the risk of liver injury between antidepressant users and non-users, and the findings were reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The multivariate models adjusted for age, gender, history of comorbidities, and use of liver damage-related drugs prior to the index date of 1 year. All data analyses were carried out using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), and a two-tailed p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The study sample included 59,989 cases hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of liver injury and 59,989 controls matched by age, gender, and index date. Approximately half of the cases exhibited hepatitis (49%), and were statistically significantly more likely than controls to have a higher prevalence of antidepressant usage (20.3% vs 13.9%), longer durations of antidepressant exposure (33 days vs 30 days), and use of other liver damage-related medications for >90 days (i.e., statins, antifungals, anti-tuberculosis agents, antibiotics, anti-epileptics, NSAIDs, acetaminophen, amiodarone, and methotrexate). Moreover, a greater proportion of cases were likely to have a history of comorbidities, including hypertension (33.2% vs 24.4%), diabetes mellitus (17.7% vs 10.1%), ischemic heart disease (17.0% vs 11.6%), arrhythmia (7.0% vs 4.6%), heart failure (4.8% vs 2.8%), hyperlipidemia (29.5% vs 15.6%), chronic kidney disease and renal failure (5.8% vs 2.7%), hyperthyroidism (2.6% vs 1.4%), and fasting or malnutrition (0.6% vs 0.2%) than controls (Table 1 ).
Table 2 presents the distribution and odds of antidepressant users among the study population. Compared with the controls, cases had a significantly higher proportion of patients using any classes of antidepressants, which was associated with an increased risk of liver injury across all durations of use (the range of crude ORs was 1.44–2.35). After adjusting for covariates, antidepressant users exhibited a significantly higher risk of liver injury (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.16, 95% CI 1.12–1.20). This risk was particularly elevated when individuals were prescribed NSRIs (aOR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.10), SSRIs (aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.16–1.29), SNRIs (aOR 1.18; 95% CI 1.13–1.24), or other types of antidepressants including trazodone hydrochloride, oxitriptan, mirtazapine, and agomelatine (aOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.14–1.42). However, all MAO-AIs users had no significant result compared with non-users.
Subgroup analyses presented in Table 2 , stratified based on days of drug usage, revealed that individuals using any class of antidepressants faced a higher risk of developing liver injury within the initial 1–30 days compared with non-users (aOR 1.24; 95% CI 1.03–1.54). Furthermore, these findings remained consistent across all classes, including MAO-AI (aOR 1.26; 95% CI 1.03–1.54), NSRI (aOR 1.14; 95% CI 1.08–1.20), SSRI (aOR 1.34; 95% CI 1.24–1.45), and SNRI (aOR 1.21; 95% CI 1.14–1.30) users. Notably, there was a discernible declining trend in risk with longer durations of usage, especially among patients using NSRIs for >90 days, who exhibited a significantly reduced risk when compared with individuals who had not utilized any form of NSRI (aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79–0.94).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Asian population-based study to illustrate the association between antidepressant use and the risk of DILI in the general population. The current study first demonstrates the nationwide risk of AILI in Taiwan over 18 years. Systematically, the study collected data encompassing the risk of liver injury linked to all classes of antidepressants, analyzing the cumulative days of exposure. The findings of the current study showed an association between antidepressant usage and risk of liver injury, with a significantly larger proportion of patients with liver injury using antidepressants compared with those without liver injury. Additionally, the median duration of antidepressant use was significantly longer in patients with liver injury compared with those without liver injury. Noteworthy is the observation that nearly 50% of suspected AILI patients presented with non-viral hepatitis. Furthermore, a higher prevalence of AILI was observed in patients with comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, renal disease, and others.
The risk of AILI in this study is lower than in the previous research, which may be due to differences in drug category distribution and other demographics [ 23 ]. Further analysis showed that certain pharmaceutical classes of antidepressants (e.g., SSRIs and other classes of antidepressants) were associated with an overall higher risk of liver injury compared with other classes, except for MAOIs. In addition, certain antidepressants may carry an increased risk of liver injury, particularly in the first 30 days of use, as suggested by research findings [ 23 ]. Patients using these medications should exercise caution, and healthcare providers should monitor for potential liver-related adverse effects during the initial month of treatment.
The prevalence of liver injury was also relatively high among those who had used anti-tuberculosis agents, statins (or fibrates), antibiotics, antifungals, anti-epileptics, NSAIDs, and other potential hepatotoxic agents (i.e., acetaminophen, amiodarone, and methotrexate) [ 22 ] for >90 days compared with those who had not, consistent with previous studies [ 12 ]. This could be attributed to the independent association of these drugs with the risk of liver injury. When combined with antidepressants, they may collectively contribute to an increased burden on the liver, potentially leading to damage.
The mechanism for AILI is not yet fully understood. Studies suggest that DILI may be related to allergic reactions, oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, cytochrome-P450 enzyme ( CYP450 ) metabolites, or immune-mediated reactions [ 17 , 24 ]. SSRIs and SNRIs are metabolized in the liver, especially through the CYP450 enzyme pathway, which includes CYP2C19 , CYP2C9 , and CYP2D6 [ 25 ]. In elderly patients or CYP2C19 poor metabolizers, the oral clearance rate is diminished, leading to a higher likelihood of adverse reactions and hepatotoxicity due to dose accumulation [ 26 ]. In clinical management, the dosage or medication regimen may be altered when an elevation in the patient’s liver indices is detected. This could explain the slight reduction in the observed risk of liver injury after a treatment duration exceeding 30 days.
MAO-AIs inhibit monoamine oxidase in the liver, reducing the breakdown of neurotransmitters and increasing their concentration in the synaptic cleft. In this study, the overall risk of DILI in users of MAO-AIs was not significantly higher than that in non-users, perhaps due to the known liver toxicity of these drugs, leading clinicians to avoid prescribing them to high-risk patients. However, MAO-AIs demonstrate multiple interactions with other medications, food, or overdose, leading to an elevated risk of hepatotoxicity [ 27 ]. A significantly higher risk observed within the first 30 days with MAO-AI use in this study may be attributed to the potential omission of these interaction factors during the initial administration period.
On the other hand, using NSRIs involves liver metabolism, either through a direct toxic effect or a hypersensitivity reaction, and is influenced by other drugs that induce or inhibit microsomal enzymes [ 24 ]. Long-term NSRI users typically administer low doses. Hence, the risk of hepatotoxicity is less obvious. In particular, our findings revealed that patients using NSRIs (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs] like imipramine or amitriptyline) for more than 90 days had a significantly reduced risk compared with non-users. This can be explained by the fact that most prescriptions for NSRIs with a low dose and long duration are given to nocturia sufferers. Nocturia is often managed by addressing underlying causes or conditions that contribute to increased nighttime urination, such as age, diabetes, and cardiovascular-related conditions [ 28 , 29 ]. NSRIs, with their anticholinergic effects that can affect bladder function, have been used off-label for managing nocturia. Overall, it is important to note that there may be residual confounding from long-term antidepressant usage in mitigating the risk of certain adverse outcomes.
Antidepressants, particularly SSRIs and SNRIs, are commonly used to treat depression and other psychological disorders, and awareness of their potential effects on the liver is essential. Clinicians should evaluate the patient’s condition when considering the risks and benefits of prescribing antidepressants and take appropriate measures where necessary.
The current study had several strengths, including a large sample size and longitudinal follow-up, which facilitated robust investigation of rare events such as liver injury. The effects of the duration of and cumulative exposure to antidepressant use were also examined to supplement existing evidence on the association between long-term antidepressant use and liver injury. Strict statistical analysis, including subgroup comparisons, was carried out to reduce the risk of bias.
This study also had several limitations. Firstly, this nationwide case–control study lacked detailed laboratory information such as hepatic fibrosis stage, baseline liver biochemical tests (e.g., alanine aminotransferase [ALT], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], total bilirubin [TB]), and lipid profile (e.g., triglycerides, low density lipoprotein cholesterol). Secondly, lack of access to medical records prevented use of a standardized definition for liver damage (e.g., Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method [RUCAM]). Therefore, the lack of a validation study specifically conducted for the diagnosis code of liver injury in the NHIRD and the inclusion of only patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of liver injury (defined using ICD codes) may have led to selection bias. Thirdly, the NHIRD did not include information on the patients’ body index (e.g., height and weight), behavioral factors (e.g., alcohol consumption and smoking), and use of alternative medications (e.g., over-the-counter products and herbal products). These limitations were addressed by imposing strict criteria to exclude non-DILI patients.
This population-based study adds to existing evidence by exploring the association between antidepressant use and the risk of liver injury. Overall, the findings showed that antidepressant usage was consistently associated with an increased risk of liver injury, and this was particularly applicable to SSRI and SNRI users as well as those using antidepressants for 1–30 days.
Navarro VJ, Senior JR. Drug-related hepatotoxicity. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:731–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sgro C, Clinard F, Ouazir K, Chanay H, Allard C, Guilleminet C, et al. Incidence of drug-induced hepatic injuries: a French population-based study. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2002;36:451–5.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Chang CH, Chang YC, Lee YC, Liu YC, Chuang LM, Lin JW. Severe hepatic injury associated with different statins in patients with chronic liver disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:155–62.
Kao WY, Su CW, Huang YS, Chou YC, Chen YC, Chung WH, et al. Risk of oral antifungal agent-induced liver injury in Taiwanese. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;77:180–9.
Lee WM. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:474–85.
Lucena MI, Andrade RJ, Kaplowitz N, García-Cortes M, Fernández MC, Romero-Gomez M, et al. Phenotypic characterization of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: the influence of age and sex. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2009;49:2001–9.
Kato Y, Nakata K, Omagari K, Kusumoto Y, Mori I, Furukawa R, et al. Clinical features of fulminant hepatitis in Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan. Intern Med Tokyo Jpn. 2001;40:5–8.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Stirnimann G, Kessebohm K, Lauterburg B. Liver injury caused by drugs: an update. Swiss Med Wkly. 2010;140: w13080.
PubMed Google Scholar
Bell LN, Chalasani N. Epidemiology of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Semin Liver Dis. 2009;29:337–47.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tajiri K, Shimizu Y. Practical guidelines for diagnosis and early management of drug-induced liver injury. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:6774–85.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Takikawa H, Murata Y, Horiike N, Fukui H, Onji M. Drug-induced liver injury in Japan: an analysis of 1676 cases between 1997 and 2006. Hepatol Res Off J Jpn Soc Hepatol. 2009;39:427–31.
Article Google Scholar
Hussaini SH, Farrington EA. Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: an overview. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007;6:673–84.
Norris W, Paredes AH, Lewis JH. Drug-induced liver injury in 2007. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008;24:287–97.
Carey EJ, Vargas HE, Douglas DD, Balan V, Byrne TJ, Harrison ME, et al. Inpatient admissions for drug-induced liver injury: results from a single center. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1977–82.
DeSanty KP, Amabile CM. Antidepressant-induced liver injury. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:1201–11.
Carvajal García-Pando A, García del Pozo J, Sánchez AS, Velasco MA, Rueda de Castro AM, Lucena MI. Hepatotoxicity associated with the new antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:135–7.
Voican CS, Corruble E, Naveau S, Perlemuter G. Antidepressant-induced liver injury: a review for clinicians. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:404–15.
Ferrajolo C, Scavone C, Donati M, Bortolami O, Stoppa G, Motola D, et al. Antidepressant-Induced acute liver injury: a case–control study in an Italian inpatient population. Drug Saf. 2018;41:95–102.
Chen VCH, Lin CF, Hsieh YH, Liang HY, Huang KY, Chiu WC, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma and antidepressants: a nationwide population-based study. Oncotarget. 2016;8:30464–70.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huang KL, Chen YL, Stewart R, Chen VCH. Antidepressant use and mortality among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6: e2332579.
Jinjuvadia K, Kwan W, Fontana RJ. Searching for a needle in a haystack: use of ICD-9-CM codes in drug-induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2437–43.
Chen M, Suzuki A, Thakkar S, Yu K, Hu C, Tong W. DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans. Drug Discov Today. 2016;21:648–53.
Licata A, Minissale MG, Calvaruso V, Craxì A. A focus on epidemiology of drug-induced liver injury: analysis of a prospective cohort. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21:112–21.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Todorović Vukotić N, Đorđević J, Pejić S, Đorđević N, Pajović SB. Antidepressants- and antipsychotics-induced hepatotoxicity. Arch Toxicol. 2021;95:767–89.
Tracy TS, Chaudhry AS, Prasad B, Thummel KE, Schuetz EG, Zhong X-B, et al. Interindividual variability in cytochrome P450-mediated drug metabolism. Drug Metab Dispos Biol Fate Chem. 2016;44:343–51.
Hicks J, Bishop J, Sangkuhl K, Müller D, Ji Y, Leckband S, et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;98:127–34.
Fiedorowicz JG, Swartz KL. The role of monoamine oxidase inhibitors in current psychiatric practice. J Psychiatr Pract. 2004;10:239–48.
FitzGerald MP, Litman HJ, Link CL, McKinlay JB. The association of nocturia with cardiac disease, diabetes, body mass index, age and diuretic use: results from the BACH survey. J Urol. 2007;177:1385–9.
Lightner DJ, Krambeck AE, Jacobson DJ, McGree ME, Jacobsen SJ, Lieber MM, et al. Nocturia is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease and death. BJU Int. 2012;110:848–53.
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Pharmacy, Asia University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
Ching-Ya Huang
School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
Ching-Ya Huang & Yow-Wen Hsieh
Department of Pharmacy, China Medical University Hospital, 2 Yuh-Der Road, Taichung, 404327, Taiwan
Ying-Shu You, Jian-Ming Lai, Hsing-Yu Hsu & Yow-Wen Hsieh
Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Ying-Shu You
Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
Cheng-Li Lin
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Yow-Wen Hsieh .
Conflict of interest.
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
This study was partly supported by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial Center (MOHW112-TDU-B-212-144004), China Medical University Hospital (DMR-111-105; DMR-112-087;DMR-113-009). We express our gratitude to the Health Data Science Center, China Medical University Hospital for providing administrative, technical, and funding support.
This study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital Research Ethics Committee [CMUH109-REC2-031(CR-4)] on February 04, 2024. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
Not applicable.
Data availability.
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article materials. The dataset used in this study is held by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). The Ministry of Health and Welfare must approve our application to access this data. Any researcher interested in accessing this dataset can submit an application form to the Ministry of Health and Welfare requesting access. Please contact the staff of MOHW (Email: wt.vog.whom@uwloracts) for further assistance. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Address: No.488, Sec. 6, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Nangang Dist., Taipei City 115, Taiwan (R.O.C.). Phone: +886-2-8590-6848.
Author contributions.
CYH and YWH contributed to the conception of the study and design. YSY took responsibility for the material preparation and methodology. YSY, CML, CLL, and HYH conducted the data collection, analysis, and interpretation. All authors drafted the manuscript, and CYH and YWH critically reviewed the article’s intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Huang, CY., You, YS., Lai, JM. et al. The Association Between Antidepressant Use and Drug-Induced Liver Injury: A Nationwide, Population-Based Case–Control Study in Taiwan. Drugs - Real World Outcomes (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00419-0
Download citation
Accepted : 25 February 2024
Published : 05 June 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00419-0
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
A new study reveals the need for benchmarking and public evaluations of AI tools in law.
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are rapidly transforming the practice of law. Nearly three quarters of lawyers plan on using generative AI for their work, from sifting through mountains of case law to drafting contracts to reviewing documents to writing legal memoranda. But are these tools reliable enough for real-world use?
Large language models have a documented tendency to “hallucinate,” or make up false information. In one highly-publicized case, a New York lawyer faced sanctions for citing ChatGPT-invented fictional cases in a legal brief; many similar cases have since been reported. And our previous study of general-purpose chatbots found that they hallucinated between 58% and 82% of the time on legal queries, highlighting the risks of incorporating AI into legal practice. In his 2023 annual report on the judiciary , Chief Justice Roberts took note and warned lawyers of hallucinations.
Across all areas of industry, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is seen and promoted as the solution for reducing hallucinations in domain-specific contexts. Relying on RAG, leading legal research services have released AI-powered legal research products that they claim “avoid” hallucinations and guarantee “hallucination-free” legal citations. RAG systems promise to deliver more accurate and trustworthy legal information by integrating a language model with a database of legal documents. Yet providers have not provided hard evidence for such claims or even precisely defined “hallucination,” making it difficult to assess their real-world reliability.
In a new preprint study by Stanford RegLab and HAI researchers, we put the claims of two providers, LexisNexis (creator of Lexis+ AI) and Thomson Reuters (creator of Westlaw AI-Assisted Research and Ask Practical Law AI)), to the test. We show that their tools do reduce errors compared to general-purpose AI models like GPT-4. That is a substantial improvement and we document instances where these tools provide sound and detailed legal research. But even these bespoke legal AI tools still hallucinate an alarming amount of the time: the Lexis+ AI and Ask Practical Law AI systems produced incorrect information more than 17% of the time, while Westlaw’s AI-Assisted Research hallucinated more than 34% of the time.
Read the full study, Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools
To conduct our study, we manually constructed a pre-registered dataset of over 200 open-ended legal queries, which we designed to probe various aspects of these systems’ performance.
Broadly, we investigated (1) general research questions (questions about doctrine, case holdings, or the bar exam); (2) jurisdiction or time-specific questions (questions about circuit splits and recent changes in the law); (3) false premise questions (questions that mimic a user having a mistaken understanding of the law); and (4) factual recall questions (questions about simple, objective facts that require no legal interpretation). These questions are designed to reflect a wide range of query types and to constitute a challenging real-world dataset of exactly the kinds of queries where legal research may be needed the most.
Figure 1: Comparison of hallucinated (red) and incomplete (yellow) answers across generative legal research tools.
These systems can hallucinate in one of two ways. First, a response from an AI tool might just be incorrect —it describes the law incorrectly or makes a factual error. Second, a response might be misgrounded —the AI tool describes the law correctly, but cites a source which does not in fact support its claims.
Given the critical importance of authoritative sources in legal research and writing, the second type of hallucination may be even more pernicious than the outright invention of legal cases. A citation might be “hallucination-free” in the narrowest sense that the citation exists , but that is not the only thing that matters. The core promise of legal AI is that it can streamline the time-consuming process of identifying relevant legal sources. If a tool provides sources that seem authoritative but are in reality irrelevant or contradictory, users could be misled. They may place undue trust in the tool's output, potentially leading to erroneous legal judgments and conclusions.
Figure 2: Top left: Example of a hallucinated response by Westlaw's AI-Assisted Research product. The system makes up a statement in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure that does not exist (and Kontrick v. Ryan, 540 U.S. 443 (2004) held that a closely related bankruptcy deadline provision was not jurisdictional). Top right: Example of a hallucinated response by LexisNexis's Lexis+ AI. Casey and its undue burden standard were overruled by the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022); the correct answer is rational basis review. Bottom left: Example of a hallucinated response by Thomson Reuters's Ask Practical Law AI. The system fails to correct the user’s mistaken premise—in reality, Justice Ginsburg joined the Court's landmark decision legalizing same-sex marriage—and instead provides additional false information about the case. Bottom right: Example of a hallucinated response from GPT-4, which generates a statutory provision that has not been codified.
Figure 3: An overview of the retrieval-augmentation generation (RAG) process. Given a user query (left), the typical process consists of two steps: (1) retrieval (middle), where the query is embedded with natural language processing and a retrieval system takes embeddings and retrieves the relevant documents (e.g., Supreme Court cases); and (2) generation (right), where the retrieved texts are fed to the language model to generate the response to the user query. Any of the subsidiary steps may introduce error and hallucinations into the generated response. (Icons are courtesy of FlatIcon.)
Under the hood, these new legal AI tools use retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to produce their results, a method that many tout as a potential solution to the hallucination problem. In theory, RAG allows a system to first retrieve the relevant source material and then use it to generate the correct response. In practice, however, we show that even RAG systems are not hallucination-free.
We identify several challenges that are particularly unique to RAG-based legal AI systems, causing hallucinations.
First, legal retrieval is hard. As any lawyer knows, finding the appropriate (or best) authority can be no easy task. Unlike other domains, the law is not entirely composed of verifiable facts —instead, law is built up over time by judges writing opinions . This makes identifying the set of documents that definitively answer a query difficult, and sometimes hallucinations occur for the simple reason that the system’s retrieval mechanism fails.
Second, even when retrieval occurs, the document that is retrieved can be an inapplicable authority. In the American legal system, rules and precedents differ across jurisdictions and time periods; documents that might be relevant on their face due to semantic similarity to a query may actually be inapposite for idiosyncratic reasons that are unique to the law. Thus, we also observe hallucinations occurring when these RAG systems fail to identify the truly binding authority. This is particularly problematic as areas where the law is in flux is precisely where legal research matters the most. One system, for instance, incorrectly recited the “undue burden” standard for abortion restrictions as good law, which was overturned in Dobbs (see Figure 2).
Third, sycophancy—the tendency of AI to agree with the user's incorrect assumptions—also poses unique risks in legal settings. One system, for instance, naively agreed with the question’s premise that Justice Ginsburg dissented in Obergefell , the case establishing a right to same-sex marriage, and answered that she did so based on her views on international copyright. (Justice Ginsburg did not dissent in Obergefell and, no, the case had nothing to do with copyright.) Notwithstanding that answer, here there are optimistic results. Our tests showed that both systems generally navigated queries based on false premises effectively. But when these systems do agree with erroneous user assertions, the implications can be severe—particularly for those hoping to use these tools to increase access to justice among pro se and under-resourced litigants.
Ultimately, our results highlight the need for rigorous and transparent benchmarking of legal AI tools. Unlike other domains, the use of AI in law remains alarmingly opaque: the tools we study provide no systematic access, publish few details about their models, and report no evaluation results at all.
This opacity makes it exceedingly challenging for lawyers to procure and acquire AI products. The large law firm Paul Weiss spent nearly a year and a half testing a product, and did not develop “hard metrics” because checking the AI system was so involved that it “makes any efficiency gains difficult to measure.” The absence of rigorous evaluation metrics makes responsible adoption difficult, especially for practitioners that are less resourced than Paul Weiss.
The lack of transparency also threatens lawyers’ ability to comply with ethical and professional responsibility requirements. The bar associations of California , New York , and Florida have all recently released guidance on lawyers’ duty of supervision over work products created with AI tools. And as of May 2024, more than 25 federal judges have issued standing orders instructing attorneys to disclose or monitor the use of AI in their courtrooms.
Without access to evaluations of the specific tools and transparency around their design, lawyers may find it impossible to comply with these responsibilities. Alternatively, given the high rate of hallucinations, lawyers may find themselves having to verify each and every proposition and citation provided by these tools, undercutting the stated efficiency gains that legal AI tools are supposed to provide.
Our study is meant in no way to single out LexisNexis and Thomson Reuters. Their products are far from the only legal AI tools that stand in need of transparency—a slew of startups offer similar products and have made similar claims , but they are available on even more restricted bases, making it even more difficult to assess how they function.
Based on what we know, legal hallucinations have not been solved.The legal profession should turn to public benchmarking and rigorous evaluations of AI tools.
This story was updated on Thursday, May 30, 2024, to include analysis of a third AI tool, Westlaw’s AI-Assisted Research.
Paper authors: Varun Magesh is a research fellow at Stanford RegLab. Faiz Surani is a research fellow at Stanford RegLab. Matthew Dahl is a joint JD/PhD student in political science at Yale University and graduate student affiliate of Stanford RegLab. Mirac Suzgun is a joint JD/PhD student in computer science at Stanford University and a graduate student fellow at Stanford RegLab. Christopher D. Manning is Thomas M. Siebel Professor of Machine Learning, Professor of Linguistics and Computer Science, and Senior Fellow at HAI. Daniel E. Ho is the William Benjamin Scott and Luna M. Scott Professor of Law, Professor of Political Science, Professor of Computer Science (by courtesy), Senior Fellow at HAI, Senior Fellow at SIEPR, and Director of the RegLab at Stanford University.
Create powerful business content together.
BONUS : Read the case study how-to guide .
Good case studies tell a compelling story to potential clients of how your company rose to the occasion. The Case Study Template will help you showcase your company’s credibility in solving a particularly challenging client problem and prove to potential clients that you have what it takes to perform well. Specifically, case studies can help you:
Xtensio is your team space for beautiful living documents. Create , manage and share business collateral, easily. Join the 256,643 changemakers.
Follow along step-by-step with the Case Study how-to guide .
An effective case study is a great way to show potential clients, customers, and stakeholders how valuable your product or service is by explaining how your business solved a particularly challenging client problem.
Marketing case studies examine a single client situation in-depth and provide a detailed analysis of how your organization resolved the challenge.
The best case studies not only tell a story about your company but also contain some hard measurable metrics. This allows you to highlight your successes in a way that will make an ideal potential customer become your customer. Essentially, a case study is an effective way to learn about your business and a great marketing tool.
When looking for potential projects to use for a case study, look for ones that:
The most important element of your case study is that it must show a real-life example to relate to your target client. While a good case study showcases your company, a great case study makes the reader want to start a conversation with you.
The first thing to consider is who will be reading your case studies. Messages and their delivery resonate differently, depending on who is on the receiving end. For example, a thirty-something software entrepreneur will measure success differently than a fifty-something CEO of a large corporation. Understanding your target audience will help you tell your case study in a way that will effectively speak to them.
When gathering information for your case study, interview happy customers and ask questions to your potential case study subject that align with the story you are trying to tell. No case study will be the same, and your questions will vary from client to client.
Before you contact the customer, consider interview questions so you have an idea of what you need to produce a compelling case study demonstrating your potential to succeed.
At the end of the information-gathering process, you should have a solid understanding of the following to outline how your product was the best solution for the customers’ particular challenge:
Some questions to ask your client during the initial interview:
Don’t forget to talk to your colleagues and get their perspectives on the project when writing your case study. You may also want to include some quotes from internal stakeholders or project leads to make an even more compelling case study.
When writing a case study, make sure you know who you’re talking to. Your audience, i.e. who would be interested in your product or service, should be your main focus when you create a case study. Once you’ve compiled your facts, format the story so that it will appeal to potential customers.
The format and content of case study templates vary, but in general, your business case study should look like a strong landing page: brief, pictorial, and engaging.
Xtensio’s case study template includes instructional copy to show you everything you need to know to create a real-life example of your company’s strengths. The template is organized into sections and modules designed to make your case study flow like a well-planned story and we’ve broken the template into three main sections: the snapshot, the body and the footer.
The Snapshot
This section is designed to give a quick overview of your story and prompt readers to want to learn more. Consider it an executive summary, a book cover, or a brief description in an online store. It should have enough information to grab a potential customer’s attention, but not so much that they will stop reading. Include client details, the project name, and a brief description of the problem, as well as quantitative metrics that demonstrate your accomplishment.
You can also include the date the case study was originally published here to help potential customers identify if your product or service is a good fit for them right now.
This section is the meat of your case study and will focus on customer results. Like any good story, it will have a beginning, a middle and an end. Classic western storytelling uses a pretty standard formula that includes a problem, the approach taken to solve it, the solution and the end results. The body of Xtensio’s case study template is divided into four key areas that align to these story elements: the Challenge, the Approach, the Solution and the Results. Here, make sure you explain using your product for a certain use case and describe how your service helped the client.
To close your case study, end with a short paragraph about who your company is, as well as your contact information. This is handy if your business case study becomes separated from your company’s website information somehow.
If you plan on sharing the case study online, make sure to add the links to your website and social media handles, using our social media module. If you are planning to print, then don’t forget to spell out the name of your website and/or add a contact phone number and email address.
Invite feedback and participation by your colleagues and the client by inviting them to collaborate on the case study template in real-time. Once you are satisfied with your case study, you can add it to your website, share it on your social channels, use it in presentations, or send out emails to potential clients. You can also download a pdf version that can be printed and shared.
Design, manage and share beautiful living documents… easily, together. Explore Xtensio
Fully customizable templates that you can make your own.
See All Templates
256,643 users and counting..
Jerome Katz
Professor of Entrepreneurship @
St. Louis University
Jake Peters
Robin Bramman
Founder and Chief Brand Mixologist @
Olakunle Oladehin
Executive Director @
Everybody Dance Now!
Aaron Friedland
The Walking School Bus
Trailblazer360
Stephen Paterson
Chief Product Officer @
AND Digital
256,643 users and counting…
Here’s the latest news about a global outbreak of H5N1 bird flu that started in 2020, and recently spread among cattle in U.S. states and marine mammals across the world, which has health officials closely monitoring it and experts concerned the virus could mutate and eventually spread to humans, where it has proven rare but deadly.
A sign warns of a outbreak of bird flu.
June 6 Dozens of cows infected with bird flu have either died or been slaughtered in Colorado, Ohio, Michigan, South Carolina and Texas, which is unusual since—unlike poultry—cows cost more to slaughter and around 90% usually make a full recovery, Reuters reported .
June 5 A new study examining the 2023 bird flu outbreak in South America that killed around 17,400 elephant seal pups and 24,000 sea lions found the disease spread between the animals in several countries, the first known case of transnational virus mammal-to-mammal bird flu transmission.
May 30 Another human case of bird flu has been detected in a dairy farm worker in Michigan—though the cases aren’t connected—and this is the first person in the U.S. to report respiratory symptoms connected to bird flu, though their symptoms are “resolving,” according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
May 23 A new study with mice suggests that drinking infected milk can spread the disease—and that a certain type of pasteurization may not always be effective in killing the virus.
May 22 Michigan reported bird flu in a farmworker—the second U.S. human case tied to transmission from dairy cows—though the worker had a mild infection and has since recovered.
May 21 Australia reported its first human case of bird flu after a child became infected in March after traveling to India, though the child has since recovered after suffering from a “severe infection,” according to the Victorian Department of Health.
May 16 The USDA conducted a study, and discovered that after high levels of the virus was injected into beef, no trace was left after the meat was cooked medium to well done, though the virus was found in meat cooked to lower temperatures.
May 14 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released influenza A waste water data for the weeks ending in April 27 and May 4, and found several states like Alaska, California, Florida, Illinois and Kansas had unusually high levels, though the agency isn’t sure if the virus came from humans or animals, and isn’t able to differentiate between influenza A subtypes, meaning the H5N1 virus or other subtypes may have been detected.
May 10 The Food and Drug Administration announced it will commit an additional $8 million to ensure the commercial milk supply is safe, while the Department of Agriculture said it will pay up to $28,000 per farm to help mitigate the spread of the disease, totaling around $98 million in funds.
May 9 Some 70 people in Colorado are being monitored for bird flu due to potential exposure, and will be tested for the virus if they show any symptoms, the Colorado Department of Public Health told Forbes—it was not immediately clear how or when the people were potentially exposed.
May 1 The Department of Agriculture said it tested 30 grocery store ground beef products for bird flu and they all came back negative, reaffirming the meat supply is safe.
May 1 The Food and Drug Administration confirmed dairy products are still safe to consume, announcing it tested grocery store samples of products like infant formula, toddler milk, sour cream and cottage cheese, and no live traces of the bird flu virus were found, although some dead remnants were found in some of the food—though none in the baby products.
April 30 Wenqing Zhang, head of the World Health Organization's Global Influenza Programme, said during a news briefing "there is a risk for cows in other countries to be getting infected," with the bird flu virus, since it’s commonly spread through the movement of migratory birds.
April 29 The Department of Agriculture told Forbes it will begin testing ground beef samples from grocery stores in states with cow outbreaks, and test ground beef cooked at different temperatures and infected with the virus to determine if it's safe to eat.
April 24 The USDA said cow-to-cow transmission may be occurring due to the cows coming into contact with raw milk—and warned against humans and other animals, including pets, consuming unpasteurized milk to prevent potential infection.
April 18 Jeremy Farrar, chief scientist for the World Health Organization, said during a press conference the threat of bird flu spreading between humans was a “great concern,” since it’s evolved and has increasingly been infecting mammals (on land and sea), which means it could possibly spread to humans.
April 1 The CDC reported the second U.S. human case of bird flu in a Texas dairy farmer who became infected after contracting the virus from infected dairy cows, but said the person was already recovering.
Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Sign up here .
Bird flu doesn’t “transmit easily from person-to-person,” according to the World Health Organization. Bird flu rarely affects humans, and most previous cases came from close contact with infected poultry, according to the CDC. Because human-to-human spread of bird flu poses “pandemic potential,” each human case is investigated to rule out this type of infection. Though none have been confirmed, there are a few global cases—none in the U.S.—where human-to-human transmission of bird flu was thought to be “probable,” including in China , Thailand , Indonesia and Pakistan .
It is very deadly. Between January 2003 and March 28, 2024 there have been 888 human cases of bird flu infection in humans, according to a report by the World Health Organization. Of those 888 cases, 463 (52%) died. To date, only two people in the U.S. have contracted H5N1 bird flu, and they both were infected after coming into contact with sick animals. The most recent case was a dairy worker in Texas who became ill in March after interacting with sick dairy cows, though he only experienced pink eye. The first incident happened in 2022 when a person in Colorado contracted the disease from infected poultry, and fully recovered.
Raw, unpasteurized milk is unsafe to drink, but pasteurized milk is fine, according to the FDA. Bird flu has been detected in both unpasteurized and pasteurized milk, but the FDA recommends manufacturers against making and selling unpasteurized milk since there’s a possibility consuming it may cause bird flu infection. However, the virus remnants in pasteurized milk have been deactivated by the heat during the pasteurization process , so this type of milk is still believed safe to consume.
The CDC warns against eating raw meat or eggs from animals “confirmed or suspected” of having bird flu because of the possibility of transmission. However, no human has ever been infected with bird flu from eating properly prepared and cooked meat, according to the agency. The possibility of infected meat entering the food supply is “extremely low” due to rigorous inspection, so properly handled and cooked meat is safe to eat, according to the USDA. To know when meat is properly cooked, whole beef cuts must be cooked to an internal temperature of 145 degrees Fahrenheit, ground meat must be 160 degrees and poultry must be cooked to 165 degrees. Rare and medium rare steaks fall below this temperature. Properly cooked eggs with an internal temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit kills bacteria and viruses including bird flu, according to the CDC. “It doesn’t matter if they may or may not have [avian] influenza… runny eggs and rare pieces of meat” are never recommended, Francisco Diez-Gonzalez, director and professor for the Center for Food Safety at the University of Georgia, told Forbes. To “play it safe,” consumers should only eat fully cooked eggs and make sure “the yolks are firm with no runny parts,” Daisy May, veterinary surgeon with U.K.-based company Medivet, said .
Symptoms of bird flu include a fever, cough, headache, chills, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, runny nose, congestion, sore throat, nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, pink eye, muscle aches and headache. However, the CDC advises it can’t be diagnosed based on symptoms alone, and laboratory testing is needed. This typically includes swabbing the nose or throat (the upper respiratory tract), or the lower respiratory tract for critically ill patients.
This year’s egg prices have increased as production decreased due to bird flu outbreaks among poultry, according to the USDA. A dozen large, grade A eggs in the U.S. costed around $2.99 in March, up almost a dollar from the fall. However, this price is down from a record $4.82 in January 2023, which was also spiked by bird flu outbreaks . Earlier this month, Cal-Maine Foods—the country’s largest egg producer—temporarily halted egg production after over one million egg-laying hens and chickens were killed after being infected with bird flu.
Once chickens have been infected with bird flu, farmers quickly kill them to help control the spread of the virus, since bird flu is highly contagious and fatal in poultry. The USDA pays farmers for all birds and eggs that have to be killed because of bird flu, as an incentive to responsibly try and curb the spread of the disease. The USDA has spent over $1 billion in bird flu compensation for farmers since 2022, according to the nonprofit Food & Environment Reporting Network.
The FDA has approved a few bird flu vaccines for humans. The U.S. has a stockpile of vaccines for H5N1 bird flu, but it wouldn’t be enough to vaccinate all Americans if an outbreak were to happen among humans. If a human outbreak does occur, the government plans to mass produce vaccines, which can take at least six months to make enough for the entire population. CSL Seqirus, the maker of one of the approved vaccines, expects to have 150 million vaccines ready within six months of an announcement of a human bird flu pandemic. Although there are approved vaccines for other variants designed for birds, there are none for the H5N1 variant circulating. However, the USDA began trials on H5N1 animal-specific vaccines in 2023.
As of May 30, more than 92 million poultry (primarily chickens) in 48 states have been euthanized because of bird flu since 2022, and 57 dairy cow herds across nine states have tested positive, according to data from the CDC (unlike chickens, cows appear to recover from the virus). The USDA believes wild migratory birds are the original source of the cow outbreaks that recently has experts concerned it may mutate and spread more easily in humans, though the CDC said its risk to the public remains low . Farrar called the cattle infections in the U.S. a “huge concern,” urging public health officials to continue closely monitoring the situation “because it may evolve into transmitting in different ways.” The increased number of mammal bird flu infections since 2022 “could indicate that the virus is looking for new hosts, and of course, moving closer to people,” Andrea Garcia, vice president of science, medicine and public health for the American Medical Association, said . The first report of a walrus dying from bird flu was detected in April on one of Norway’s Arctic Islands, and the first U.S. dolphin infected with bird flu died back in 2022, according to a report published April 18. More than 10 human bird flu cases were reported to the World Health Organization in 2023, and all but one survived. Bird flu has devastated bird populations, and 67 countries reported the deaths of 131 million poultry in 2022 alone. Although bird flu typically infects wild birds and poultry, it’s spread to other animals during the outbreak, and at least 10 countries have reported outbreaks in mammals since 2022. Around 17,400 elephant seal pups died from bird flu in Argentina in 2023, and at least 24,000 sea lions died in South America the same year. Besides cattle, bird flu has been detected in over 200 other mammals—like seals, raccoons and bears—in the U.S. since 2022. Although rare, even domestic pets like dogs and cats are susceptible to the virus, and the FDA warns against giving unpasteurized milk to cats to avoid possible transmission.
On June 5, WHO confirmed the first human death of a strain of bird flu that’s never before been seen in humans and is separate from H5N1. A 59-year-old man in Mexico contracted H5N2, and died on April 24 after being hospitalized and developing a fever, diarrhea, nausea, shortness of breath and general discomfort. Cases of H5N2 have been reported in poultry in Mexico, but the man had no history with poultry or animals, WHO said. It’s unclear how he became infected. He was bedridden for weeks prior to the infection, and suffered from several other health conditions.
Another Bird Flu Variant Reaches Humans: What To Know About H5N2—After First-Ever Confirmed Death
WHO Warns Threat Of Bird Flu Spreading To Humans Is ‘Great Concern’ (Forbes)
One In Five Milk Samples From Across US Had Traces Of Bird Flu Virus, FDA Says (Forbes)
Can Pets Get Bird Flu? Here’s What To Know (Forbes)
Avian H5N1 (Bird) Flu: Why Experts Are Worried—And What You Should Know (Forbes)
One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.
In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service. We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.
Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:
User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:
So, how can you be a power user?
Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
JavaScript appears to be disabled on this computer. Please click here to see any active alerts .
What epa is doing.
Learn what EPA is doing to address PFAS.
PFAS are a group of manufactured chemicals that have been used in industry and consumer products since the 1940s because of their useful properties. There are thousands of different PFAS, some of which have been more widely used and studied than others.
Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), for example, are two of the most widely used and studied chemicals in the PFAS group. PFOA and PFOS have been replaced in the United States with other PFAS in recent years.
One common characteristic of concern of PFAS is that many break down very slowly and can build up in people, animals, and the environment over time.
PFAS can be present in our water, soil, air, and food as well as in materials found in our homes or workplaces, including:
Due to their widespread production and use, as well as their ability to move and persist in the environment, surveys conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that most people in the United States have been exposed to some PFAS. Most known exposures are relatively low, but some can be high, particularly when people are exposed to a concentrated source over long periods of time. Some PFAS chemicals can accumulate in the body over time.
Current research has shown that people can be exposed to PFAS by:
Current scientific research suggests that exposure to certain PFAS may lead to adverse health outcomes. However, research is still ongoing to determine how different levels of exposure to different PFAS can lead to a variety of health effects. Research is also underway to better understand the health effects associated with low levels of exposure to PFAS over long periods of time, especially in children.
Current peer-reviewed scientific studies have shown that exposure to certain levels of PFAS may lead to:
Scientists at EPA, in other federal agencies, and in academia and industry are continuing to conduct and review the growing body of research about PFAS. However, health effects associated with exposure to PFAS are difficult to specify for many reasons, such as:
Some people have higher exposures to PFAS than others because of their occupations or where they live. For example:
Because children are still developing, they may be more sensitive to the harmful effects of chemicals such as PFAS. They can also be exposed more than adults because:
Breast milk from mothers with PFAS in their blood and formula made with water containing PFAS can expose infants to PFAS, and it may also be possible for children to be exposed in utero during pregnancy. Scientists continue to do research in this area. Based on current science, the benefits of breastfeeding appear to outweigh the risks for infants exposed to PFAS in breast milk . To weigh the risks and benefits of breastfeeding, mothers should contact their doctors.
News releases from epa about pfas.
Sign up to receive EPA’s press releases and alerts on PFAS related topics.
What is a regulation.
Under federal environmental laws, EPA and other federal agencies are authorized to help put those laws into effect by creating and enforcing regulations.
Regulations are mandatory requirements that can apply to individuals, businesses, state or local governments, non-profits, and others.
Federal agencies are required to provide an opportunity for public comment when proposing a new regulation and must consider the comments in revising the proposal and issuing a final rule. In carrying out our mission to protect human health and the environment, EPA develops regulations to prevent or to clean up hazardous chemicals released into our air, land, and water, some of which relate to PFAS.
Commenting on a proposed regulation is an important opportunity to make your voice heard. It is a way for you to provide decisionmakers with key information on any or all aspects of the proposed action, including:
EPA’s regulations will always be announced in the Federal Register and can be found at the following government websites: https://www.federalregister.gov/ , and https://www.regulations.gov/ .
For some rules, EPA holds a public hearing where you can provide comments in person or remotely. The agency always accepts comments in writing. All comments – whether in person or written – get the same level of consideration. Below are additional resources to help you comment on EPA’s proposed regulations related to PFAS.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Mark van der maas.
1 School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
2 Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Heather orpana.
4 School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
3 Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Introduction:.
We conducted a pilot assessment of the feasibility of implementing the International Alcohol Control (IAC) Study in Ontario, Canada, to allow for future comparisons on the impacts of alcohol control policies with a number of countries.
The IAC Study questionnaire was adapted for use in the province of Ontario, and a split-sample approach was used to collect data. Data were collected by computerassisted telephone interviewing of 500 participants, with half the sample each answering a subset of the adapted IAC Study survey.
Just over half of the sample (53.6%) reported high frequency drinking (once a week or more frequently), while 6.5% reported heavy typical occasion drinking (8 drinks or more per session). Self-reported rates of alcohol-related harms from one’s own and others’ drinking were relatively low. Attitudes towards alcohol control varied. A substantial majority supported more police spot checks to detect drinking and driving, while restrictions on the number of alcohol outlets and increases in the price of alcohol were generally opposed.
This pilot study demonstrated that the IAC Study survey can be implemented in Canada with some modifications. Future research should assess how to improve participation rates and the feasibility of implementing the longitudinal aspect of the IAC Study. This survey provides additional insight into alcohol-related behaviours and attitudes towards alcohol control policies, which can be used to develop appropriate public health responses in the Canadian context.
The majority of adults in Canada consume alcohol, 1 and the production and distribution of alcohol creates thousands of jobs, while governments derive significant tax revenues from alcohol production and sales.
At the same time, alcohol causes or contributes to a large number of conditions, diseases and injuries. 2 According to the Global Burden of Disease Study, in 2016, alcohol was responsible for approximately 350 000 disability-adjusted life year (DALYs) and 3.9% of all-cause DALYs in Canada. 3 In the same year, alcohol was the third leading behavioural contributor to the burden of disease globally, and the second leading behavioural contributor in Canada. 3 Alcohol is the largest single contributor to motor vehicle fatalities and was associated with one-third of motor vehicle collision fatalities in 2012, exceeding the number of deaths from assault. 4 In the United States, about one-third of those who die by suicide have been shown to be alcohol positive at the time of death. 5 Excessive use of alcohol causes secondary harm to others, 6 including substantial problems in families 7 and in the workplace, 8 and frequently involves aggression and violence. 9 , 10 Aggression is related to both overall consumption and frequency of intoxication. 11 , 12
In Canada, burden related to alcohol in terms of costs that include health care, law enforcement and lost productivity has been estimated to be approximately $14.7 billion annually. 13 In most Canadian provinces, estimates of these burdens exceed revenues collected by governments. 14
An effective prevention strategy requires a combination of population-level interventions and more focused interventions. The World Health Organization has identified three “best buys” for cost-effective alcohol policy interventions: tax increases, restricted access to retailed alcohol and bans on alcohol advertising. 15 Other population- level strategies include national/ provincial/territorial alcohol strategies, alcohol pricing and type of alcohol control and retailing system. 16
A population-level perspective is essential as the major burden of morbidity and mortality from alcohol is attributable not to the small proportion of the population that exhibit dependence on alcohol, but to the large portion of the population considered to be “moderate” drinkers. 17 , 18 Population-level interventions tend to avoid victim blaming and stigmatization of those who are alcohol dependent or regularly engage in high-risk drinking. 19 Other common interventions designed to promote population health include drinking and driving countermeasures, server interventions, and screening and brief interventions.
While there is substantial evidence supporting the effectiveness of populationlevel policies and interventions (e.g. studies by Babor et al. 20 and Anderson et al. 21 ), more information is needed on the causal effects of policy on behaviour change. 18 The International Alcohol Control (IAC) Study was designed to address this gap. The IAC Study measures the impact of policy on behaviours such as purchasing and response to marketing to better understand the causal chain between policy and alcohol consumption. 18 The IAC Study also examines and interprets the impact of policies that are introduced as a package, as they tend to be. 18 The IAC study was modeled on the International Tobacco Control study, which was similarly designed to determine the effects of policy changes on changes in behaviour. 22
The IAC Study draws on the World Health Organization’s (2010) Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol 23 and the international analysis of drinking patterns, harm from alcohol and effective interventions by Babor et al. 20 as well as other sources. The main rationale for the IAC Study was the substantial global burden of disease and injury from alcohol and the pressing need for effective policy to reduce the burden. 18
The IAC Study uses several data sources. These include a longitudinal survey of individuals; a comprehensive literature review drawing on key policy, strategy, reporting and research documents; qualitative interviews with relevant stakeholders; and routinely collected and administrative data such as outlet location, alcohol price and treatment locations. 18 The IAC Study measures alcohol consumption using a within-location beverage- specific framework; this has been shown to provide estimates of consumption that are closer to alcohol sales data. Respondents are asked about mutually exclusive physical locations, types of beverage consumed for an estimate of alcohol content, number of drinks per locationsession to estimate total alcohol consumed per drinking session and the frequency of location-sessions for total monthly consumption estimates. 24 As of December 2017, there were IAC Study initiatives in 13 countries, including this pilot study in the province of Ontario. 25
Results from IAC Study initiatives for a number of countries have been published: Australia, 26 England and Scotland, 27 New Zealand 28 and the Republic of Korea. 29 Of these countries, Canada’s social culture, political structures, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and alcohol policies are similar to those of England, Australia and New Zealand, though per capita alcohol consumption is lower at 8.9 litres per year (in England this is 11.4 L; in Australia, 10.6 L; and in New Zealand, 10.7 L). 30 The research design of a longitudinal survey of drinkers, along with analysis of the policy context, permits the examination of changes over time within and between jurisdictions.
While many organizations in Canada monitor and report on alcohol use and problems, 1 , 31 there is no comprehensive source of information on drinking behaviour and the factors that influence it. Thus, the important information on levels of alcohol consumption in Canada and alcohol-related problems of youth and adult drinkers typically do not offer insight into how and where alcohol is consumed, how much is spent on alcohol in various environments or other topics salient from a policy perspective.
Several Canadian provinces have recently made, or are considering, major changes to alcohol policies that may significantly affect alcohol use and associated practices. These changes include the introduction of beer and wine sales in grocery stores in Ontario; 32 further privatization of alcohol retailing in several provinces; 33 , 34 changes to pricing policies; 35 and the increase in sanctions for hazardous alcohol-related behaviours (e.g. the provincial government of Ontario introducing immediate penalties for a blood alcohol concentration of 0.05 mg% when driving). 36 , 37 The ability to monitor the impact of these changes to help us understand the most appropriate ways to reduce alcohol- related harms is one of the key benefits of the IAC study. 21 The IAC Study has proven to be of substantial value in informing alcohol policy in several countries in recent years. 24
In this paper, we describe a pilot assessment of the feasibility of implementing the survey component of the IAC Study in Ontario. This pilot assessment had three main purposes:
Survey design
The Canadian pilot of the IAC Study implemented a modified version of the New Zealand and Australian versions of the IAC Study. 22 The investigating team examined the original surveys and, after running a small-scale pre-test, determined that the full instrument would likely require well over 30 minutes to administer. A pilot questionnaire was designed, with input from the research firm conducting the surveys to ensure suitability for a computer-assisted telephone survey in Ontario. This questionnaire used a split-sample strategy of questioning with two subsets of questions. This split-sample strategy also took into account the need to conduct the pilot with finite resources. Adaptations included adjustments for Canadian drink size standards, volume of drinks and slang for drink containers.
The adapted questionnaires were assessed by the IAC Study principal investigators, Drs. Sally Casswell and Tasia Huckle, to ensure suitability as IAC Study instruments. The final adapted Canadian versions, available from the authors on request, were used in field testing.
Alcohol variables
Three derived variables representing drinking patterns were calculated according to the method reported by Chaiyasong et al. 39
“High frequency drinking” refers to engaging in drinking sessions once a week or more frequently, at any location, over a six-month period. For the pilot study, a drinking session was defined as any occasion during which the respondent drank any amount of drink of at least 4% alcohol by volume.
“Typical occasion quantity” was defined as the weighted mean of standard drinks consumed per session across locations, taking into account location frequency. High quantity per session drinking was defined as drinking a mean of 8 or more standard drinks per occasion.
Definitions for standard drink sizes in terms of alcohol content vary across jurisdictions, with Australian standards containing less alcohol than Canadian standards. In comparisons between the results of the Chaiyasong et al. study 39 and this pilot study, numbers reflect the Australian standard drink size.
All other descriptions reflect Canadian standards (13.6 g of pure alcohol). Several variables related to risky drinking practices were also included. Binge-drinking is defined as 5 drinks or more per drinking session for men and 4 drinks or more per session for women. Pre-drinking refers to drinking alcohol before going to a location where drinking is also planned. Overdrinking refers to consuming more alcoholic drinks than planned.
Data collection
Survey participants had to be permanent residents of Ontario; living in private households (institutionalized populations were excluded, as is typical in telephone surveys, 40 because residents often do not have access to a telephone or appear on landline lists); aged 18–65 years; able to complete the survey in English; and have consumed at least one alcoholic beverage in the past six months. The plan was to survey an equal number of male and female respondents. The sample focused on current drinkers as most of the survey is concerned with capturing drinking behaviours.
Data were collected over a six-week period in the winter of 2017 through telephone surveys conducted by Focal Research. Due the limited resources of the pilot project, a sample of 500 participants was sought. Participants were drawn from two primary samples: a simple random sample of Ontario households with landline telephones, and a sample of Ontario residents with only cellphones. A small number were sampled from a research panel of Ontario residents maintained by Focal Research to achieve the desired number of young men.
A two-tiered sampling strategy was used. Households were first screened to identify any adult aged 18–65 years. Among these households, a brief survey was conducted to compile a roster of eligible adults, their age and sex. Each consenting adult was screened for alcohol consumption in the past six months, and one of these adults was randomly invited to participate in the survey and randomly allocated to either split sample.
About halfway through data collection, it became clear that the simple random sample initially planned might not provide enough younger or male participants for meaningful comparisons. A quota sampling procedure was then introduced to increase the number of men and participants aged under 45 years.
Of 5381 households invited to participate, 1827 (34%) were successfully contacted and agreed to participate. Of these, 1409 households were disqualified because they did not meet the inclusion criteria (i.e. no alcohol was consumed in the past six months) and/or their sex and age quota had been reached (which accounted for the largest number of disqualified households).
Due to low response rates in younger age groups, more respondents were drawn from older age categories. Upon completing an interview, if the respondent said that another eligible adult was in the household and they agreed to participate, that adult was randomly allocated to a split sample and also interviewed.
An average of 1.03, 1.25 and 1 participants per household were in the cellphone only, landline and research panel samples, respectively. A total of 500 participants from 418 households were included in this pilot study, with 87, 387 and 26 participants from the cellphone only, landline and research panel samples, respectively.
Data were cleaned and verified, with ranges examined to identify any responses outside of expected values and ensure that the study dataset included valid and meaningful responses. Data analysis and reporting of preliminary results were designed to address the three principle goals of the research. Results were weighted by age, sex and highest educational attainment, estimated based on the results of the 2016 census data for Ontario. All analyses were conducted using statistical package SPSS version 22 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
This project received research ethics approval from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) REB certificate #114/2016.
Consistent with the sampling approach, the participating sample was evenly split between men and women ( Table 1 ). The largest proportion of respondents (30.8%) was aged between 45 and 54 years, followed by those 55 and above (28.6%). The smallest proportion was made up the youngest respondents aged 18 to 24 (8.4%), followed by those aged 25 to 34 (13.6%). These proportions differ from census data, particularly in the overrepresentation of adults aged 45 to 54 years (18.5% in the census). 41
Most respondents were married (76.6%); born in Canada; not of Indigenous ethnicity (83.4%); and employed for wages (62.8%). Most respondents were living in a household with no children under the age of 18 (56.1%; data not shown). The mean (SD) number of household residents was 3.1 (1.4). Most of the sample reported completing either college (28.2%) or university (24.6%), while 13.8% reported some college or university and 5.6% reported a trade certificate. The proportion of the current sample who had completed some postsecondary training or education (71.2%) was high in comparison to the 2016 census for Ontario (65.2%). 42 Total family incomes were high, with nearly half of those responding (46.1%) reporting an annual family income of $100 000 or more, a higher median income than reported by Statistics Canada ($86 081). 43
The IAC Study procedures result in higher consumption estimates, in terms of mean drinks per month, than those seen in a well-regarded survey of the adult population in Ontario, the 2016 CAMH Monitor survey ( Table 2 ). The CAMH Monitor obtained its estimates using a typical quantity–frequency method. 44 Among female drinkers, IAC Study procedures resulted in an estimate of number of drinks consumed per month that was 3.12% higher than the CAMH Monitor survey estimate (statistically nonsignificant). Among male drinkers, IAC Study procedures resulted in a 10.13% higher estimate of number of drinks consumed per month ( t = 2.707, p < .001). In the total population of drinkers, IAC Study procedures resulted in an 6.89% higher estimate of monthly number of drinks consumed, which is shown to significant in a two-tailed impendent samples t -test ( t = 3.175, p = .002).
The mean number of drinks consumed per drinking session varied substantially across drinking locations ( Table 3 ). At 1.27 (0.51) and 1.70 (1.38), respectively, the fewest mean (SD) number of drinks per occasion were reported for drinking at work or restaurants. At 3.09 (2.23), about twice as many drinks per occasion were consumed when drinking at home. The average number of drinks per occasion was 6.12 (5.84) when drinking at a cottage/ cabin or while camping and 4.24 (3.01) at public special events, indicative of binge-drinking.
Approximately 53.6% of the Ontario pilot study sample reported high frequency drinking, defined as engaging in a drinking session once a week or more frequently at all locations over a six-month period, while 6.5% of participants drank on average 8 or more drinks per drinking session ( Table 4 ). The Ontario pilot study results are somewhat lower than those of England, Scotland and New Zealand for high frequency drinking, and much lower than all other countries for heavy typical occasion. Data from the WHO Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018 indicate that total per capita alcohol consumption for Canada is somewhat lower than for England, Scotland and New Zealand, consistent with the survey data we present here. 30
When asked if they or anyone else had been injured as a result of their drinking, 91.2% said this had never happened and 7.5% said it had happened but not in the past six months ( Table 5 ). When asked if a relative, friend, doctor or other health care worker had been concerned about their drinking or had suggested they cut down, 92.4% said that this had never happened to them, 5.3% said that this had happened but not in the past six months and 2.2% said that this had happened in the past six months. When asked if they had ever been involved with police as a result of their drinking, 98.1% said that this had never happened to them.
When asked about getting injured as a result of someone else’s drinking, 86.4% said that this had never happened to them, 10.3% said that this had happened but not in the past six months and 3.3% said that this had happened in the past six months ( Table 5 ). When asked if they had ever experienced other negative effects on their lives as a result of others’ drinking, 63.3% said that this had never happened to them, 25.6% said that this had happened but not in the past six months and 11.2% said that this had happened in the past six months.
When asked if they supported restrictions on the number of alcohol outlets, the largest proportion of participants (44.2%) opposed or strongly opposed them such restrictions, while the next largest proportion (30.5%) neither supported nor opposed them ( Table 6 ). About half of the respondents (51.6%) strongly opposed and about one-quarter (26.3%) opposed an increase in the price of alcohol. While the largest proportion of respondents neither supported nor opposed restrictions on alcohol advertising (35.0%), 31.0% supported and 5.9% strongly supported advertising restrictions. The largest proportion (41.4%) opposed and 20.6% strongly opposed earlier closing times for buying alcohol, while 24.6% neither supported nor opposed this. Of note, almost two-thirds of respondents (64.2%) strongly supported more police spot checks to detect drinking and driving.
A policy change at the time of the survey was the introduction of the sale of beer and wine in large grocery stores in Ontario; this began in 2015. 45 Among those who had purchased alcohol in the previous six months, there was little variation by age or sex between those who had and those who had not purchased alcohol at a large grocery store ( Table 7 ). However, the rate of over-drinking was higher among those who had purchased alcohol from a large grocery store than among those who had not (53% vs. 40%, respectively; p = .039), while there was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of binge-drinking (62.13% vs. 58.75%, respectively; statistically nonsignificant).
The purpose of this study was to pilot the IAC Study instrument in Canada in order to (1) adapt the IAC Study instrument to the Canadian context; (2) pilot the survey tool in a sample of participants in Ontario; and (3) provide a preliminary assessment of the information that can be gathered from the IAC Study–based instrument compared with the data collected by other IAC Study sites.
There were challenges and opportunities in adapting the original IAC Study instrument for use in Canada. A number of terms used in New Zealand for types of alcohol beverages and beverage sizes needed to be adapted. Also, typical drinking occasions differed between the two countries. For example, the Ontario sample showed far fewer heavier typical drinking occasions, as shown in Table 4 . Before the instrument was ready for use in Ontario, the specific terminology related to beverages, sizes and drinking locations needed rewording, with care taken to avoid altering the essential meaning.
The decision to use a split-sample approach was a pragmatic one as it allowed all main survey dimensions to be piloted without imposing a time burden on respondents. The final average length for Sample 1 was 27.2 minutes and for Sample 2 was 30.4 minutes. These adjustments demonstrate that, with some reasonably small methodological modifications, the IAC Study instrument can be applied to the Ontario population.
The IAC Study method of collecting information on alcohol consumption based on information session location, type of drink and number of drinks per session results in higher estimates of consumption. 46 The IAC Study method of calculating consumption resulted in 35.6% higher estimates of average monthly consumption for the total sample compared to the standard quantity–frequency method used in the well-regarded CAMH Monitor survey of the Ontario adult population. 44
It has long been recognized that surveybased measures of alcohol consumption substantially underestimate population alcohol consumption, as reflected by per capita consumption measures based on alcohol sales data. 47 Thus, while surveybased measures of alcohol use provide useful and valuable indicators of harmful drinking, their underestimation of population alcohol consumption lead to concerns about their utility for health planning and policy purposes. 47 Survey methods, like the IAC Study, that account for some of the “missing” alcohol may provide important additional value to efforts to understand and address harmful alcohol consumption.
The ability of the IAC Study methods to detect a higher level of consumption in Ontario demonstrates consistency between the pilot study and existing research on the IAC and supports the appropriateness of its use in Ontario.
Other results point to the importance of collecting the more comprehensive and nuanced data on alcohol use that is available with the IAC Study instrument. For example, heavy episodic or binge-drinking is widely recognized as a hazardous form of drinking, in part because on binge occasions individuals are more likely to be intoxicated and experience injuries, get into fights, drive while impaired and so on. Data on where binge-drinking occurs are sparse, and there is a common belief that binge-drinking occasions is common in bars. 48 However, we observed that the average number of drinks per drinking occasion was relatively low in bars compared with other locations. This may point to the success of efforts in the past few years to control heavy or excessive drinking in bars, taverns and pubs. 49
Of particular interest, we found that the average or typical drinking occasion when staying at a cottage/cabin or camping and at public special events is equivalent to binge-drinking. This may be influenced by the relative isolation and control over such events, which might lower the chances for drinking at several locations in the same day, for example, pre-drinking before going to a bar. Identifying locations where heavy or binge-drinking are most common may help inform more effective prevention efforts.
Compared to other jurisdictions that have used the IAC Study design, high frequency drinking and high quantities in typical drinking occasions are relatively low in this pilot study. According to the WHO Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018 , Canada does have lower drinking rates than many of the comparators used. 30
Despite employing several sampling strategies to try to increase the number of younger adult respondents, this pilot study had a disproportionately large number of adults aged over 45. This likely resulted in underestimating heavy drinking as binge-drinking tends to be more common in younger age groups in Ontario. 50 Despite this possible bias, the relative drinking patterns of Ontarians this pilot study determined were proportional to the findings of other current sources of information on drinking behaviour patterns. 30 That the study data are in line with comparisons between Canada and other countries 30 also indicates the appropriateness of the IAC Study for use in Canada.
Only about 8% of respondents said they had personally experienced harm or other problems linked with their own drinking ( Table 5 ). However, nearly 14% reported being injured as a result of others’ drinking, and about 37% reported experiencing negative effects as a result of someone else’s drinking. The latter is substantially higher than that reported in surveys of Ontario in 2006 6 although the 2006 survey included non-drinkers, who may be less likely to have experienced harm from others. 51
Implementation of the IAC Study in Canada would expand the collection of important data on Canadians’ attitudes towards alcohol policy. The findings on attitudes on five alcohol policies ( Table 6 ) show some support for effective policies but rejection of others that are also known to be very effective, such as alcohol pricing. 2 , 52 , 53 The proportion ranged from 84% supporting police spot checks to detect drinking and driving, to only 8% supporting an increase in the price of alcohol. However, it is noteworthy that 37% supported restrictions on alcohol advertising and promotion. These findings are generally in line with previous research focusing on Ontario adults, 54 and at least partially support a claim by Room et al. 2 that popular policies are largely ineffective, and effective policies are unpopular.
The pilot study was also able to capture information on a relatively recent policy change in Ontario, the sale of beer of and wine in grocery stores. Though grocery store purchasing showed no difference in sex and age, there was a significant difference in rate of over-drinking with grocery store purchasers drinking more than they had planned in a drinking session more often. Though the differences in predrinking, planned intoxication and bingedrinking were not significant, they were fairly large and would likely show significance in a sample with greater statistical power.
More frequent risky drinking practices among grocery store purchasers has important implications for policy decisions when considered through the lens of the total consumption model of alcoholrelated harm. This model holds that an increase in the accessibility of alcohol is associated with an increase in the consumption, which in turn, is strongly predictive of the extent of alcohol-related harms. 55 The association of over-drinking with grocery store purchasing in particular suggests that the introduction of alcohol purchasing in grocery stores presents a risk to population health. It should be noted that the direction of this relationship is not discernible given the current cross-sectional design. In order to determine whether availability increases the risk of harmful drinking practices or whether those who engage in riskier drinking practices are likely to buy alcohol at any location (including grocery stores) more frequently, longitudinal analysis of drinking patterns is necessary. Implementation of the longitudinal component of the IAC Study would make such a determination possible.
Limitations
An important feature of the IAC Study is its longitudinal design, which allows the tracking of changing drinking behaviours across policy changes, but longitudinal data collection was outside the scope of the current pilot project. The results of this pilot suggest that implementing a longitudinal design would be a necessary next step in implementing the IAC Study in Canada. However, as is the trend in much survey research, low response rates continue to be a challenge. Future research should consider methods for increasing participation rates, such as provision of incentives while reducing the potential for bias in participation.
Another important limitation of this current study was the limited representativeness of the sample. Quota sampling and inclusion of a cellphone sampling frame were implemented in order to bring the age distribution closer to the age profile of Ontario adults. However, the sample was not reflective of the age distribution of Ontario, with adults over the age of 45 overrepresented. Weighting procedures were used to help reduce the effect of this bias, but the limitations of the sample should still be kept in mind when interpreting the study results.
A small degree of clustering was present in our sample, with 500 participants drawn from 418 households. Our analyses did not account for the clustered nature of the sample, and variance may be underestimated due to this. This relatively small sample also means that the current analyses are likely to be underpowered.
The survey design also relied on selfreporting of drinking and purchasing behaviours, the experience of harm and attitudes on policy. As such, findings in this study may reflect recall or social desirability bias on part of survey respondents.
The results of this pilot study suggest that the IAC Study can be feasibly applied in the Canadian context. The IAC Study represents an important opportunity to improve the quality of information on drinking behaviours in Ontario and other Canadian jurisdictions at a time when recent, ongoing and suggested changes in alcohol policy may increase drinking and drinking-related harms. Improved methods for identifying harmful drinking patterns, attitudes towards alcohol policy and negative consequences of drinking alcohol plus the ability to compare these findings with those in other countries will likely improve prevention of these harms.
Despite the potential value of the IAC Study in Canada, the pilot also identified potential problems in the length of survey administration, difficulties in obtaining an appropriate sample and the limited insight of a cross-sectional pilot for a longitudinal study.
We are pleased to acknowledge the extensive contribution of Focal Research to the refinement of the survey instrument, the planning and the execution of the field work. Sally Casswell and Taisia Huckle provided detailed feedback on our adaptation of the survey instrument to the Ontario context. Sarah Callinan and Robin Room provided access to the version of the IAC Study survey and technical report used in Australia and advice based on their experience.
Funding for this pilot study was provided by the Public Health Agency of Canada to the CAMH.
RG is the Editor-in-Chief of the HPCDP Journal, but recused himself from taking any editorial decisions on this manuscript.
RG, NG and RM conceived the study. NG, RM, MvM and GS managed data collection. RG and HO provided study guidance and support. MvM analysed the data. NG, RM, MvM and HO interpreted the results. NG, MvM and HO wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
The content and views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Canada.
Unilever Global Change location
Fewer things, done better, with greater impact.
Our Growth Action Plan addresses these challenges head-on. In the coming years, our focus will be on four sustainability priorities .
A montage of Unilever products being used together with agricultural footage.
A jar of Hellmann’s mayonnaise on a kitchen counter, a sandwich in the background with someone holding a knife. The sandwich is then pressed down ready to cut.
Tomatoes growing on a vine. Someone in the foreground with a handful of soil.
A woman rubs Vaseline on her lower legs.
Rain falling into a pool of water in a rice field. A rice field with water droplets rising up.
A man tosses a Persil capsule into a washing machine. A Persil 3-in-1 Bio packshot with the words ‘Dirt is good’.
Our ambition is to deliver net zero emissions across our value chain.
Our ambition is to deliver resilient and regenerative natural and agricultural ecosystems.
Our ambition is an end to plastic pollution through reduction, circulation and collaboration.
Our ambition is to ensure a decent livelihood for people in our global value chain, including by earning a living wage.
The first era was about ringing the alarm. The second was about setting long-term ambitions. The third is about delivering impact faster , by making sustainability progress integral to business performance.
We intend to lead in this new era by being:
using capital allocation to make progress across our sustainability priorities.
with roadmaps, clear accountability and reward.
through deeper collaboration and more assertive policy advocacy.
"Our updated commitments are very stretching, but they are also intentionally and, unashamedly, realistic. We are determined that Unilever will deliver against them." Hein Schumacher, CEO Read our CEO Hein Schumacher’s views
10 June 2024
The sun doesn’t just drive our ice cream sales; it also helps power our business in a sustainable way. Find out how solar solutions integrated into our warehouses, fleets and sales kiosks are making energy savings, reducing emissions and contributing to our climate goals.
16 May 2024
Our updated Climate Transition Action Plan (CTAP) sets out Unilever’s ambitious new climate targets. Discover how we’re focusing our efforts so we can deepen our impact by 2030, and why we believe taking urgent climate action now is good for our business in the long term.
With the fourth round of negotiations for a UN treaty to end plastic pollution now concluded, Unilever CEO Hein Schumacher reflects on the progress made and the road ahead.
Head of Social Sustainability, Anouk Heilen, explains how we’re ensuring a living wage for everyone we work with and why better living standards can build a stronger business.
30 April 2024
We recently announced an evolved sustainability agenda to make more tangible progress on the big complex challenges we face. Pablo Costa, Global Head of Packaging, explains what that means for our approach to plastic, and how our updated goals are aimed at making greater impact.
Find out about our approach to sustainability and our ongoing commitment to responsible business.
Find out more about our progress and reporting on issues such as positive nutrition, business integrity, and safety.
Human rights continue to underpin our sustainability agenda. Find out more about our progress.
Find out more about how we are working towards a society where everyone is treated equally.
Read more about our Growth Action Plan and how we are stepping up our execution to deliver improved performance.
Disclaimer covering our sustainability pages.
Read the disclaimer covering our sustainability pages (PDF 92.63 KB) .
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Case Study Details. Jeff is a 66-year-old Caucasian man whose wife has encouraged him to seek treatment. He has never been in therapy before, and has no history of depression or anxiety. However, his alcohol use has recently been getting in the way of his marriage, and interfering with his newly-retired life.
the majority drink moderately or not at all. But there is more to the story. Although the majority are not problem drinkers, a minority of students tend to drink most of the alcohol consumed by students in any given week. Most are drinking some and some are drinking way too much (Johannessen, 2003, p. 4). Despite evidence that most students drink
This case is first of the kind depicting clinical features as well as withdrawal of combined volatile and moderate alcohol abuse. The feature of combined intoxication of the two abused substances makes it difficult for the clinician to reach a diagnosis. Our case report thus puts forward the scenario of increasing combined alcohol and volatile ...
Abstract. In this article, a case-based format is used to address complex clinical issues in addiction medicine. The cases were developed from the authors' practice experience, and were presented at the American College of Medical Toxicology Addiction Academy in 2015. Section I: Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Pain explores cases of patients ...
A Case of Alcohol Abuse. The patient is a 65-year-old white woman, married for 35 years to an accountant. They have 5 grown children and 12 grandchildren. She taught elementary school for 28 years and has not worked since retiring 15 years ago.
Case Study Details. Juan is a 34-year old Mexican-American construction worker. He reports having to work in extreme heat during interstate road repair and notes that his use of alcohol is comparable to others at the work-site. During a typical 10-hour workday, he may drink up to 8 cold beers to deal with the heat.
A Survey of Substance Use Disorder. Henry drinks beer daily and has done so for the past 15 years. He drinks 5-6 cans on weekdays and 8-12 cans on the weekends, as well as liquor. Henry also smokes half a pack per day of cigarettes. He smoked marijuana as a teen, but took no other drugs.
As per the DSM-5, the criteria for alcohol use disorder in James' case are the following: He wants to reduce alcohol consumption but cannot succeed. He continues drinking, disregarding the family and work problems. He has intoxication after drinking (KM, 2017). Sometimes, James consumes more alcohol than intended.
Case Study: Lorrie. Figure 1. Lorrie. Lorrie Wiley grew up in a neighborhood on the west side of Baltimore, surrounded by family and friends struggling with drug issues. She started using marijuana and "popping pills" at the age of 13, and within the following decade, someone introduced her to cocaine and heroin.
Case Study 2 - Explained. On August 20, 2022, a TikTok video was posted, claiming that Disney World was going to lower the drinking age to 18. It was stated that Disney World was battling the Florida government in court to get a resort exemption, which would allow anyone 18 and older to drink on property. The TikTok video acquired millions of ...
This case study examines the problem of deviation of normal relationships in families of persons with alcohol dependence. The case given for analysis describes rather typical situation of families with excessively drinking husbands. The case study aims at formulating the overall strategy of finding the way out for the members of such families.
This case study is an attempt to assess the impact of psychiatric social work intervention in person with alcohol dependence. Psychiatric social work intervention (brief intervention) was provided ...
current issue. current issue; browse recently published; browse full issue index; learning/cme
This case study examines the problem of deviation of normal relationships in families of persons with alcohol dependence. The case given for analysis describes rather typical situation of families with excessively drinking husbands. The case study aims at formulating the overall strategy of finding the way out for the members of such families.
Steven's story of alcohol addiction: a case study. Serenity health offers drug & alcohol rehab, detox & counselling services for successful recovery. Skip to content. 0800 118 2892 +44 (0)203 151 1280; ... Allowing his drinking, and his behaviour while drinking to, to jeopardise existing relationships and potential future relationships ...
Can you think of examples of similar situations which involve different lifestyle issues? Seven steps to effective case study discussion. This case study is a revised version of one by Dennis Teague in Case Studies in Missions, edited by Paul and Frances Hiebert, Baker Book House. It may be reproduced only upon payment of a 35-cent royalty per ...
This paper describes the challenges faced and solutions created when gaining approval for use of mature minor consent in a respondent-driven sampling (RDS) study to explore the social norms and alcohol consumption among 14-17-year-old adolescents (n = 1012) in the community.
An alcoholic patient who continues to drink: case presentation. Stuart McPherson, specialist registrar1 and Colin John Rees, consultant gastroenterologist1. Mr Bond is a 42 year old man with alcoholic cirrhosis who was admitted to our unit with haematemesis. He had had three previous admissions with alcohol related problems and had twice bled ...
The investigation reveals that the pH value of surface water was 8.5 which were more than the standard values. The calcium and magnesium content were 398 mg/L and 305.1 mg/L respectively in ground ...
Steven is a 43-year-old man who has been struggling with alcohol addiction for several years. He started drinking in his early 20s as a way to socialize with his friends and alleviate stress from work. Initially, he would only drink on weekends or during special occasions, but over time, his drinking gradually increased in frequency and ...
Free Red Bull: Building Brand Equity In Non-Traditional Ways Case Study Sample. Red Bull was established by Dietrich Mateschitz in year 1985. Company introduces energy drink exclusively in Austria in year 1987. After five years of exclusive operation in Austria Market, Company expanded its business in European market.
The population-based case-control study sample included individuals registered on the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database between 2000 and 2018. Hospitalized patients with suspected drug-induced liver injury were considered as cases, while control subjects were matched 1:1 by age, gender, and index date (the first observed diagnosis of ...
Written by Coursera Staff • Updated on Apr 19, 2024. Data analysis is the practice of working with data to glean useful information, which can then be used to make informed decisions. "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts," Sherlock ...
And our previous study of general-purpose chatbots found that they hallucinated between 58% and 82% of the time on legal queries, highlighting the risks of incorporating AI into legal practice. In his 2023 annual report on the judiciary, Chief Justice Roberts took note and warned lawyers of hallucinations.
In addition, a sample of drinking water was taken from a random selection of 25% of the total enrolled households in the dry (June-August 2016) and wet seasons (January-February 2017). The participant population was sorted by community, as a surrogate for water supply, and one-third from each community was randomly selected by a random ...
Case Study Template. Used 9813 times Share | Updated May 15, 2024. Good case studies tell a compelling story to potential clients of how your company rose to the occasion. The Case Study Template will help you showcase your company's credibility in solving a particularly challenging client problem and prove to potential clients that you have what it takes to perform well.
Timeline. June 5 A new study examining the 2023 bird flu outbreak in South America that killed around 17,400 elephant seal pups and 24,000 sea lions found the disease spread between the animals in ...
Reproductive effects such as decreased fertility or increased high blood pressure in pregnant women. Developmental effects or delays in children, including low birth weight, accelerated puberty, bone variations, or behavioral changes. Increased risk of some cancers, including prostate, kidney, and testicular cancers.
Approximately 53.6% of the Ontario pilot study sample reported high frequency drinking, defined as engaging in a drinking session once a week or more frequently at all locations over a six-month period, while 6.5% of participants drank on average 8 or more drinks per drinking session (Table 4). The Ontario pilot study results are somewhat lower ...
The next era of corporate sustainability. The first era was about ringing the alarm. The second was about setting long-term ambitions. The third is about delivering impact faster, by making sustainability progress integral to business performance. We intend to lead in this new era by being: