OR
Recent studies (Juniper, 2016; Barr, 2018; Williams, 2020; Peake, 2021) have shown that renewable energy is one positive step towards slowing down the negative effects of climate change.
Barr, J.M. (2018) New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. Juniper, T. (2016) New York, N.Y.: DK Publishing. Peake, S. (2021) Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University Press. Williams, N. (2020) . London: Bloomsbury Publishing. | [if any]. edn [if applicable]. Place of Publication: Publisher. | | he authors are listed in chronological order in the in-text citations BUT in alphabetical order according to surnames in the reference list. |
| |
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maintains that ‘air quality in Ireland is generally good’ (2020, p. 4). | Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2020) Wexford: Environmental Protection Agency. | [if any]. edn [if applicable]. Place of Publication: Publisher. |
| |
‘Primary energy sources can be divided into renewable and non-renewable sources’ (Hadorn, 2015, p. 88). | Hadorn, J.C. (ed.) (2015) Berlin: Ernst & Sohn. | [if any]. edn [if applicable]. Place of Publication: Publisher. |
| |
Brady (2021) gives a very positive review of McAnulty’s memoir, which focuses on the natural environment. | Brady, A. (2021) 'Finding hope in nature'. Review of , by D. McAnulty. , 344(6), p. 80. | being reviewed by Author(s) of book. containing the review, volume(Issue number), page number(s). |
| |
‘A conservatory or greenhouse on the south side of a building can be thought of as a kind of habitable solar collector’ (Everett, 2018, p. 75). | Everett, B. (2018) 'Solar thermal energy', in Peake, S. (ed.) 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57-114. | [if any]. edn [if applicable]. Place of Publication: Publisher, page number(s). |
| |
This volume examines the role the media plays in the public’s understanding of climate change (Brevini and Lewis, 2018). | Brevini, B. and Lewis, J. (eds) (2018) (2 vols). New York, N.Y.: Peter Lang Publishing. | [if any] . (No. of vols). Place of Publication: Publisher. |
| | |
| |
The text is embellished with illustrations from original drawings (Measom, no date). | Measom, G.S. (no date) . London: Richard Griffin & Co. | [if any]. edn [if applicable]. Place of Publication: Publisher. |
| |
Gaskell (c. 1855) sets her social novel in an industrial English city, driven by coal-powered factories. | Gaskell, E. (c. 1855) London: Chapman & Hall. | . year of publication) [if any]. edn [if applicable]. Place of Publication: Publisher. |
| |
Taylor’s observations (1996, cited in Garvey, 2019) are based on a genuine respect for nature. OR A respect for nature is based on the belief that ‘every living thing has a good of its own’ (Taylor, 1996, quoted in Garvey, 2019, p. 53). | Garvey, J. (2019) London: Continuum. | [if any]. edn [if applicable]. Place of Publication: Publisher. |
| |
- << Previous: Quick-Find Referencing Guide
- Next: eBooks >>
- Last Updated: Aug 9, 2024 11:36 AM
- URL: https://lit.libguides.com/Write-it-Right
The Library, Technological University of the Shannon: Midwest
Citation Styles
- Chicago Style
- Annotated Bibliographies
What is a Lit Review?
How to write a lit review.
- Video Introduction to Lit Reviews
Main Objectives
Examples of lit reviews, additional resources.
- Zotero (Citation Management)
What is a literature review?
- Either a complete piece of writing unto itself or a section of a larger piece of writing like a book or article
- A thorough and critical look at the information and perspectives that other experts and scholars have written about a specific topic
- A way to give historical perspective on an issue and show how other researchers have addressed a problem
- An analysis of sources based on your own perspective on the topic
- Based on the most pertinent and significant research conducted in the field, both new and old
- A descriptive list or collection of summaries of other research without synthesis or analysis
- An annotated bibliography
- A literary review (a brief, critical discussion about the merits and weaknesses of a literary work such as a play, novel or a book of poems)
- Exhaustive; the objective is not to list as many relevant books, articles, reports as possible
- To convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic
- To explain what the strengths and weaknesses of that knowledge and those ideas might be
- To learn how others have defined and measured key concepts
- To keep the writer/reader up to date with current developments and historical trends in a particular field or discipline
- To establish context for the argument explored in the rest of a paper
- To provide evidence that may be used to support your own findings
- To demonstrate your understanding and your ability to critically evaluate research in the field
- To suggest previously unused or underused methodologies, designs, and quantitative and qualitative strategies
- To identify gaps in previous studies and flawed methodologies and/or theoretical approaches in order to avoid replication of mistakes
- To help the researcher avoid repetition of earlier research
- To suggest unexplored populations
- To determine whether past studies agree or disagree and identify strengths and weaknesses on both sides of a controversy in the literature
- Choose a topic that is interesting to you; this makes the research and writing process more enjoyable and rewarding.
- For a literature review, you'll also want to make sure that the topic you choose is one that other researchers have explored before so that you'll be able to find plenty of relevant sources to review.
- Your research doesn't need to be exhaustive. Pay careful attention to bibliographies. Focus on the most frequently cited literature about your topic and literature from the best known scholars in your field. Ask yourself: "Does this source make a significant contribution to the understanding of my topic?"
- Reading other literature reviews from your field may help you get ideas for themes to look for in your research. You can usually find some of these through the library databases by adding literature review as a keyword in your search.
- Start with the most recent publications and work backwards. This way, you ensure you have the most current information, and it becomes easier to identify the most seminal earlier sources by reviewing the material that current researchers are citing.
The organization of your lit review should be determined based on what you'd like to highlight from your research. Here are a few suggestions:
- Chronology : Discuss literature in chronological order of its writing/publication to demonstrate a change in trends over time or to detail a history of controversy in the field or of developments in the understanding of your topic.
- Theme: Group your sources by subject or theme to show the variety of angles from which your topic has been studied. This works well if, for example, your goal is to identify an angle or subtopic that has so far been overlooked by researchers.
- Methodology: Grouping your sources by methodology (for example, dividing the literature into qualitative vs. quantitative studies or grouping sources according to the populations studied) is useful for illustrating an overlooked population, an unused or underused methodology, or a flawed experimental technique.
- Be selective. Highlight only the most important and relevant points from a source in your review.
- Use quotes sparingly. Short quotes can help to emphasize a point, but thorough analysis of language from each source is generally unnecessary in a literature review.
- Synthesize your sources. Your goal is not to make a list of summaries of each source but to show how the sources relate to one another and to your own work.
- Make sure that your own voice and perspective remains front and center. Don't rely too heavily on summary or paraphrasing. For each source, draw a conclusion about how it relates to your own work or to the other literature on your topic.
- Be objective. When you identify a disagreement in the literature, be sure to represent both sides. Don't exclude a source simply on the basis that it does not support your own research hypothesis.
- At the end of your lit review, make suggestions for future research. What subjects, populations, methodologies, or theoretical lenses warrant further exploration? What common flaws or biases did you identify that could be corrected in future studies?
- Double check that you've correctly cited each of the sources you've used in the citation style requested by your professor (APA, MLA, etc.) and that your lit review is formatted according to the guidelines for that style.
Your literature review should:
- Be focused on and organized around your topic.
- Synthesize your research into a summary of what is and is not known about your topic.
- Identify any gaps or areas of controversy in the literature related to your topic.
- Suggest questions that require further research.
- Have your voice and perspective at the forefront rather than merely summarizing others' work.
- Cyberbullying: How Physical Intimidation Influences the Way People are Bullied
- Use of Propofol and Emergence Agitation in Children
- Eternity and Immortality in Spinoza's 'Ethics'
- Literature Review Tutorials and Samples - Wilson Library at University of La Verne
- Literature Reviews: Introduction - University Library at Georgia State
- Literature Reviews - The Writing Center at UNC Chapel Hill
- Writing a Literature Review - Boston College Libraries
- Write a Literature Review - University Library at UC Santa Cruz
- << Previous: Annotated Bibliographies
- Next: Zotero (Citation Management) >>
- Last Updated: Aug 28, 2024 12:27 PM
- URL: https://researchguides.elac.edu/Citation
- Link to facebook
- Link to linkedin
- Link to twitter
- Link to youtube
- Writing Tips
How to Cite a Book Review in Harvard Referencing
- 3-minute read
- 25th March 2023
If you’re a student writing a paper, you’ve probably used a variety of sources to compile your research and get your ideas down. Now it’s time to give proper credit to those sources.
If you’re citing a book review in Harvard referencing , you’ve come to the right place. Harvard doesn’t have an official set of rules, though, so many variations of it exist. Make sure you check your own style guide to confirm the guidelines you need to follow.
Creating an In-text Citation for a Book Review
To create an in-text citation for a book review in Harvard referencing, simply include the reviewer’s name and the year that the review was published (separated by a comma) in parentheses. If you include the name in the main text, you can just add the year. For example:
If you use a direct quote, you’ll need to include the page numbers after the year with “p.” or “pp.” like this:
If there are two reviewers, you can include both names separated by “and.” If there are three or more reviewers, only include the first name followed by “et al.”
Creating a Reference List Entry for a Book Review
Once you finish your paper, you’ll need to include a reference list with all the sources you used. To add a book review to this list, follow this format:
Reviewer, A. (year review was published). “Title of Book Review,” review of Title of Book Being Reviewed , by Author, X. Title of Journal or Newspaper Containing Review , volume number, issue number, page number(s).
Find this useful?
Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.
Using our example, the reference list entry would look something like this:
Gaines, T. (2020). “Banks’ Use of Symbolism,” review of The Last Storm , by Banks, J. Obscure Book Reviews , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2–4.
Hopefully, you now feel confident citing a book review in Harvard referencing. Like we said earlier, though, make sure you check your institution’s style guide for all its requirements. In this post, we looked at the Open University style of Harvard.
If you’d like an expert to check your references, regardless of which style you’re using, we’ll be happy to help. We’ll also check your work for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and so much more. Submit a free sample today and try out our service!
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you create an in-text citation for a book review in harvard.
To create an in-text citation for a book review in Harvard referencing, include the reviewer’s name and the year their review was published in parentheses: (Reviewer, year).
How do you reference a book review in Harvard?
To create a reference list entry for a book review in Harvard, follow this format: Reviewer, A. (year review was published). “Title of Book Review,” review of Title of Book Being Reviewed , by Author, X. Title of Journal or Newspaper Containing Review , volume number, issue number, page number(s).
Share this article:
Post A New Comment
Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.
5-minute read
Free Email Newsletter Template (2024)
Promoting a brand means sharing valuable insights to connect more deeply with your audience, and...
6-minute read
How to Write a Nonprofit Grant Proposal
If you’re seeking funding to support your charitable endeavors as a nonprofit organization, you’ll need...
9-minute read
How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation
Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...
8-minute read
Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement
Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...
7-minute read
Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization
Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...
4-minute read
Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio
Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...
Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.
Library Services
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES
- Guides and databases
- Library skills
- A-Z of Harvard references
- Citing authors with Harvard
- Page numbers and punctuation
- References with missing details
- Secondary referencing
- Example reference list
- Journal article
- Magazine article
- Newspaper article
- Online video
- Radio and internet radio
- Television advertisement
- Television programme
- Ancient text
- Bibliography
- Book (printed, one author or editor)
- Book (printed, multiple authors or editors)
- Book (printed, with no author)
- Chapter in a book (print)
- Collected works
- Dictionaries and Encyclopedia entries
- Multivolume work
- Religious text
- Thesis or dissertation
- Translated work
- Census data
- Financial report
- Mathematical equation
- Scientific dataset
- Book illustration, Figure or Diagram
- Inscription on a building
- Installation
- Painting or Drawing
- Interview (on the internet)
- Interview (newspaper)
- Interview (radio or television)
- Interview (as part of research)
- Act of the UK parliament (statute)
- Bill (House of Commons/Lords)
- Birth/Death/Marriage certificate
- British standards
- Command paper
- European Union publication
- Government/Official publication
- House of Commons/Lords paper
- Legislation from UK devolved assemblies
- Statutory instrument
- Military record
- Film/Television script
- Musical score
- Play (live performance)
- Play script
- Song lyrics
- Conference paper
- Conference proceedings
- Discussion paper
- Minutes of meeting
- Personal communication
- PowerPoint presentation
- Published report
- Student's own work
- Tutor materials for academic course
- Unpublished report
- Working paper
- Generative AI
- Referencing glossary
To be made up of:
- Name of the reviewer.
- Year of publication of the review (in round brackets).
- Title of the review (in single quotation marks).
- Review of ... (title of work reviewed in italics).
- Creator of work being reviewed,
- Publication details (title in italics).
‘Creator of work being reviewed’ may refer to an author (book), director (drama) or composer (music).
In-text citation:
Stevens (2010)
Reference list:
Stevens, H. (2010). ‘Biology of birds’. Review of The birds and the bees , by David Bills. Journal of the History of Biology , 50(2), pp.190-92.
Quick links
- Harvard references A-Z
- << Previous: Newspaper article
- Next: Audio-visual and Digital media >>
- Last Updated: Jul 15, 2024 2:14 PM
- URL: https://library-guides.ucl.ac.uk/harvard
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
WRITING A TARGETED LITERATURE REVIEW a targeted literature review is NOT: ¡ a sophisticated evaluation of the entire literature or literatures related to your topic ¡ a set of thinly connected summaries of important related works haphazardly selected from many subfields a targeted literature review IS: ¡ a carefully curated set of sources from a small number of subfield literatures
Look at more recent work citing these works (e.g., Web of Science). In writing the review, chronology is often important. Capture the. essence of the works you draw on. See Turco's "Token Theory" section. Provide supporting quotes when necessary. Avoid citing aspects of the works that aren't central (common mistake!).
Personal: To familiarize yourself with a new area of research, to get an overview of a topic, so you don't want to miss something important, etc. Required writing for a journal article, thesis or dissertation, grant application, etc. Literature reviews vary; there are many ways to write a literature review based on discipline, material type ...
Examples of literature reviews. Step 1 - Search for relevant literature. Step 2 - Evaluate and select sources. Step 3 - Identify themes, debates, and gaps. Step 4 - Outline your literature review's structure. Step 5 - Write your literature review.
Before you begin to write, think about your voice and your reader. You want your writing to communicate your knowledge. You want to write with an awareness of your reader. You want your introduction to be clear and 'hook' your reader's interest. Using your notes, plan how individual research studies coherently and logically support your ...
Write and Cite. This guide offers information on writing resources, citation style guides, and academic writing expectations and best practices, as well as information on resources related to copyright, fair use, permissions, and open access. This page is not currently available due to visibility settings. Last Updated: Aug 20, 2024 4:05 PM ...
terpreting the facts.• Cr. tique the literature. Evaluate its strengths as well as any limitations you observe in the argument, methods, or analysis.• Sy. thesize the evidence. Note connections or discrepancies in the. esearch you find, andIs a literature review its own paper, or a sect. on of a bigger pa.
It's Iterative! Writing a literature review (or any research paper, really) is an iterative process -- meaning a writer repeats steps again and again. They don't select a topic, then research, and then write the paper without giving themselves freedom to jump back to a previous step. Based on your research you may revisit your topic.
Sep 20, 2021 1388. To get started, visit our tutorial, The Literature Review: A Research Journey. The tutorial begins with a discussion of the definition and purpose of a literature review followed by modules on defining a research question; finding literature; managing research; synthesizing the literature; and writing the review.
The best proposals are timely and clearly explain why readers should pay attention to the proposed topic. It is not enough for a review to be a summary of the latest growth in the literature: the ...
American Journal of Philology, 140 (2), p. 367, Available at:10.1353/ajp.2019.0021 (Accessed 1 March 2022). In-Text-Citation: Example: According to Zajko's (2019) review of the book .... It has been noted that the theoretical perspectives of interest, covered in this title, could be explored more thoroughly (Zajko, 2019).
When you cite a source with up to three authors, cite all authors' names. For four or more authors, list only the first name, followed by ' et al. ': Number of authors. In-text citation example. 1 author. (Davis, 2019) 2 authors. (Davis and Barrett, 2019) 3 authors.
The Harvard referencing system is known as the Author-Date style. It emphasizes the name of the creator of a piece of information and the date of publication, with the list of references in alphabetical order at the end of your paper. Unlike other citation styles, there is no single, definitive version of Harvard Style.
5.2 Citing two or three authors. 5.3 Citing four or more authors. 5.4 Citing works by the same author written in the same year. 5.5 Citing from chapters written by different authors. 5.6 Secondary referencing. 5.7 Citing a direct quotation. 3. 3. 4.
Guide.pdf. 3) Copy the URL of the paper too and put it under the reference. You may need it again. to retrieve the paper to r ead it. 4) Under the reference (under the frame), copy the Abstract as ...
A good literature review should help the reader sense how you will answer your research question and should highlight the preceding arguments and evidence you think are most helpful in moving the topic forward. The purpose of the literature review is to dive into the existing debates on the topic to learn about the various schools of thought ...
Writing a Literature Review. A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and ...
To reference a book in Harvard style, you need an in-text citation and a corresponding entry in your reference list or bibliography. A basic book reference looks like this: Author surname, initial. (Year) Book title. City: Publisher. Szalay, D. (2017) All that man is. London: Vintage. (Szalay, 2017, p. 24)
Brady (2021) gives a very positive review of McAnulty's memoir, which focuses on the natural environment. Brady, A. (2021) 'Finding hope in nature'. Review of Diary of a young naturalist, by D. McAnulty. Scientific American, 344(6), p. 80. Reviewer's name, initial(s). (year of publication) 'Title of the review'.
Step 4: Write. Be selective. Highlight only the most important and relevant points from a source in your review. Use quotes sparingly. Short quotes can help to emphasize a point, but thorough analysis of language from each source is generally unnecessary in a literature review. Synthesize your sources.
The document provides guidance on writing a literature review in the Harvard referencing style. It discusses the importance of understanding the Harvard style, which uses author-date citations, and mastering its formatting guidelines. The document also addresses challenges like synthesizing sources into a cohesive narrative, critically evaluating sources, and organizing the review in a logical ...
Creating an In-text Citation for a Book Review. To create an in-text citation for a book review in Harvard referencing, simply include the reviewer's name and the year that the review was published (separated by a comma) in parentheses. If you include the name in the main text, you can just add the year. For example:
Creator of work being reviewed, Publication details (title in italics). 'Creator of work being reviewed' may refer to an author (book), director (drama) or composer (music). In-text citation: Stevens (2010) Reference list: Stevens, H. (2010). 'Biology of birds'. Review of The birds and the bees, by David Bills.