literature review on online teaching and learning

Neuroscience Education Approach Through Online Learning: A Systematic Literature Review of Current Research and Future Directions

• Conference paper
• First Online: 22 May 2024
• Cite this conference paper

• Fauziah Sulaiman   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9584-0421 6 ,
• Elnetthra Folly Eldy   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9865-9406 7 ,
• Lorna Uden 8 &
• Sitty Nur Syafa Bakri   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3486-4857 7  

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 2082))

Included in the following conference series:

• International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education Challenges

Online learning has brought about significant changes in the education since the COVID-19 pandemic. The cognitive processes involved in online learning have been debated for decades. Although many of the issues regarding instructional designs have been addressed, post pandemic challenges require us to take a more practical approach to prepare students with 21st-century skills. However, discussions on constructing an instructional design through online learning, particularly those related to active learning from a neuroscience perspective are still lacking. A systematic literature review to synthesise empirical data on using or implementing neuroscience educational approaches in online learning is needed. This paper attempts to identify the trends in the neuroscience education in online learning to research sampling trends and the focus of the field of study. The study utilised the Science Direct, Scopus, Pro Quest, and ERIC databases based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA), of 27 original articles published between 2014 and 2023. The findings reveal that the United States is be the dominant country in conducting neuroscience education approaches through online learning and related studies were mostly performed in 2023. The research samples were also more focused on higher education institutions (HEIs) with an emphasis on teaching and learning activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Cui, Y., Zhang, H.: Educational neuroscience training for teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge construction. Front. Psychol. 12 , 792723 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.792723

Article   Google Scholar  

Sulaiman, F., Uden, L., Eldy, E.F.: Online learning in higher education institution during COVID-19: a review and the way forward. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D. (eds.) LTEC 2022. CCIS, vol. 1595, pp. 167–184. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08890-2_13

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Osler, J.E., Wright, M.A.: Dynamic Neuroscientific Systemology: Using Tri–Squared Meta–Analysis And Innovative Instructional Design To Develop A Novel Distance Education Model For The Systemic Creation Of Engaging Online Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Technology, v12 n2 p42–55 Jul-Sep 2015 i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 12 l No. 2 l July - September 2015

Google Scholar  

Neuroscience. In Merriam-Webster (1963). http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/neuroscience

Osler, J.E.: The 4A metric algorithm: A unique E–learning engineering solution designed via neuroscience to counter cheating and reduce its recidivism by measuring student growth thorough systemic sequential online learning i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, Vol. 12 l No. 2 l September - November 2016 (2016)

Montague, P.R., King-Casas, B., Cohen, J.D.: Imaging valuation models in human choice. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29 , 417–448 (2006)

Siok, W.T., Perfetti, C.A., Jin, Z., Tan, L.H.: Biological abnormality of impaired reading is constrained by culture. Nature 431 , 71–76 (2004)

Tang, Y., et al.: Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by cultures. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. USA, vol. 103, pp. 10775–10780 (2006)

Stewart, P.C.: This is your brain on psychology wireless electroencephalography technology in a university classroom. Teach. Psychol. 42 (3), 234–241 (2015)

Li, P., Lan, Y-J.: Digital language learning (DLL): insights from behavior, cognition, and the brain. bilingualism: Lang. Cogn. 25 , 361–378 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000353

Uden, L., Sulaiman, F., Lamun, R.F.: Factors influencing students’ attitudes and readiness towards active online learning in physics. Educ. Sci. 12 (11), 746 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110746

Uden, L., Sulaiman, F., Ching, G.S., Rosales, J.J.: Integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics project-based learning for physics learning from neuroscience perspectives. Front. Psychol. 14 , 1136246 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136246

Simonetti, I., et al.: Neurophysiological evaluation of students’ experience during remote and face-to-face lessons: a case study at driving school. Brain Sci. 13 , 95 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13010095

Botvinick, M., Braver, T.: Motivation and cognitive control: from behavior to neural mechanism. Psychology 66 (1), 83–113 (2015)

Diamond, A., Whitington, V.: Studying early brain development: educators’ reports about their learning and its applications to early childhood policies and practices. Australas. J. Early Childhood 40 (3), 11–19 (2015)

Ng, B., Ong, A.K.: Neuroscience and digital learning environment in universities: what do current research tell us? J. Scholarship Teach. Learn. 18 (3), 116–131 (2018). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v18i3.22651

Doukakis, S., Alexopoulus, E.C.: Online learning, educational neuroscience and knowledge transformation opportunities for secondary education students. J. High. Theory Pract. 21 (3), 49–57 (2018). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i3.4141

Moore, M.G., Resta, P., Rumble, G., Tait, A., Zaparovanny, Y.: Open and distance learning: Trends, policy and strategy considerations. UNESCO (2002)

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., Bond, A.: The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning EDUCAUSE Rev. 27 1–12 (2020). https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Nikiforos, S., Tzanavaris, S., Kermanidis, K.L.: Post-pandemic pedagogy: distance education in greece during COVID-19 pandemic through the eyes of the teachers. Eur. J. Eng. Res. Sci. (2020). Special Issue: CIE (2020). https://www.ej-eng.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/2305

Singh, V., Thurman, A.: How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). Am. J. Distance Educ. 33 , 289–306 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082

Zimmerman, B.J.: Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Pract. 41 (2), 64–70 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Hu, H., Gramling, J.: Learning strategies for success in a web-based course: a descriptive exploration. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 10 (2), 123–134 (2009). 250 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ864048

Neroni, J., Meijs, C., Gijselaers, H.J.M., Kirschner, P.A., de Groot, R.H.M.: Learning strategies and academic performance in distance education. Learn. Individ. Differ. 73 , 1–7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.007

Mayer, R E.: 2 - LEARNING STRATEGIES: AN OVERVIEW. In: Weinstein, C.E., Goetz, E.T., Alexander P.A. (eds.), Learning and Study Strategies, pp. 11–22. Academic Press (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-742460-6.50008-6

McCombs, B.L.: Historical review of learning strategies research: strategies for the whole learner—a tribute to Claire Ellen Weinstein and early researchers of this topic. Front. Educ. (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00006

Gusenbauer, M., Haddaway, N.R.: Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res. Synth. Methods 11 (2), 181–217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339 , b2535 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

Wiggins, G.A., Bhattacharya, J.: Mind the gap: an attempt to bridge computational and neuroscientific approaches to study creativity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8 , 540 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00540

Kak, V.: Neurosciences education: from′ gurukul′ to e-learning. Neurol. India 63 (3), 298–299 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.158149

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Kruger, M.: Neuroscience and E-learning: Where is the ideal nexus? Kidmore End: Academic Conferences International Limited (2018). https://www.proquest.com/conference-papers-proceedings/neuroscience-e-learning-where-is-ideal-nexus/docview/2081759999/se-2

Sandrone, S., Schneider, L.D.: Active and distance learning in neuroscience education. Neuron 106 (6), 895–898 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.001

Solomon, J.T. Hamilton, E., Viswanathan, V., Nayak, C.R.: On the use of brain-based learning protocols in fluid mechanics instruction. J. STEM Educ. 21 (3), 19–26 (2020). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1289957

Nathaniel, T.I., Goodwin, R.L., Fowler, L., McPhail, B., Black, A.C., Jr.: An adaptive blended learning model for the implementation of an integrated medical neuroscience course during the Covid-19 pandemic. Anat. Sci. Educ. 14 (6), 699–710 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2097

do Amaral, A., Alberto, J., Fregni, F.: Applying neuroscience concepts to enhance learning in an online project-based learning centred course. J. Prob. Based Learn. High. Educ. 9 (2), p. 142–159 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v9i2.5892

Riva, G., Wiederhold, B.K., Mantovani, F.: Surviving COVID-19: the neuroscience of smart working and distance learning. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 24 (2), 79–85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0009

Fragkaki, M., Mystakidis, S., Dimitropoulos, K.: Higher education faculty perceptions and needs on neuroeducation in teaching and learning. Educ. Sci. 12 , 707 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100707

Mosene, K., Heitmann, H., Pötter, D., Schmidt-Graf, F.: New concepts in neurology education: successful implementation of flipped classroom lectures. Neurol. Res. Pract. 4 (1), 31 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00196-7

Doukakis, S., Niari, M., Malliou, E., Vlachou, S., Filippakopoulou, E.: Teaching informatics to adults of vocational schools during the pandemic: students’ views and the role of neuroeducation. Information 13 , 274 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13060274

Beattie, E.N.: The power of the positive: enhancing online student engagement for adult literacy learners. Adult Literacy Educ. 4 (1), 20–35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.35847/EBeattie.4.1.20

Whiting, H., et al.: Theories of blended learning: a novel approach to tertiary neuroanatomy. Int. J. High. Educ. 11 (4) (2022). http://ijhe.sciedupress.com , https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n4p191

Juárez-Varón, D., Bellido-García, I., Gupta, B.: Analysis of stress, attention, interest, and engagement in onsite and online higher education: a neurotechnological stud. Comunicar, 31(76), 21–34.n. 76, v. XXXI, Pages: Pages: 21–33. Media Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3916/C76-2023-02

Sáiz-Manzanares., M., Marticorena-Sánchez, R., Martín-Antón, L. Almeida, L., Carbonero-Martín, M.: Application and challenges of eye tracking technology in higher education. Comunicar, Media Educ. Res. J. 76, v. XXXI, 35–45 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3916/C76-2023-03

Frei-Landau, R., Grobgeld, E., Guberman, R.: Implementing digital neuroscience in special-needs-teacher education: exploring student-teachers’ multifaceted learning outcomes related to teaching children with neurodevelopmental disorders (2023). Front. Psychol. 14:1232315. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232315

Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A., Fragkaki, M., Dimitropoulos, K.: Online professional development on educational neuroscience in higher education based on design thinking. Information 14 , 382 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/info14070382

da Silva Soares Jr, R., Barreto, C., Sato, J.R.: Perspectives in eye-tracking technology for applications in education. South Afr. J. Childhood Educ. 13 (1), 1204 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1204

Baars, B.J.: A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, NY (1988)

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Science and Natural Resources, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia

Fauziah Sulaiman

Preparatory Centre for Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia

Elnetthra Folly Eldy & Sitty Nur Syafa Bakri

Faculty of Computing and Computer Science, Staffordshire University, Stoke-On-Trent, UK

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fauziah Sulaiman .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK

Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences, Seinäjoki, Finland

Dario Liberona

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Sulaiman, F., Eldy, E.F., Uden, L., Bakri, S.N.S. (2024). Neuroscience Education Approach Through Online Learning: A Systematic Literature Review of Current Research and Future Directions. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D. (eds) Learning Technology for Education Challenges. LTEC 2024. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2082. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61678-5_21

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61678-5_21

Published : 22 May 2024

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-61677-8

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-61678-5

eBook Packages : Computer Science Computer Science (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning

Illinois Online Higher Education Symposium

Towards Online Excellence

November 8, 2024 free virtual conference.

Organized by Illinois Public Universities

Pre-Register Today for Updates & Reminders!

Click the "Pre-Register" button above to register online.

Online Registration is Now Closed

To attend, please call 815-753-0595 or email [email protected]

Links to download session resources and handouts are available below

Institute to Be Fully Online

Due to a number of factors, such as the risk for the speaker to travel while COVID case numbers are rising in much of the country, the Teaching Effectiveness Institute will now be delivered fully online as opposed to in-person with a live streaming option. Information about how to participate in the online session will be sent to registered participants.

NIU is proud to be partnering with all Illinois public universities to offer the inaugural Illinois Online Higher Education Symposium, bringing together thought leaders and practitioners with expertise in online teaching and learning from across the state of Illinois to discuss the latest trends in online learning--from pedagogy to technology.

This free virtual conference will be held on November 8th, 2024 and welcomes all those who learn, teach, develop, support, or administer online education.

Target Audience (Presenters and Attendees)

Higher education instructors who teach online, online leaders or administrators, instructional designers, instructional technologists, and anyone interested in online learning. While the focus is on Illinois, we invite anyone from anywhere to participate.

Purpose of the Event

• Showcase exemplary virtual educational practices
• Collaborate and communicate with the community of online and digital educators
• Discuss current trends and disruptions in online environments
• Share online teaching practices unique to Illinois' history, geography, and demography

Uncovering the Hidden Curriculum

Thursday, august 11, 1 - 4 pm.

Outside the formal dimensions of learning lies a curriculum rarely discussed: the hidden curriculum of how to be an effective student in higher education. This curriculum is not carefully laid out in college catalogs, and it may seem obvious to experienced faculty and instructors, but it can be a barrier to student success, particularly for first-generation students. When we uncover it for our students, we can create a more equitable learning environment. In this session we will discuss aspects of higher education's hidden curriculum and how you can help students to become more effective learners.

Register Now!

Motivating and Engaging Students

Friday, august 12, 9 am - noon.

Research on learning is clear: we learn more when we are motivated and engaged, but it is unrealistic to expect that all students are excited to learn in every course. When we encounter students who seem uninterested or even apathetic toward course content and assignments, there are ways we can motivate, excite and even inspire students to learn. This is more challenging than ever given how exhausted we all are as we emerge from the pandemic, so this session is an opportunity to explore how you, even in these difficult times, can make classroom learning a more meaningful experience for students.

Small Teaching: From Minor Changes to Major Results

Time - time am.

While large and complex teaching innovations can be exciting and effective, research from the learning sciences suggests that a few small, manageable changes can improve learning in almost any type of course, from traditional lectures to flipped classrooms. In this session, you will learn practical strategies that can have a positive impact on student learning and consider how you might apply them in your upcoming courses.

Present at Inaugural Symposium

We are seeking proposals that showcase our vibrant statewide higher education online community. For this inaugural event, we hope to schedule sessions about teaching online, designing online, hybrid, or HyFlex courses, and administering or leading online programs. The conference aims to improve online teaching and learning in Illinois and beyond.

Proposals will be reviewed by other educators who will provide feedback.

• April 22, 2024: Accepting submissions
• June 30, 2024: Deadline for submissions
• August 2, 2024: Notification of acceptance
• October 1, 2024: Conference schedule released
• October 25, 2024: Deadline for flash talks, pre-recorded sessions, and digital materials
• November 8, 2024: Symposium

Themes to Consider

• Leading by Example: Visionary Leadership in Online Education
• Leadership Strategies for Online Learning Excellence
• Designing for Online Learning: Pathway Building for Multi-modal (e.g. Traditional, Workplace Learning, Accelerated Programs, and Micro-credentials)
• Online Pedagogy – Examples of Engaging Practice
• AI Influences on Online Learning – Practices to use AI
• Supporting Online Faculty, Students, and Technologies
• Innovative Hybrid/HyFlex Teaching and Learning Strategies

Review Criteria

Proposals will be reviewed using the following criteria:

• Clarity: The proposal is written clearly and professionally.
• Relevance: The session’s topic is relevant and of current interest to those who teach, administer, support, research or lead online education.
• Significance: The session will make a notable contribution to the knowledge and/or practice of online education.
• Completeness: The proposal adequately describes what will occur during the session (not just describing the background and importance of the topic).
• Alignment: The proposal aligns with one or more of the conference topics.

Step 1: Download and Complete the Proposal Template

Step 2: Submit Your Proposal

Organizing Committee - Illinois Chief Online Learning Officers

• Lisa J. Anderson , Director, Office of Online Learning, University of Illinois
• Michel Bellini , Director, Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning, University of Illinois
• Craig Engstrom , Director, Center for Teaching Excellence, Southern Illinois University Carbondale
• Michael Gillespie , Director of Faculty Development and Innovation, Eastern Illinois University
• Michele Gribbins , Director, Center for Online Learning, Research and Service, University of Illinois-Springfield
• Wenhao David Huang , Associate Head, Education Policy, Organization and Leadership, University of Illinois
• Nikki LaGrone , Director, Center for Teaching and Learning, Governors State University
• Anthony Piña , Chief Online Learning Officer, Illinois State University
• Jason Rhode , Associate Vice Provost for Teaching, Learning, and Digital Education, Northern Illinois University
• Ian Szechowycz , Director of Digital Spaces, Western Illinois University
• Mary Walker-Ettling , Director, Online Services and Educational Outreach at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
• Susan Wegmann , Director, SIUC Global, Southern Illinois University Carbondale

Featured Speaker

Keynote: Ray Schroeder UPCEA Senior Fellow UIS Professor Emeritus Personal Website

Presentation: "Artificial Intelligence in Online Learning"

Online learning continues to be the preferred mode of delivery of higher learning to adult and professional students. The advent of Artificial Intelligence tools and agents have become available to enhance the delivery of learning online. They promise to make our online programs more efficient, effective and flexible for lifelong learning. We will examine the opportunities that these advanced, smart technologies offer and the potential they provide to further extend and expand our online learning programs.

A nationally respected and connected leader in higher education online learning, Ray Schroeder is senior fellow of UPCEA, the online and professional education association, and professor emeritus at the University of Illinois Springfield (UIS). With 50 years on the faculty and administration at the Urbana and Springfield campuses of the University of Illinois, Ray is the recipient of numerous national awards and citations for individual excellence and leadership from many associations and entities, including the Sloan Consortium (OLC), US Distance Learning Association, American Journal of Distance Education, Illinois Council for Continuing Higher Education, University of Wisconsin, and University of Illinois. In 2023, Ray received the honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters degree from UIS in 2023 and became the first recipient of the UPCEA Leadership Award for the Advancement of Digital Learning (now renamed the Ray Schroeder Leadership Award for the Advancement of Digital Learning). He is the author of book chapters, articles, widely read blogs, and social media feeds on news and research in online learning/educational technology. Ray is a noted speaker, consultant, researcher, and author on online learning, emerging educational technologies, and technology-enhanced learning topics.

In this opening keynote, Dr. Michael Wesch, Kansas State University, will share his experience using video to transform pedagogy and engagement in his online courses. The techniques have proven so effective and popular with students that they have inspired a radical revision of his in-person teaching as well. Dr. Wesch's hope is that we can not only thrive through this particular cultural moment, but perhaps many of you, like him, will find a love for online teaching and the lasting effect may be better online programs and courses for students who simply cannot join us on our campuses.

Michael Wesch is the creator of the Teaching Without Walls video series which includes the top ranked YouTube video for college online teaching.  The New York Times listed him as one of 10 professors in the nation whose courses "mess with old models" and added that "they give students an experience that might change how they think, what they care about or even how they live their lives."  His videos have been viewed over 20 million times, translated in over 20 languages, and are frequently featured at international film festivals and major academic conferences worldwide.  Wesch has won several major awards for his work, including the US Professor of the Year Award from the Carnegie Foundation, the Wired Magazine Rave Award, and he was named an Emerging Explorer by National Geographic.  He is also co-creator of anth101.com and author of The Art of Being Human , a free and open textbook alternative for Introduction to Cultural Anthropology.

Planning is key to creating a video that has a powerful impact on teaching and learning. This session will address audience analysis, learning objectives, content planning, scripting, and other factors required for successful video development. Plan to achieve results!

You don't need expensive equipment to record video. This session will review techniques for recording video using your smart phone or webcam. You will practice recording a simple video that could be used to increase your presence in any course. Record your presence!

Note: All are welcome to the event. However, to complete the "hands-on" activity, participants will need to have a recording device, such as a smart phone or web cam, and recording app on the device.

Simple editing tools can be used to improve video content and enhance the viewers' experience. This session will review the process for completing simple edits using tools such as Kaltura Editor. Edit for impact!

Note: All are welcome to the event. Participants may choose to edit the video they created during the earlier session or use a video provided by the CITL, which will be available in the resources for the event.

Friday, August 14, 2020

Taking video to the next level :   storytelling , engagement ,   pedagogy , and   social justice  .

Laura Vazquez received her Ph.D. in Radio, TV and Film from Northwestern University and has been teaching media theory and production courses in the Department of Communication at Northern Illinois University for 20 years. She currently chairs the Presidential Commission on the Status of Women and is also the Undergraduate Director for the Department of Communication . Dr. Vazquez is also the president of the University Film and Video Association .

Vazquez is a documentary filmmaker who has produced several social issue documentaries on topics such as domestic violence and the courts, poverty and homelessness among various populations, sexual assault on college campuses and the politics of healthy food. Her most recent film Think Globally, Act Locally , premiered in October 2015 at the 12th International Pascal Conference in Catania, Italy. It has screened in several festivals including Big Muddy, National Communication Association Social Justice film series and the Illinois International Film Festival. Recently she participated in a multi-institution $200,000 grant from the Wyncote Foundation to oversee the production of student made films on sexual assault on college campuses.

Videos can be produced for different purposes. During this session, you will learn how to select different video approaches to align with teaching and learning goals. We will also discuss how to use student-produced videos for assessments. Align for high impact!

Rich multimodal course content may include quality images, audio and video recordings. This session will include a review of strategies for enriching video by effectively using multimodal content aligned with course goals. Multimodal mashup for teaching and learning!

The final session of the Institute will include a showcase of work created by participants during the 2-day period. The Institute will conclude with a discussion of lessons learned and next steps. Teaching Effectiveness Institute videopalooza!

• Upcoming Programs
• Self-Paced Programs
• Faculty Participants
• ACUE Distinguished Teaching Scholars
• Inclusive Teaching for Equitable Learning
• Faculty Academy for Cultural Competence and Equity
• Descriptions
• Print Attendance Report

Phone: 815-753-0595 Email: [email protected]

Connect with us on

Facebook page Twitter page YouTube page Instagram page LinkedIn page

• Open access
• Published: 22 May 2024

Joint interprofessional education of pharmacy and dietetics undergraduates - a scoping review

• Anna Rudzińska   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8369-2131 1 ,
• Piotr Guzy   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4071-2080 2 ,
• Agnieszka Skowron   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3768-4958 2 ,
• Jerzy Gąsowski   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-5323 1 &
• Karolina Piotrowicz   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-8588 1  

BMC Medical Education volume  24 , Article number:  557 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Introduction

Interprofessional education (IPE) is an integrative approach that enables collaboration of students of two or more different health professions in aim to acquire skills and competencies related not only to their field of study but also to ensure the standard of care based on collaborative practice. IPE has not yet been explored in relation to collaboration between dietetics-nutrition and pharmacy students, while there is evidence that in many cases nutrition is complementary to pharmacotherapy in the treatment process.

The aim of this scoping review was to gather, describe and discuss all relevant literature regarding joint interprofessional training of pharmacy and dietetics-nutrition undergraduates.

We performed a literature search for studies where IPE between dietetics-nutrition and pharmacy students was described. 2204 articles on this topic were identified. After eligibility assessment, 8 articles were included in the review.

Eight studies were included in the review. Two of these described IPE activities between dietetics and pharmacy students only. The included studies varied in setting, methodology and outcome measures and covered a wide range of topics relevant to clinical practice, such as management of inflammatory bowel diseases, care of the older adults or counselling skills. The most common teaching method was the use of case studies. Some of the included studies did not identify specific learning objectives. The most common way of gathering feedback from participants was through questionnaires and interviews.

Conclusions

IPE of pharmacy and dietetics-nutrition students is feasible and may be beneficial in many aspects related to learning. However, there is no well-established model or standard that would facilitate the implementation of such activities in individual educational institutions.

Peer Review reports

Collaborative, interprofessional healthcare should become the model for healthcare delivery. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) document published in 2010, the benefits of interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional collaborative practice include shorter hospital stays, lower rates of complications and reduced mortality [ 1 ]. IPE is a topic of interest for research on graduate-level education in various aspects of medical care. However, literature reports vary in the models of educational approach evaluated, including, but not limited to, the number of different professions or specialties included, the educational level of participants (graduate or undergraduate), the learning settings, and the educational topics [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. There are also significant differences in the effects measured across studies. These may aim to measure students’ knowledge, skills, or opinions and experiences, as well as clinical skills or effects on the functioning of care systems [ 2 , 4 , 5 ]. Student-oriented outcomes include effects related to specific clinical or professional areas, as well as general collaborative skills, including teamwork or communication skills [ 4 , 6 , 7 ].

In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on incorporating elements of interdisciplinary education into the curricula of medical schools. This has been highlighted by the accreditation committees of medical and nursing schools in the United States, such as the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) [ 8 ] and the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN) [ 9 ], which include in their guidelines requirements for teaching aimed at effective collaboration between different professions. The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) publishes guidelines for accreditation that include a requirement to introduce interprofessional activities aimed at teaching skills such as conflict resolution and recognition of different professional roles [ 10 ]. In the UK, the General Medical Council requires medical schools to provide opportunities for students to work with other health and social care professionals during the course of their studies [ 11 ].

There are well-documented examples of good practice in providing such learning activities for the aforementioned majors, while care teams in both hospital and community settings are becoming increasingly multi-professional [ 12 ]. Nowadays, pharmacological and nutritional lifestyle interventions are considered important and complementary treatment modalities and pharmacists and dietitians are becoming more common members of these care teams. This creates an area for collaborative learning between dietitian-nutritionists and pharmacists, which may be considered beneficial in training on topics relevant to clinical practice where the required competencies are cross-disciplinary and part of the curriculum overlaps. This approach of combining pharmacological and dietary interventions is reflected in the clinical guidelines for diabetes [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], hypertension [ 16 ], dyslipidaemia [ 17 , 18 ], chronic kidney disease [ 19 , 20 ] or exocrine pancreatic insufficiency [ 21 , 22 ].

The two curricula have in common not only the learning outcomes related to knowledge of therapeutic interventions, but also the role of both professions in the health care system. Both dieticians and pharmacists are responsible for delivering elements of health education in many European countries. Tasks that used to be carried out mainly by doctors and nurses are now largely carried out by members of both professions. This creates favourable conditions for learning using interprofessional education methods. Dietetics and pharmacy students can transfer knowledge on chronic disease management to each other and support each other in acquiring skills for effective communication with other members of the healthcare team and, most importantly, with the patient. Such an approach at the undergraduate level can lay a solid basis for future professional collaboration.

The purpose of this scoping review is to gather, describe and discuss all relevant literature regarding joint interprofessional training of pharmacy and dietetics-nutrition undergraduates with particular focus on learning settings, methods, topics, and outcome measures of joint learning used in research.

We used the extended definition of IPE proposed by Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education (CAIPE), according to which IPE can be defined as occasions when members or students of two or more professions learn with, from and about each other to improve collaboration and the quality of care and services [ 23 ].

We decided to conduct this review in accordance with scoping review methodology, following PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews [ 24 ].

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

We included each study that examined the interprofessional education initiatives involving pharmacy students and dietetics-nutrition students.

We excluded studies where:

students of either pharmacy or dietetics-nutrition were not included;

the majority (> 50%) of the group were postgraduates;

it was uncertain, whether dietetics-nutrition and pharmacy students had the opportunity to work together;

described learning outcomes of interprofessional learning activity were unrelated with future working environment and patient care (e.g. language courses, time management training).

During the screening stage, we considered only publications in English and Polish. We excluded narrative reviews, conference abstracts, letters, opinions, and editorials.

Search strategy

We conducted systematic search of 3 medical databases: Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library and Embase with following queries:

For PubMed and Cochrane: (((((((((((dietician) OR (nutritionist)) OR (dietitian)) OR (dieticians)) OR (nutritionists)) OR (dietitians)) OR (dietetics student)) OR (dietetics students)) OR (“Dietetics“[Mesh]))) AND ((((((pharmacist) OR (pharmacists)) OR (Pharmacy student)) OR (Pharmacy students)) OR (“Students, Pharmacy“[Mesh]))))

For Embase: ((‘pharmacist’/exp OR pharmacist) OR ‘pharmacy education’/exp OR ‘pharmacy student’/exp) AND ((‘dietitian’/exp OR ‘dietitian’) OR ‘dietetics’/exp OR ‘dietetics student’/exp).

Search results are current as of May 17, 2023.

The selection of relevant studies was carried out independently by two researchers with didactic experience (PG, MPharm and AR, Master of Dietetics) in three step eligibility assessment process compliant with PRISMA Statement Extension for Scoping Reviews [ 24 ]. After the removal of duplicates, we screened titles and abstracts of identified literature. In the next step full texts have been screened. After selection of studies, we additionally reviewed the reference lists of the included full texts and checked the manuscripts citing the retrieved papers. Any disagreements on the inclusion of the study were resolved by discussion with third researcher with high level of competence in university-level teaching, research, and clinical experience (KP; MD, PhD).

Of the initial 2204 records screened, we included 8 manuscripts. Details on the sources, reasons for exclusion, and selection process are presented in PRISMA diagram (Fig.  1 ).

The PRISMA flowchart for the scoping review of joint interprofessional education of pharmacy and dietetics undergraduates

In total, 234 students of dietetics and 721 students of pharmacy participated in the included studies. The characteristics of individual studies are compared in Table  1 .

Students (majors) involved in the interdisciplinary training

Only in the studies by Wilby et al. and Khalafalla et al. did pharmacy and dietetics students have the opportunity to work together without the participation of students from other disciplines [ 26 , 29 ]. Wilby et al. described a one-day course-based voluntary IPE session in which students were given a case of a patient with Crohn’s disease and aimed to develop a care plan taking into account nutritional and pharmacological issues. Attitudes towards team-based care were assessed using an adapted survey (Heinemann, Schmitt, Farrell and Brallier; 1999). The survey consisted of 11 items measuring attitudes towards interprofessional care [ 26 , 33 ]. 95.1% of students agreed that the team approach improves the quality of patient care and 87.8% agreed that team meetings promote communication between team members from different disciplines. In general, the vast majority of participants agreed that interprofessional care was an applicable and beneficial concept, but there were few items in the questionnaire where opinions were divided. Controversies tended to relate to the leading role of doctors in interprofessional care and whether they had the right to interfere with patient care plans developed by other members of the healthcare team. 56.1% of respondents disagreed with the statement ‘Physicians are natural team leaders’. The other controversial items in the survey were ‘When developing interdisciplinary patient care plans, much time is wasted translating jargon from other disciplines’ (only 56.1% disagreed) and ‘Patients are less satisfied with their care when it is provided by a team’ (only 61.0% disagreed) [ 26 ]. In a study by Khalafalla et al., pharmacy and dietetics students participated in a voluntary university course aimed at improving communication between future health professionals, clarifying roles and developing teamwork skills. The authors did not specify why they chose to include these two professions in the interprofessional course. The teaching method used in this course was team-based learning (TBL) [ 29 ]. Although only pharmacy and dietetics students attended the course, the curriculum was facilitated by a team consisting of a registered dietitian, a clinical pharmacist, a paediatrician and a cardiovascular researcher. The course consisted of four sessions. Three were dedicated to theoretical knowledge on healthy eating, lifestyle and obesity, and the development of soft skills such as motivational interviewing, coaching and cultural competence. In the fourth session, students conducted mock interviews and had the opportunity to receive feedback from the registered dietitian. Student outcomes were assessed using the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS). In general, students’ self-perceived competencies increased in all areas assessed. In presenting the results of this study, the authors did not make a comparison between nutrition and pharmacy students [ 29 ].

In other studies, the number of majors varied from five (Watts et al.) [ 32 ] to eleven (Van Digelle et al.) [ 31 ]. The most common major to participate in an interprofessional learning environment was nursing, which was included in every study except the two that included only students of pharmacy and dietetics. Other common majors included were physiotherapy (in three studies) [ 25 , 27 , 31 ], social work and occupational therapy (each in four studies) [ 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] and psychology (in three studies) [ 25 , 28 , 30 ]. Based on the data we obtained from the included manuscripts, none of the authors provided a rationale for the selection of specific majors.

Learning setting and subject

The majority of the described interprofessional initiatives were implemented as university courses (voluntary or compulsory). In two studies an interprofessional clinic, where students could perform their professional roles was set (Kent et al., Watts et al.) [ 25 , 32 ].One study was based in a clinical setting, as the described intervention was interprofessional clinical rotations as part of the curriculum of the participating programmes (Pelham et al.) [ 27 ].

Four studies (Kent et al., Khalafalla et al., Bhattacharya et al., Van Diggele et al.) mentioned specific learning outcomes achieved by students upon completion of the course [ 25 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Six of the included studies defined subject areas (e.g., childhood obesity) or skills that students were expected to develop through participation in a course (e.g., cultural competency). In the study by Kent et al. students worked in an outpatient clinic for older adults, and the study aimed to report learning outcomes related to interprofessional collaboration in this specific setting [ 25 ]. In the study by Wilby et al., nutrition and pharmacy students worked on a case study of a patient with Crohn’s disease, but no learning objectives or specific topics were mentioned. In the study by Reitsma et al. no specific learning outcomes were mentioned, but the authors mentioned that the case studies used during the course reflected patients referred to their local clinics, e.g. patients with cancer, human immunodeficiency virus, Alzheimer’s disease, a teenager with an eating disorder and older adults. The project was planned with the involvement of a multidisciplinary team of teachers from six different health professions [ 26 ]. In the study by Khalafalla et al. the learning outcomes were defined but only related to the different aspects of nutrition education and motivational interviewing and not to the interdisciplinary practice of pharmacists and dietitians. Topics covered in the course included obesity, healthy nutrition, and lifestyle, coaching and motivational interviewing skills, and cultural competency [ 29 ]. The study by Bhattacharya et al. was part of the Geriatrics Champions Programme (GCP), a multidisciplinary project designed to train health professionals in different aspects of geriatric care. Thirty learning objectives were divided into eight domains: special considerations in geriatric care; medication management; cognitive, affective and behavioural health; complex or chronic illness in older adults; palliative and end-of-life care; hospital patient safety; transitions of care; ambulatory care. The domains were based on the American Geriatrics Society Internal Medicine-Family Medicine (IM-FM) Residency Competencies. Learning objectives within each domain were adapted for each specialty involved in interprofessional learning [ 30 ]. In study by van Diggele et al. three learning outcomes related to interprofessional collaboration were defined. The manuscript lacked in information on specific topics covered during the course [ 31 ]. Studies by Watts et al. and Pelham et al. lacked in information on learning outcomes provided by described courses [ 27 , 32 ].

Learning approach

Two of the included studies (Kent et al., Watts et al.) used the service-learning (SL) method [ 25 , 32 ]. Service-learning is a learning approach that combines theoretical knowledge gained in an academic setting with practical outcomes that benefit community members in some way. The important parts of service-learning are established learning objectives that meet the needs of the beneficiaries, reflection on the learning experience, reciprocity between beneficiaries and learners so that both parties have the opportunity to learn and teach, and structuring of the learning experience [ 34 ]. In Kent et al. and Watts et al. studies SL was used to create student-led clinics. In a study by Kent et al., the student-led clinic aimed to address the needs of senior citizens being discharged from hospital. Students from different disciplines formed interdisciplinary teams and provided advice and, if an unmet health need was identified, wrote a recommendation to the patient’s GP. After each day students presented each case study to other participants [ 25 , 32 ]. The study by Watts et al. aimed to compare face-to-face mobile community clinics run by students from different professions with the experience of a virtual student-run clinic. While the online clinic sessions were conducted using case studies and real patients were not present during the course, the face-to-face mobile clinics involved community members, particularly underserved older adults, and were offered in assisted living and senior centres. During the patient’s visit to the clinic, students collected health and dietary information, carried out supervised medication reconciliation and assessed the need for social support services. Debriefing sessions were held after the clinics to allow students to discuss the impact of interdisciplinary medical practice [ 32 ].

Case-based learning was the main intervention described in three of the included manuscripts (Wilby et al., Reitsma et al., van Diggele et al.) [ 26 , 28 , 31 ]. Case-based learning is a structured teaching approach that aims to prepare students for the future practice using clinical cases [ 35 ]. In the study by Reitsma et al., students participated in weekly meetings to discuss treatment approaches from the perspective of different health professions. The authors aimed to assess team dynamics and identify students who took on leadership roles during the intervention, as the course lasted 4–6 weeks. The number of nutrition and pharmacy students who took a leadership role during the meeting increased between the first and last meeting of the course [ 28 ]. In the van Diggele et al. study, students were asked to solve a case study and produce a video of their case management and treatment plan for this particular patient. The results of an intervention were evaluated using thematic analysis of the qualitative data. The following themes were identified in students’ responses to an open-ended question “What was most beneficial to your learning?“: opportunity to practice working in an interprofessional team, peer learning and collaboration (for both dietetics and pharmacy students), role clarification (for pharmacy students), perspectives of other disciplines in patient management (for dietetics students) [ 31 ].

The study by Khalafalla et al. used the team-based learning method, previously defined in this article [ 29 ]. The main components of this teaching approach are individual student preparation, individual and team Readiness Assessment Tests (tRATs), and in-class assignments requiring team-based decision making [ 36 ]. The second manuscript that described an intervention based on a team-based learning approach was the study by Bhattacharya et al. The intervention studied was a 24-month course in geriatrics led by facilitators from different faculties. The sessions were structured and consisted of individual and team readiness assessment tests, case studies, discussions and feedback. Before each session, students had access to online materials such as articles and patient cases. Participation in discussions and other activities was rewarded with points, and the team with the highest score received a prize at the end of the academic year [ 30 ].

Measure of outcomes

Two studies used qualitative methods to assess the outcomes of the educational intervention delivered. (Kent et al., Pelham et al.) [ 25 , 27 ]. The majority of included studies used both qualitative and quantitative approaches to the effectiveness and/or usefulness of the intervention for learners. (Reitsma et al., Khalafalla et al., Bhattacharya et al., Van Diggele et al.) [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. In the Watts et al. and Wilby et al. studies, the only tool used to measure outcomes was a validated questionnaire [ 26 , 32 ]. One study analysed clinical workplace providers’ experiences with IPE (Pelham et al.) [ 27 ], one (Kent et al.) mentioned both students’ and educators’ perspective, while other focused on students’ experiences [ 25 ]. A comparison of the included studies in terms of used measures of outcomes is presented in Table  2 .

We identified eight manuscripts relating to the described interprofessional learning for dietetics and pharmacy students. Of the included studies, two focused exclusively on dietetics and pharmacy students. Clinical teaching (particularly including geriatrics, gastroenterology, obesity, infectious diseases, oncology), cultural competence and interprofessional collaboration were identified as areas where interprofessional learning for dietetics and pharmacy students could be considered useful. However, some of the included studies did not identify specific learning objectives that would be useful in optimising future collaborations between pharmacy and nutrition or dietetics students. The included studies varied in setting, methodology and outcome measures and covered a wide range of topics relevant to clinical practice. In the included studies, case-based learning was the most commonly used teaching method. The use of this approach allows students from different disciplines to be involved in the care of the patient within their area of expertise, while encouraging interdisciplinary discussion of case management.

In the study by Wilby et al. [ 26 ], which included only dietetics and pharmacy students, authors draw attention to the important issue of involving all potential members of the interprofessional care team in interprofessional learning activities. On the one hand, such an approach would create an environment for more complex collaboration, and on the other hand, joint work between two health professions allows students to become better acquainted with the specifics of a particular health profession. What is more, in this study, only 44% of the students surveyed felt that doctors were natural leaders of the care team. It is also possible that working in teams made up exclusively of two professions allowed them to take on a significant amount of responsibility that would otherwise have been shared between team members.

This finding is in line with what was found in another study on IPE. Mei-Chi Ho et al. [ 37 ] conducted a study involving nursing and physiotherapy students. At the end of the study, the participants described a better recognition of the roles of the different health professions and how they complement each other. The students emphasised that doctors may not have sufficient knowledge of subjects that are directly related to other professions, and therefore achieved better role clarification. Similar observations about collaboration between pairs of different medical professions suggest that it may be worth exploring the potential benefits of collaboration in interprofessional, yet less diverse groups, with the aim of achieving better role awareness and encouraging communication between groups of professionals who traditionally do not share the decision-making process in patient care.

None of the papers justified why particular groups of students were included in the study. To our knowledge, there are no guidelines on this aspect of setting up interprofessional learning groups. An important observation from our review is the suggestion that when setting up classes for students of different professions, it is important to ensure that the learners are provided with educational material that allows to demonstrate the skills of each of the professions included in the study. It is also important to identify thematic areas that can be used as a basis for interdisciplinary activities. The included studies show that a variety of topics can be explored by dietetics-nutrition and pharmacy students in collaborative educational environment. The themes identified in our review where dietetics and pharmacy students collaborated were geriatrics, gastroenterology, infectious diseases and oncology, and obesity. Students also achieved learning outcomes related to cultural competence, motivational interviewing and health coaching. In the study involving only dietetics and pharmacy students, topics included managing the treatment process of a patient with Crohn’s disease and developing soft skills useful in counselling. The case of a patient with Crohn’s disease may be used to illustrate the areas in which students from these disciplines can work together. Crohn’s disease is often associated with the need for enteral or parenteral nutrition. It is essential that at least four professionals are involved in the process of managing the patient’s nutritional needs: a medical doctor, a nurse, a dietitian and a pharmacist [ 38 ]. For this reason, the management of inflammatory bowel diseases seems to be a good field for joint competence development for dietitians and pharmacists. Another area of clinical practice where interprofessional training of dietitians and pharmacists seems relevant is geriatric care, including the management of nutrition-related adverse effects of medications. It is known that anorexia [ 39 ] of ageing can be caused by some groups of prescribed and over-the-counter medications as well as polypharmacy, which causes drug-drug interactions. By working together, dietitians and pharmacists can identify the problem of loss of appetite and resolve it by suggesting deprescribing or changing the schedule of medications and meals. An education that includes the above fields allows for the systematic development of skills from the higher levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy [ 40 ] as students are not only aware of the presence of other health professions (remember), but also have the opportunity to familiarise themselves with their competencies and identify challenges that require collaboration (understand), implement protocols of practice (apply), draw conclusions on the relevance of cooperation (analyze), discuss the advantages and disadvantages of implemented solutions (evaluate), and propose innovative solutions to patient care based on the skills and knowledge of all team members (create). One of the examples of the collaboration between postgraduate dietitians and pharmacists regarding remember and understand levels of Bloom’s taxonomy is the study by Kizaki et al. [ 41 ]., in which pharmacists and dietitians were asked to rate their feelings about the availability of dietary advice in pharmacies in Japan. When surveyed, 70% of pharmacists found this type of service useful. Pharmacists also agreed that the availability of dietary advice reduces the number of medicines a patient has to take. More than 80% of pharmacists thought that the number of pharmacies offering dietary advice would increase in the future. The successful implementation of such services in Japan, followed by a satisfactory level of mutual recognition of the competences of each profession, leads to the conclusion that there is an area for collaboration between practitioners of these two professions in relation to the higher levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy model. This is also in line with the implementation of the patient-centred model of care, as integrated education at undergraduate level seems a reasonable way to build skills and awareness that are crucial for future successful collaboration between health professions to achieve high standards of patient-centred care. In such patient-centered care model, patients’ preferences, goals and beliefs take precedence over medical paternalism. This often requires a shift from a disease-centred approach, which promotes the central role of the physician, to a perspective in which other needs of the patient are considered equally important, allowing other health-related professions to take the lead. As patient treatment is often influenced by nutritional status and polypharmacy, the added value of IPE between dietitians and pharmacists would be to teach such approaches from the outset, rather than putting health professionals from different disciplines in a situation where they have to start working together as a team without proper training on how to do so. Another important component of IPE approach is promoting an inclusive attitude where uncertainties are resolved with respect for each profession and attempts are made to establish common communication practices. In such an approach, IPE is not only a teaching format aimed at the acquisition of knowledge related to the future profession, but also an opportunity for students of different disciplines to learn communication beyond the boundaries of the profession. In this way, IPE is more about giving students a space to share their thoughts, discuss and collaborate, rather than teaching them the principles of effective communication in the artificial conditions of a classroom.

The results presented by the authors of the included studies tended to focus on the overall student experience. Most projects did not use standardised assessment tools. In addition, only one study considered teachers’ perceptions of the interprofessional education experience (Kent et al.) [ 25 ] and one study considered employers’ perceptions (Pelham et al.) [ 27 ]. An important direction for further research in the area of interprofessional education of dietetics and pharmacy students seems to be not only the student experience, but also the evaluation of the educational process by experienced educators and, in later stages, by potential employers. Involving employers in the evaluation of the usefulness of interprofessional educational activities may help to identify further areas where this collaboration could have long-term benefits. Another area where further research could be undertaken is the element of evaluating the uptake of leadership by students on different courses, introduced in one of the included articles. The effectiveness of the educational interventions described could then be assessed through a shift in the perception of the relevance of one’s role in the patient care process and the willingness to take initiative and responsibility for the outcomes achieved.

The included studies represented a wide range of educational and research approaches. In view of the conclusions drawn by the authors, we have decided to summarise the implications for the further planning of joint educational and research activities for students of nutrition and dietetics and pharmacy (Table  3 .).

Our scoping review needs to be considered in the context of its limitations. All included papers provided information on the type of learning project evaluated. However, only 4 of them (Kent et al., Khalafalla et al., Bhattacharya et al., Van Diggele et al.) reported specific learning outcomes. These outcomes differed significantly between studies [ 25 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. In other studies authors included only a description of the skills (Wilby et al.) [ 26 ] or competencies (Reitsma et al.) [ 28 ] that the students should acquire during the training, but these were not specified or comparable between studies.

Several published studies addressed the issue of IPE jointly in pharmacy and dietetics-nutrition. The studies ranged in setting, methodology and outcome measures. Although the topics of educational courses varied, most of the included studies used case studies as the main teaching method during the courses described, two of the studies used student-led clinics and other types of problem-based learning. All of the teaching strategies used focused on students taking action and being encouraged to work together. The IPE, as delivered in the included studies, was feasible and was providing measurable benefit. The students who took part experienced improved skills both in individual soft competences and teamwork.

Changing paradigms of patient care lead to changes in educational approaches. Despite methodological differences, the reviewed papers suggest that IPE is a viable educational option. Its implementation can facilitate teamwork that is better adapted to the changing needs of the patient and thus lead to improvements in patient care. The main challenge to the wider use of IPE among students of dietetics-nutrition and pharmacy appears to be the lack of scientific evidence to support the decisions needed to carefully plan and implement IPE activities. However, the available data suggest that IPE in these programmes is feasible in a variety of settings and can be beneficial for learners.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

World Health Organization

Interprofessional education

Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education

Team-based learning

Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey

Geriatrics Champions Program

American Geriatrics Society Internal Medicine-Family Medicine

Service-learning

Team readiness assurance tests

World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. 2010. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice Accessed 12 May 2023.

Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, Freeth D, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews. 2013;3(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3 .

Guraya SY, Barr H. The effectiveness of interprofessional education in healthcare: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(3):160–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2017.12.009 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Spaulding EM, Marvel FA, Jacob E, Rahman A, Hansen BR, Hanyok LA, et al. Interprofessional education and collaboration among healthcare students and professionals: a systematic review and call for action. J Interprof Care. 2019;35(4):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1697214 .

Berger-Estilita J, Fuchs A, Hahn M, Chiang H, Greif R. Attitudes towards interprofessional education in the medical curriculum: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02176-4 .

van Diggele C, Roberts C, Burgess A, Mellis C. Interprofessional education: Tips for design and implementation. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02286-z .

Miselis HH, Zawacki S, White S, Yinusa-Nyahkoon L, Mostow C, Furlong J, et al. Interprofessional education in the clinical learning environment: a mixed-methods evaluation of a longitudinal experience in the primary care setting. J Interprof Care. 2022;1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2022.2025768 .

Standards P. & Notification Forms. LCME. [accessed 2024 Mar 9]. https://lcme.org/publications/#Standards .

2023 Accreditation Manual [accessed 2024 Mar 9]. https://resources.acenursing.org/space/AM/1842642947/2023+Accreditation+Manual .

Accreditation Standards And Key Elements For The Professional Program. in Pharmacy Leading to The Doctor of Pharmacy Degree. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. [accessed 2024 Mar 9]. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf .

General Medical Council. Promoting Excellence: standards for medical education and training. 2015. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/promoting-excellence-standards-for-medical-education-and-training-2109_pdf-61939165.pdf .

Schot E, Tummers L, Noordegraaf M. Working on working together: A systematic review on how healthcare professionals contribute to interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020;34(3):1–11. [Accessed online 2024 Mar 9]. https://www.tandonline.com/doi/full/ https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1636007 .

NICE. Type 2 Diabetes in Adults: Management Type 2 Diabetes in Adults: Management NICE Guideline. 2022. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28/resources/type-2-diabetes-in-adults-management-pdf-1837338615493 Accessed 12 May 2023.

NICE. Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management NICE guideline. 2015. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng17/resources/type-1-diabetes-in-adults-diagnosis-and-management-pdf-1837276469701 Accessed 12 May 2023.

Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, Gabbay RA, Green J, Maruthur NM, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2022;45(11). https://doi.org/10.2337/dci22-0034 .

Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2020;75(6):1334–57. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.15026 .

Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA, /ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol. Circulation. 2018;139(25). https://professional.heart.org/idc/groups/ahamah-public/@wcm/@sop/@smd/documents/downloadable/ucm_502856.pdf Accessed 12 May 2023.

NICE. Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment vascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid and reduction, including lipid modification modification Clinical guideline. 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg181/resources/cardiovascular-disease-risk-assessment-and-reduction-including-lipid-modification-pdf-35109807660997 Accessed 12 May 2023.

NICE. Chronic kidney disease: assessment and management NICE guideline. 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng203/resources/chronic-kidney-disease-assessment-and-management-pdf-66143713055173 Accessed 12 May 2023.

Fiaccadori E, Sabatino A, Barazzoni R, Carrero JJ, Cupisti A, De Waele E et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in hospitalized patients with acute or chronic kidney disease. Clinical Nutrition. 2021 Feb. https://www.espen.org/files/ESPEN-Guidelines/ESPEN-guideline-on-clinical-nutrition-in-hospitalized-patients-with-acute-or-chronic-kidney-disease.pdf Accessed 12 May 2023.

Dominguez-Munoz JE, Drewes AM, Lindkvist B, Ewald N, Czakó L, Rosendahl J, et al. Recommendations from the United European Gastroenterology evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2018;18(8):847–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.09.016 .

Durie P, Baillargeon J, Bouchard S, Donnellan F, Zepeda-Gomez S, Teshima C. Diagnosis and management of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) in primary care: consensus guidance of a Canadian expert panel. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2017.1389704 .

Collaborative practice through learning together to work together. Caipe.org. 2019. https://www.caipe.org/resource/CAIPE-Statement-of-Purpose-2016.pdf Accessed 12 May 2023.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 .

Kent F, Drysdale P, Martin N, Keating JL. The mixed-discipline aged-care student clinic: an authentic interprofessional learning initiative. J Allied Health. 2014;43(1):51–6. PMID: 24598900.

Google Scholar  

Wilby KJ, Al-Abdi T, Hassan A, Brown MA, Paravattil B, Khalifa SI. Attitudes of pharmacy and nutrition students towards team-based care after first exposure to interprofessional education in Qatar. J Interprof Care. 2015;29(1):82–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.933949 .

Pelham K, Skinner MA, McHugh P, Pullon S. Interprofessional education in a rural community: the perspectives of the clinical workplace providers. J Prim Health Care. 2016;8(3):210–9. https://doi.org/10.1071/HC16010 .

Reitsma G, Scrooby B, Rabie T, Viljoen M, Smit K, Du Preez A, Pretorius R, Van Oort A, Swanepoel M, Naudé A, Dolman R. Health students’ experiences of the process of interprofessional education: a pilot project. J Interprof Care. 2019;33(3):298–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1572600 .

Khalafalla FG, Covarrubias K, Fesperman M, Eichmann K, VanGarsse A, Ofstad W. Enhancing nutrition and lifestyle education for healthcare professional students through an interprofessional, team-based training program. Currents Pharm Teach Learn. 2020;12(12):1484–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.07.017 .

Bhattacharya SB, Jernigan S, Hyatt M, Sabata D, Johnston S, Burkhardt C. Preparing a healthcare workforce for geriatrics care: an interprofessional team based learning program. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):644. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02456-8 .

van Diggele C, Roberts C, Haq I. Optimising student-led interprofessional learning across eleven health disciplines. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02527-9 .

Watts SO, Tuggle FJ, Sewell J, Slay JL, Ellison KJ, Frugé AD. Achievement of interprofessional competencies in live and virtual community clinics: a comparative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;119:105578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105578 .

Heinemann GD, Schmitt MH, Farrell MP, Brallier SA. Development of an attitudes toward Health Care teams Scale. Eval Health Prof. 1999;22(1):123–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/01632789922034202 .

Yoong SQ, Liao AWX, Goh SH, Zhang H. Educational effects of community service-learning involving older adults in nursing education: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;113:105376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105376 .

McLean SF. Case-based learning and its application in Medical and Health-Care fields: a review of Worldwide Literature. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016;3. https://doi.org/10.4137/JMECD.S20377 . JMECD.S20377.

Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, Hudes PD. Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE Guide 65. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e275–87. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.651179 .

Ho JM, Wong AY, Schoeb V, Chan AS, Tang PM, Wong FK. Interprofessional team-based learning: a qualitative study on the experiences of nursing and physiotherapy students. Front Public Health. 2022;9:706346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.706346 .

Landi F, Calvani R, Tosato M, Martone AM, Ortolani E, Savera G, Sisto A, Marzetti E. Anorexia of aging: risk factors, consequences, and potential treatments. Nutrients. 2016;8(2):69. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8020069 .

Barrocas A, Schwartz DB, Bistrian BR, Guenter P, Mueller C, Chernoff R, Hasse JM. Nutrition support teams: Institution, evolution, and innovation. Nutr Clin Practice: Official Publication Am Soc Parenter Enter Nutr. 2023;38(1):10–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10931 .

Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Vol. Handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company; 1956.

Kizaki H, Ota T, Mashima S, Nakamura Y, Kiyokawa S, Kominato H, Satoh H, Sawada Y, Hori S. Questionnaire survey investigation of the present status of dietetic consultation at community pharmacies from the perspectives of registered dietitians and pharmacists. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):935. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06959-3 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 2 Jakubowskiego St., building I, 5th floor, 30- 688, Kraków, Poland

Anna Rudzińska, Jerzy Gąsowski & Karolina Piotrowicz

Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688, Krakow, Poland

Piotr Guzy & Agnieszka Skowron

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

AR and PG contributed equally to this paper. They established inclusion/exclusion criteria, developed search strategy, conducted screening and articles review. They also extracted data from included papers. KP consulted AR and PG throughout the entire process, resolved disagreements on the inclusion of the study. AR, PG, KP, AS, JG analyzed and interpreted data. All authors reviewed manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karolina Piotrowicz .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate, consent for publication, competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Rudzińska, A., Guzy, P., Skowron, A. et al. Joint interprofessional education of pharmacy and dietetics undergraduates - a scoping review. BMC Med Educ 24 , 557 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05411-4

Download citation

Received : 15 December 2023

Accepted : 10 April 2024

Published : 22 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05411-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Medical education
• Interprofessional
• Undergraduates

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

• Submission enquiries: [email protected]
• General enquiries: [email protected]