33 ± 1.2
LPHC:
32 ± 1.2
Abbreviations: AED = almond-enriched diet, AIT = aerobic interval training, BDI = Beck’s depression inventory, BDI-II = Beck’s Depression Inventory-2, BWL = behavioral weight loss, CES-D = center for epidemiologic studies depression scale, CRT-O = cognitive remediation therapy for obesity, DASS-21 = depression anxiety stress scale 21 items, EBT = emotional brain training, FRBA = food-related behavioral activation, HADS = hospital anxiety and depression scale, HCLF = high carbohydrate and low fat diet, HDRS = Hamilton depression rating scale, HGL = high glycemic index, HP = high protein diet, HPLC = high protein, low carbohydrate diet, LCD = low calorie diet, LCHF = low carbohydrate, high fat diet, LED = low energy diet, LF = low fat diet, LGL = low glycemic index, LPHC = low protein, high carbohydrate diet, MHP = moderately high protein diet, MINI = mini international neuropsychiatric interview, N/A = not applicable, NF = nut-free diet, PHQ-9 = patient health questionnaire, POMS = profile of mood states, SD = standard deviation, VLCD = very low calorie diet.
The sample sizes of included studies ranged between n = 25 [ 29 ] and n = 1025 [ 30 ] participants, and adherence and completion rates varied between ≈60% [ 31 ] and 100% [ 28 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] (see Table 1 ). Mean age of patients was reported in 19 studies, with a combined mean of 47.1 years. Gender was reported in 21 studies with a total of 2041 females and 863 males. The mean BMI was reported in 15 studies and pooling those means gave a mean of 33.9 kg/m 2 . The shortest intervention duration was 28 days [ 28 ] whilst the longest was 52 weeks [ 31 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. One study did not explicitly state the data collection end point [ 35 ].
The most frequently used depression scale was Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI) used by 11 studies [ 25 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 35 , 39 , 40 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ], followed by the Profile of Mood States (POMS) used in six [ 28 , 31 , 39 , 41 , 44 , 46 ], and the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) [ 28 , 36 , 38 ] and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) used in three [ 29 , 47 , 48 ]. Two studies used the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) [ 34 , 49 ] A further seven scales were used by some studies, either in conjunction with the aforementioned, or on their own (see Table 1 ). The majority of studies compared different dieting therapy groups to each other, with only three studies comparing an energy-restricted dieting group to a nondieting control group [ 43 , 47 , 50 ].
A summary of the findings of each of the included studies can be found in Table 2 . Not all studies provided all values for every outcome measure but all of them commented on the desired outcomes, i.e., the effects of diet interventions on depressive symptoms in obese or overweight participants. Overall, the majority of studies concluded that weight loss, whether through calorie restriction, dietary supplements, or behavioral training, resulted in a reduction of depressive symptoms, with reported values of effect sizes on depression and depressive symptoms varying between a Cohen’s d of 0.16 [ 42 ] and 0.64 [ 49 ], while effect sizes of weight change ranged from a Cohen’s d of 0.0 [ 31 ] to 0.45 [ 39 ].
Findings of included studies.
Study | Weight kg (Mean ± SD) | BMI kg/m (Mean ± SD) | Depression | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Post | -Value | Baseline | Post | -Value | Baseline | Post | -Value | |
Bot et al. [ ] | P: 31.4 P + FRBA: 31.2 S: 31.3 S + FRBA: 31.7 | P: 7.3 (4.1) P + FRBA: 7.4 (4.4) S: 7.9 (4.4) S + FRBA: 7.1 (4) | |||||||
Breymeyer et al. [ ] | HGL: 2.80 LGL: 2.03 | = 0.002 | |||||||
Brinkworth, Buckley et al. [ ] | LCHF: 96 ± 1.6 HCLF: 97.6 ± 1.6 | LCHF: 82.3 ± 2.1 HCLF: 83.9 ± 1.9 | BDI: POMS: = 0.05 | ||||||
Brinkworth, Luscombe-Marsh et al. [ ] | LC: 101.8 ± 2 HCLF: 101.1 ± 2 | LC: 92.6 ± 2 HCLF: 91 ± 2 | |||||||
Canheta et al. [ ] | 46.3 ± 6.5 | < 0.001 | |||||||
Coates et al. [ ] | AED: 84.4 ± 12 NF: 85.4 ± 14 | AED: 84.8 ± 1.38 NF: 85.6 ± 1.36 | > 0.05 | AED: 30.2 ± 0.44 NF: 30.6 ± 0.43 | AED: 30.5 ± 0.44 NF: 30.3 ± 0.43 | > 0.05 | AED: 0.89 ± 1.9 NF: –3.74 ± 1.88 | AED: 1.11 ± 2.2 NF: –2.22 ± 2.17 | POMS: > 0.05 |
Crerand et al. [ ] | D: 97.8 ± 13.5 C: 96.1 ± 12.1 | D: 36.2 ± 4.5 C: 35.3 ± 4.3 | D vs. C: | D: 7.7 ± 5.5 C: 7.4 ± 5.9 | < 0.001 | ||||
Fuller et al. [ ] | D: 90.9 ± 12.2 C: 93.8 ± 12.7 | D: –7.9 ± 2.1 C: 0.1 | D: 34.1 ± 4.3 C: 35.2 ± 4.8 | D: 22.1 ± 8.1 C: 23.7 ± 11.1 | D: 19.3 ± 6 C: 25.3 ± 12.7 | POMS: time x group < 0.001 | |||
Galletly et al. [ ] | HPLC: 104.2 ± 5.3 LPHC: 98.6 ± 4.6 | HPLC: –6.9 ± 0.8 LPHC: –8.5 ± 6.3 | HPLC: 37.6 ± 6.4 LPHC: 37.2 ± 6.9 | HPLC: 34.5 ± 5.7 LPHC: 34.5 ± 6.3 | HPLC: 5.6 ± 3.2 LPHC: 4.8 ± 3.4 | HPLC: 3.6 ± 2.8 LPHC: 3.4 ± 3.3 | HPLC: < 0.001 LPHC: NS | ||
Hadi et al. [ ] | 89.4 ± 16.1 | –5.2% ± 4.3% | < 0.001 | 31.1 ± 3.9 | 5 ± 4.6 | 2 ± 4.1 | < 0.001 | ||
Halyburton et al. [ ] | LCHF: 93.6 ± 2.1 HCLF: 97 ± 2.1 | LCHF: 33.3 ± 0.6 HCLF: 33.8 ± 0.6 | < 0.001 | ||||||
Hariri et al. [ ] | Su: 84.3 ± 11.7 P: 79.3 ± 11.4 | Su: 78.96 ± 10.84 P: 76.89 ± 11.35 | < 0.001 | Su: 32.4 ± 3.73 P: 31.2 ± 3.87 | S: 30.4 ± 3.55 P: 30.3 ± 3.89 | < 0.001 | Su: 25.4 ± 9.42 P: 26.17 ± 11.21 | Su: 25.4 ± 9.42 P: 26.17 ± 11.21 | < 0.001 |
Lutze et al. [ ] | HP: 100.5 ± 1.8 HC: 102.6 ± 1.8 | HP: –12.3 ± 1.4 HC: –10.9 ± 1.4 | HP: 23.4 ± 1.09 HC: 23.04 ± 1.05 | HP: 20.77 ± 0.97 HC: 20.19 ± 0.94 | POMS: < 0.001 SF-36 subscales vitality and mental health: < 0.001 | ||||
Pedersen et al. [ ] | Median: 92.8 | LED: < 0.001 | Median: 31.4 | ||||||
Raman et al. [ ] | CRT-O: 40.3 ± 7.8 C: 39.2 ± 7.4 | CRT-O: 38.9 ± 7.6 C: 39.7 ± 8.4 | CRT-O:19.1 ± 11.2 C: 13.3 ± 12.2 | CRT-O: 4.5 ± 5.1 C: 15.4 ± 12.2 | |||||
Rodriguez-Lozada et al. [ ] | 87.7 | –8.6 | < 0.001 | 31.6 | –3.1 | < 0.001 | 6.6 | –2.7 | < 0.001 |
Ruusunen et al. [ ] | –3.14 ± 4.5 | 30.5 ± 3.4 | –1.16 ± 1.74 | I vs. C: = 0.024 | I: 6.8 ± 5.6 | I: –0.9 ± 4.5 | I: | ||
Sanchez et al. [ ] | Pro: 95.1 ± 13.9 | Pro: –5.3 ± 4.3 | Pro: 33.8 ± 3.3 | Pro: 4.4 ± 4.1 | Pro: –1.5 ± 3 | < 0.05 | |||
Uemura et al. [ ] | I: 66.3 ± 8.74 | I: 64.6 ± 8.07 | < 0.001 | I: 27.8 ± 3.1 | I: 27.1 ± 2.82 | < 0.001 | I: 17.64 ± 13.58 | I: 10.05 ± 7.4 | < 0.001 |
Tan et al. [ ] | D: 93.8 C: 93.1 | D: 92.7 C: 94.4 | D: < 0.05 | D: 29.4 C: 29.2 | D: 5.0 C: 4.0 | D: 4.0 C: 3.0 | < 0.05 | ||
Vaghef-Mehrabany et al. [ ] | For >1.9kg weight loss: HDRS: 13.2 BDI: 19.5 | For >1.9kg weight loss: HDRS: 9.1 BDI: 14.7 | For >1.9kg weight loss: HDRS: < 0.001 BDI: = 0.006 | ||||||
Vigna et al. [ ] | HE: 33.1 ± 0.84 C: 33.4 ± 0.83 | HE: 32.01 ± 0.82 C: 32.08 ± 0.88 | HE: 48.8 ± 1.03 | HE: 43.2 ± 2.38 | HE: | ||||
Webber et al. [ ] | BWL: 99 ± 16.7 EBT: 101 ± 10.8 | BWL: 36 ± 4.3 EBT: 37 ± 4.9 | BWL: –1.3 EBT: –0.6 | BWL: < 0.001 EBT: = 0.032 BWL vs. EBT: | BWL: 7.5 ± 6.4 EBT: 10.4 ± 9.8 | BWL: –2.9 EBT: –3.1 | BWL: = 0.012 EBT: = 0.006 | ||
Wing et al. [ ] | 103.2 ± 16.9 | VLCD: 14.6 ± 9.4 BD: 11.4 ± 7.2 | VLCD: 5 ± 6.3 BD: 2.9 ± 2.8 | VLCD: BD: |
Abbreviations: AED = almond-enriched diet, BD = balanced diet, BDI = Beck’s depression inventory, BDI-II = Beck’s Depression Inventory-2, BWL = behavioral weight loss, C = control, CES-D = center for epidemiologic studies depression scale, CRT-O = cognitive remediation therapy for obesity, D = diet, EBT = emotional brain training, FRBA = food-related behavioral activation, HCLF = high carbohydrate and low fat diet, HDRS = Hamilton depression rating scale, HE = H. erinaceus supplement, HGL = high glycemic index, HP = high protein diet, HPLC = high protein, low carbohydrate diet, I = intervention group, LCHF = low carbohydrate, high fat diet, LED = low energy diet, LGL = low glycemic index, LPHC = low protein, high carbohydrate diet, NF = nut-free diet, P = placebo, Pro = probiotic group, POMS = profile of mood states, S = supplements, Su = sumac supplement group, SD = standard deviation, SF-36 = short form health status survey, VLCD = very low calorie diet.
As we obtained studies in people with obesity and diagnosed depression and with obesity and depressive symptoms without the clinical diagnosis of depression, we will report on these two types of studies in separate sections. In people with obesity and depressive symptoms, but no diagnosis of depression, authors used different treatment approaches: energy restricted diets, energy restricted diets plus pre/probiotic supplementation, diet combined with an exercise intervention, and counselling. Thus, we dedicated one paragraph to each of these approaches. However, as these are not disjointed categories, some studies fell into multiple categories.
Of the included studies only three were conducted in participants with concurrent obesity and clinically established depressive disorder. Participants in these three studies were on an energy restricted diet plus an additional supplement or placebo. Hariri et al. reported all relevant values for weight, BMI, and depression scores and demonstrated a decrease in weight and depression scores for both groups (sumac vs. placebo) [ 33 ]. Vaghef-Mehrabany et al. [ 25 ] and Vigna et al. [ 37 ] did not provide values for all groups at all time points but nonetheless commented on the outcomes. Vaghef-Mahrabany et al. did not find any difference between the group receiving supplementation and the placebo group, however, they did note that regardless of group classification, participants that lost more than 1.9 kg of weight showed significantly improved depression scores. In contrast, Vigna et al. reported significant reductions in depression scores for the group receiving the H. erinaceus supplement.
Studies of energy restricted diets.
The majority of studies ( n = 16) investigated the effects of specific calorie restricted diets on weight and depressive symptoms in overweight or obese participants without an established current clinical diagnosis of depression. None of the studies included here reported full datasets with values at each time point and corresponding significance values. Most authors reported a decrease in depressive symptoms following a calorie restricted diet, aside from one study [ 48 ] that reported no change in depression scores. Three studies compared a calorie restricted diet with a noncalorie restricted control group, and all three found a reduction in both weight and depression scores in the intervention group [ 40 , 43 , 50 ]. However, most studies compared different calorie reduced diets with each other, i.e., four studies compared a low carbohydrate, high fat (LCHF) diet with a high fat, low carbohydrate (HCLF) diet [ 29 , 31 , 39 , 44 ], one study compared a high protein diet with a high carbohydrate diet [ 41 ], one study compared a high protein diet with low fat diet [ 32 ], one compared a very low calorie diet with an energy reduced balanced diet [ 42 ], and one study compared the traditional Brazilian diet with olive oil supplementation [ 47 ]. The remaining studies on energy restricted diets included the use of dietary supplements and will thus be discussed separately in the next section.
Three studies reported on the impact of calorie restriction with additional pre/probiotic supplementation [ 25 , 45 , 49 ]. Hadi et al. [ 49 ] and Sanchez et al. [ 45 ] found a significant decrease in depression scores for the groups receiving pro/prebiotics whereas Vaghef-Mehrabany et al. [ 25 ] reported a decrease in depression scores for participants who achieved a weight loss greater than 1.9kg regardless of prebiotic supplementation.
Four studies investigated the impact of diet and exercise/lifestyle interventions on depressive symptoms [ 35 , 39 , 40 , 48 ]. Three of them reported significant reductions in depression scores accompanying reductions in weight, except from Pedersen et al. [ 48 ] who reported no differences in depression scores between the two groups (aerobic interval training (AIT) vs. low energy diet (LED)) even though the LED group achieved a 10.4% decrease in body weight.
We found seven studies that reported on the effects of supplements without calorie restriction [ 46 ] or on the effects of behavioral modifications/counselling on depression scores [ 28 , 30 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 38 ]. These studies were not specifically prescribing calorie restricted diets but were rather providing additional supplements and/or counselling on healthy lifestyle modifications, such as dietary and exercise recommendations. The exception to this was the Breymeyer et al. study, which did not include any training or calorie restriction but was comparing the effects of a high glycemic (HG) diet (vs. a low glycemic (LG) diet) on depression scores [ 28 ]. The authors concluded that mood disturbance was higher for the group on the HG diet, with higher depression scores associated with higher glycemic load. Coates et al. investigated the effects of an almond-enriched diet compared to a nut-free diet and found no differences in depression scores between the two groups [ 46 ]. Three studies [ 35 , 36 , 38 ] investigated what effect counselling or behavioral training has on depression scores and all three found improvements in depressive symptoms following the intervention. One study investigated the effects of multinutrient supplementation and/or food-related behavioral activation therapy (in a 2 × 2 design) on depressive symptoms and did not find any significant effect of either on depression scores [ 30 ]. Lastly, one study compared the effect of behavioral weight loss with or without cognitive remediation therapy on body weight and depression scores and found no changes in depression scores between the two groups [ 34 ].
4.1. summary of the main findings.
This systematic review summarizes the existing data on the effects of diet on depressive symptoms in overweight or obese patients. Findings from the included studies were mixed, with the majority of studies reporting significant improvements in depression scores after diet and weight loss, and the remaining studies reporting no differences between depression scores between pre- and postintervention [ 34 , 46 , 48 ]. No studies reported deterioration of depressive symptoms aside from one that reported increased mood disturbance in participants on a high glycemic load diet [ 28 ]. Importantly, the majority of authors reported high adherence to the intervention, whether those were hypocaloric diets or supplements. The trend of obese individuals experiencing an improvement in their depressive symptoms after diet and weight loss is in line with previous research. Dietary interventions using a calorie-restricted diet (e.g., [ 25 , 29 , 44 ]) resulted in decreases in depressive symptoms. However, the results are less clear for dietary supplements (e.g., [ 33 , 37 , 46 ]). Overall, the dietary approaches were heterogenous in that the diets investigated were calorie reduced, traditional, high/low in protein, high/low in carbohydrates, with/or without pre-/probiotic, vitamins, or naturopathic supplements.
It is well established that depression and obesity co-occur to a high degree [ 5 , 6 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ], however the relationship between the two disorders is complex and currently of ambiguous directionality. Stunkard et al. presented a summary on the existing data using a moderator/mediator framework in which they classified eating and physical activity as an important mediator of obesity and comorbid depression [ 16 ]. Some authors consider depression as a consequence of obesity resulting from societal stigmatization, dissatisfaction with one’s appearance, and low self-esteem [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. Others consider obesity as resulting from decreased physical activity, excessive ‘comfort’ eating, and antidepressant medication use that often accompanies depression [ 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ].
Several epidemiological studies have found associations between mood and diet. Particularly, a western-style diet high in processed foods and sugar content and low in fruits and vegetables, is associated with worsening of mood states. Indeed, one of our included studies found increases in depression scores in participants on a high glycemic load diet [ 28 ]. Diets that are high in carbohydrates but low in fat and protein have also been associated with lower mood scores in cross-sectional studies [ 63 , 64 ], whereas an abundance of research extols the beneficial effects of Mediterranean-style diets [ 65 ] which are high in fruit, vegetables, nuts, pulses and wholegrains, low in fat and carbohydrate, with very little processed foods. The differences in mood scores between these two types of diets are thought to be partly due to the increased systemic inflammation and oxidative processes that often accompanies a western-style diet [ 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ].
Research has exposed metabolic and inflammatory dysregulation as a common denominator in depression and obesity [ 70 , 71 ]. Additionally, both depressed and obese patients exhibit dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis [ 72 , 73 ] and consequently chronic elevations in cortisol [ 74 , 75 ]. Increases in cortisol levels have been reported as having a causal role in depression, as well as leading to weight gain, specifically in abdominal adiposity. Recently, white adipose tissue (WAT) has been conceptualized as an endocrine organ, as opposed to how it was previously thought of—as an inert storage tissue—due to its ability to produce cytokines and other related molecules. Among these are interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [ 76 , 77 , 78 ], which are known proinflammatory cytokines, as well as chemokines, including monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 [ 79 , 80 ]. The ensuing signaling cascade leads to immune activation and white blood cell accumulation, and an overall increased inflammatory response. This immune activation has various downstream effects. For example, IL-2 reduces tryptophan plasma levels [ 81 ], possibly by activating tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). Tryptophan is an essential amino acid necessary for 5-HT synthesis. Low levels of tryptophan could lead to lower levels of serotonin and thus affect mood. Another example is the accumulation of peripheral monocytes in the brain as a result of systemic inflammation [ 82 ], and specifically the increased production of MCP-1 in hypothalamic neurons. This monocyte migration has been associated with increased anxiety and depression [ 83 ]. Minimization of accumulated adipose tissue through weight loss could attenuate this inflammatory process, leading to improved mood.
Another molecule implicated in both obesity and depression is leptin. Leptin is a peptide hormone released by adipocytes and crosses the blood–brain barrier via a saturable transport mechanism. Low plasma levels of leptin have been observed in depressed patients [ 84 , 85 ]. In the case of obesity however, plasma leptin levels have been found to be elevated [ 86 , 87 ]. This contradictory finding can be explained by leptin resistance (as in the case of type 2 diabetic patients being resistant to insulin) and could be a result of impaired transport across the blood–brain barrier, of reduced function of the leptin receptor, or errors in signal transduction [ 88 , 89 ]. Similar to cortisol and inflammatory molecules described previously, leptin modulates HPA axis function [ 90 , 91 ]. Leptin also interacts with monoamines and although its effect on monoamine neurotransmission remains unclear, there is evidence for leptin’s involvement in the 5-HT system [ 92 ] and in the activation of STAT3 in dopamine neurons of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) [ 93 ]. Reducing the amount of adipose tissue through diet and subsequent weight loss could ameliorate leptin resistance, reinstate leptin function, and relieve low mood.
It should be borne in mind that psychosocial attributes may affect physiology, and the distinction between the two mechanisms here is for ease of discussion. A good example of this environment x biology interaction is the finding that weight discrimination, often experienced by obese individuals, increases cortisol levels [ 94 ]. Additionally, repeated discrimination can lead to lower self-esteem and increased negative affect [ 95 ]. Many studies have reported on the negative attitudes of employers, peers, and even clinicians towards obese persons [ 96 , 97 ]. Continued maltreatment can impact obese persons’ mood and self-concept, both of which can contribute to depression.
Even if obese individuals do not experience weight discrimination or stigma by others, their self-esteem could be impacted by their own body image dissatisfaction (BID). Some research has found correlations between BID and depressive symptoms and suggested that obesity confers risk for developing depression through increased BID [ 98 , 99 ]. Therefore, it is possible that losing weight improves body image satisfaction and low mood. For a more thorough discussion see Markowitz et al. [ 100 ].
It is important to note that some researchers posit that while obese individuals experiencing weight loss also experience an improvement in mood, this improvement does not seem to be mediated by the weight loss itself but is rather related to active participation in treatment [ 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 ].
Given the high prevalence of obesity and depression and the strain exerted on healthcare systems it would be of great value if prescribing dietary modifications for the amelioration of obesity had the additional consequence of improving depressive symptoms. Our findings suggest that dietary interventions leading to weight loss improve mood scores in both clinically and subclinically depressed obese individuals. Importantly, adherence to intervention seemed to be high in our included studies, which provides clinicians reason for optimism.
People with obesity and depression or depressive symptoms are a particularly vulnerable group who are at risk of worsening of depressive symptoms (e.g., [ 105 ]), switching from depression to mania (e.g., [ 106 ]), and of the appearance of eating disorder symptoms (e.g., [ 107 ]). Thus, further studies in obese and depressed patients should focus on the safety of diets regarding the reoccurrence of depressive symptoms, the switch from depression to mania, and the appearance of eating disorder symptoms.
This is the first review to systematically collate research on the effects of dietary interventions on depression and depressive symptoms in overweight/obese patients. Our strict inclusion of longitudinal clinical trials strengthens the validity of our findings. Additionally, the quality of most of the studies was good, and only one was deemed fair (see Table 1 ). However, the respective study quality was deemed good according to each study’s specific research question which is not the same as being of good quality to answer the research question of this review. Therefore, our finding of weight loss ameliorating depression scores in obese individuals is based on limited and heterogeneous data.
Furthermore, even though a meta-analytic approach would have provided more quantifiable evidence, such an approach would have been inappropriate based on the heterogeneity of the studies. This heterogeneity emerged from both the plethora of dietary approaches investigated as well as the varied comparison groups, and the lack of data. However, future meta-analytic research could investigate well-defined dietary categories by being less stringent with inclusion criteria, for example by including all studies in depressed patients regardless of the weight status.
A further limitation of our review is the inclusion of only three studies that compared the depression scores of participants in an energy-restricted diet group to a non-dieting control group. The lack of well-defined randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with this specific research question limits the validity and generalizability of our conclusion. Further RCTs are necessary to confirm the trend we have noted in this review.
Our study focused on the use of diet in people with both, obesity and depression. We did not include studies if obesity was not an important aspect of the study design, e.g., the SMILES trial [ 108 ] and the HELFIMED study [ 109 ], both of which showed that dietary improvement is associated with a reduction in depression scores. However, this systematic review focused on people with both, obesity and depression, because we wanted to investigate whether dietary modifications would help people who suffer from both disorders.
The findings of the current review provide preliminary evidence for the importance of weight loss in obese individuals experiencing low mood. The majority of studies included showed decreases in depression scores following dietary interventions, specifically through calorie-restricted diets. This is in line with a large body of research reporting amelioration of depressive symptoms in obese patients after weight loss. It is plausible that pursuing dietary interventions for obese patients with comorbid depression could have the additional benefit of relieving some of their depressive symptoms as well as improving their metabolic profile and cardiovascular risk. Therefore, a restricted diet might specifically help people with type 2 depression which is characterized by an increased appetite and weight gain, leaden paralysis, hypersomnia, and a persistently poor metabolic profile [ 13 ].
In summary, people with obesity and depression appear to be a specific subgroup of depressed patients. In this subgroup, calorie-restricted diets could constitute a promising personalized treatment approach which might lead to a reduction of depressive symptoms. The underlying mechanisms at play may be related to the immune and endocrine systems and to psychosocial aspects obesity.
Original idea by H.H.; H.H., A.H.Y., U.S. and B.W.J.H.P. developed the scientific concept of the manuscript; O.P. and J.K. performed the systematic review; O.P. drafted the manuscript, and all authors provided feedback; all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
O.P., U.S., H.H., and A.H.Y. received salary support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, KCL. U.S. and A.H.Y. are also supported by NIHR Senior Investigator Awards. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, or the UK Department of Health.
Informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
1. Introduction. Obesity is a chronic disease that is increasing in prevalence and is now considered to be a global epidemic. Epidemiologic studies have revealed an association between high body mass index (BMI) and an extensive range of chronic diseases such as Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver (NAFL), cardiovascular disease , , diabetes mellitus , several malignancies , , musculoskeletal diseases ...
The prevalence of obesity has tripled over the past four decades, imposing an enormous burden on people's health. Polygenic (or common) obesity and rare, severe, early-onset monogenic obesity ...
New study released by the Lancet shows that, in 2022, more than 1 billion people in the world are now living with obesity. Worldwide, obesity among adults has more than doubled since 1990, and has quadrupled among children and adolescents (5 to 19 years of age). The data also show that 43% of adults were overweight in 2022.
But a new analysis quantifies the upsurge. More than 1 billion people worldwide were living with obesity as of 2022, researchers report February 29 in the Lancet. That's about one-eighth of the ...
The major part of research efforts in polygenic obesity has been focused on adult cohorts ... Furthermore, high-fat diet (+/− fructose) fed mice revealed a decreased CTP1a activity and thus a decreased fat metabolism, whereas knockdown of the fructose metabolism enhanced CPT1a activity . Taken together, EWAS studies have extensively helped to ...
The combined burden of underweight and obesity has increased in most countries, driven by an increase in obesity, while underweight and thinness remain prevalent in south Asia and parts of Africa. A healthy nutrition transition that enhances access to nutritious foods is needed to address the remaining burden of underweight while curbing and reversing the increase in obesity.
A new analysis has revealed regions of the genome linked to both elevated levels of body fat and protection from some of the negative health impacts of obesity. ... Research & Funding Expand Research & Funding. Current Funding Opportunities. Research Programs & Contacts. Human Subjects Research.
Research on the causes of obesity has about a 100-year-long history (). One of the first attempts to understand the inheritance of body ... and limbic system. The most significant gene sets revealed pathways related to synaptic function; glutamate signaling; noradrenaline, dopamine, and serotonin release cycles and γ-aminobutyric acid ...
Previous research has investigated the genetic regulation of blood pressure regulatory ... KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed that key obesity genes were enriched in signaling pathways in ...
Introduction. Obesity is linked with elevated risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [].An increasing trend in obesity prevalence since the early 1980s has posed a significant population health burden across the globe [] while obesity prevalence varies by region and country [1, 3].Country-specific trends in obesity are generally tracked using longitudinal panel or repeated cross-sectional ...
Obesity is a condition in which excess fat has accumulated in the body, such that it can have an adverse effect on health. Obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) of greater than 30 kg/m2.
More than a billion people are living with obesity around the world, global estimates published in The Lancet show. This includes about 880 million adults and 159 million children, according to ...
See the 2020-2030 Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research. The NHLBI is an active member of the National Collaborative on Childhood Obesity (NCCOR) external link. , which is a public-private partnership to accelerate progress in reducing childhood obesity. The NHLBI has been providing guidance to physicians on the diagnosis, prevention ...
Worldwide adult obesity has more than doubled since 1990, and adolescent obesity has quadrupled. In 2022, 2.5 billion adults (18 years and older) were overweight. Of these, 890 million were living with obesity. In 2022, 43% of adults aged 18 years and over were overweight and 16% were living with obesity. In 2022, 37 million children under the ...
1. Introduction. Obesity is a chronic disease that is increasing in prevalence and is now considered to be a global epidemic. Epidemiologic studies have revealed an association between high body mass index (BMI) and an extensive range of chronic diseases such as Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver (NAFL), cardiovascular disease [1], [2], diabetes mellitus [1], several malignancies [3], [4 ...
However, this SLR also reveals that only limited research has reported using ML specifically for detecting obesity. This aspect remains a promising research area because ML techniques can provide far more robust rates of prediction accuracy than those achieved using simple techniques, including statistical methods, such as linear regression.
Background. There has been a significant global increase in obesity rate during the last 50 years. Obesity is defined as when a person has a body mass index [BMI (kg/m 2), dividing a person's weight by the square of their height] greater than or equal to 30, overweight is defined as a BMI of 25.0-29.9.Being overweight or obesity is linked with more deaths than being underweight and is a more ...
This means that more than 100 million adults have obesity, and more than 22 million adults have severe obesity. The prevalence of obesity increased from 30.5% in 1999-2000 2 to 41.9% in 2017-March 2020. During the same time, the prevalence of severe obesity increased from 4.7% to 9.2%. Note: Obesity is defined as having a body mass index (BMI ...
The WHO classification using BMI defines undernutrition as <18.5 kg/m 2, normal weight as 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2, overweight as 25-29.9 kg/m 2, obesity as ≥30 kg/m 2, and ≥40 kg/m 2 is ...
A new small study led by Johns Hopkins Medicine researchers and published July 25 th in the journal Nature Cardiovascular Research has revealed the impact of obesity on muscle structure in ...
Obesity has become a global epidemic and is one of today's most public health problems worldwide. Obesity poses a major risk for a variety of serious diseases including diabetes mellitus, non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD), cardiovascular disease, hypertension and stroke, and certain forms of cancer (Bluher, 2019).Obesity is mainly caused by imbalanced energy intake and expenditure due to a ...
A recent study by the American Cancer Society reveals that unhealthy dietary habits can be linked to up to 35% of certain cancer types. ... Rising rates of obesity, coupled with declining fruit ...
Some studies revealed that individuals with gestational diabetes, obesity or MASLD have reduced serum NRG4 levels compared with control individuals [79,80,81,82]. However, one study found no link between serum NRG4 levels and MASLD [ 83 ] while another study found a positive correlation between serum NRG4 levels and insulin resistance [ 84 ].
New research in behavioral science has revealed that cynical thinking stands in the way of success in the workplace. Cynics, it turns out, earn less money, report lower job satisfaction, and are ...
Prevalence. The prevalence of paediatric obesity 16 has increased worldwide over the past five decades. From 1975 to 2016, the global age-standardised prevalence of obesity in children and adolescents aged 5-19 years increased from 0·7% (95% credible interval [CrI] 0·4-1·2) to 5·6% (4·8-6·5) for girls and from 0·9% (0·5-1·3) to 7·8% (6·7-9·1) for boys. 17 Since 2000, the ...
1. Introduction. Both depression and obesity are major public health concerns [1,2] with high worldwide prevalence and associated increased cardiovascular risks [3,4].Research has revealed an association between depression and obesity, with the prevalence of depression in obese individuals being twice as high as in those of normal weight [].The relationship between depression and obesity ...