define consiglio thesis

• More from M-W
• To save this word, you'll need to log in. Log In

Definition of thesis

Did you know.

In high school, college, or graduate school, students often have to write a thesis on a topic in their major field of study. In many fields, a final thesis is the biggest challenge involved in getting a master's degree, and the same is true for students studying for a Ph.D. (a Ph.D. thesis is often called a dissertation ). But a thesis may also be an idea; so in the course of the paper the student may put forth several theses (notice the plural form) and attempt to prove them.

Examples of thesis in a Sentence

These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'thesis.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback about these examples.

Word History

in sense 3, Middle English, lowering of the voice, from Late Latin & Greek; Late Latin, from Greek, downbeat, more important part of a foot, literally, act of laying down; in other senses, Latin, from Greek, literally, act of laying down, from tithenai to put, lay down — more at do

14th century, in the meaning defined at sense 3a(1)

Dictionary Entries Near thesis

the sins of the fathers are visited upon the children

thesis novel

Cite this Entry

“Thesis.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary , Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/thesis. Accessed 12 May. 2024.

Kids Definition

Kids definition of thesis, more from merriam-webster on thesis.

Nglish: Translation of thesis for Spanish Speakers

Britannica English: Translation of thesis for Arabic Speakers

Britannica.com: Encyclopedia article about thesis

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

Can you solve 4 words at once?

Word of the day.

See Definitions and Examples »

Get Word of the Day daily email!

Popular in Grammar & Usage

More commonly misspelled words, your vs. you're: how to use them correctly, every letter is silent, sometimes: a-z list of examples, more commonly mispronounced words, how to use em dashes (—), en dashes (–) , and hyphens (-), popular in wordplay, the words of the week - may 10, a great big list of bread words, 10 scrabble words without any vowels, 8 uncommon words related to love, 9 superb owl words, games & quizzes.

To support our work, we invite you to accept cookies or to subscribe.

You have chosen not to accept cookies when visiting our site.

The content available on our site is the result of the daily efforts of our editors. They all work towards a single goal: to provide you with rich, high-quality content. All this is possible thanks to the income generated by advertising and subscriptions.

By giving your consent or subscribing, you are supporting the work of our editorial team and ensuring the long-term future of our site.

If you already have purchased a subscription, please log in

What is the translation of "consiglio" in English?

"consiglio" in english, consiglio {m}.

• volume_up council
• recommendation
• consideration

consigliare {vb}

• volume_up advise
• give advice to

Consiglio d'Europa {m} [example]

• volume_up Council of Europe

consiglio consultivo {m}

• volume_up advisory council

consiglio distrettuale {m}

• volume_up borough council
• district council

"member of the Consiglio di Stato" in Italian

• volume_up consigliere di Stato

Translations

Consiglio {masculine}.

• "di esperti"
• open_in_new Link to source
• warning Request revision

consigliare [ consiglio|consigliato ] {verb}

Consiglio d'europa {masculine} [example], consiglio consultivo {masculine}, consiglio distrettuale {masculine}, member of the consiglio di stato {noun}, context sentences, italian english contextual examples of "consiglio" in english.

These sentences come from external sources and may not be accurate. bab.la is not responsible for their content.

Monolingual examples

Italian how to use "consiglio" in a sentence, italian how to use "consigliare" in a sentence, italian how to use "consiglio consultivo" in a sentence, italian how to use "consiglio distrettuale" in a sentence, italian how to use "advisory council" in a sentence, synonyms (italian) for "consiglio":.

• ammonimento
• avvertimento
• indicazione
• insegnamento
• raccomandazione
• suggerimento
• avvedutezza
• ponderazione
• riflessione
• dare un consiglio
• raccomandare
• consigliere di contea
• consigliere di facoltà
• consigliere didattico
• consigliere donna responsabile della programmazione didattica
• consigliere per la sicurezza nazionale
• consigliere privato della corona
• consigliere provinciale
• consigliere regionale
• consigliere responsabile della programmazione didattica
• consiglieri
• consiglio che regola il Federal Reserve System
• consiglio comunale
• consiglio comunale di comune rurale
• consiglio comunitario
• consiglio consultivo
• consiglio d'amministrazione
• consiglio d'istituto
• consiglio dei ministri
• consiglio dei ministri che regola le controversie in materia di spese pubbliche
• consiglio della riserva federale

Have a look at the English-Swahili dictionary by bab.la.

Social Login

English translation of 'consiglio'

Examples of 'consiglio' in a sentence consiglio

Browse alphabetically consiglio

• consigliere comunale
• consigliere d'amministrazione
• consigliere delegato
• consiglio comunale
• consiglio d'amministrazione
• Consiglio d'Europa
• All ITALIAN words that begin with 'C'

Related terms of consiglio

• consigliare
• Consiglio di Stato
• consiglio di fabbrica
• View more related words

Quick word challenge

Quiz Review

Score: 0 / 5

Wordle Helper

Scrabble Tools

A Theory of Commonsense Knowledge

Cite this chapter.

• L. A. Zadeh 6  

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 39))

94 Accesses

44 Citations

The theory outlined in this paper is based on the idea that what is commonly called commonsense knowledge may be viewed as a collection of dispositions , that is, propositions with implied fuzzy quantifiers. Typical examples of dispositions are: Icy roads are slippery. Tall men are not very agile. Overeating causes obesity. Bob loves women. What is rare is expensive , etc. It is understood that, upon restoration of fuzzy quantifiers, a disposition is converted into a proposition with explicit fuzzy quantifiers, e.g., Tall men are not very agile → Most tall men are not very agile .

Since traditional logical systems provide no methods for representing the meaning of propositions containing fuzzy quantifiers, such systems are unsuitable for dealing with commonsense knowledge. It is suggested in this paper that an appropriate computational framework for dealing with commonsense knowledge is provided by fuzzy logic , which, as its name implies, is the logic underlying fuzzy (or approximate) reasoning. Such a framework, with an emphasis on the representation of dispositions, is outlined and illustrated with examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Adams, E.W., H.F. Levine: 1975, ‘On the uncertainties transmitted from premises to conclusions in deductive inferences’, Synthese 30,429–460.

Article   Google Scholar  

Baldwin, J.F., S.Q. Zhou: 1982, ‘A fuzzy relational inference language’, Report NO. EM/FS 132, University of Bristol.

Google Scholar  

Barr, A., E.W. Feigenbaum: 1982, ‘The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence’, vols. 1,2 and 3. Los Altos: Kaufmann.

Barwise, J., R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized quantifiers and natural language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

Bellman, R.E., L.A. Zadeh: 1977, ‘Local and fuzzy logics’, in: Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, Epstein, G. (ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 103–165.

Blanchard, N.: 1981, ‘Theories cardinales et ordinals des ensembles flou: les multiensembles’, Thesis, University of Claude Bernard, Lyon.

Brachman, R. J., B. C. Smith: 1980, ’Special Issue on Knowledge Representation, SIGART 70.

Cooper, W.S.: 1978, ‘Logical Linguistics’, Dordrecht: Reidel.

Cresswell, M.J.: 1973, ‘Logic and Languages’, London; Methuen.

Cushing, S.: 1982, ‘Quantifier Meanings-A Study in the Dimensions of Semantic Competence’, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Date, C.J.: 1977, ‘An Introduction to Database Systems’, Reading; Addison-Wesley.

Davis, R., D.B. Lenat: 1982, ‘Knowledge-Based Systems in Artificial Intelligence’, New York: McGraw-Hill.

DeLuca, A., S.A. Termini: 1972, ‘A definition of nonprobabilstic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets theory’, Information and Control 20, 301–312.

Dubois, D., H. Prade: 1980, ‘Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications’, New York: Academic Press.

Duda, R.O, P.E. Hart, K. Konolige, R. Reboh: 1979, ‘A computer-based consultant for mineral exploration’, Tech. Report, SRJ International, Menlo Park, CA.

Feigenbaum, E.A.: 1977, ‘The art of artificial intelligence: Themes and case studies in knowledge engineering’, Proc. IJCAI5.

Findler, N.V. (ed.): 1979, ‘Associative Networks: Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computer’, New York Academic Press.

Gaines, B.R.: 1979, ‘Logical foundations for database systems’, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 11,481–500.

Goguen, J.A.: 1969, ‘The logic of inexact concepts’, Synthese 19, 325–373.

Hofmann, T.R.: 1982, ‘Qualitative terms for quantity’, In Proc. 6th European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, R. Trappl, (ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Hoover, D.N.: 1978, ‘Probability logic’, Annals Math. Lgoic 14, 287–313.

Ishizuka, M., K.S. Pu, J.T.P. Yao: 1982, ‘A rule-based inference with fuzzy set for structural damage assessment’, Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes, M. Gupta, and E. Sanchez (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Keenan, E.L.: 1971, ‘Quantifier structures in English’, Foundations of Language 7, 255–336.

Klement, E.P., W. Schwyhla, R. Lowen: 1981, ‘Fuzzy probability measures’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 5, 83–108.

Klement, E.P.: 1981, ‘Operations on fuzzy sets and fuzzy numbers related to triangular norms’, Proc. 11th Conf. Multiple-Valued Logic, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, 218–225.

Mamdani, E.H., B.R. Gaines: 1981, ‘Fuzzy Reasoning and its Applications’, London: Academic Press.

McCarthy, J.: 1980, ‘Circumscription: A non-monotonic inference rule’, Artificial Intelligence 13, 27–40.

McCawley, J.D.: 1981, ‘Everything that Linguists have Always Wanted to Know about Logic’, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McDermott, D.V., J. Doyle: 1982, ‘Non-monotonic logic I’, Artificial Intelligence 13, 41–72.

McDermott, D.V.: 1982, ‘Non-monotonic logic, II: nonmonotonic modal theories’, J. Assoc. Comp. Mach. 29, 33–57.

Michalski, R., J.G. Carbonell, T.M. Mitchell: 1983, ‘Machine Learning’, Palo Alto: Tioga Press.

Miller, G.A., P.N. Johnson-Laird: 1976, ‘Language and Perception’, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Mizumoto, M., M. Umano, K. Tanaka: 1977, ‘Implementation of a fuzzy-set-theoretic data-structure system’, 3rd Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, Tokyo.

Mizumoto, M., S. Fukame, K. Tanaka: 1978, ‘Fuzzy reasoning Methods by Zadeh and Mamdani, and improved methods’, Proc. Third Workshop on Fuzzy Reasoning, Queen Mary College, London..

Moisil, G.C.: 1975, ‘Lectures on the Logic of Fuzzy Reasoning’, Bucarest: Scientific Editions.

Noguchi, K., M. Umano, M. Mizumoto, K. Tanaka: 1976, ‘Implementation of fuzzy artificial intelligence language FLOU’, Technical Report on Automation and Language of IECE.

Orlov, A.I: 1980, ‘Problems of Optimization and Fuzzy Variables’, Moscow: Znaniye.

Partee, B.: 1976, ‘Montague Grammar’, New York: Academic Press.

Peterson, P.: 1979, ‘On the logic of few, many and most’, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 20, 155–179.

Reiter, R., G. Criscuolo: 1983, ‘Some representational issues in default reasoning’, Computers and Mathematics 9, 15–28.

Rescher, N.: 1976, ‘Plausible Reasoning’, Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.

Rich, E.: 1983, ‘Artificial Intelligence’, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rieger, C.: 1975, ‘Conceptual memory’, in Conceptual Information Processing, Schank, R. (ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Schubert, L.K., R.G. Goebel, N. Cercone: 1979, ‘The structure and organization of a semantic net for comprehension and inference’, in: Associative Networks, Findler, N. V.., (ed.), New York: Academic Press, 122–178.

Shortliffe, E.H., B. Buchanan: 1975, ‘A model of inexact reasoning in medicine’, Mathematical Biosciences 23, 351–379.

Shortliffe, E.H.: 1976, ‘Computer-Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN’, New York: American Elsevier.

Sugeno, M.: 1977, ‘Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals: a survey’, in Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes, Gupta, M.M., Saridis, G.N. and Gaines, B.R. (eds.) Amsterdam: North Holland, 89–102.

Suppes, P.: 1970, ‘A Probabilistic Theory of Causality’, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Szolovits, P., S.G. Pauker: 1978, ‘Categorical and probabilistic reasoning in medical diagnosis’, Artificial Intelligence 11, 115–144.

Terano, T., M. Sugeno: 1975, ‘Conditional fuzzy measures and their applications’, Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes, Zadeh. L. A, Fu, K. S, Tanaka, K., Shimura. M. (eds.), New York: Academic Press, 151–170.

Weiss, S.M., C.A. Kulikowski: 1979, ‘EXPERT: A system for developing consultation models’, Proc. IJAI6.

Yager, R.R.: 1980, ‘Quantified propositions in a linguistic logic’, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar ·on Fuzzy Set Theory, Klement, E.P. (ed.), Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.

Zadeh, L.A.: 1968, ‘Probability measures of fuzzy events’, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 23, 421–427.

Zadeh, L.A.; 1971, ‘Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings’, Inf. Sci. 3, 177–200.

Zadeh, L.A.: 1975, ‘Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning’ (in memory of Grigore Moisil), Synthese 30, 407–428.

Zadeh, L.A.: 1975, ‘The concept of a linguistic variable and its applicatiop to approximate reasoning’, Inform. Sci. 8, 199–249, 301–357, 9, 43–80.

Zadeh, L.A.: 1978, ‘PRUF-a meaning representation language for natural languages’, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 10, 395–460.

Zadeh, L.A.: 1979, ‘A theory of approximate reasoning’ Electronics Research Laboratory Memorandum M77/58 University of California, Berkeley. Also in: Machine Intelligence 9, Hayes, J.E., Michie, D., Kulich, L.I.,(eds.), New York: Wiley 149–194.

Zadeh, L.A.: 1980, ‘Inference in fuzzy logic’, Proc. 10 th Inter. Symp. on Multiple-valued Logic, Northwestern University, 124–131.

Zadeh, L.A.: 1980, ‘Possibility theory and soft data analysis’, Electronic Res. Laboratory Memorandum M79/59 University of California, Berkeley; also in Mathematical Frontiers of the Social and Policy Sciences, Cobb, L., and Thrall, R.M. (eds.), Boulder: Westview Press, 69–129 (1981).

Zadeh, L.A.: 1981, ‘Test-score semantics for natural languages and meaning-representation via PRUF’, Techn. Note 247, AI Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. Also in Empirical Semantics, Rieger, B.B., (ed.), Bochum: Brockmeyer, 281–349.

Zadeh, L.A.: 1981, ‘Fuzzy probabilities and their role in decision analysis’, Proc. 4th MIT/ONR Workshop on Command, Control and Communications M.I.T., 159–179.

Zadeh, L.A.: 1983, ‘A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages’, Computers and Mathematics 9, 149–184.

Zimmer, A.: 1982, ‘Some experiments concerning the fuzzy meaning of logical quantifiers’, in General Surveys of Systems Methodology, Troncoli, L. (ed.), 435–441. Society for General Systems Research, Louisville.

Zimmermann, H.-J., P. Zysno: 1980, ‘Latent connectives in human decision making’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 4, 37–52.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Computer Science Division, Department of EECS and ERL, University of California, Berkeley, USA

L. A. Zadeh

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

University of Paderborn, Germany

Heinz J. Skala

Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Laboratorio di Cibernetica, Naples, Italy

Universidad Politécnica de Barcelona, Spain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Zadeh, L.A. (1984). A Theory of Commonsense Knowledge. In: Skala, H.J., Termini, S., Trillas, E. (eds) Aspects of Vagueness. Theory and Decision Library, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6309-2_13

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6309-2_13

Publisher Name : Springer, Dordrecht

Print ISBN : 978-94-009-6311-5

Online ISBN : 978-94-009-6309-2

eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Walden University
• Faculty Portal

Writing a Paper: Thesis Statements

Basics of thesis statements.

The thesis statement is the brief articulation of your paper's central argument and purpose. You might hear it referred to as simply a "thesis." Every scholarly paper should have a thesis statement, and strong thesis statements are concise, specific, and arguable. Concise means the thesis is short: perhaps one or two sentences for a shorter paper. Specific means the thesis deals with a narrow and focused topic, appropriate to the paper's length. Arguable means that a scholar in your field could disagree (or perhaps already has!).

Strong thesis statements address specific intellectual questions, have clear positions, and use a structure that reflects the overall structure of the paper. Read on to learn more about constructing a strong thesis statement.

Being Specific

This thesis statement has no specific argument:

Needs Improvement: In this essay, I will examine two scholarly articles to find similarities and differences.

This statement is concise, but it is neither specific nor arguable—a reader might wonder, "Which scholarly articles? What is the topic of this paper? What field is the author writing in?" Additionally, the purpose of the paper—to "examine…to find similarities and differences" is not of a scholarly level. Identifying similarities and differences is a good first step, but strong academic argument goes further, analyzing what those similarities and differences might mean or imply.

Better: In this essay, I will argue that Bowler's (2003) autocratic management style, when coupled with Smith's (2007) theory of social cognition, can reduce the expenses associated with employee turnover.

The new revision here is still concise, as well as specific and arguable.  We can see that it is specific because the writer is mentioning (a) concrete ideas and (b) exact authors.  We can also gather the field (business) and the topic (management and employee turnover). The statement is arguable because the student goes beyond merely comparing; he or she draws conclusions from that comparison ("can reduce the expenses associated with employee turnover").

Making a Unique Argument

This thesis draft repeats the language of the writing prompt without making a unique argument:

Needs Improvement: The purpose of this essay is to monitor, assess, and evaluate an educational program for its strengths and weaknesses. Then, I will provide suggestions for improvement.

You can see here that the student has simply stated the paper's assignment, without articulating specifically how he or she will address it. The student can correct this error simply by phrasing the thesis statement as a specific answer to the assignment prompt.

Better: Through a series of student interviews, I found that Kennedy High School's antibullying program was ineffective. In order to address issues of conflict between students, I argue that Kennedy High School should embrace policies outlined by the California Department of Education (2010).

Words like "ineffective" and "argue" show here that the student has clearly thought through the assignment and analyzed the material; he or she is putting forth a specific and debatable position. The concrete information ("student interviews," "antibullying") further prepares the reader for the body of the paper and demonstrates how the student has addressed the assignment prompt without just restating that language.

Creating a Debate

This thesis statement includes only obvious fact or plot summary instead of argument:

Needs Improvement: Leadership is an important quality in nurse educators.

A good strategy to determine if your thesis statement is too broad (and therefore, not arguable) is to ask yourself, "Would a scholar in my field disagree with this point?" Here, we can see easily that no scholar is likely to argue that leadership is an unimportant quality in nurse educators.  The student needs to come up with a more arguable claim, and probably a narrower one; remember that a short paper needs a more focused topic than a dissertation.

Better: Roderick's (2009) theory of participatory leadership  is particularly appropriate to nurse educators working within the emergency medicine field, where students benefit most from collegial and kinesthetic learning.

Here, the student has identified a particular type of leadership ("participatory leadership"), narrowing the topic, and has made an arguable claim (this type of leadership is "appropriate" to a specific type of nurse educator). Conceivably, a scholar in the nursing field might disagree with this approach. The student's paper can now proceed, providing specific pieces of evidence to support the arguable central claim.

Choosing the Right Words

This thesis statement uses large or scholarly-sounding words that have no real substance:

Needs Improvement: Scholars should work to seize metacognitive outcomes by harnessing discipline-based networks to empower collaborative infrastructures.

There are many words in this sentence that may be buzzwords in the student's field or key terms taken from other texts, but together they do not communicate a clear, specific meaning. Sometimes students think scholarly writing means constructing complex sentences using special language, but actually it's usually a stronger choice to write clear, simple sentences. When in doubt, remember that your ideas should be complex, not your sentence structure.

Better: Ecologists should work to educate the U.S. public on conservation methods by making use of local and national green organizations to create a widespread communication plan.

Notice in the revision that the field is now clear (ecology), and the language has been made much more field-specific ("conservation methods," "green organizations"), so the reader is able to see concretely the ideas the student is communicating.

Leaving Room for Discussion

This thesis statement is not capable of development or advancement in the paper:

Needs Improvement: There are always alternatives to illegal drug use.

This sample thesis statement makes a claim, but it is not a claim that will sustain extended discussion. This claim is the type of claim that might be appropriate for the conclusion of a paper, but in the beginning of the paper, the student is left with nowhere to go. What further points can be made? If there are "always alternatives" to the problem the student is identifying, then why bother developing a paper around that claim? Ideally, a thesis statement should be complex enough to explore over the length of the entire paper.

Better: The most effective treatment plan for methamphetamine addiction may be a combination of pharmacological and cognitive therapy, as argued by Baker (2008), Smith (2009), and Xavier (2011).

In the revised thesis, you can see the student make a specific, debatable claim that has the potential to generate several pages' worth of discussion. When drafting a thesis statement, think about the questions your thesis statement will generate: What follow-up inquiries might a reader have? In the first example, there are almost no additional questions implied, but the revised example allows for a good deal more exploration.

Thesis Mad Libs

If you are having trouble getting started, try using the models below to generate a rough model of a thesis statement! These models are intended for drafting purposes only and should not appear in your final work.

• In this essay, I argue ____, using ______ to assert _____.
• While scholars have often argued ______, I argue______, because_______.
• Through an analysis of ______, I argue ______, which is important because_______.

Words to Avoid and to Embrace

When drafting your thesis statement, avoid words like explore, investigate, learn, compile, summarize , and explain to describe the main purpose of your paper. These words imply a paper that summarizes or "reports," rather than synthesizing and analyzing.

Instead of the terms above, try words like argue, critique, question , and interrogate . These more analytical words may help you begin strongly, by articulating a specific, critical, scholarly position.

Read Kayla's blog post for tips on taking a stand in a well-crafted thesis statement.

Related Resources

Didn't find what you need? Email us at [email protected] .

• Previous Page: Introductions
• Next Page: Conclusions
• Office of Student Disability Services

Walden Resources

Departments.

• Academic Residencies
• Academic Skills
• Career Planning and Development
• Customer Care Team
• Field Experience
• Military Services
• Student Success Advising
• Writing Skills

Centers and Offices

• Center for Social Change
• Office of Academic Support and Instructional Services
• Office of Degree Acceleration
• Office of Research and Doctoral Services
• Office of Student Affairs

Student Resources

• Doctoral Writing Assessment
• Form & Style Review
• Quick Answers
• ScholarWorks
• SKIL Courses and Workshops
• Walden Bookstore
• Walden Catalog & Student Handbook
• Student Safety/Title IX
• Legal & Consumer Information
• Website Terms and Conditions
• Cookie Policy
• Accessibility
• Accreditation
• State Authorization
• Net Price Calculator
• Contact Walden

Walden University is a member of Adtalem Global Education, Inc. www.adtalem.com Walden University is certified to operate by SCHEV © 2024 Walden University LLC. All rights reserved.

• Dictionaries home
• American English
• Collocations
• German-English
• Grammar home
• Practical English Usage
• Learn & Practise Grammar (Beta)
• Word Lists home
• My Word Lists
• Recent additions
• Resources home
• Text Checker

Definition of thesis noun from the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary

• Students must submit a thesis on an agreed subject within four years.
• He presented this thesis for his PhD.
• a thesis for a master's degree
• He's doing a doctoral thesis on the early works of Shostakovich.
• Many departments require their students to do a thesis defense.
• She completed an MSc by thesis.
• her thesis adviser at MIT
• in a/​the thesis
• thesis about

Definitions on the go

Look up any word in the dictionary offline, anytime, anywhere with the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary app.

• Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

Meaning of thesis in English

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

• I wrote my thesis on literacy strategies for boys .
• Her main thesis is that children need a lot of verbal stimulation .
• boilerplate
• composition
• dissertation
• essay question
• peer review

You can also find related words, phrases, and synonyms in the topics:

thesis | American Dictionary

Examples of thesis, collocations with thesis.

These are words often used in combination with thesis .

Click on a collocation to see more examples of it.

Translations of thesis

Get a quick, free translation!

Word of the Day

gyroscopically

with the use of a gyroscope (= a device containing a wheel that spins freely within a frame, used on aircraft, ships, etc. to help keep them horizontal)

Varied and diverse (Talking about differences, Part 1)

Learn more with +Plus

• Recent and Recommended {{#preferredDictionaries}} {{name}} {{/preferredDictionaries}}
• Definitions Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English English Learner’s Dictionary Essential British English Essential American English
• Grammar and thesaurus Usage explanations of natural written and spoken English Grammar Thesaurus
• Pronunciation British and American pronunciations with audio English Pronunciation
• English–Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified)–English
• English–Chinese (Traditional) Chinese (Traditional)–English
• English–Dutch Dutch–English
• English–French French–English
• English–German German–English
• English–Indonesian Indonesian–English
• English–Italian Italian–English
• English–Japanese Japanese–English
• English–Norwegian Norwegian–English
• English–Polish Polish–English
• English–Portuguese Portuguese–English
• English–Spanish Spanish–English
• English–Swedish Swedish–English
• Dictionary +Plus Word Lists
• English    Noun
• American    Noun
• Collocations
• Translations
• All translations

To add thesis to a word list please sign up or log in.

Add thesis to one of your lists below, or create a new one.

{{message}}

Something went wrong.

There was a problem sending your report.

Definitions of terms in a bachelors', master's or PhD thesis - 3 cases

Finding a suitable definition for a term in a bachelor's thesis, master's thesis or dissertation is often tedious, but absolutely necessary. Otherwise, you start from scratch. There are often many definitions for the same term...

What definition do I use? Fortunately, there are proven methods for searching and formulating definitions. This will help you get a grip on the terms. Let's go!

What is a definition?

A definition always leads a term back to a generic term. In an academic paper, such as a Bachelor's thesis, Master's Thesis or dissertation, the definitions MUST come from recognized sources. But sometimes there aren’t any scientific sources for a research subject, which is especially true when exploring a new field. At that point, you have to formulate a definition yourself.

Three cases can be distinguished with regard to the definition of terms:

• Accepted term - Case 1
• New inconsistent concept - case 2
• New, largely unexplored term (YOUR focus) - Case 3.

Let's go through the cases in order.

Case 1: Definition of an accepted term

The term has been known for a long time and is frequently used in scientific sources. The definitions in different sources are relatively consistent. This can be seen from the fact that the same source references appear repeatedly in definitions.

Examples of such terms are attitudes, motivation, incentives, learning disabilities or controlling.

Such terms are hardly ever discussed anymore. They are simply implied by the definition. Nevertheless, there may be new variations of definitions. However, they are usually for a very specific term and therefore not relevant for your text.

A quick way to get started in defining these terms:

• Be sure to use the correct spelling of the term. Distinguish singular and plural. Search the term in Google.
• Go to Wikipedia and look up the references inside the term article. Focus on scientific sources like books or papers. (Of course you can also do this without a wiki!)
• Locate these sources and gather them. Search at the beginning of the chapter or book for possible definitions. Usually several authors are cited. This is followed by a proposal for a definition, as it is subsequently used in the textbook.
• Adopt this definition, but refer to the original source if it came from another source.
• Write the definition into your text, with the full reference.

IMPORTANT: Do not use Google, Wikipedia, other pure online sources or encyclopedias as a source reference for definitions of recognized terms. It signals carelessness, if not laziness... The only possible sources for the definition of terms are

• textbooks or reference books
• scientific articles (paper)
• lists of standards like DIN, ISO, Law Codices...

By the way, the best sources are standards like DIN and ISO or laws of all kinds. These legal definitions are the best.

Case 2: Definition of still inconsistent term

A characteristic of this type of term is the existence of several definitions by different authors. Ultimately, each definition focuses on specific characteristics. That is why it is often not "either-or", but "both-also".

This is reminiscent of the example with the elephant, which six blind people examine by touch and then describe. The person who touches the trunk says it is a snake. The one sitting on his back says, "That's a mountain." Whoever touches the legs says it is a tree trunk, the ears are ferns, the ivory teeth are field cliffs, etc.

This situation is typical for relatively new subject areas where there is still a lot to discover. New is of course relative and depends on the subject. If there are only five to ten articles on a subject area, this indicates a need for research.

Examples of such terms are social media, trust, mediation.

Proceed as follows when defining these terms for the dissertation:

• Search for the relevant authors on the subject area.
• Search in their scientific articles for the definitions used.
• Make an overview of these definitions. Literally and with reference!!
• Filter out the substance from the respective definitions, the central words and the generic term.
• Check which of these definitions fits your approach.
• Use the appropriate definition or combine several definitions.
• Reconsider and justify your decision. Further work depends on this.
• Ask experts in the field, authors of papers.
• Agree upon the definition with the supervisor of the dissertation.

Case 3: Definition of new, still largely unexplored terms = focus of a dissertation

In this case it is a completely new concept. So far, there are only definitions of experts with experience in the subject area. These have themselves formulated a definition, but it has not been recognized officially. In any case, there are no recognized scientific sources on the field of research to date. But you need a clear definition for your text.

IMPORTANT: Please think very carefully if you really want to work on this topic. The lack of scientifically formulated definitions suggests that this could be an extremely tedious project. You practically have to explore the field without any orientation in the literature. Maybe you are the first to build a model. It could be heroic, but I'm sure it's a lot of work.

This is how you should proceed with new terms in the dissertation:

• Collect all available publications with information on this topic.
• Sort the publications found according to their quality, substance and scientific quality. Use only the best sources (data sources must be traceable and trustworthy)
• Make a comprehensive word cloud of relevant terms and variants.
• Collect the characteristics for the object or terms.
• Think carefully about which other terms are related to the term.
• Filter the ideas and arguments from texts that describe characteristics and are heading towards a definition.
• Make a list of these attributes. These are candidates for the definition.
• Search for generic terms for the term in appropriate documents.
• Make a list.

If you have collected enough sources or five days have passed (whichever happens first):

• Formulate YOUR first definition.
• Leave it for a day or two.
• Check, revise, iterate, collect the evidence, share the definition with others.
• Formulate the working definition for your text. It may be refined along the way.
• Discuss the draft of your definition with the supervisor or even with experts as soon as you are sure you have something to show.

IMPORTANT: Include the reference for each quote.

Now formulate the preliminary working definition that you will use during your research for the dissertation. Refine it if necessary.

Good luck writing your text! Silvio and the Aristolo Team

PS: Check out the Thesis-ABC and the Thesis Guide for writing a bachelor's or master's thesis in 31 days.