freedom of speech and expression ielts essay

Welcome Guest!

IELTS Listening
IELTS Reading
IELTS Writing
IELTS Writing Task 1
IELTS Writing Task 2
IELTS Speaking
IELTS Speaking Part 1
IELTS Speaking Part 2
IELTS Speaking Part 3
IELTS Practice Tests
IELTS Listening Practice Tests
IELTS Reading Practice Tests
IELTS Writing Practice Tests
IELTS Speaking Practice Tests
All Courses
IELTS Online Classes
OET Online Classes
PTE Online Classes
CELPIP Online Classes
Free Live Classes
Australia PR
Germany Job Seeker Visa
Austria Job Seeker Visa
Sweden Job Seeker Visa
Study Abroad
Student Testimonials
Our Trainers
IELTS Webinar
Immigration Webinar

Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? – IELTS Writing Task 2

13 min read

Updated On Feb 09, 2024

freedom of speech and expression ielts essay

Share on Whatsapp

Share on Email

Share on Linkedin

Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? – IELTS Writing Task 2

Limited-Time Offer : Access a FREE 10-Day IELTS Study Plan!

This article contains Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? sample essays.

Given below is a real IELTS Writing Part 2 Essay question. We have provided sample essays as well as an essay outline so that you can practice writing your own!

Not sure how to approach IELTS Essay questions? Take a look at IELTS Writing Task 2 Preparation Tips and Tricks !

Learn how to write the perfect IELTS essay introduction for Band 9 score with the guide below!

Read the sample essay for Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In IELTS Writing Task 2, students are asked to write a formal essay of at least 250 words, in 4-5 paragraphs based on the given writing task 2 essay topics. The task is similar for both Academic and General Training with regards to the type of questions and the scoring, but the topics given for General Training will be slightly easier than Academic. Given below is an essay with sample answers that will help you to practise and get a good score.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Model Essay 01 :

Human beings have an unquestionable need to express themselves and their needs through various forms, the most common of which is speech. Therefore, my opinion is that the freedom of speech is of vital importance in order for a society to be called “free”.

Freedom of speech brings about numerous benefits which can be put into two aspects . The first one is for a nation. Freedom of speech, provided that it is protected by law, enables the press or a citizen to show the wrongdoings of one or some specific authorities. This gives a chance for careful inquiries to ensure the transparency of the authority. Thus, corruption can be hampered. Another consequent outcome is that the nation becomes appealing to both domestic and foreign investors, which boosts its economic growth a great deal. Given the freedom of speech, the press, or broadly speaking, the media, can also assist people in elections. Citizens can have a clearer view of the nominees through information from the media besides their campaigns to pick up the best person to lead the country. The other aspect is for each individual living in a society. Any citizen should be free to say what she believes is right and helpful for her life and her community. It means that people can speak up their opinion when there is something wrong, illegal, or negatively affect their lives. For instance, a group of citizens can show disapproval with an unfair policy on t ax payment publicly through a demonstration or on the media. This can put pressure on the government to consider their request and work out a solution. If people’s voice is respected, they will feel that their need of self expression is satisfied . Thus, the community becomes worth-living with people with a high sense of well-being .

In a nutshell, freedom of speech, once respected and guaranteed by law , is essential for a healthy society as it helps adjust the quality of the government and protect people from injustice. That is why it should be encouraged more widely.

Model Essay 02 :

Freedom of speech is very important for a citizen to upgrade himself and society. Freedom is a key point to initiate development and bring people closer, start networking and move forward for a mission like, Mission of change, Mission of independence etc.

Freedom of speaking is necessary for anyone either he is 2 years old kid or 60 years old man. It gives people courage to communicate to make decisions and work on that. For Example Politician: they speak in public places to make the commitments and plans to develop the country. Audience listen to them patiently, analyse their words and gives approval in the form of vote to win, so that he can get a chance to work on his promises and commitments.

Furthermore, Freedom is fragrance of beautiful society. It makes you extrovert and nourishes you to achieve defined goal . Whereas this privilege is only limited to politicians these days. Those who are not politicians and if they speak something true about someone, they can be killed or murdered, if the opponent party is stronger than them. It also limits anyone to take decisions and forces you to think 100 times before speaking in public place. Hence we become slaves in our own country.

Therefore, I truly believe that citizen should have freedom to speak in favour or against of anyone. Facing the problems and keeping quiet can bring disaster and put us in soup . Instead of giving up the problems we need to become unite and work together. Likewise, makes the hey when sun shines.

Model Essay 03 :

In the last decade, there has been considerable debate over the role of free speech in a free society. Some object to absolute freedom of speech. Others advocate free speech, arguing that the freedom of speech is the single most important political right of citizens in a civilized society. Whilst I believe that there are strong arguments on both sides, I would suggest that freedom of speech should be protected in all but extreme circumstances.

The freedom of speech is important at all levels in a society. Yet it is most important for government. A government which does not know what the people feel and think is in a dangerous position. This is how the communist regimes of Eastern Europe were toppled in the 1980s. The same is happening again in other regions of the world today. The governments that muzzle free speech run a risk of pushing their people to behave destructively or to rebel.

Furthermore, without free speech no political action is possible and no resistance to injustice and oppression is possible. Without free speech elections would have no meaning at all. Policies of contestants become known to the public and become responsive to public opinion only by virtue of free speech. Between elections the freely expressed opinions of citizens help restrain oppressive rule. Without this freedom it is futile to expect political freedom or consequently economic freedom.

In conclusion, I believe that the importance of free speech as a basic and valuable characteristic of a free society cannot be underestimated. It may be challenging for society to allow differences of opinion out into the open; however, the consequences of restricting free speech are likely to be more damaging in the longer term.

Model Essay 04 :

Freedom of speech is an origins freedom of liberal world. However, many people argue that sometimes we should restrict this right in order to maintain social harmony or state security. This point of view occurred even in free societies. For example, some countries denied people to express favor of Nazi ideologies. This essay describes why I totally refuse this opinion.

There were three main reasons for free societies to not abandon freedom of expression. Firstly, freedom of speech is a pillar of free societies itself because it have made another kind of freedom possible. For example, we hardly to imagine how people can stop authorities to abuse their bodies or properties if the not even have the right to speak that they don’t prefer it. It is not necessary to say that people participation or free election cannot be occurred if people not have the right to critic policies or candidates. We can do all of these only when we have freedom to speak as a precondition.

The following reason, some people may argue that even free societies have laws to protect people from harmful; however, speech is not an action. In other words, even hardest words harm nothing. Therefore, I accept that free societies have the right to stop dangerous action coming from speech, but it not has the right to blind the right to speak. It is undeniable that people have ability to said stupid words but free societies civilize enough to deal with it by neglect, tolerate, or social punishments like banned that people from communities.

For the last reason, worse speech still can give benefits to societies. Like scholar said: the function of bad idea is to make us know what is good idea look like. For instance, when some people speak support Nazi regime, public will turned to critics it and demonstrates why we should not listen to them, and, this will make children know how holocaust was terrible. Moreover, it is not necessary to say that some dangerous words in the past like Christian gospel can turn to be valuable words when the time was past. Thus, why we not leave the speech test its value by time instead of act like roman soldiers who execute Jesus.

All in all, freedom of expression is an important component of free societies. Moreover, we have another ways to deal with bad word in particular let it is experimented its value by time.

Model Essay 05 :

In the process of building the democracy in a fee society, there have been lots of tense debates over the vital role of free speech in the building of a democratic society. Some people object to absolute freedom of speech. Others advocate free speech, arguing that the freedom of speech is the most essential political right of citizens in a civilized society.

From my personal view point, I strongly opine that freedom of speech is not only essential for individuals in a society but also for governments as well for the reasons mentioned below: On the one hand, as responsible citizens, the people have the justifiable rights to contribute their opinions freely about the policies and the executions of the governments without any hindrances. For example: Martin Luther King strongly voiced his opinions to protest the discrimination against the skin color and urged the government to quickly apply what had been written in American Constitution, creating an equality to benefit the black community and the people as well. Moreover, a right leader should be chosen in free and fair election where he can present his opinions and policy which might be against the direction of the government . The tolerance of the ruling authority to accept opposing view-points possibly create a democratic atmosphere in political life of a country, promoting social development. On the other hand, the governments need to hear open voice to adjust their policies in accordance people’s ambitions while the governments that muzzle free speech definitely run the risk of being overthrown. For instance: During the period of 1980s, Vietnamese leaders have highly appreciated the opinions of the think tank consisting of intellectuals and launched the process of renovation, bringing about many brilliant achievements in the stabilizing of the political and economic situation. Contrarily, many Eastern European countries fell into collapse due to governing the country following outdated doctrines without listening to the people’s desires.

In conclusion, freedom of speech is extremely necessary to instill inspirations among the people in the society to contribute their opinions to improve and enhance all aspects of the country . It plays an important part in forcing the governments to incessantly improve their governing ways to better serve their people with the supervision and criticizing of public opinion.

Model Essay 06 :

Whether people should be allowed to raise their voice freely or not has long been of a debate. Some people say that freedom of speech is a right of human while others believe that this could lead to unexpected consequences for societies. I myself support the authorization of freedom of speech, especially in a free society.

To commence with, I think it is necessary that freedom of speech become part of people’s life for several reasons. First of all, there is no doubt that people benefit a lot from this policy. There would be more space for people to express what they think instead of keeping it for their own. Accordingly, people can voice their concerns and thinking on issues in societies regardless of ages, religions, complexions, social and political parties, etc. This might make them feel more and more liberate. Moreover, others might enrich their knowledge, cognition on different aspects of life thanks to the innovative and straightforward ideas that has been considered trivial or even illegal in several countries. Second of all, freedom of speech might, indirectly, help the development of any country. The fact is that there is more freedom granted for ordinary people in developed countries. It seems that people in these countries are free to raise their voice over matters or policies that they think are not for their interests. As their voices are heard by leaders of the countries, those problems might be corrected in a right way. In contrast, if there is limitation on the right of speech, people are not willing to speak out in a fear of possible punishments from authorities. This does not help to change the wrongdoings or inadequate policies that are introduced by relevant agencies. Nevertheless, some people fear that allowing freedom of speech might result in the chaos of society. They argue that as it is legal to say freely, some people abuse the free mass media to incite the disorder or disagreement of a society in order to support their political purposes. This is partly true, then again it does not represent the mass but only some dissidents who have opposing ideology and want to challenge legal governments. Also, freedom of speech does not mean ability to challenge the stability of any community. Therefore, similar acts like protest incitements will not be tolerated by authorities.

In general, there are still differences between those who support and oppose the authorization of freedom of speech. From my perspective, I believe that it is necessary to grant people this right in a free society. Governments should both legalize this policy and make sure that they can control adverse consequences.

Model Essay 07 :

Freedom of speech is a global problem and has become a controversial topic across the world recently. The raised question is that whether speaking freely is really needed in the liberal world. In my opinion, freedom of speech is an indispensable part of our lives but limited.

Foremost, freedom of speech is the demonstration of human rights and the demand of social development. By dint of speaking freely, people can express their will and aspiration, opinion and thought; and hence they are able to protect their own legitimate rights and interests in the individual or social issues. For instance, the citizens have the right to vote and veto, criticize and comment a law draft, decree or policy of their country. Moreover, thanks to freedom of speech the habitants are courageous to expose crime or illegal acts of some authorities such as corruption, bribery or abuse of power. Simultaneously, the residents also appraise the righteous deeds like charity. Consequently, an equitable, civilized and developed society is established, in which human rights has always been highly respected. However, freedom of speech is not only human right but obligation also. In fact, many habitants bribed by some political groups abused of free speech in order to overthrow their national government and make riots. In some cases, excessive free speech provoked, offended or insulted belief and ideology of the others. For example, Charlie Hebdo satirical French magazine has recently continued to post caricature of the prophet Mohammed of Islam, which led to the attack the publisher of two extremist Islamic militants, killed 12 people including general editor Mr. Stephane Charbonnie.

Thus, freedom of speech should be limited within the framework of the law to avoid the negative events. Concisely, freedom of expression is essential for the civilized and free society today, but should have certain limitation for a prosperous, stable and peaceful world.

Model Essay 08 :

Freedom of speech is very important in humans lives and in every era, it is also essential. In the past, people were not allowed to express their thoughts freely because of peremptory domination, caste discrimination, religious beliefs,…Nowadays, we need to improve this right for everyone.

Firstly, if people could express what they think and do not have to conceal their feelings, the society would develop positively. For example, if in the past,outrage and violence of some husbands in the family were usually be concealed because of some backward ideologies; in present, the wives have the rights to denounce the crimes and demand their rights. Or through facebook social networking site, users could post what they think and spread it to other people. They can be experience, knowledge, feeling or even questions for people to seek to answer. Clearly that when bad things are brought to light and boycott, good things are spread and share, our society would be an ideal and wonderful place to live. In addition, people should be given the right of feeling that they have the position in the society because they have their voice. One person would soon be stressful and vexatious when most of their thoughts are restrictive in the house. However, in contrast to the benefits that freedom of speech brings about, there are some bad effects. If the people are allowed all the things, they can spread untrue things or exaggerate everything up; as a result, we could not recognize what are true and what are false because there are a lot of information available by a lot of people. Sometimes, some political criminals abuse the right to disseminate bad information or spread untrue rumours that affect the government or officials.

In conclusion, I think freedom of speech should always be attached to every era and the way we think or say will affect our society considerably. Despite some harm effects, freedom of speech is still essential in free society.

Get Evaluated for FREE:

Do you have an essay on this topic? Please post it in the comments section. One of our IELTS trainers will evaluate your essay from an examiner’s point of view and reply to the comment. This service is completely FREE of cost.

Practice IELTS Writing Task 2 based on Essay types

Start Preparing for IELTS: Get Your 10-Day Study Plan Today!

Kasturika Samanta

Kasturika is a professional Content Writer with over three years of experience as an English language teacher. Her understanding of English language requirements, as set by foreign universities, is enriched by her interactions with students and educators. Her work is a fusion of extensive knowledge of SEO practices and up-to-date guidelines. This enables her to produce content that not only informs but also engages IELTS aspirants. Her passion for exploring new horizons has driven her to achieve new heights in her learning journey.

Explore other Direct Question Essays

Some People Say the Main Way to Be Happy in Life is to Have a Lot of Money – IELTS Writing Task 2

Raajdeep Saha

Many People Like to Wear Fashionable Clothes – IELTS Writing Task 2

Janice Thompson

Consumers Are Faced With Increasing Numbers of Advertisements From Competing Companies – IELTS Writing Task 2

Post your Comments

Ngan-ngoc-anh

Posted on Oct 10, 2023

The ongoing discussion revolves around whether everyone should be allowed complete freedom to express their beliefs and viewpoints on various societal issues through the internet. On the other hand, some argue that such a practice might worsen the situation. This topic holds great significance in the digital age, where online platforms have become widespread means of communication and self-expression.

Supporters of granting citizens full freedom to convey their personal opinions assert that this is a fundamental cornerstone of a democratic society. They contend that in a civilized and democratic nation, the unrestricted exchange of ideas and perspectives is essential for nurturing open discussions and accommodating diverse viewpoints. Additionally, they believe that enabling individuals to freely communicate their concerns and grievances empowers marginalized groups and fosters individual growth and learning. In essence, these proponents champion the unrestrained expression of personal opinions as an essential political right.

Nevertheless, there are those who voice concerns about the uncontrolled expression of personal opinions on the internet. They argue that this approach might lead to the spread of misinformation and hate speech, potentially amplifying false information and fueling online harassment and hostility. Furthermore, they suggest that an entirely open online environment could pose risks to public safety and erode social cohesion. In essence, these individuals propose that unrestrained expression of personal opinions may entail significant risks.

In my view, there is validity in both arguments. While I firmly believe in the value of freedom of expression and its role in a democratic society, it is crucial to acknowledge that with great freedom comes great responsibility. Hence, a balanced approach is necessary.

Promoting digital literacy and critical thinking can aid individuals in distinguishing reliable information from falsehoods and reducing the risk of spreading misinformation. Additionally, exercising responsible self-censorship can contribute to mitigating the dissemination of harmful content. Online platforms also play a role by implementing effective content moderation policies to maintain safe and productive online spaces.

In conclusion, the debate surrounding the freedom to express personal opinions on the internet is multifaceted. While complete freedom of expression is a vital democratic principle, it must be complemented by responsible behavior and thoughtful regulation to strike a balance between safeguarding individual liberties and ensuring societal well-being.

IELTS Expert

Posted on Jan 8, 2024

Overall Band: 5 Main ideas are difficult to identify and such ideas that are identifiable lack relevance, clarity and support. Large parts of the response are repetitive. Relationships between ideas is unclear and inadequately marked. There is some use of basic cohesive devices, which is mechanical.

To Get more Insights on IELTS Writing, Avail a FREE 1:1 Demo Class with Our Expert Trainer here and Get a FREE BAND 9 Sample answer too.

Posted on May 19, 2022

Modern societies frequently assume that living in a democratic country guarantees free speach. However, in each democracy some individuals still have to fight for their particular, yet fundamental liberties. Besides, citizenry needs the freedom of speech to increase political transparency. Thus, I believe it is crucial to defend it.

It is undeniable that nowadays it is easier than ever to express one’s thoughts and feelings. Nevertheless, some people reject the notion that every human being is different and that life choices may vary from one to another. If one does not convey his or hers desires, they will not be included in public discussion and consequently in law enforcement. For instance, a discussion on LGBT rights is taking place in Poland. Even though it is a free country, catholic governors which are predominant in parliament enact laws that prevent homosexual people from legalizing their relationships and having families. The only effective way to oppose such regulations is by protest and demonstration. Not surprisingly, the freedom of speech is essential to drive a debate and allow everyone to be heard.

What is more, the right of speaking freely is a reminder to authorities that their actions are being watched and commented on. If societies entrust almost every aspect of their lives to governments, they should be allowed to have an insight into their real activities. History provides numerous examples, such as Watergate scandal, which prove that governors can take malicious actions. Such incidents should be revealed to the public so that citizens can choose whether they should reelect the same senators or not. Freedom of speech without a doubt increases the transparency of governments.

In conclusion, although some tend to believe that speaking freely in democratic country is a redundant conception, I consider it is a problem which has a significant scope of improvement. People shall be conscious that some minorities have difficulties with exerting their rights. Additionally, it is essential to have the liberty to comment on governmental eventualities.

Posted on May 20, 2022

Band Score – 6

Concentrate on the correct usage of articles, prepositions, pronouns, verbs and punctuation.

Pay attention to spellings and word order in a sentence.

Use C2 level of words.

Posted on Nov 5, 2021

Man is a social being , and thus it is necessary for humans to communicate and interact with each other. However, in a few countries, many rules have been formulated which do not allow their citizens to fully enjoy the freedom of speech which is constituted on them by the government. This essay agrees with the notion that a free society guarantees that its people have no restrictions on their freedom of speech.

Evil and wrongdoings of the authorities cannot be weeded out unless people can freely express their agitation against this. In an autonomy, people usually cannot opine about the working of the government. Therefore, the negative aspects of their rule will not be brought to light ,and thus it will lead to the country’s and citizen’s ruin. A classic example of this is the The Third Realm. The dictatorship of Adolf Hitler in Germany proved to the world how important the right of speech is, as the residents were not allowed to speak up to the world and thus the world remained unaware of the cold – blooded massacres that were happening under his order. Thus, it should be ensured that a person’s liberty to express himself or herself should not be interfered in any way.

In addition, expression of one’s opinions, beliefs and stands on certain issues will bring together like -minded people, and this can further bring about better changes. For example, people with same perspectives can join their hands in organising charity funds for the poor and destitute..or for the people who have lost their loved ones in a natural disaster. There are numerous instances ..where a single individual on a social platform has gathered thousands around the world for a good initiative. Therefore, it is agreed that the freedom of speech is of utmost importance in a free society.

In conclusion, people in a free society will enjoy the privilege to voice their opinions and thus will call off the corruptions of those in power and also provide a chance to provide humanitarian relief.

Posted on Nov 6, 2021

Band score: 5.5

Grammar: Concentrate on pronoun usage and plural possessives.

Posted on Aug 29, 2021

An independent society does not suffer any kind of restrictions on speech, on religion or on caste. In my opinion, as right to freedom of speech assist people in expressing their views and opinions without any fear, thus, the same forms an integral part of a free nation. In the forthcoming paragraphs, this essay will delve deep into the arguments supporting my views on freedom of speech being pivot to independent society. With the independency of expressing views, citizens of a country are able to discuss their agreements and disagreements for any decision. As in any country wherein people are encouraged and are provided with an open platform to showcase their opinions regarding the different policies or acts of the government, people tend to enjoy more freedom than a country having restricted policy for right to speech. Moreover, it is with the help of this right only that people are able to speak against anything which goes wrong against their interest and thus, maintains freedom of choice in a nation. Furthermore, as in these nations, no policies can be just imposed on public and hence, it assists in maintaining complete freedom in a society. For instance, movement like ‘Black lives matter’ in the United States and ‘Farmers Protest’ in India are great example of freedom of speech, wherein people have come out to express their disappointments. Ergo, in my view, no society can be said an independent one unless its people are conferred with the right to speech. Freedom to speech acts as a primary source to eradicate oppression from a society and hence, building a free nation. There are many countries in the world, which does not provide the right to feely disseminate news by the media and exempts them from the basic right to speech. Such countries majorly operate under dictatorship and citizens of these countries do not have the right to speak against the government policies and thus suffers from oppression. Had public been given opportunity to speak out and give their opinions, such oppression by these governments would not sustain. Therefore, in my opinion, right to speech is a basic ingredient for a society to be free from any kind of oppression. In conclusion, right to freedom of speech gives a platform to people to express their opinions and raise their voice against oppressions, therefore, any society without these basic rights to their citizens cannot be said to be a free society

Posted on Sep 1, 2021

Overall band: 6.0

Grammar: Concentrate on subject verb agreement. Learn sentence structures and how to avoid disconnected sentence fragments.

Lexical Resource: Freedom of speech, oppression etc are repeated many times in the essay. Please use synonyms.

Recent Articles

People May No Longer Be Able to Pay for Things Using Cash – IELTS Writing Task 2

Nehasri Ravishenbagam

Many People Complain that They Have Difficulties Getting Enough Sleep – IELTS Writing Task 2

Our Offices

Gurgaon city scape, gurgaon bptp.

Step 1 of 3

Great going .

Get a free session from trainer

Have you taken test before?

Please select any option

Get free eBook to excel in test

Please enter Email ID

Get support from an Band 9 trainer

Please enter phone number

Already Registered?

Select a date

Please select a date

Select a time (IST Time Zone)

Please select a time

Mark Your Calendar: Free Session with Expert on

Which exam are you preparing?

Great Going!

Practice Test
Useful Tips – Tricks
Full Writing Review
General Writing Task
Writing Task 1
Writing Task 2
Writing Exercises
Writing Sample – Topics
Writing Vocabulary
Speaking Vocabulary
Intro Question
Speaking Part 1
Speaking Part 2
Speaking Part 2 – Audio
Speaking Part 3
IELTS Books
Recent Exams
IELTS Vocabulary
Essay from Examiners
IELTS Ideas

IELTS App - For Mobile

Ready for the IELTS exam with our IELTS app. Over 2 million downloads

Popular Last 24h

Writing task 2: it is impossible to help all people around the world in need so governments should focus on people from their own country., describe a book – you have recently read/ that you would like to read again, writing task 2: many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects, listening full test 6 - section 4, ielts speaking part 3: arriving late & managing study time, a street market in your city / a street market where you did shopping, writing task 1: the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the united kingdom in 1980 and 2010.

IELTS Test/Skills FAQs
IELTS Scoring in Detail
Forecast Speaking – 2023
List IELTS Speaking Part 3
List IELTS Speaking Part 1
IELTS Writing 2023 – Actual Test

Our Telegram

Join our community for IELTS preparation and share and download materials.

The information on this site is for informational purposes only. IELTS is a registered trademark of the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, or IDP Education Australia.

Latest Articles

Cue card – describe a gift you bought for someone, cue card – describe a place where you like to go shopping, ielts writing task 1 (process wasted glass bottles) – band 9, ielts speaking part 1: rubbish/ plastic garbage, talk about global warming (part 1/3), most popular, describe a ﬁlm that made you laugh, describe a person whom you met for the ﬁrst time and made you happy, topic: experience is the best teacher, describe something difﬁcult you would like to succeed in doing, in many countries，today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment..

IELTS Scores
Life Skills Test
Find a Test Centre
Alternatives to IELTS
General Training
Academic Word List
Topic Vocabulary
Collocation
Phrasal Verbs
Writing eBooks
Reading eBook
All eBooks & Courses

Freedom of Speech Essays

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

Click on the HTML link code below.
Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.

Band 7+ eBooks

"I think these eBooks are FANTASTIC!!! I know that's not academic language, but it's the truth!"

Linda, from Italy, Scored Band 7.5

IELTS Modules:

Other resources:.

All Lessons
Band Score Calculator
Writing Feedback
Speaking Feedback
Teacher Resources
Free Downloads
Recent Essay Exam Questions
Books for IELTS Prep
Useful Links

Recent Articles

Useful Language for IELTS Graphs

May 16, 24 04:44 AM

Taking a Gap Year

May 14, 24 03:00 PM

IELTS Essay: Loving Wildlife and Nature

May 10, 24 02:36 AM

Important pages

IELTS Writing IELTS Speaking IELTS Listening IELTS Reading All Lessons Vocabulary Academic Task 1 Academic Task 2 Practice Tests

Connect with us

IELTS is a registered trademark of University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia.

IELTS Practice.Org

IELTS Practice Tests and Preparation Tips

Band 9 IELTS Essays

Is Freedom Of Speech Necessary In A Free Society?

by Manjusha Nambiar · Published August 30, 2019 · Updated April 18, 2024

Need help with IELTS writing? Get your essays, letters and reports corrected by me.

Sample essay

It is debatable whether free speech is an absolute must or not. In my opinion, it should definitely be protected because it is crucial for the progress and wellbeing of the society; however, there are certain situations where it needs to be reined.

Like every other form of freedom, freedom of speech is not absolute. No one should have the right to say whatever they want regardless of the consequences. Words are like weapons. They can hurt if they are not wielded carefully. For example, if someone ridicules another for being born with a certain disability it can have a very damaging effect on the victim. Thus, in my opinion, people with disability should be protected from a personal attack wrapped in the name of free speech. Furthermore, any forms of bullying should not be tolerated. Whether it is verbal or physical, no one should suffer when another person exercises their freedom of speech. For instance, nowadays it is popular among web-users to ‘troll’ someone online. This act of ridiculing others on the web is popularly called trolling and it is very toxic. Trolling has even led to suicides. Therefore, freedom of speech should have its limits and law should be drafted to protect people from its misuse.

On the other hand, freedom of speech and expression is crucial for the healthy functioning of the society. The freedom to express opinions is crucial for a civilized society to correct its course for a better tomorrow. Regardless of how controversial an issue is, people should have the freedom to express themselves and be heard of. This is one way for the government to assess public sentiment and take actions for a brighter future. Hence, free speech is not only beneficial but also mandatory for a society to progress. Without it, authorities will have full control over the people and progress will not be made.

In conclusion, free speech should have its limitations and no one should be allowed to hurt another person by mouthing whatever they feel like. At the same time, it should be protected and encouraged because in a free society everyone has the right to be heard.

Tags: band 9 essay band 9 essay sample band 9 essay samples ielts writing samples

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

Next story Does Personality Describe The Person | Band 9 Essay Sample
Previous story Many High Level Positions In Companies Are Filled By Men

IELTS Mentor "IELTS Preparation & Sample Answer"

Skip to content
Jump to main navigation and login

Nav view search

IELTS Sample

IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.

Ielts essay # 114 - creative artists should be given freedom to express their ideas, ielts writing task 2/ ielts essay:, creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. there should be no government restrictions on what they do..

IELTS Essay
Writing Task 2
Agree/Disagree Essay
IELTS Writing Task 2

IELTS Materials

IELTS Bar Graph
IELTS Line Graph
IELTS Table Chart
IELTS Flow Chart
IELTS Pie Chart
IELTS Letter Writing
Academic Reading

Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Copyright Notice
HTML Sitemap

General Reading
Academic Reading
IELTS Writing Task 2
IELTS Writing Task 1

Essay#74 | Freedom of Speech

Decide whether you agree/disagree completely with the statement, partly agree/disagree with it, or have no definite opinion.

Choose one of these approaches:

State your position in the introduction and then justify it with arguments. This may be more suitable if you feel strongly about the statement.

Present the arguments first and then say what you think in the conclusion. This may be better if you have no strong opinion but can put forward arguments on both sides.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Some people think that professional athletes make good role models for young people, while others believe they don’t.

Discuss both these points of views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Model answer.

The freedom of speech is important at all levels in a society. Yet it is most important for the governments. A government which does not know what the people feel and think is in a dangerous position. This is how the communist regimes of Eastern Europe were toppled in the 1980s. The same is happening again in other regions of the world today. The governments that muzzle free speech run a risk of pushing their people to behave destructively or to rebel.

(285 words)

Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)

Table#8 | Worldwide Market Share of the Notebook Computer

The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007.

Table#7 | Teacher Training Qualifications

The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualifications in 2007/8 and 2008/9, and the proportion of male qualifiers.

Freedom of Speech and Expression Opinion Essay

It is indeed true that the freedom of individual expression largely emanates from the level of autonomy granted. When our individual autonomies are restricted, the freedom of expression is also affected. This implies that autonomy is the epitome of the freedom of expression in many ways.

Nonetheless, a certain level of restriction is usually applied by authorities in cases whereby the granted autonomy may lead to chaos or disruption of peace (de Zayas & Martín, 2012).

Some critics argue that individual autonomies may be restricted on the basis of persuasive speech. However, expressive statements that are too persuasive may not necessarily be stopped by the government except in extraordinary situations when such speeches are meant to cause fear. If negative consequences are brought about by a speech, then it is justifiable for the authorities to inject some restrictions (Kendrick, 2014).

Needless to say, offensive speech cannot be allowed by the government because it does not go hand in hand with the tenets of true autonomy. It can be proper for a speech to be permitted even if it is persuasive so long as it does not offend others. Perhaps, this is the point of diversion between autonomy and restriction of the freedom of expression.

There are myriads of laws that have been established with the aim of reviewing the impacts of freedom of speech. A speech might be considered to be offensive in various ways. In some cases, individuals are offended by the freedom of speech if they suspect that the impacts will be negative (Temperman, 2011). Owing to the persuasion principle, the freedom of speech cannot be easily suppressed.

It is also interesting to mention that a given piece of speech can be offensive without necessarily being persuasive. In other terms, a speech might be intrinsically offensive (McLaughlin, Uggen & Blackstone, 2012).

Self-fulfillment of every individual is the main factor that drives the freedom of speech and expression. The latter is also instrumental when seeking the autonomy of individuals. Freedom of opinion and expression is one of the crucial political freedoms and fundamental freedoms practiced globally (Claybourn, 2011). It goes hand in hand with freedom of information and specifically freedom of the press.

The latter refers to the freedom for a newspaper owner to say or be silent about what he sees fit in his journal. It is subject to response by the courts for libel or slander. Defamation and slander are the main reasons why restrictions on the notion of freedom of expression for any public speech exists (Temperman, 2011).

For some scholars like Kant, freedom of expression is necessary since it elevates the inner thoughts of an individual. Of course, the freedom to speak or write can be taken away by a higher power. We can say that this external power that robs men the freedom to communicate their mind publicly, also removes the freedom of thought.

The latter is a clear indication that the freedom of speech and expression have notable clash with the autonomy prescribed by individuals. One of the ways that can be used to bridge the gap or balance the conflict is the adoption of internationally recognized pieces of legislation that bind every nation (Temperman, 2011). For instance, the freedom of opinion should be presumed as a basic right to every individual.

The Human Rights declaration does not specify the particular conditions or restrictions on the freedom of expression. Nonetheless, a number of jurisdictions under the umbrella of the United Nations and countries bound by the declaration tend to restrict this freedom since it prohibits the language that agitate for racial, national or religious hatred (Temperman, 2011).

Freedom of expression is often the first freedom eliminated in totalitarian regimes. Since the late twentieth century, the emergence of various forms of mass communication such as the Internet alongside the inability of states to adapt to such technological developments have led to several challenges.

As a result, there has been growing need to control the freedom of expression and take it over completely as it is the case with a country like China (Temperman, 2011).

Freedom of expression is subject to limitations that are prescribed by law and are deemed necessary to respect the rights and reputation of others. This means that restrictions are often imposed on the freedom of expression whenever deemed necessary.

For security reasons (for example repression of incitement to commit crimes or offenses), restriction on the freedom of expression may be imposed and consequently affect the autonomy of individuals. Second, protection of the rights of individuals may take place when there are possibilities of repression of public insult and defamation, or the fight against racial discrimination and denial.

When individuals or institutions can intervene formally to limit expression outside the restricted case, we talk about censorship. Sex and violence are among the topics covered most often by censorship.

Several states also have laws against blasphemy, that are considered by several secular activists as an attack on the freedom of expression. Therefore, freedom of expression remains restricted in several jurisdictions (de Zayas & Martín, 2012).

Freedom of expression also encounters a severe limitation with respect to private life and hence the autonomy of an individual.

Freedom of expression is perhaps not the first or most fundamental freedom (freedom of movement is the first freedom or the freedom that determines priority and takes precedence over others). Freedom of expression has been dismissed by some political theorists as a Western perspective or philosophy (Temperman, 2011).

During the 1960s, the freedom of expression was sought by a significant number of pressure groups following attempts to recurrent pornographic or immoral literature materials that were censored. Today, there are myriads of legislations in place that address offensive terms that may be used against minority groups or religions.

Regularly, writers and publishers are concerned about the resurgence of censorship. The reason given in most cases is not pornography, but hate speech. In the United States, a new anti paparazzi came into effect in California since January 1, 2010. It has been claimed by the actress Jennifer Aniston and supported by several other celebrities.

Sexual harassment is obviously a criminal offense punishable by law. If committed by an employee; it is liable to disciplinary action that should be taken by the employer. In the context of labor relations, sexual harassment can take many forms: blackmail hiring or promotion, threats of retaliation if a victim refuses to give in to sexual advances, and so on (de Zayas & Martín, 2012).

The harasser can be the employer, a colleague of the victim, a recruiting firm or a customer of an organization. It is the responsibility of employers to take all necessary steps to prevent acts of sexual harassment, stop it and even inflict punishment to the offenders. Sexual harassment entails the act of imposing an indecent act of sexual behavior and tendencies on a person.

This may take place repeatedly and eventually culminate into impairing of a person’s dignity. Sexual harassment may also be executed verbally to the detriment of the victim’s personal values. An employee can be intimidated by all forms of sexual harassment and finally limit his or her autonomy. An individual may also be grossly humiliated in a situation that entails sexual harassment.

The scope of protection of victims and witnesses of sexual harassment in the context of the employment relationship is one of the pointers that can be put into consideration when exploring the issue of autonomy and the freedom of expression or speech. Although there are labor laws in place, it is the responsibility of employers to make sure that victims of sexual harassment are safeguarded.

What sanctions can be taken against the perpetrator of sexual harassment? In any case, individuals who have been sexually harassed at workplace may lack the autonomy to perform as per the expected standards since they fear losing their jobs (de Zayas & Martín, 2012).

Labor inspectors are in particular responsible for ensuring compliance with the provisions of the Labor Code and other legal requirements relating to employment (Claybourn, 2011). They are responsible, in conjunction with the officers and agents of the judicial police, to report violations stated in the labor laws provisions.

Acts of sexual harassment committed by an employee should be fully subjected to disciplinary sanction by the employer.

I believe that there is a difference in ideology between the perspectives exemplified in the above section. Therefore, the freedom of expression and autonomy of individuals should be exercised within the provisions of the law in order to bridge the gap or minimize the prevailing conflicts.

Claybourn, M. (2011). Relationships between moral disengagement, work characteristics and workplace harassment. Journal of Business Ethics, 100 (2), 283-301.

de Zayas, A., & Martín, Ã. R. (2012). Freedom of Opinion and Freedom of Expression: Some Reflections on General Comment No. 34 of the UN Human Rights Committee. Netherlands International Law Review, 59 (3), 425-454.

Kendrick, L. (2014). Free Speech and Guilty Minds. Columbia Law Review, 114 , 1255- 1295.

McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012). Sexual harassment, workplace authority, and the paradox of power. American Sociological Review, 77 (4), 625- 647.

Temperman, J. (2011). Freedom of expression and religious sensitivities in pluralist societies: Facing the challenge of extreme speech. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2011 (3), 729-757.

Chicago (A-D)
Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2019, June 23). Freedom of Speech and Expression. https://ivypanda.com/essays/freedom-of-speech-and-expression/

"Freedom of Speech and Expression." IvyPanda , 23 June 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/freedom-of-speech-and-expression/.

IvyPanda . (2019) 'Freedom of Speech and Expression'. 23 June.

IvyPanda . 2019. "Freedom of Speech and Expression." June 23, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/freedom-of-speech-and-expression/.

1. IvyPanda . "Freedom of Speech and Expression." June 23, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/freedom-of-speech-and-expression/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Freedom of Speech and Expression." June 23, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/freedom-of-speech-and-expression/.

Defamations on BUGusa Inc. Company
Synopsis of Tort Case
False Statements in Violating Reputation
Neoliberal Approach to Assessing Sustainability
Aimé Césaire's Discourse on Colonialism
Utilitarianism in Government
Principles of Democratic Structuring
Biggart and Swedberg Views on Capitalist Development

IELTS BAND7

Best coaching Tel:8439000086

Dehradun: 8439000086

Freedom Of Speech # Essay For IELTS

Is freedom of speech necessary in free society? Give your opinions.

Speech is the most powerful tool, mankind can ever get. It were speeches of Hitler that persuaded Germany to fight the second world war, the speeches of Gandhi that ignited the fire amongst Indians to get freedom. And even in modern times, whether it is the win of Barack Obama or Narendra Modi, their speech has a major role to play. I believe a country can truly be considered free if its people have the freedom of speech.

Firstly, freedom of speech gives a sense of attachment with the country. People feel more connected if they have a say in the decisions of the country. Secondly, allowing people to speak their minds helps often helps in reaching better solutions. For example-: in 2006, when Indian government increased the reservations, people across the country came out and demanded that it would be unfair for them. This helped government in realizing their view point. Had there be no freedom of speech, may be the government had regulated it and given rise to a new revolt. Thirdly, a country becomes more democratic if the citizens are free to speak. The main idea of democracy, “a citizen’s nations” gets in acted with freedom of speech.

Although freedom of speech can even turn to a disaster if people are not tolerant. For example-: Often people tend to take someone’s opinion as offend and create issues for the person involved. Freedom of speech comes with great responsibility. The responsibility to accept other peoples’ opinion before they give their own. It comes with an understanding that different people can have different opinions and until they are not harming you, you must allow them to exist.

Overall, I believe freedom of speech marks a free society. The issues involved with it can be fought back only with education and acceptance of diversity. IELTSBAND7

One comment

WhatsApp us

Listening Tests
Academic Tests
General Tests
IELTS Writing Checker
IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking Club
IELTS AI Speaking Test Simulator
Latest Topics
Vocabularying
2024 © IELTS 69

Knowledge is power. Freedom of expression and speech is a crucial part of most modern societies.

IELTS essay Knowledge is power. Freedom of expression and speech is a crucial part of most modern societies.

Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
? One main idea per paragraph
Include an introduction and conclusion
Support main points with an explanation and then an example
Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
Check your writing for errors
Answer all parts of the question
? Present relevant ideas
Fully explain these ideas
Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
? Currently is not available
Meet the criteria
Doesn't meet the criteria
6 band Most children want to wach the same TV program and play the same computer games like their friends. Should parents allow them to do like this? Some kids desire to watch television programs and play video games same as their friends. This essay agrees that parents should not give permission to their children to behave like this. This essay will first, outline that some TV programs portrait abusive language and obscene scenes which are not s ...
6.5 band In many countries schools have server problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? The government of the few nations has been suffering from many challenges. This will lead to the academic institute has to manage the pupil’s action. The essay will discuss the reason of this impact and measures that are taken to curb it as per my opinion; are discussed in below paragraphs. To begi ...
As a hawk flieth not high with one wing, even so a man reacheth not to excellence with one tongue. Roger Ascham
6 band Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. Social networking sites, for instance Facebook, are thought by some to have had a detrimental effect on individual people as well as society and local communities. However, while I believe that such sites are mainly beneficial to the individual, I agree that they have had a damaging effect on local ...
6 band The housing shortage in big cities can cause severe social consequences. Some people think that only government can solve this. Do what extend It is undeniable that exponential rise in population has made it difficult for people mainly in cities area to find accommodation, and only the governmental bodies who can eradicate such issues. This essay, therefore, presents my strong agreement. To embark with, world’s population now has reached ...
Learning is a treasure that will follow its owner everywhere. Chinese Proverb
6 band Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular. Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages? Advancement in internet with technology has made the lives of the pople effortless. Nowadays most of the people prefer to buy various things online rather than going to a store. This approach has both merits and demerits but the merits overshadow the demerits. Purchasing products online has plethor ...
6 band Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic: The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life. Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. Gone are the days where people used to work in a single career to earn money. Recent trends suggests that people are more interested in choosing different career options to earn money and being educated throughout their life. In this essay I will explain why having many career options will help an i ...
Language is the road map of a culture. It tells you where its people come from and where they are going. Rita Mae Brown

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Human Rights — Freedom of Speech

Argumentative Essays on Freedom of Speech

Freedom of speech essay topic examples, argumentative essays.

Argumentative essays on freedom of speech require you to take a stance on a specific aspect of this topic and provide evidence to support your viewpoint. Consider these topic examples:

1. Argue for the importance of protecting hate speech as a form of free expression, emphasizing the principles of free speech and the potential consequences of limiting it.
2. Debate the ethical implications of social media platforms censoring or moderating content, exploring the balance between maintaining a safe online environment and upholding free speech rights.

Example Introduction Paragraph for an Argumentative Freedom of Speech Essay: Freedom of speech is a cornerstone of democratic societies, but it often challenges our notions of what should be protected. In this argumentative essay, we will examine the importance of safeguarding hate speech as a form of free expression, exploring the principles of free speech and the potential ramifications of its restriction.

Example Conclusion Paragraph for an Argumentative Freedom of Speech Essay: In conclusion, the argument for protecting hate speech within the bounds of free expression highlights the enduring principles of democracy and free speech. As we navigate these complex debates, we must remain committed to preserving the foundations of our democratic society.

Compare and Contrast Essays

Compare and contrast essays on freedom of speech involve analyzing the similarities and differences between various aspects of free speech laws, practices, or the historical development of free speech rights in different countries. Consider these topics:

1. Compare and contrast the approach to freedom of speech in the United States and European Union, examining the legal frameworks, historical context, and key differences in their protection of free expression.
2. Analyze the evolution of freedom of speech in the digital age, comparing the challenges and opportunities presented by online platforms and the traditional forms of free expression.

Example Introduction Paragraph for a Compare and Contrast Freedom of Speech Essay: Freedom of speech varies across different countries and contexts, raising questions about the boundaries of this fundamental right. In this compare and contrast essay, we will explore the approaches to freedom of speech in the United States and the European Union, shedding light on their legal frameworks, historical backgrounds, and notable distinctions.

Example Conclusion Paragraph for a Compare and Contrast Freedom of Speech Essay: In conclusion, the comparison and contrast of freedom of speech in the United States and the European Union reveal the multifaceted nature of this fundamental right. As we examine these diverse perspectives, we gain a deeper appreciation for the complexities surrounding free expression in our globalized world.

Descriptive Essays

Descriptive essays on freedom of speech allow you to provide detailed accounts and analysis of specific instances, historical events, or contemporary debates related to free speech. Here are some topic ideas:

1. Describe a landmark Supreme Court case related to freedom of speech, such as the "Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District" case, and its significance in shaping free speech rights for students.
2. Paint a vivid picture of a recent protest or demonstration where freedom of speech played a central role, discussing the motivations of the protesters, the public's response, and the outcomes of the event.

Example Introduction Paragraph for a Descriptive Freedom of Speech Essay: Freedom of speech is often tested and defined in the courtroom and in the streets. In this descriptive essay, we will delve into the landmark Supreme Court case "Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District" and its profound impact on the free speech rights of students within the educational system.

Example Conclusion Paragraph for a Descriptive Freedom of Speech Essay: In conclusion, the descriptive exploration of the "Tinker" case illustrates the enduring struggle to balance students' free speech rights with the need for a productive educational environment. As we reflect on this historical event, we are reminded of the ongoing challenges in preserving and defining freedom of speech in schools.

Persuasive Essays

Persuasive essays on freedom of speech involve advocating for specific actions, policies, or changes related to the protection or limitations of free speech rights. Consider these persuasive topics:

1. Persuade your audience of the importance of enacting legislation to combat "cancel culture" and protect individuals' right to express unpopular opinions without fear of social or professional consequences.
2. Advocate for greater transparency and accountability in social media content moderation practices, highlighting the potential impact on free speech and the public's right to access diverse information.

Example Introduction Paragraph for a Persuasive Freedom of Speech Essay: The boundaries of free speech are continually tested in our rapidly changing society. In this persuasive essay, I will make a compelling case for the necessity of legislation to combat "cancel culture" and preserve individuals' right to express dissenting views without facing severe social or professional repercussions.

Example Conclusion Paragraph for a Persuasive Freedom of Speech Essay: In conclusion, the persuasive argument for legislation against "cancel culture" underscores the importance of safeguarding free speech in the face of societal pressures. As we advocate for change, we contribute to the preservation of a diverse and inclusive marketplace of ideas.

Narrative Essays

Narrative essays on freedom of speech allow you to share personal stories, experiences, or observations related to free speech, your encounters with debates or controversies, or the impact of free expression on your life. Explore these narrative essay topics:

1. Narrate a personal experience where you exercised your right to free speech, detailing the circumstances, motivations, and reactions from others, and reflecting on the significance of your actions.
2. Share a story of your involvement in a community or online discussion where freedom of speech played a central role, emphasizing the challenges and rewards of engaging in open dialogue.

Example Introduction Paragraph for a Narrative Freedom of Speech Essay: Freedom of speech is not just an abstract concept; it is a lived experience. In this narrative essay, I will take you through a personal journey where I exercised my right to free speech, recounting the circumstances, motivations, and the impact of my actions on those around me.

Example Conclusion Paragraph for a Narrative Freedom of Speech Essay: In conclusion, the narrative of my personal experience with free speech highlights the transformative power of open dialogue and individual expression. As we share our stories, we contribute to the rich tapestry of voices that define our commitment to this essential democratic principle.

Eric Foner's Analysis of American Freedom

Argumentative essay ten reasons for banning books, made-to-order essay as fast as you need it.

Each essay is customized to cater to your unique preferences

+ experts online

Turner V Driver Case Analysis

Rights to freedom of speech and expression, the role of the freedom of speech, the abuse of the freedom of speech and freedom of press by the media in the united states, let us write you an essay from scratch.

450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

The Meaning of The Freedom of Speech

Protection of the freedom of speech and the freedom of press in usa, the significance of putting limitation and prohibition to the expression of personal opinion, controversial points of free speech, get a personalized essay in under 3 hours.

Expert-written essays crafted with your exact needs in mind

A Study of The True Meaning of Free Speech in Today's Society

The misconception of hate speech and its connection with the freedom of speech, the link between freedom of speech and hate speech, the issue of free speech and hate speech on campus, freedom of speech and social media, the violation of freedom of speech in north korea, freedom of speech and expression, freedom of speech and censorship in social media, freedom of speech at college campuses, freedom of speech can cause harm onto others, my case for freedom of speech, the significance of the expression of personal opinion and governance, the results of restrictions of speech freedom and expression at college campuses, pros and cons of internet censorship, an examination of the first amendment: the freedom of speech, freedom of speech: challenges with defining and regulation, the main aspects of the right to free speech, a research on the censorship of popular music, the expression of personal opinion in universities as a solution to contentious issues, the issues of internet censorship in australia.

Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that encompasses the liberty to express thoughts, opinions, beliefs, and ideas without fear of censorship, reprisal, or governmental interference.

1. The right to seek information and ideas; 2. The right to receive information and ideas; 3. The right to impart information and ideas.

The concept of freedom of speech has deep historical roots, originating from ancient civilizations and evolving through various historical contexts. The ancient Greeks, particularly in Athens, valued free expression and public debate, considering it essential for democratic governance. Similarly, the Roman Republic allowed citizens the freedom to express their opinions in political matters. The modern understanding of freedom of speech emerged during the Age of Enlightenment in the 17th and 18th centuries. Prominent thinkers like John Locke and Voltaire advocated for the right to express ideas without censorship or persecution. Their ideas influenced the development of democratic societies and the recognition of freedom of speech as a fundamental human right. The historical context of freedom of speech also includes pivotal moments, such as the American Revolution and the French Revolution. These revolutions challenged the existing oppressive regimes and led to the inclusion of free speech protections in their respective declarations of rights. Since then, the concept of freedom of speech has been enshrined in numerous international human rights documents, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The freedom of speech is a fundamental right protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. It guarantees individuals the right to express their opinions, beliefs, and ideas without fear of government censorship or retaliation. The historical context of freedom of speech in the US can be traced back to the country's founding. The American Revolution and the subsequent establishment of the Constitution were driven by a desire for individual liberties, including the right to freely express oneself. Over the years, the interpretation and application of freedom of speech in the US have been shaped by landmark court cases. For instance, in the 1960s, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of protecting political and symbolic speech, even if it was controversial or dissenting. This period also saw the rise of the free speech movement, which advocated for greater rights on college campuses. However, the freedom of speech in the US is not absolute. Certain types of speech, such as obscenity, defamation, incitement to violence, and hate speech, are subject to limitations and can be legally restricted.

Thomas Jefferson: As one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, Jefferson was a staunch advocate for freedom of speech. He believed that a free exchange of ideas was vital for a democratic society and emphasized its protection in the First Amendment. Voltaire: A French philosopher and writer, Voltaire championed the principles of free expression and tolerance. His writings challenged oppressive regimes and promoted the idea that individuals should have the right to speak their minds without fear of persecution. Martin Luther King Jr.: Known for his leadership in the American civil rights movement, King passionately defended free speech as a means to advocate for social justice. His powerful speeches and peaceful protests were instrumental in promoting equality and challenging systemic racism. John Stuart Mill: An influential philosopher and political economist, Mill articulated the concept of the "marketplace of ideas" and argued for unrestricted freedom of speech. He believed that through open and robust debate, society could discover the truth and prevent the suppression of minority viewpoints.

Public opinion on the freedom of speech varies widely, reflecting the diversity of perspectives within societies around the world. While many individuals staunchly uphold the value and importance of free speech as a fundamental human right, others harbor concerns and reservations regarding its boundaries and potential consequences. Additionally, cultural and societal factors significantly shape public opinion on freedom of speech. Different countries and communities may have distinct historical experiences, cultural norms, and legal frameworks that influence their perspectives. The balance between individual freedoms and collective well-being may vary across societies, leading to differing opinions on where the boundaries of free speech should lie. Technological advancements and the rise of social media platforms have further complicated public opinion on freedom of speech. The digital age has enabled individuals to express their views on a global scale, amplifying the impact and reach of their words. However, it has also highlighted concerns about online harassment, the spread of misinformation, and the potential for manipulation and abuse of free speech rights. As a result, debates emerge around the role of platforms in regulating speech and ensuring the responsible use of online communication tools.

1. Protection of democratic principles 2. Advancement of knowledge and progress 3. Promotion of individual autonomy 4. Protection of minority rights 5. Defense against tyranny

1. Harmful and hateful speech 2. Protection of vulnerable groups 3. Misinformation and propaganda 4. Privacy and dignity 5. Societal stability and public safety

1. The recognition of speech protection can be traced back to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215, marking an early milestone in safeguarding the freedom of expression. 2. In 399 BC, the renowned Greek philosopher Socrates faced persecution for his advocacy of unrestricted speech, showcasing the historical roots of the ongoing struggle for free speech rights. 3. A significant majority, approximately 70% of Americans, believe in the importance of granting individuals the right to free speech, even if their words are deemed highly offensive or controversial. 4. A pivotal moment for student rights came in 1969 with the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, which affirmed that students maintain their right to free speech even within the confines of school hours.

The topic of freedom of speech is of immense importance for writing an essay due to its fundamental role in society. Freedom of speech is a cornerstone of democracy, enabling individuals to express their opinions, ideas, and beliefs openly without fear of censorship or retribution. It serves as a catalyst for societal progress, allowing for the exchange of diverse perspectives, critical thinking, and the challenging of established norms. Exploring the concept of freedom of speech in an essay provides an opportunity to delve into its historical significance and the ongoing struggles for its protection. It allows for an examination of the complex balance between free expression and the limitations necessary to prevent harm or hate speech. Additionally, discussing the importance of freedom of speech facilitates a deeper understanding of its role in fostering social justice, political discourse, and the protection of minority voices. Moreover, the topic invites exploration of contemporary issues such as online censorship, fake news, and the challenges posed by the digital age. By analyzing case studies, legal frameworks, and international perspectives, an essay on freedom of speech can shed light on the ongoing debates, dilemmas, and potential solutions to ensure its preservation in an ever-evolving society.

1. Sullivan, K. M. (2010). Two concepts of freedom of speech. Harvard Law Review, 124(1), 143-177. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/20788316) 2. Van Mill, D. (2002). Freedom of speech. (https://plato.stanford.edu/ENTRIES/freedom-speech/) 3. Bogen, D. (1983). The origins of freedom of speech and press. Md. L. Rev., 42, 429. (https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/mllr42&div=20&id=&page=) 4. Yong, C. (2011). Does freedom of speech include hate speech?. Res Publica, 17, 385-403. (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11158-011-9158-y) 5. McHugh, M. R. (2004). Historiography and freedom of speech: the case of Cremutius Cordus. In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity (pp. 391-408). Brill. (https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789047405689/B9789047405689-s018.xml) 6. Milo, D. (2008). Defamation and freedom of speech. (https://academic.oup.com/book/2591) 7. Helwig, C. C. (1998). Children's conceptions of fair government and freedom of speech. Child Development, 69(2), 518-531. (https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06205.x) 8. Cheung, A. S. (2011). Exercising freedom of speech behind the great firewall: A study of judges’ and lawyers’ blogs in China. Harvard International Law Journal Online. (https://harvardilj.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2011/04/HILJ-Online_52_Cheung1.pdf) 9. Nieuwenhuis, A. (2000). Freedom of speech: USA vs Germany and Europe. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 18(2), 195-214. (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/092405190001800203)

Relevant topics

Gun Control
Human Trafficking
Death Penalty
Police Brutality
Pro Choice (Abortion)
Women's Rights
Martin Luther King
Animal Testing

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Bibliography

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

Instructions Followed To The Letter
Deadlines Met At Every Stage
Unique And Plagiarism Free

My Study Times

Education through Innovation

Importance Of Freedom : Essay, Article, Speech, Paragraph, Cue Card

Importance of freedom : essay, article, speech, paragraph, ielts cue card.

Importance Of Freedom Essay

The colonial era spanning across 18th and 19th century became an epitome of oppression and slavery of the native population. Countless stories of the true and alleged atrocities of white on black and brown churned the imagination of the masses and fueled freedom movements across the Globe. In other words, freedom is important is an understatement because it is as crucial as the air is to life.

Freedom of thought and expression

How many times have we seen that free society generally develop very fast as compared to the closed ones? In fact, regular discussions with the people make the government and media more open. As a result, aspirations of the individuals are taken care of however state should draw the line as to what extent the freedom is exercised by the citizens.

An autocratic regime may indulge in corruption and malpractices resulting in an inefficient administration. To make the matters worse, the right of people are suppressed without ant scope of compromise with the government.

If a person is free, he or she is more creative in daily life. In addition, freedom also inspires individuals to think independently with logic and rational approach. A slave cannot think properly as the person is under the spell of the master. Freedom is extremely important to the modern society if it wants inclusive development of not the only majority but also the minority population.

Intellectual growth: Modern education is built on the concept of freedom and independent thinking. If the society is expressive the government would be more in tune with reality and take decision according to the wishes of the people.

Happiness: You can be extremely rich and wealth but without freedom, you may not feel happiness in life. It is the desire to do something independently that gives satisfaction to the individual.

Responsible person: If an individual is independent he can act responsibly and be aware of the consequences. It plays a very important role in making the society mature and takes decisions that are in general good for the community.

Healthy debate: A free group of people will discuss and debate before solving any problem. Since we are young, the textbook teaches us to love for the common good of the society, however, each person is a different individual and would become expressive if he is allowed freedom.

Living life under slavery: People who do not have the freedom are akin to bonded laborers that cannot fulfill their desires. In addition, one has to live as per the norms of the society while remaining under the rule of an autocrat. It is found that a nation with a dictator at the helm is always prone to insurgencies and armed uprisings as people are not able to pursue their dreams with greater freedom. Although superficially everything seems to be fine, the strong undercurrent against the government is evident in the general population.

Conclusion on Importance of Freedom

In short, it can be said that freedom is the part and parcel of the modern life and any development is only possible when people have sufficient room for growth.

Importance Of Freedom Article
Importance Of Freedom Speech
Importance Of Freedom of Speech
Importance Of Freedom of Speech Essay
Importance Of Freedom of IELTS Writing
Speech on Freedom

About Charmin Patel

Blogger and Digital Marketer by Choice and Chemical Engineer By Chance. Computer and Internet Geek Person Who Loves To Do Something New Every Day.

Trending Now
Foundational Courses
Data Science
Practice Problem
Machine Learning
System Design
DevOps Tutorial
Email Writing - Format and Samples
English Essay Writing Tips, Examples, Format
Letter to Principal, Format And Samples
Analytical Writing Section in GRE General
12 Best ChatGPT Prompts for Academic Writing Assistance in 2024
Writing data from a Python List to CSV row-wise
CBSE Sample Papers for Class 9 Social Science Set 2 with Solutions
A Guide to Writing an Essay for Job Interviews
CBSE Sample Papers for Class 11 History Set 2 with Solutions 2023-24
How to prepare for IELTS?
5 Content Writing Tools to Improve your Content Writing Skills
IBPS Clerk Prelims Reasoning Question Paper 2020
CBSE Sample Papers for Class 11 Economics (2023-24) Set 1 with Solutions
IBPS Clerk Prelims Reasoning Question Paper 2021
IBPS Clerk Prelims English Question Paper 2019
IBPS Clerk Prelims English Question Paper 2021
Fill In The Blanks - Rules, Tips and Tricks with Examples
CBSE Sample Papers Class 11 History (2023-24) Set-1 with Solution
UPSC Prelims 2018 General Studies Paper I With Detailed Solutions

IELTS Writing Task 2: Format, Sample, Tips

The IELTS Writing Task 2: The second portion of the writing test, known as IELTS Writing Task 2, asks you to produce an essay in response to a point of view, argument, or problem. Your essay should be written in a formal tone, be at least 250 words long, and take no more than 40 minutes to finish.

Table of Content

IELTS Writing Task 2- Format

1. task question, 2. word limit, 4. response structure, 5. evaluation criteria, difference between ielts writing task 2- academic vs general, understanding the evaluation criteria, common ielts writing task 2 topics, band descriptors ielts writing task 2, ielts essay types for writing task 2, ielts writing task 2 preparation tips, ielts writing task 2 sample, ielts writing task 2- faqs, what are indigenous cultures and languages, why is it important to protect indigenous cultures and languages, what are some challenges in protecting indigenous cultures and languages, what role can governments play in protecting indigenous cultures and languages, are there any potential drawbacks to prioritizing the protection of indigenous cultures and languages.

You will be presented with a topic or statement related to a contemporary issue or problem.
The task question may ask you to discuss a particular problem, present a solution, evaluate a situation, or provide your opinion on a given topic.
You are expected to write at least 250 words for the IELTS Writing Task 2.
It is advisable to write within the range of 250300 words, as responses shorter than 250 words are penalized, and longer responses do not necessarily receive higher scores.
3. Time Allotment:
You have 40 minutes to complete the IELTS Writing Task 2.
Your response should be structured as an essay with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
The introduction should provide an overview of the topic and outline the main points you will discuss.
The body paragraphs should develop your ideas and arguments, with one main idea per paragraph supported by relevant examples or evidence.
The conclusion should summarize your main points and provide a final perspective on the topic.
Your response will be evaluated based on four criteria: Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource (vocabulary), and Grammatical Range and Accuracy.
You should aim to address all parts of the task question, present a clear and coherent argument, use a wide range of vocabulary accurately, and demonstrate a good command of grammar and sentence structures.

Must Read: IELTS Academic vs General Tests – What’s the Difference?

The IELTS Writing Task 2 covers a wide range of topics related to contemporary issues and problems. Here are some common topics that frequently appear in the IELTS Writing Task 2:

1. Education:

The role of technology in education
The importance of extracurricular activities
The advantages and disadvantages of single gender schools

2. Environment:

Climate change and its impacts
Sustainable development and environmental conservation
The use of renewable energy sources
The impact of lifestyle choices on health
The role of government in promoting public health
The advantages and disadvantages of alternative medicine

4. Society and Culture:

The effects of globalization on local cultures
The impact of social media on human interactions
The role of religion in modern society

5. Technology:

The advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence
The impact of technology on employment and job markets
The role of technology in communication and information sharing

6. Urbanization and Transportation:

The challenges of urban growth and city planning
The benefits and drawbacks of public transportation
The impact of transportation on the environment

7. Crime and Justice:

The causes and prevention of crime
The effectiveness of different types of punishment
The role of the criminal justice system in society

8. Economics and Business:

The impact of globalization on international trade
The role of advertising in influencing consumer behavior
The advantages and disadvantages of outsourcing

9. Government and Politics:

The importance of freedom of speech and press
The role of government in regulating the economy
The impact of immigration on societies

10. Arts and Culture:

The importance of preserving cultural heritage
The role of art in society
The impact of censorship on artistic expression

In the IELTS Writing Task 2, candidates are required to write an essay in response to a prompt or question. There are several common types of essays that may appear in Task 2:

1. Argumentative/Opinion Essays: These essays require candidates to express their opinion on a given topic and support it with reasons and examples. They often involve discussing both sides of an issue and presenting a clear argument in favor of one viewpoint.

2. Discussion/Two-sided Essays: Similar to argumentative essays, discussion essays require candidates to discuss both sides of an issue before expressing their opinion or preference. They need to provide balanced arguments and consider opposing viewpoints.

3. Advantages and Disadvantages Essays : In these essays, candidates need to discuss the pros and cons of a particular issue, situation, or trend. They should provide examples to illustrate each point and offer a balanced analysis.

4. Problem-Solution Essays: These essays involve identifying a problem or issue, discussing its causes and effects, and proposing possible solutions or measures to address it. Candidates need to present logical arguments and support their solutions with evidence.

5. Cause and Effect Essays: Cause and effect essays focus on analyzing the reasons behind a specific phenomenon or event and its subsequent effects. Candidates should clearly outline the causal relationships and provide relevant examples.

6. Comparison/Contrast Essays: These essays require candidates to compare and contrast two or more ideas, concepts, or approaches. They should highlight similarities and differences and draw conclusions based on their analysis.

7. Process Essays: Process essays explain a sequence of steps or actions involved in a particular process, such as how to do something or how something works. Candidates need to provide clear explanations and use appropriate transition words to guide the reader through each step.

8. Agree/Disagree Essays: In these essays, candidates are given a statement or opinion, and they need to express whether they agree or disagree with it. They should support their stance with reasons and examples.

IELTS Writing Task 2 preparation tips to help you improve your performance:

1. Understand the Task Question

Read the task question carefully and identify the key components, such as the topic, the instructions (e.g., discuss, evaluate, give your opinion), and any specific aspects to be addressed.
Underline or highlight the essential elements to ensure you address all parts of the question.

2. Plan Your Essay

Spend a few minutes planning your essay before you start writing.
Brainstorm ideas and organize them into an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Develop a clear thesis statement and main points to guide your essay.

3. Manage Your Time

Allocate your time wisely, allowing enough time for planning, writing, and reviewing.
Aim to spend around 510 minutes planning, 2530 minutes writing, and 5 minutes reviewing and making corrections.

4. Use Appropriate Structure and Paragraphing

Follow a standard essay structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Each body paragraph should focus on one main idea and include supporting details, examples, or evidence.
Use clear topic sentences and logical transitions between paragraphs.

5. Develop Your Ideas

Provide relevant and welldeveloped ideas to support your main points.
Use examples, personal experiences, facts, or hypothetical situations to illustrate your arguments.
Show critical thinking by analyzing different perspectives and addressing counterarguments.

6. Use Appropriate Language and Vocabulary

Use a range of appropriate vocabulary related to the topic.
Vary your sentence structures and avoid repetition.
Demonstrate your ability to use idiomatic expressions and collocations accurately.

7. Pay Attention to Grammar and Accuracy

Review and proofread your essay for grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and punctuation issues.
Ensure subjectverb agreement, correct tense usage, and appropriate word forms.
Avoid overly complex sentences that may increase the risk of errors.

8. Practice with Sample Questions

Familiarize yourself with different types of IELTS Writing Task 2 questions by practicing with sample prompts.
Set a timer and practice writing complete essays under timed conditions.
Seek feedback from experienced IELTS teachers or online resources to identify areas for improvement.

9. Learn from Model Answers

Study highscoring model answers to understand the expected level of writing and the organization of ideas.
Analyze the structure, language use, and development of arguments in these model answers.
Incorporate effective strategies and techniques into your own writing practice.

10. Stay UptoDate with Current Affairs

Stay informed about current events, global issues, and debates related to various topics.
Read reputable news sources, magazines, or online articles to broaden your knowledge and enhance your ability to discuss contemporary topics.

Here is a practice IELTS Writing Task 2 topic for you: Topic: Some people believe that governments should make more efforts to protect indigenous cultures and languages from disappearing. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words discussing both viewpoints and giving your opinion.

Make a plan before you start writing. Outline your introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion.
The introduction should paraphrase the topic and outline what will be discussed.
Discuss both sides of the argument in the body paragraphs. One paragraph arguing for protecting indigenous cultures/languages, one paragraph arguing against or giving the opposite view.
Use examples, data or personal experiences to support your arguments.
The conclusion should summarize your main points and give a clear opinion.
Use a range of vocabulary and sentence structures. Avoid repetition.
Check for grammar, spelling and punctuation errors.

In conclusion, while protecting indigenous cultures and languages is undoubtedly important for preserving human diversity and heritage, it should be balanced with practical considerations and the interests of the wider community. A nuanced approach that promotes understanding and appreciation while accommodating evolving societal needs is ideal.

Also Read: IELTS Full Form: Check Its Significance IELTS Average Score: Across Worldwide and India IELTS Minimum Score for Top Universities in 2024 IELTS Exam Pattern 2024: Section-wise IELTS Exam Paper Pattern, Question Types

Indigenous cultures and languages refer to the traditional practices, belief systems, and modes of expression of ethnic groups native to a particular region or country.

Protecting indigenous cultures and languages helps preserve unique identities, traditional knowledge, and cultural diversity, which are valuable aspects of human heritage and can contribute to our understanding of history, societies, and the environment.

Challenges include globalization, urbanization, lack of resources, and a shift towards more dominant cultures and languages, which can lead to the erosion of indigenous practices and languages over time.

Governments can implement policies to support the use and teaching of indigenous languages, provide funding for cultural preservation efforts, and promote awareness and appreciation of indigenous cultures through education and media.

Potential drawbacks include the allocation of limited resources towards this effort at the expense of other priorities, the potential for cultural stagnation or resistance to cultural evolution, and the risk of creating divisions or conflicts within diverse societies.

Please Login to comment...

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

Gaza campus protests: what are students’ free speech rights and what can universities do?

Lecturer in Political Theory and Philosophy, Queen's University Belfast

Disclosure statement

Suzanne Whitten does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Queen's University Belfast provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation UK.

View all partners

Red camping tents on a green lawn, with a large hand painted sign reading 'students demand arms off campus'

Students expressing solidarity with Palestinians and protesting Israel’s war in Gaza have set up encampments on campuses around the UK. Around 15 encampments have emerged in Oxford , Cambridge , Edinburgh , Warwick Manchester and others. They’ve also emerged in other countries including France and Ireland .

Broadly, students are calling for transparency over and divestment from universities’ financial links with Israeli companies (particularly those involved in the arms industry). They are demanding university leaders cut ties with Israeli universities, increase resources (including scholarships for Palestinian students and make long-term commitments relating to the rebuilding of higher education in Palestine.

The encampments follow similar action at more than 140 universities in the US. There, scenes of police arresting protesters have sparked intense debate about when (if ever) it is permissible to limit the free expression of students.

Read more: US student Gaza protests: five things that have been missed

Universities have a difficult balance to strike between protecting student speech rights and ensuring campus safety.

In the US, public universities (as “arms of government”) are prevented from interfering with free speech under the constitution’s first amendment. While this doesn’t apply in the same way to private universities, most have agreed to uphold policies that closely resemble it. These rights must be balanced against reasonable considerations about the time, place and manner of the speech, as well as civil rights laws against harassment.

The UK does not have the same free speech protections, but many university leaders have made clear that their institutions support freedom of expression . They have reminded students of their duties to ensure that protest activities remain lawful and do not risk the safety of others.

They have encouraged students to follow university policy , and be mindful of other students, staff and members of the public. This generally means that they should not obstruct their access to work or get in the way of their education.

Rishi Sunak met with 17 vice-chancellors and representatives from the Union of Jewish Students (UJS), seeking reassurance that any antisemitism arising from the protests would be swiftly dealt with. And the education secretary, Gillian Keegan, called for vice-chancellors to “show leadership” to ensure that campuses are a safe place for all students.

Are the protests legal?

Protests that take place on university campuses in the UK are considered legal exercises of the right to freedom of expression. The rights of freedom of expression and freedom of assembly are protected by the European Convention on Human Rights, which is enshrined in UK law under the Human Rights Act .

These rights are further reinforced by a 1986 UK education law , which requires universities to take “reasonably practicable” steps to protect freedom of speech on campus. This includes permitting and facilitating the right to protest.

There are notable exceptions. In England and Wales, speech that incites violence is considered unlawful, as is harassment on the basis of protected characteristics (race, religion, sexuality and so on). The law is slightly different in Scotland and Northern Ireland .

Expressed support for one of the UK government’s 79 proscribed organisations (including Hezbollah and Hamas) is also criminalised by the Terrorism Act .

A student protest, with a prominent cardboard sign reading 'every university in gaza has been destroyed'.

When it comes to semi-permanent occupations, duties to facilitate freedom of expression will be in tension with universities’ obligations to keep students and staff safe. Sally Mapstone, the president of the vice-chancellors’ group Universities UK, said universities “may need to take action ” if encampments interfere with the ability to take exams, graduate or go about other business.

In the past, universities have ended occupations by applying for a “possession order” from the High Court. This can lead to students being removed by bailiffs, as happened in March 2023 when the University of Bristol evicted students taking part in a rent strike.

In April 2024 , Bristol Students Occupy for Palestine ended a four-week occupation of the university’s executive management building after they were served with a possession order.

Any universities that take this route would need to show that they have considered protestors’ freedom of expression and assembly rights , and that these have been outweighed by other competing obligations.

The encampments could also risk breaching the Police Crime Sentencing and Courts Act and the Public Order Act, introduced in 2022 and 2023. These controversial laws limit noisy protests and make it unlawful to cause “public nuisance”.

They also ban protests that cause serious disruption to the life of the community , including by tunnelling , locking-on and taking part in slow-walking protests . Again, any interventions (from either the university or the police) must be weighed against the freedom of expression rights of protesters.

Successful negotiations

So far, some of the protests have been successful. Management at Goldsmiths, University of London agreed to protesters’ demands, including investing in a number of scholarships for Palestinian students and reviewing the university’s investment policy. The encampment at Trinity College Dublin has ended after the university agreed to divest from “Israeli companies that have activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and appear on the UN blacklist in this regard”.

The University of York has also agreed to divest from weapons manufacturers. Other universities have established meetings between protesters and management, though most negotiations are still in the early stages.

Apart from upholding their legal obligations, universities should maintain open lines of dialogue with protesters. Doing so is not only essential from a safety perspective, but ensures that all are able to exercise their rights effectively. So far, most universities have been clear about their commitment to free expression, acknowledging lawful protest as a fundamental component of university life.

The free exchange of ideas will often make some people feel uncomfortable . But speech which harasses or threatens others is not only unlawful, it prevents them from taking part in university life as equals. Universities must also offer accessible channels of complaint for students and staff who have experienced abuse from others on campus.

UK higher education
Student protests
UK universities
Campus free speech
encampments
Gaza Protests

Compliance Lead

Lecturer / Senior Lecturer - Marketing

Assistant Editor - 1 year cadetship

Executive Dean, Faculty of Health

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer, Earth System Science (School of Science)

Is freedom of speech necessary in free society? Agree or disagree?

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree? ...do you think...? ...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ » — a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Check your IELTS essay »
Find essays with the same topic
View collections of IELTS Writing Samples
Show IELTS Writing Task 2 Topics

The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating and information. state which you consider to be the most effective - comics - books - radio - television - film - theatre give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experiance., some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. others say that there are more important environmental problems. discuss both these views and give your own opinion., in some countries, the differences in ages between parents and children are greater than in the past. do you think the advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages, it is sometimes said that people should be encouraged to get married before they are 30, as this is the best both for individual and for society. do you agree or disagree.

Share full article

Supported by

Guest Essay

The Happiness Gap Between Left and Right Isn’t Closing

A woman’s face with red lipstick and red-and-white stripes on one side in imitation of an American flag.

By Thomas B. Edsall

Mr. Edsall contributes a weekly column from Washington, D.C., on politics, demographics and inequality.

Why is it that a substantial body of social science research finds that conservatives are happier than liberals?

A partial answer: Those on the right are less likely to be angered or upset by social and economic inequities, believing that the system rewards those who work hard, that hierarchies are part of the natural order of things and that market outcomes are fundamentally fair.

Those on the left stand in opposition to each of these assessments of the social order, prompting frustration and discontent with the world around them.

The happiness gap has been with us for at least 50 years, and most research seeking to explain it has focused on conservatives. More recently, however, psychologists and other social scientists have begun to dig deeper into the underpinnings of liberal discontent — not only unhappiness but also depression and other measures of dissatisfaction.

One of the findings emerging from this research is that the decline in happiness and in a sense of agency is concentrated among those on the left who stress matters of identity, social justice and the oppression of marginalized groups.

There is, in addition, a parallel phenomenon taking place on the right as Donald Trump and his MAGA loyalists angrily complain of oppression by liberals who engage in a relentless vendetta to keep Trump out of the White House.

There is a difference in the way the left and right react to frustration and grievance. Instead of despair, the contemporary right has responded with mounting anger, rejecting democratic institutions and norms.

In a 2021 Vox article, “ Trump and the Republican Revolt Against Democracy ,” Zack Beauchamp described in detail the emergence of destructive and aggressive discontent among conservatives.

Citing a wide range of polling data and academic studies, Beauchamp found:

More than twice as many Republicans (39 percent) as Democrats (17 percent) believed that “if elected leaders won’t protect America, the people must act — even if that means violence.”

Fifty-seven percent of Republicans considered Democrats to be “enemies,” compared with 41 percent of Democrats who viewed Republicans as “enemies.”

Among Republicans, support for “the use of force to defend our way of life,” as well as for the belief that “strong leaders bend rules” and that “sometimes you have to take the law in your own hands,” grows stronger in direct correlation with racial and ethnic hostility.

Trump has repeatedly warned of the potential for political violence. In January he predicted bedlam if the criminal charges filed in federal and state courts against him damaged his presidential campaign:

I think they feel this is the way they’re going to try and win, and that’s not the way it goes. It’ll be bedlam in the country. It’s a very bad thing. It’s a very bad precedent. As we said, it’s the opening of a Pandora’s box.

Before he was indicted in New York, Trump claimed there would be “potential death and destruction” if he was charged.

At an Ohio campaign rally in March, Trump declared, “If I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a blood bath for the whole country.”

In other words, Trump and his allies respond to adversity and what they see as attacks from the left with threats and anger, while a segment of the left often but not always responds to adversity and social inequity with dejection and sorrow.

There are significant consequences for this internalization.

Jamin Halberstadt , a professor of psychology at the University of Otago in New Zealand and a co-author of “ Outgroup Threat and the Emergence of Cohesive Groups : A Cross-Cultural Examination,” argued in his emailed reply to my inquiry that because “a focus on injustice and victimhood is, by definition, disempowering (isn’t that why we talk of ‘survivors’ rather than ‘victims’?), loss of control is not good for self-esteem or happiness.”

But, he pointed out:

this focus, while no doubt a part of the most visible and influential side of progressive ideology, is still just a part. Liberalism is a big construct, and I’m reluctant to reduce it to a focus on social justice issues. Some liberals have this view, but I suspect their influence is outsized because (a) they have the social media megaphone and (b) we are in a climate in which freedom of expression and, in particular, challenges to the worldview you characterize have been curtailed.

Expanding on this line of argument, Halberstadt wrote:

I’m sure some self-described liberals have views that are counterproductive to their own happiness. One sub-ideology associated with liberalism is, as you describe, a sense of victimhood and grievance. But there is more than one way to respond to structural barriers. Within that group of the aggrieved, some probably see systemic problems that cannot be overcome, and that’s naturally demoralizing and depressing. But others see systemic problems as a challenge to overcome.

Taking Halberstadt’s assessment of the effects of grievance and victimhood a step farther, Timothy A. Judge , the chairman of the department of management and human resources at Notre Dame, wrote in a 2009 paper, “ Core Self-Evaluations and Work Success ”:

Core self-evaluations (C.S.E.) is a broad, integrative trait indicated by self-esteem, locus of control, generalized self-efficacy and (low) neuroticism (high emotional stability). Individuals with high levels of C.S.E. perform better on their jobs, are more successful in their careers, are more satisfied with their jobs and lives, report lower levels of stress and conflict, cope more effectively with setbacks and better capitalize on advantages and opportunities.

I asked Judge and other scholars a question: Have liberal pessimists fostered an outlook that spawns unhappiness as its adherents believe they face seemingly insurmountable structural barriers?

Judge replied by email:

I do share the perspective that a focus on status, hierarchies and institutions that reinforce privilege contributes to an external locus of control. And the reason is fairly straightforward. We can only change these things through collective and, often, policy initiatives — which tend to be complex, slow, often conflictual and outside our individual control. On the other hand, if I view “life’s chances” (Virginia Woolf’s term) to be mostly dependent on my own agency, this reflects an internal focus, which will often depend on enacting initiatives largely within my control.

Judge elaborated on his argument:

If our predominant focus in how we view the world is social inequities, status hierarchies, societal unfairness conferred by privilege, then everyone would agree that these things are not easy to fix, which means, in a sense, we must accept some unhappy premises: Life isn’t fair; outcomes are outside my control, often at the hands of bad, powerful actors; social change depends on collective action that may be conflictual; an individual may have limited power to control their own destiny, etc. These are not happy thoughts because they cause me to view the world as inherently unfair, oppressive, conflictual, etc. It may or may not be right, but I would argue that these are in fact viewpoints of how we view the world, and our place in it, that would undermine our happiness.

Last year, George Yancey , a professor of sociology at Baylor University, published “ Identity Politics, Political Ideology, and Well-Being : Is Identity Politics Good for Our Well-Being?”

Yancey argued that recent events “suggest that identity politics may correlate to a decrease in well-being, particularly among young progressives, and offer an explanation tied to internal elements within political progressiveness.”

By focusing on “political progressives, rather than political conservatives,” Yancey wrote, “a nuanced approach to understanding the relationship between political ideology and well-being begins to emerge.”

Identity politics, he continued, focuses “on external institutional forces that one cannot immediately alleviate.” It results in what scholars call the externalization of one’s locus of control, or viewing the inequities of society as a result of powerful if not insurmountable outside forces, including structural racism, patriarchy and capitalism, as opposed to believing that individuals can overcome such obstacles through hard work and collective effort.

As a result, Yancey wrote, “identity politics may be an important mechanism by which progressive political ideology can lead to lower levels of well-being.”

Conversely, Yancey pointed out, “a class-based progressive cognitive emphasis may focus less on the group identity, generating less of a need to rely on emotional narratives and dichotomous thinking and may be less likely to be detrimental to the well-being of a political progressive.”

Yancey tested this theory using data collected in the 2021 Baylor Religion Survey of 1,232 respondents.

“Certain types of political progressive ideology can have contrasting effects on well-being,” Yancey wrote. “It is plausible that identity politics may explain the recent increase well-being gap between conservatives and progressives.”

Oskari Lahtinen , a senior researcher in psychology at the University of Turku in Finland, published a study in March, “ Construction and Validation of a Scale for Assessing Critical Social Justice Attitudes ,” that reinforces Yancey’s argument.

Lahtinen conducted two surveys of a total of 5,878 men and women to determine the share of Finnish citizens who held “critical social justice attitudes” and how those who held such views differed from those who did not.

Critical social justice proponents, on Lahtinen’s scale,

point out varieties of oppression that cause privileged people (e.g., male, white, heterosexual, cisgender) to benefit over marginalized people (e.g., woman, Black, gay, transgender). In critical race theory, some of the core tenets include that (1) white supremacy and racism are omnipresent and colorblind policies are not enough to tackle them, (2) people of color have their own unique standpoint and (3) races are social constructs.

What did Lahtinen find?

The critical social justice propositions encountered

strong rejection from men. Women expressed more than twice as much support for the propositions. In both studies, critical social justice was correlated modestly with depression, anxiety, and (lack of) happiness, but not more so than being on the political left was.

In an email responding to my inquiries about his paper, Lahtinen wrote that one of the key findings in his research was that “there were large differences between genders in critical social justice advocacy: Three out of five women but only one out of seven men expressed support for the critical social justice claims.”

In addition, he pointed out, “there was one variable in the study that closely corresponded to external locus of control: ‘Other people or structures are more responsible for my well-being than I myself am.’”

The correlation between agreement with this statement and unhappiness was among the strongest in the survey:

People on the left endorsed this item (around 2 on a scale of 0 to 4) far more than people on the right (around 0.5). Endorsing the belief was determined by political party preference much more than by gender, for instance.

Such measures as locus of control, self-esteem, a belief in personal agency and optimism all play major roles in daily life.

In a December 2022 paper, “ The Politics of Depression : Diverging Trends in Internalizing Symptoms Among U.S. Adolescents by Political Beliefs,” Catherine Gimbrone , Lisa M. Bates , Seth Prins and Katherine M. Keyes , all at Columbia’s Mailman School of Public Health, noted that “trends in adolescent internalizing symptoms diverged by political beliefs, sex and parental education over time, with female liberal adolescents experiencing the largest increases in depressive symptoms, especially in the context of demographic risk factors, including parental education.”

“These findings,” they added, “indicate a growing mental health disparity between adolescents who identify with certain political beliefs. It is therefore possible that the ideological lenses through which adolescents view the political climate differentially affect their mental well-being.”

Gimbrone and her co-authors based their work on studies of 85,000 teenagers from 2005 to 2018. They found that

while internalizing symptom scores worsened over time for all adolescents, they deteriorated most quickly for female liberal adolescents. Beginning in approximately 2010 and continuing through 2018, female liberal adolescents reported the largest changes in depressive affect, self-esteem, self-derogation and loneliness.

In conclusion, the authors wrote, “socially underprivileged liberals reported the worst internalizing symptom scores over time, likely indicating that the experiences and beliefs that inform a liberal political identity are ultimately less protective against poor mental health than those that inform a conservative political identity.”

From another vantage point, Nick Haslam , a professor of psychology at the University of Melbourne, argued in his 2020 paper “ Harm Inflation: Making Sense of Concept Creep ” that recent years have seen “a rising sensitivity to harm within at least some Western cultures, such that previously innocuous or unremarked phenomena were increasingly identified as harmful and that this rising sensitivity reflected a politically liberal moral agenda.”

As examples, Haslam wrote that the definition of “trauma” has been

progressively broadened to include adverse life events of decreasing severity and those experienced vicariously rather than directly. “Mental disorder” came to include a wider range of conditions, so that new forms of psychopathology were added in each revision of diagnostic manuals and the threshold for diagnosing some existing forms was lowered. “Abuse” extended from physical acts to verbal and emotional slights and incorporated forms of passive neglect in addition to active aggression.

Haslam described this process as concept creep and argued that “some examples of concept creep are surely the work of deliberate actors who might be called expansion entrepreneurs.”

Concept expansion, Haslam wrote, “can be used as a tactic to amplify the perceived seriousness of a movement’s chosen social problem.” In addition, “such expansion can be effective means of enhancing the perceived seriousness of a social problem or threat by increasing the perceived prevalence of both ‘victims’ and ‘perpetrators.’”

Haslam cited studies showing that strong “correlates of holding expansive concepts of harm were compassion-related trait values, left-liberal political attitudes and forms of morality associated with both.” Holding expansive concepts of harm was also “associated with affective and cognitive empathy orientation and most strongly of all with endorsement of harm- and fairness-based morality.” Many of these characteristics are associated with the political left.

“The expansion of harm-related concepts has implications for acceptable self-expression and free speech,” Haslam wrote. “Creeping concepts enlarge the range of expressions judged to be unacceptably harmful, thereby increasing calls for speech restrictions. Expansion of the harm-related concepts of hate and hate speech exemplifies this possibility.”

While much of the commentary on the progressive left has been critical, Haslam takes a more ambivalent position: “Sometimes concept creep is presented in an exclusively negative frame,” he wrote, but that fails to address the “positive implications. To that end, we offer three positive consequences of the phenomenon.”

The first is that expansionary definitions of harm “can be useful in drawing attention to harms previously overlooked. Consider the vertical expansion of abuse to include emotional abuse.”

Second, “concept creep can prevent harmful practices by modifying social norms.” For example, “changing definitions of bullying that include social exclusion and antagonistic acts expressed horizontally rather than only downward in organizational hierarchies may also entrench norms against the commission of destructive behavior.”

And finally:

The expansion of psychology’s negative concepts can motivate interventions aimed at preventing or reducing the harms associated with the newly categorized behaviors. For instance, the conceptual expansion of addiction to include behavioral addictions (e.g., gambling and internet addictions) has prompted a flurry of research into treatment options, which has found that a range of psychosocial treatments can be successfully used to treat gambling, internet and sexual addictions.

Judge suggested an approach to this line of inquiry that he believed might offer a way for liberalism to regain its footing:

I would like to think that there is a version of modern progressivism that accepts many of the premises of the problem and causes of inequality but does so in a way that also celebrates the power of individualism, of consensus and of common cause. I know this is perhaps naïve. But if we give in to cynicism (that consensus can’t be found), that’s self-reinforcing, isn’t it? I think about the progress on how society now views sexual orientation and the success stories. The change was too slow, painful for many, but was there any other way?

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips . And here's our email: [email protected] .

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Instagram , TikTok , WhatsApp , X and Threads .

Thomas B. Edsall has been a contributor to the Times Opinion section since 2011. His column on strategic and demographic trends in American politics appears every Wednesday. He previously covered politics for The Washington Post. @ edsall

IMAGES

Freedom of Speech Essay
On Freedom Of Speech And Expression
Freedom of Expression Essay Example
Freedom of speech Essay Composition for all class students
Essay on Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Expression Essay Example

VIDEO

Article 19(1)(A) : Freedom of Speech and Expression
How to Write an IELTS Essay
IELTS Discussion Essay: Useful Academic Expressions
Freedom of Expression explained (explainity® explainer video)
IELTS Writing: The 3 Essay Types
Understanding the Limits on Freedom of Expression

COMMENTS

Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society?
Model Essay 02 : Freedom of speech is very important for a citizen to upgrade himself and society. Freedom is a key point to initiate development and bring people closer, start networking and move forward for a mission like, Mission of change, Mission of independence etc. Freedom of speaking is necessary for anyone either he is 2 years old kid ...
IELTS Writing Task 2 : Freedom of Speech
Model Essay 02 : Freedom of speech is very important for a citizen to upgrade himself and society. Freedom is a key point to initiate development and bring people closer, start networking and move forward for a mission like, Mission of change, Mission of independence etc. Freedom of speaking is necessary for anyone either he is 2 years old kid ...
Freedom of Speech Essays
Freedom of speech is a basic human right in all free society, it is essential in decision making from parliament to community level. When this basic human right is threaten, people become very emotional and will do anything to protect it. This can lead to social unrest and alternatively have negative effects on the economy.
Is Freedom Of Speech Necessary In A Free Society?
Therefore, freedom of speech should have its limits and law should be drafted to protect people from its misuse. On the other hand, freedom of speech and expression is crucial for the healthy functioning of the society. The freedom to express opinions is crucial for a civilized society to correct its course for a better tomorrow.
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample 304
Write at least 250 words. Model Answer: Freedom of speech is very important for a citizen to upgrade himself and society. Freedom is a key point to initiate development and bring people closer, start networking and move forward for a mission like the mission of change, the mission of independence etc. Freedom of speaking is necessary for anyone ...
IELTS Essay # 114
Model Answer 1: The issue of freedom of creative artist has extremely grown in importance in most countries over the few decades. It is considered that government should not interfere with their works and the artists should be free to do whatever they want. While I accept many artists are sharing their valuable ideas for the tremendous ...
Some people believe in the right to freedom of speech
Writing Samples /. Band 6. Some people believe in the right to freedom of speech. Others believe in censorship. Discuss both views and give your opinion. # people # right # freedom # speech # censorship. One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether we should allow freedom of expression or support. censorship.
Essay#74
The freedom of speech is important at all levels in a society. Yet it is most important for the governments. A government which does not know what the people feel and think is in a dangerous position. This is how the communist regimes of Eastern Europe were toppled in the 1980s. The same is happening again in other regions of the world today.
Freedom of Expression Essay Example
Introduction. Freedom of expression refers to the right to express one's opinions or thoughts freely by utilizing any of the different modes of communication available. The ideas aired should, however, not cause any intentional harm to other personality or status through false or ambiguous statements.
Freedom of Speech IELTS Writing Task 2
Content Curator. Freedom of Speech IELTS Writing Task 2 consists of three sample answers provided below. The task requires the candidates to provide a tentative and argumentative answer to the question. The sample answers comprise two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description of the topic.
Freedom of Speech and Expression
It is indeed true that the freedom of individual expression largely emanates from the level of autonomy granted. When our individual autonomies are restricted, the freedom of expression is also affected. This implies that autonomy is the epitome of the freedom of expression in many ways. We will write a custom essay on your topic.
Band 4: Some people believe that in the right of freedom of speech
Check out this IELTS Writing Task 2 essay written by our user on the topic: Some people believe that in the right of freedom of speech. Others believe in. ... On one hand I strongly support the group that clamering for freedom of expression for several reasons. Firstly freedom of speech is a human right.
Freedom Of Speech # Essay For IELTS
Firstly, freedom of speech gives a sense of attachment with the country. People feel more connected if they have a say in the decisions of the country. Secondly, allowing people to speak their minds helps often helps in reaching better solutions. For example-: in 2006, when Indian government increased the reservations, people across the country ...
Freedom of speech is necessary in a free society
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
1
The easiest way to score well on the IELTS Task 2 writing portion is to structure your writing in a solid essay format. A strong argument essay structure can be split up into 4 paragraphs, each containing 4 sentences (except the conclusion paragraph, which only contains 3 sentences). Stick to this essay structure: Paragraph 1 - Introduction
Why Is Freedom of Speech an Important Right? When, if Ever, Can It Be
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people ...
IELTS essay Knowledge is power. Freedom of expression and speech is a
Freedom of expression and speech is a crucial part of most modern societies. lQqJ Freedom of expression and speech is a crucial part of most modern societies. Within this culture, many people believe that by sharing information freely among all humanity, the future of the world is enhanced.
Freedom of Speech Essay • Examples for Students • GradesFixer
2 pages / 743 words. "The Right to Freedom of Speech and expression under Article 19 (1) (a) is an inalienable right of every citizen of the country; however the right is not absolute and subject to certain limitation. This right is enjoyed exclusively by the citizens i.e., natural persons... Freedom of Speech Civil Rights.
Band 4: Some people believe that in the right of freedom of speech
Check out this IELTS Writing Task 2 essay written by our user on the topic: Some people believe that in the right of freedom of speech. Others believe in ... For example, article 19(1) (a) of the constitution of india gurantees freedom of speech and expression to all citizens of India, which is the fundamental right of them. On the contrary ...
Essay, Article, Speech, Paragraph, Cue Card
Importance Of Freedom : Essay, Article, Speech, Paragraph, IELTS Cue Card Importance Of Freedom Essay. The colonial era spanning across 18th and 19th century became an epitome of oppression and slavery of the native population. Countless stories of the true and alleged atrocities of white on black and brown churned the imagination of the masses ...
Full article: Protecting the human right to freedom of expression in
Article 19 of the UDHR protected freedom of opinion and expression in the following terms (United Nations, 1948 ): Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
IELTS Writing Task 2: Format, Sample, Tips
IELTS Essay Types for Writing Task 2. In the IELTS Writing Task 2, candidates are required to write an essay in response to a prompt or question. There are several common types of essays that may appear in Task 2: 1. Argumentative/Opinion Essays: These essays require candidates to express their opinion on a given topic and support it with ...
Gaza campus protests: what are students' free speech rights and what
Protests that take place on university campuses in the UK are considered legal exercises of the right to freedom of expression. The rights of freedom of expression and freedom of assembly are ...
Is freedom of speech necessary in free society? Agree or ...
Ensure that you fully address the prompt and provide a clear opinion on whether freedom of speech is necessary in a free society. Present arguments to support your opinion. Coherence and Cohesion. Work on the organization and structure of your essay. Consider using paragraphs to separate your ideas and provide a clear introduction and conclusion.
National Rifle Association of America (NRA) v. Vullo: Did a New York
Footnotes Jump to essay-1 Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System v. Southworth, 529 U. S. 217, 229 (2000). Jump to essay-2 Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of Univ. of Va., 515 U. S. 819, 833 (1995). Jump to essay-3 Ashcroft v. Am. Civ. Liberties Union, 535 U.S. 564, 573 (2002).For additional background on the government speech doctrine, see Government Speech and Government as Speaker ...
Some people believe that in the right of freedom of speech. Others
Discover numerous IELTS Writing Task 2 essay samples, ranging from band 4+ to 9, written by our users on the topic: Some people believe that in the right of ... The question of freedom of speech has been debated on different platforms and has been a hot topic in many areas for quiet sometime.There is a group which argue that freedom of speech ...
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC & NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton: Content Moderation
The Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment prevents the government from unduly abridging the freedom of speech. 1 Footnote U.S. Const. amend. I. A recurring issue in free speech cases is what constitutes speech protected by the First Amendment. In determining whether government is regulating speech, courts examine whether a regulation relate[s] to the suppression of free expression or if it ...
The Happiness Gap Between Left and Right Isn't Closing
Some liberals have this view, but I suspect their influence is outsized because (a) they have the social media megaphone and (b) we are in a climate in which freedom of expression and, in ...
PDF Candidates for the Master of Arts Degree Biography and Memoir
Essays in Macroeconomics and Finance Justine Florianne Guillochon. June 2024 Heterogenous Household Expectations, Consumption Choices and Trust Chuxin Liu September 2023 . Essays in Health Economics John Patrick Orellana . February 2024 Essays on Real Estate, Flood Risk, and Political Sentiment Goncalo Pessa Figueiredo Costa June 2024

Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? – IELTS Writing Task 2

Model Essay 01 :

Model Essay 02 :

Model Essay 03 :

Model Essay 04 :

Model Essay 05 :

Model Essay 06 :

Model Essay 07 :

Model Essay 08 :

Get Evaluated for FREE:

More Writing Task 2 Essay Topics

Practice IELTS Writing Task 2 based on Essay types

Kasturika Samanta

Explore other Direct Question Essays

Post your Comments

Recent Articles

Our Offices

Step 1 of 3

Great Going!

IELTS App - For Mobile

Popular Last 24h

Our Telegram

Latest Articles

Freedom of Speech Essays

Band 7+ eBooks

IELTS Modules:

Recent Articles

Useful Language for IELTS Graphs

Taking a Gap Year

IELTS Essay: Loving Wildlife and Nature

Important pages

Connect with us

Is Freedom Of Speech Necessary In A Free Society?

Sample essay

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

IELTS Mentor "IELTS Preparation & Sample Answer"

Nav view search

IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.

IELTS Materials

Useful Links

Essay#74 | Freedom of Speech

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write at least 250 words.

You May Like this

Table#8 | Worldwide Market Share of the Notebook Computer

Table#7 | Teacher Training Qualifications

Freedom of Speech and Expression Opinion Essay

Freedom Of Speech # Essay For IELTS

One comment

Knowledge is power. Freedom of expression and speech is a crucial part of most modern societies.

IELTS essay Knowledge is power. Freedom of expression and speech is a crucial part of most modern societies.

Argumentative Essays on Freedom of Speech

Compare and Contrast Essays

Descriptive Essays

Persuasive Essays

Narrative Essays

Eric Foner's Analysis of American Freedom

Turner V Driver Case Analysis

The Meaning of The Freedom of Speech

A Study of The True Meaning of Free Speech in Today's Society

Relevant topics

Importance Of Freedom : Essay, Article, Speech, Paragraph, Cue Card

Conclusion on Importance of Freedom

About Charmin Patel

IELTS Writing Task 2: Format, Sample, Tips

IELTS Writing Task 2- Format

Please Login to comment...

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

Gaza campus protests: what are students’ free speech rights and what can universities do?

Disclosure statement

Are the protests legal?

Successful negotiations

Compliance Lead

Lecturer / Senior Lecturer - Marketing

Assistant Editor - 1 year cadetship

Executive Dean, Faculty of Health

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer, Earth System Science (School of Science)

Is freedom of speech necessary in free society? Agree or disagree?

Your opinion