2. variables
3. variables
4. variables
5. variables
6. variables
7. variables
8. variables
The simplest way to understand a variable is as any characteristic or attribute that can experience change or vary over time or context – hence the name “variable”. For example, the dosage of a particular medicine could be classified as a variable, as the amount can vary (i.e., a higher dose or a lower dose). Similarly, gender, age or ethnicity could be considered demographic variables, because each person varies in these respects.
Within research, especially scientific research, variables form the foundation of studies, as researchers are often interested in how one variable impacts another, and the relationships between different variables. For example:
As you can see, variables are often used to explain relationships between different elements and phenomena. In scientific studies, especially experimental studies, the objective is often to understand the causal relationships between variables. In other words, the role of cause and effect between variables. This is achieved by manipulating certain variables while controlling others – and then observing the outcome. But, we’ll get into that a little later…
Variables can be a little intimidating for new researchers because there are a wide variety of variables, and oftentimes, there are multiple labels for the same thing. To lay a firm foundation, we’ll first look at the three main types of variables, namely:
Simply put, the independent variable is the “ cause ” in the relationship between two (or more) variables. In other words, when the independent variable changes, it has an impact on another variable.
For example:
It’s useful to know that independent variables can go by a few different names, including, explanatory variables (because they explain an event or outcome) and predictor variables (because they predict the value of another variable). Terminology aside though, the most important takeaway is that independent variables are assumed to be the “cause” in any cause-effect relationship. As you can imagine, these types of variables are of major interest to researchers, as many studies seek to understand the causal factors behind a phenomenon.
While the independent variable is the “ cause ”, the dependent variable is the “ effect ” – or rather, the affected variable . In other words, the dependent variable is the variable that is assumed to change as a result of a change in the independent variable.
Keeping with the previous example, let’s look at some dependent variables in action:
In scientific studies, researchers will typically pay very close attention to the dependent variable (or variables), carefully measuring any changes in response to hypothesised independent variables. This can be tricky in practice, as it’s not always easy to reliably measure specific phenomena or outcomes – or to be certain that the actual cause of the change is in fact the independent variable.
As the adage goes, correlation is not causation . In other words, just because two variables have a relationship doesn’t mean that it’s a causal relationship – they may just happen to vary together. For example, you could find a correlation between the number of people who own a certain brand of car and the number of people who have a certain type of job. Just because the number of people who own that brand of car and the number of people who have that type of job is correlated, it doesn’t mean that owning that brand of car causes someone to have that type of job or vice versa. The correlation could, for example, be caused by another factor such as income level or age group, which would affect both car ownership and job type.
To confidently establish a causal relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable (i.e., X causes Y), you’ll typically need an experimental design , where you have complete control over the environmen t and the variables of interest. But even so, this doesn’t always translate into the “real world”. Simply put, what happens in the lab sometimes stays in the lab!
As an alternative to pure experimental research, correlational or “ quasi-experimental ” research (where the researcher cannot manipulate or change variables) can be done on a much larger scale more easily, allowing one to understand specific relationships in the real world. These types of studies also assume some causality between independent and dependent variables, but it’s not always clear. So, if you go this route, you need to be cautious in terms of how you describe the impact and causality between variables and be sure to acknowledge any limitations in your own research.
In an experimental design, a control variable (or controlled variable) is a variable that is intentionally held constant to ensure it doesn’t have an influence on any other variables. As a result, this variable remains unchanged throughout the course of the study. In other words, it’s a variable that’s not allowed to vary – tough life 🙂
As we mentioned earlier, one of the major challenges in identifying and measuring causal relationships is that it’s difficult to isolate the impact of variables other than the independent variable. Simply put, there’s always a risk that there are factors beyond the ones you’re specifically looking at that might be impacting the results of your study. So, to minimise the risk of this, researchers will attempt (as best possible) to hold other variables constant . These factors are then considered control variables.
Some examples of variables that you may need to control include:
Which specific variables need to be controlled for will vary tremendously depending on the research project at hand, so there’s no generic list of control variables to consult. As a researcher, you’ll need to think carefully about all the factors that could vary within your research context and then consider how you’ll go about controlling them. A good starting point is to look at previous studies similar to yours and pay close attention to which variables they controlled for.
Of course, you won’t always be able to control every possible variable, and so, in many cases, you’ll just have to acknowledge their potential impact and account for them in the conclusions you draw. Every study has its limitations , so don’t get fixated or discouraged by troublesome variables. Nevertheless, always think carefully about the factors beyond what you’re focusing on – don’t make assumptions!
As we mentioned, independent, dependent and control variables are the most common variables you’ll come across in your research, but they’re certainly not the only ones you need to be aware of. Next, we’ll look at a few “secondary” variables that you need to keep in mind as you design your research.
Let’s jump into it…
A moderating variable is a variable that influences the strength or direction of the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. In other words, moderating variables affect how much (or how little) the IV affects the DV, or whether the IV has a positive or negative relationship with the DV (i.e., moves in the same or opposite direction).
For example, in a study about the effects of sleep deprivation on academic performance, gender could be used as a moderating variable to see if there are any differences in how men and women respond to a lack of sleep. In such a case, one may find that gender has an influence on how much students’ scores suffer when they’re deprived of sleep.
It’s important to note that while moderators can have an influence on outcomes , they don’t necessarily cause them ; rather they modify or “moderate” existing relationships between other variables. This means that it’s possible for two different groups with similar characteristics, but different levels of moderation, to experience very different results from the same experiment or study design.
Mediating variables are often used to explain the relationship between the independent and dependent variable (s). For example, if you were researching the effects of age on job satisfaction, then education level could be considered a mediating variable, as it may explain why older people have higher job satisfaction than younger people – they may have more experience or better qualifications, which lead to greater job satisfaction.
Mediating variables also help researchers understand how different factors interact with each other to influence outcomes. For instance, if you wanted to study the effect of stress on academic performance, then coping strategies might act as a mediating factor by influencing both stress levels and academic performance simultaneously. For example, students who use effective coping strategies might be less stressed but also perform better academically due to their improved mental state.
In addition, mediating variables can provide insight into causal relationships between two variables by helping researchers determine whether changes in one factor directly cause changes in another – or whether there is an indirect relationship between them mediated by some third factor(s). For instance, if you wanted to investigate the impact of parental involvement on student achievement, you would need to consider family dynamics as a potential mediator, since it could influence both parental involvement and student achievement simultaneously.
A confounding variable (also known as a third variable or lurking variable ) is an extraneous factor that can influence the relationship between two variables being studied. Specifically, for a variable to be considered a confounding variable, it needs to meet two criteria:
Some common examples of confounding variables include demographic factors such as gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, education level, and health status. In addition to these, there are also environmental factors to consider. For example, air pollution could confound the impact of the variables of interest in a study investigating health outcomes.
Naturally, it’s important to identify as many confounding variables as possible when conducting your research, as they can heavily distort the results and lead you to draw incorrect conclusions . So, always think carefully about what factors may have a confounding effect on your variables of interest and try to manage these as best you can.
Latent variables are unobservable factors that can influence the behaviour of individuals and explain certain outcomes within a study. They’re also known as hidden or underlying variables , and what makes them rather tricky is that they can’t be directly observed or measured . Instead, latent variables must be inferred from other observable data points such as responses to surveys or experiments.
For example, in a study of mental health, the variable “resilience” could be considered a latent variable. It can’t be directly measured , but it can be inferred from measures of mental health symptoms, stress, and coping mechanisms. The same applies to a lot of concepts we encounter every day – for example:
One way in which we overcome the challenge of measuring the immeasurable is latent variable models (LVMs). An LVM is a type of statistical model that describes a relationship between observed variables and one or more unobserved (latent) variables. These models allow researchers to uncover patterns in their data which may not have been visible before, thanks to their complexity and interrelatedness with other variables. Those patterns can then inform hypotheses about cause-and-effect relationships among those same variables which were previously unknown prior to running the LVM. Powerful stuff, we say!
In the world of scientific research, there’s no shortage of variable types, some of which have multiple names and some of which overlap with each other. In this post, we’ve covered some of the popular ones, but remember that this is not an exhaustive list .
To recap, we’ve explored:
If you’re still feeling a bit lost and need a helping hand with your research project, check out our 1-on-1 coaching service , where we guide you through each step of the research journey. Also, be sure to check out our free dissertation writing course and our collection of free, fully-editable chapter templates .
This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...
Very informative, concise and helpful. Thank you
Helping information.Thanks
practical and well-demonstrated
Very helpful and insightful
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.
Research methods are specific procedures for collecting and analysing data. Developing your research methods is an integral part of your research design . When planning your methods, there are two key decisions you will make.
First, decide how you will collect data . Your methods depend on what type of data you need to answer your research question :
Second, decide how you will analyse the data .
Methods for collecting data, examples of data collection methods, methods for analysing data, examples of data analysis methods, frequently asked questions about methodology.
Data are the information that you collect for the purposes of answering your research question . The type of data you need depends on the aims of your research.
Your choice of qualitative or quantitative data collection depends on the type of knowledge you want to develop.
For questions about ideas, experiences and meanings, or to study something that can’t be described numerically, collect qualitative data .
If you want to develop a more mechanistic understanding of a topic, or your research involves hypothesis testing , collect quantitative data .
Qualitative | ||
---|---|---|
Quantitative | . |
You can also take a mixed methods approach, where you use both qualitative and quantitative research methods.
Primary data are any original information that you collect for the purposes of answering your research question (e.g. through surveys , observations and experiments ). Secondary data are information that has already been collected by other researchers (e.g. in a government census or previous scientific studies).
If you are exploring a novel research question, you’ll probably need to collect primary data. But if you want to synthesise existing knowledge, analyse historical trends, or identify patterns on a large scale, secondary data might be a better choice.
Primary | ||
---|---|---|
Secondary |
In descriptive research , you collect data about your study subject without intervening. The validity of your research will depend on your sampling method .
In experimental research , you systematically intervene in a process and measure the outcome. The validity of your research will depend on your experimental design .
To conduct an experiment, you need to be able to vary your independent variable , precisely measure your dependent variable, and control for confounding variables . If it’s practically and ethically possible, this method is the best choice for answering questions about cause and effect.
Descriptive | ||
---|---|---|
Experimental |
Research method | Primary or secondary? | Qualitative or quantitative? | When to use |
---|---|---|---|
Primary | Quantitative | To test cause-and-effect relationships. | |
Primary | Quantitative | To understand general characteristics of a population. | |
Interview/focus group | Primary | Qualitative | To gain more in-depth understanding of a topic. |
Observation | Primary | Either | To understand how something occurs in its natural setting. |
Secondary | Either | To situate your research in an existing body of work, or to evaluate trends within a research topic. | |
Either | Either | To gain an in-depth understanding of a specific group or context, or when you don’t have the resources for a large study. |
Your data analysis methods will depend on the type of data you collect and how you prepare them for analysis.
Data can often be analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. For example, survey responses could be analysed qualitatively by studying the meanings of responses or quantitatively by studying the frequencies of responses.
Qualitative analysis is used to understand words, ideas, and experiences. You can use it to interpret data that were collected:
Qualitative analysis tends to be quite flexible and relies on the researcher’s judgement, so you have to reflect carefully on your choices and assumptions.
Quantitative analysis uses numbers and statistics to understand frequencies, averages and correlations (in descriptive studies) or cause-and-effect relationships (in experiments).
You can use quantitative analysis to interpret data that were collected either:
Because the data are collected and analysed in a statistically valid way, the results of quantitative analysis can be easily standardised and shared among researchers.
Research method | Qualitative or quantitative? | When to use |
---|---|---|
Quantitative | To analyse data collected in a statistically valid manner (e.g. from experiments, surveys, and observations). | |
Meta-analysis | Quantitative | To statistically analyse the results of a large collection of studies. Can only be applied to studies that collected data in a statistically valid manner. |
Qualitative | To analyse data collected from interviews, focus groups or textual sources. To understand general themes in the data and how they are communicated. | |
Either | To analyse large volumes of textual or visual data collected from surveys, literature reviews, or other sources. Can be quantitative (i.e. frequencies of words) or qualitative (i.e. meanings of words). |
Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.
Quantitative methods allow you to test a hypothesis by systematically collecting and analysing data, while qualitative methods allow you to explore ideas and experiences in depth.
In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .
A sample is a subset of individuals from a larger population. Sampling means selecting the group that you will actually collect data from in your research.
For example, if you are researching the opinions of students in your university, you could survey a sample of 100 students.
Statistical sampling allows you to test a hypothesis about the characteristics of a population. There are various sampling methods you can use to ensure that your sample is representative of the population as a whole.
The research methods you use depend on the type of data you need to answer your research question .
Methodology refers to the overarching strategy and rationale of your research project . It involves studying the methods used in your field and the theories or principles behind them, in order to develop an approach that matches your objectives.
Methods are the specific tools and procedures you use to collect and analyse data (e.g. experiments, surveys , and statistical tests ).
In shorter scientific papers, where the aim is to report the findings of a specific study, you might simply describe what you did in a methods section .
In a longer or more complex research project, such as a thesis or dissertation , you will probably include a methodology section , where you explain your approach to answering the research questions and cite relevant sources to support your choice of methods.
More interesting articles.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Feroze kaliyadan.
Department of Dermatology, King Faisal University, Al Hofuf, Saudi Arabia
1 Department of Dermatology, Prayas Amrita Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
This short “snippet” covers three important aspects related to statistics – the concept of variables , the importance, and practical aspects related to descriptive statistics and issues related to sampling – types of sampling and sample size estimation.
What is a variable?[ 1 , 2 ] To put it in very simple terms, a variable is an entity whose value varies. A variable is an essential component of any statistical data. It is a feature of a member of a given sample or population, which is unique, and can differ in quantity or quantity from another member of the same sample or population. Variables either are the primary quantities of interest or act as practical substitutes for the same. The importance of variables is that they help in operationalization of concepts for data collection. For example, if you want to do an experiment based on the severity of urticaria, one option would be to measure the severity using a scale to grade severity of itching. This becomes an operational variable. For a variable to be “good,” it needs to have some properties such as good reliability and validity, low bias, feasibility/practicality, low cost, objectivity, clarity, and acceptance. Variables can be classified into various ways as discussed below.
A variable can collect either qualitative or quantitative data. A variable differing in quantity is called a quantitative variable (e.g., weight of a group of patients), whereas a variable differing in quality is called a qualitative variable (e.g., the Fitzpatrick skin type)
A simple test which can be used to differentiate between qualitative and quantitative variables is the subtraction test. If you can subtract the value of one variable from the other to get a meaningful result, then you are dealing with a quantitative variable (this of course will not apply to rating scales/ranks).
Discrete variables are variables in which no values may be assumed between the two given values (e.g., number of lesions in each patient in a sample of patients with urticaria).
Continuous variables, on the other hand, can take any value in between the two given values (e.g., duration for which the weals last in the same sample of patients with urticaria). One way of differentiating between continuous and discrete variables is to use the “mid-way” test. If, for every pair of values of a variable, a value exactly mid-way between them is meaningful, the variable is continuous. For example, two values for the time taken for a weal to subside can be 10 and 13 min. The mid-way value would be 11.5 min which makes sense. However, for a number of weals, suppose you have a pair of values – 5 and 8 – the midway value would be 6.5 weals, which does not make sense.
Nominal/categorical variables are, as the name suggests, variables which can be slotted into different categories (e.g., gender or type of psoriasis).
Ordinal variables or ranked variables are similar to categorical, but can be put into an order (e.g., a scale for severity of itching).
In the context of an experimental study, the dependent variable (also called outcome variable) is directly linked to the primary outcome of the study. For example, in a clinical trial on psoriasis, the PASI (psoriasis area severity index) would possibly be one dependent variable. The independent variable (sometime also called explanatory variable) is something which is not affected by the experiment itself but which can be manipulated to affect the dependent variable. Other terms sometimes used synonymously include blocking variable, covariate, or predictor variable. Confounding variables are extra variables, which can have an effect on the experiment. They are linked with dependent and independent variables and can cause spurious association. For example, in a clinical trial for a topical treatment in psoriasis, the concomitant use of moisturizers might be a confounding variable. A control variable is a variable that must be kept constant during the course of an experiment.
Statistics can be broadly divided into descriptive statistics and inferential statistics.[ 3 , 4 ] Descriptive statistics give a summary about the sample being studied without drawing any inferences based on probability theory. Even if the primary aim of a study involves inferential statistics, descriptive statistics are still used to give a general summary. When we describe the population using tools such as frequency distribution tables, percentages, and other measures of central tendency like the mean, for example, we are talking about descriptive statistics. When we use a specific statistical test (e.g., Mann–Whitney U-test) to compare the mean scores and express it in terms of statistical significance, we are talking about inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics can help in summarizing data in the form of simple quantitative measures such as percentages or means or in the form of visual summaries such as histograms and box plots.
Descriptive statistics can be used to describe a single variable (univariate analysis) or more than one variable (bivariate/multivariate analysis). In the case of more than one variable, descriptive statistics can help summarize relationships between variables using tools such as scatter plots.
Descriptive statistics can be broadly put under two categories:
Sorting and grouping is most commonly done using frequency distribution tables. For continuous variables, it is generally better to use groups in the frequency table. Ideally, group sizes should be equal (except in extreme ends where open groups are used; e.g., age “greater than” or “less than”).
Another form of presenting frequency distributions is the “stem and leaf” diagram, which is considered to be a more accurate form of description.
Suppose the weight in kilograms of a group of 10 patients is as follows:
56, 34, 48, 43, 87, 78, 54, 62, 61, 59
The “stem” records the value of the “ten's” place (or higher) and the “leaf” records the value in the “one's” place [ Table 1 ].
Stem and leaf plot
0 | - |
1 | - |
2 | - |
3 | 4 |
4 | 3 8 |
5 | 4 6 9 |
6 | 1 2 |
7 | 8 |
8 | 7 |
9 | - |
The most common tools used for visual display include frequency diagrams, bar charts (for noncontinuous variables) and histograms (for continuous variables). Composite bar charts can be used to compare variables. For example, the frequency distribution in a sample population of males and females can be illustrated as given in Figure 1 .
Composite bar chart
A pie chart helps show how a total quantity is divided among its constituent variables. Scatter diagrams can be used to illustrate the relationship between two variables. For example, global scores given for improvement in a condition like acne by the patient and the doctor [ Figure 2 ].
Scatter diagram
The main tools used for summary statistics are broadly grouped into measures of central tendency (such as mean, median, and mode) and measures of dispersion or variation (such as range, standard deviation, and variance).
Imagine that the data below represent the weights of a sample of 15 pediatric patients arranged in ascending order:
30, 35, 37, 38, 38, 38, 42, 42, 44, 46, 47, 48, 51, 53, 86
Just having the raw data does not mean much to us, so we try to express it in terms of some values, which give a summary of the data.
The mean is basically the sum of all the values divided by the total number. In this case, we get a value of 45.
The problem is that some extreme values (outliers), like “'86,” in this case can skew the value of the mean. In this case, we consider other values like the median, which is the point that divides the distribution into two equal halves. It is also referred to as the 50 th percentile (50% of the values are above it and 50% are below it). In our previous example, since we have already arranged the values in ascending order we find that the point which divides it into two equal halves is the 8 th value – 42. In case of a total number of values being even, we choose the two middle points and take an average to reach the median.
The mode is the most common data point. In our example, this would be 38. The mode as in our case may not necessarily be in the center of the distribution.
The median is the best measure of central tendency from among the mean, median, and mode. In a “symmetric” distribution, all three are the same, whereas in skewed data the median and mean are not the same; lie more toward the skew, with the mean lying further to the skew compared with the median. For example, in Figure 3 , a right skewed distribution is seen (direction of skew is based on the tail); data values' distribution is longer on the right-hand (positive) side than on the left-hand side. The mean is typically greater than the median in such cases.
Location of mode, median, and mean
The range gives the spread between the lowest and highest values. In our previous example, this will be 86-30 = 56.
A more valuable measure is the interquartile range. A quartile is one of the values which break the distribution into four equal parts. The 25 th percentile is the data point which divides the group between the first one-fourth and the last three-fourth of the data. The first one-fourth will form the first quartile. The 75 th percentile is the data point which divides the distribution into a first three-fourth and last one-fourth (the last one-fourth being the fourth quartile). The range between the 25 th percentile and 75 th percentile is called the interquartile range.
Variance is also a measure of dispersion. The larger the variance, the further the individual units are from the mean. Let us consider the same example we used for calculating the mean. The mean was 45.
For the first value (30), the deviation from the mean will be 15; for the last value (86), the deviation will be 41. Similarly we can calculate the deviations for all values in a sample. Adding these deviations and averaging will give a clue to the total dispersion, but the problem is that since the deviations are a mix of negative and positive values, the final total becomes zero. To calculate the variance, this problem is overcome by adding squares of the deviations. So variance would be the sum of squares of the variation divided by the total number in the population (for a sample we use “n − 1”). To get a more realistic value of the average dispersion, we take the square root of the variance, which is called the “standard deviation.”
The box plot is a composite representation that portrays the mean, median, range, and the outliers [ Figure 4 ].
Skewness is a measure of the symmetry of distribution. Basically if the distribution curve is symmetric, it looks the same on either side of the central point. When this is not the case, it is said to be skewed. Kurtosis is a representation of outliers. Distributions with high kurtosis tend to have “heavy tails” indicating a larger number of outliers, whereas distributions with low kurtosis have light tails, indicating lesser outliers. There are formulas to calculate both skewness and kurtosis [Figures [Figures5 5 – 8 ].
Positive skew
High kurtosis (positive kurtosis – also called leptokurtic)
Negative skew
Low kurtosis (negative kurtosis – also called “Platykurtic”)
In an ideal study, we should be able to include all units of a particular population under study, something that is referred to as a census.[ 5 , 6 ] This would remove the chances of sampling error (difference between the outcome characteristics in a random sample when compared with the true population values – something that is virtually unavoidable when you take a random sample). However, it is obvious that this would not be feasible in most situations. Hence, we have to study a subset of the population to reach to our conclusions. This representative subset is a sample and we need to have sufficient numbers in this sample to make meaningful and accurate conclusions and reduce the effect of sampling error.
We also need to know that broadly sampling can be divided into two types – probability sampling and nonprobability sampling. Examples of probability sampling include methods such as simple random sampling (each member in a population has an equal chance of being selected), stratified random sampling (in nonhomogeneous populations, the population is divided into subgroups – followed be random sampling in each subgroup), systematic (sampling is based on a systematic technique – e.g., every third person is selected for a survey), and cluster sampling (similar to stratified sampling except that the clusters here are preexisting clusters unlike stratified sampling where the researcher decides on the stratification criteria), whereas nonprobability sampling, where every unit in the population does not have an equal chance of inclusion into the sample, includes methods such as convenience sampling (e.g., sample selected based on ease of access) and purposive sampling (where only people who meet specific criteria are included in the sample).
An accurate calculation of sample size is an essential aspect of good study design. It is important to calculate the sample size much in advance, rather than have to go for post hoc analysis. A sample size that is too less may make the study underpowered, whereas a sample size which is more than necessary might lead to a wastage of resources.
We will first go through the sample size calculation for a hypothesis-based design (like a randomized control trial).
The important factors to consider for sample size calculation include study design, type of statistical test, level of significance, power and effect size, variance (standard deviation for quantitative data), and expected proportions in the case of qualitative data. This is based on previous data, either based on previous studies or based on the clinicians' experience. In case the study is something being conducted for the first time, a pilot study might be conducted which helps generate these data for further studies based on a larger sample size). It is also important to know whether the data follow a normal distribution or not.
Two essential aspects we must understand are the concept of Type I and Type II errors. In a study that compares two groups, a null hypothesis assumes that there is no significant difference between the two groups, and any observed difference being due to sampling or experimental error. When we reject a null hypothesis, when it is true, we label it as a Type I error (also denoted as “alpha,” correlating with significance levels). In a Type II error (also denoted as “beta”), we fail to reject a null hypothesis, when the alternate hypothesis is actually true. Type II errors are usually expressed as “1- β,” correlating with the power of the test. While there are no absolute rules, the minimal levels accepted are 0.05 for α (corresponding to a significance level of 5%) and 0.20 for β (corresponding to a minimum recommended power of “1 − 0.20,” or 80%).
For a clinical trial, the investigator will have to decide in advance what clinically detectable change is significant (for numerical data, this is could be the anticipated outcome means in the two groups, whereas for categorical data, it could correlate with the proportions of successful outcomes in two groups.). While we will not go into details of the formula for sample size calculation, some important points are as follows:
In the context where effect size is involved, the sample size is inversely proportional to the square of the effect size. What this means in effect is that reducing the effect size will lead to an increase in the required sample size.
Reducing the level of significance (alpha) or increasing power (1-β) will lead to an increase in the calculated sample size.
An increase in variance of the outcome leads to an increase in the calculated sample size.
A note is that for estimation type of studies/surveys, sample size calculation needs to consider some other factors too. This includes an idea about total population size (this generally does not make a major difference when population size is above 20,000, so in situations where population size is not known we can assume a population of 20,000 or more). The other factor is the “margin of error” – the amount of deviation which the investigators find acceptable in terms of percentages. Regarding confidence levels, ideally, a 95% confidence level is the minimum recommended for surveys too. Finally, we need an idea of the expected/crude prevalence – either based on previous studies or based on estimates.
Sample size calculation also needs to add corrections for patient drop-outs/lost-to-follow-up patients and missing records. An important point is that in some studies dealing with rare diseases, it may be difficult to achieve desired sample size. In these cases, the investigators might have to rework outcomes or maybe pool data from multiple centers. Although post hoc power can be analyzed, a better approach suggested is to calculate 95% confidence intervals for the outcome and interpret the study results based on this.
Conflicts of interest.
There are no conflicts of interest.
Do you need support in running a pricing or product study? We can help you with agile consumer research and conjoint analysis.
Conjointly offers a great survey tool with multiple question types, randomisation blocks, and multilingual support. The Basic tier is always free.
Fully-functional online survey tool with various question types, logic, randomisation, and reporting for unlimited number of surveys.
Completely free for academics and students .
You won’t be able to do very much in research unless you know how to talk about variables. A variable is any entity that can take on different values. OK, so what does that mean? Anything that can vary can be considered a variable. For instance, age can be considered a variable because age can take different values for different people or for the same person at different times. Similarly, country can be considered a variable because a person’s country can be assigned a value.
Variables aren’t always ‘quantitative’ or numerical. The variable city consists of text values like New York or Sydney . We can, if it is useful, assign quantitative values instead of (or in place of) the text values, but we don’t have to assign numbers in order for something to be a variable. It’s also important to realize that variables aren’t only things that we measure in the traditional sense. For instance, in much social research and in program evaluation, we consider the treatment or program to be made up of one or more variables (i.e. the ‘cause’ can be considered a variable). An educational program can have varying amounts of ’time on task’, ‘classroom settings’, ‘student-teacher ratios’, and so on. So even the program can be considered a variable (which can be made up of a number of sub-variables).
An attribute is a specific value on a variable. For instance, the variable Student grade has two attributes: pass and fail . Or, the variable agreement might be defined as having five attributes:
Another important distinction having to do with the term ‘variable’ is the distinction between an independent and dependent variable. This distinction is particularly relevant when you are investigating cause-effect relationships. It took me the longest time to learn this distinction. (Of course, I’m someone who gets confused about the signs for ‘arrivals’ and ‘departures’ at airports – do I go to arrivals because I’m arriving at the airport or does the person I’m picking up go to arrivals because they’re arriving on the plane!). I originally thought that an independent variable was one that would be free to vary or respond to some program or treatment, and that a dependent variable must be one that depends on my efforts (that is, it’s the treatment ). But this is entirely backwards! In fact the independent variable is what you (or nature) manipulates – a treatment or program or cause. The dependent variable is what is affected by the independent variable – your effects or outcomes. For example, if you are studying the effects of a new educational program on student achievement, the program is the independent variable and your measures of achievement are the dependent ones.
Finally, there are two traits of variables that should always be achieved. Each variable should be exhaustive , it should include all possible answerable responses. For instance, if the variable is “religion” and the only options are “Protestant”, “Jewish”, and “Muslim”, there are quite a few religions I can think of that haven’t been included. The list does not exhaust all possibilities. On the other hand, if you exhaust all the possibilities with some variables – religion being one of them – you would simply have too many responses. The way to deal with this is to explicitly list the most common attributes and then use a general category like “Other” to account for all remaining ones. In addition to being exhaustive, the attributes of a variable should be mutually exclusive , no respondent should be able to have two attributes simultaneously. While this might seem obvious, it is often rather tricky in practice. For instance, you might be tempted to represent the variable “Employment Status” with the two attributes “employed” and “unemployed.” But these attributes are not necessarily mutually exclusive – a person who is looking for a second job while employed would be able to check both attributes! But don’t we often use questions on surveys that ask the respondent to “check all that apply” and then list a series of categories? Yes, we do, but technically speaking, each of the categories in a question like that is its own variable and is treated dichotomously as either “checked” or “unchecked”, attributes that are mutually exclusive.
Conjointly uses essential cookies to make our site work. We also use additional cookies in order to understand the usage of the site, gather audience analytics, and for remarketing purposes.
For more information on Conjointly's use of cookies, please read our Cookie Policy .
I am new to conjointly, i am already using conjointly.
The Plagiarism Checker Online For Your Academic Work
Start Plagiarism Check
Editing & Proofreading for Your Research Paper
Get it proofread now
Online Printing & Binding with Free Express Delivery
Configure binding now
Plagiarism Check within 10min
Printing & Binding with 3D Live Preview
How do you like this article cancel reply.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
A fundamental component in statistical investigations is the methodology you employ in selecting your research variables. The careful selection of appropriate variable types can significantly enhance the robustness of your experimental design . This piece explores the diverse array of variable classifications within the field of statistical research. Additionally, understanding the different types of variables in research can greatly aid in shaping your experimental hypotheses and outcomes.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
A variable is a trait of an item of analysis in research. Types of variables in research are imperative, as they describe and measure places, people, ideas , or other research objects . There are many types of variables in research. Therefore, you must choose the right types of variables in research for your study.
Note that the correct variable will help with your research design , test selection, and result interpretation.
In a study testing whether some genders are more stress-tolerant than others, variables you can include are the level of stressors in the study setting, male and female subjects, and productivity levels in the presence of stressors.
Also, before choosing which types of variables in research to use, you should know how the various types work and the ideal statistical tests and result interpretations you will use for your study. The key is to determine the type of data the variable contains and the part of the experiment the variable represents.
Data is the precise extent of a variable in statistical research that you record in a data sheet. It is generally divided into quantitative and categorical classes.
Quantitative or numerical data represents amounts, while categorical data represents collections or groupings.
The type of data contained in your variable will determine the types of variables in research. For instance, variables consisting of quantitative data are called quantitative variables, while those containing categorical data are called categorical variables. The section below explains these two types of variables in research better.
The scores you record when collecting quantitative data usually represent real values you can add, divide , subtract , or multiply . There are two types of quantitative variables: discrete variables and continuous variables .
The table below explains the elements that set apart discrete and continuous types of variables in research:
Discrete or integer variables | Individual item counts or values | • Number of employees in a company • Number of students in a school district |
Continuous or ratio variables | Measurements of non-finite or continuous scores | • Age • Weight • Volume • Distance |
Categorical variables contain data representing groupings. Additionally, the data in categorical variables is sometimes recorded as numbers . However, the numbers represent categories instead of real amounts.
There are three categorical types of variables in research: nominal variables, ordinal variables , and binary variables . Here is a tabular summary.
Binary/dichotomous variables | YES/NO outcomes | • Win/lose in a game • Pass/fail in an exam |
Nominal variables | No-rank groups or orders between groups | • Colors • Participant name • Brand names |
Ordinal variables | Groups ranked in a particular order | • Performance rankings in an exam • Rating scales of survey responses |
It is worth mentioning that some categorical variables can function as multiple types. For example, in some studies, you can use ordinal variables as quantitative variables if the scales are numerical and not discrete.
A data sheet is where you record the data on the variables in your experiment.
In a study of the salt-tolerance levels of various plant species, you can record the data on salt addition and how the plant responds in your datasheet.
The key is to gather the information and draw a conclusion over a specific period and filling out a data sheet along the process.
Below is an example of a data sheet containing binary, nominal, continuous , and ordinal types of variables in research.
A | 12 | 0 | - | - | - |
A | 18 | 50 | - | - | - |
B | 11 | 0 | - | - | - |
B | 15 | 50 | - | - | - |
C | 25 | 0 | - | - | - |
C | 31 | 50 | - | - | - |
The purpose of experiments is to determine how the variables affect each other. As stated in our experiment above, the study aims to find out how the quantity of salt introduce in the water affects the plant’s growth and survival.
Therefore, the researcher manipulates the independent variables and measures the dependent variables . Additionally, you may have control variables that you hold constant.
The table below summarizes independent variables, dependent variables , and control variables .
Independent/ treatment variables | The variables you manipulate to affect the experiment outcome | The amount of salt added to the water |
Dependent/ response variables | The variable that represents the experiment outcomes | The plant’s growth or survival |
Control variables | Variables held constant throughout the study | Temperature or light in the experiment room |
In salt-tolerance research, there is one independent variable (salt amount) and three independent variables. All other variables are neither dependent nor independent.
Below is a data sheet based on our experiment:
The types of variables in research may differ depending on the study.
In correlational research , dependent and independent variables do not apply because the study objective is not to determine the cause-and-effect link between variables.
However, in correlational research, one variable may precede the other, as illness leads to death, and not vice versa. In such an instance, the preceding variable, like illness, is the predictor variable, while the other one is the outcome variable.
The key to conducting effective research is to define your types of variables as independent and dependent. Next, you must determine if they are categorical or numerical types of variables in research so you can choose the proper statistical tests for your study.
Below are other types of variables in research worth understanding.
Confounding variables | Hides the actual impact of an alternative variable in your study | Pot size and soil type |
Latent variables | Cannot be measured directly | Salt tolerance |
Composite variables | Formed by combining multiple variables | The health variables combined into a single health score |
An autonomous or independent variable is the one you believe is the origin of the outcome, while the dependent variable is the one you believe affects the outcome of your study.
Knowing the types of variables in research that you can work with will help you choose the best statistical tests and result representation techniques. It will also help you with your study design.
Discrete variables are types of variables in research that represent counts, like the quantities of objects. In contrast, continuous variables are types of variables in research that represent measurable quantities like age, volume, and weight.
I am extremely satisfied with the service! Great quality paper, amazing...
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential, while others help us to improve this website and your experience.
Individual Privacy Preferences
Cookie Details Privacy Policy Imprint
Here you will find an overview of all cookies used. You can give your consent to whole categories or display further information and select certain cookies.
Accept all Save
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
Show Cookie Information Hide Cookie Information
Name | |
---|---|
Anbieter | Eigentümer dieser Website, |
Zweck | Speichert die Einstellungen der Besucher, die in der Cookie Box von Borlabs Cookie ausgewählt wurden. |
Cookie Name | borlabs-cookie |
Cookie Laufzeit | 1 Jahr |
Name | |
---|---|
Anbieter | Bachelorprint |
Zweck | Erkennt das Herkunftsland und leitet zur entsprechenden Sprachversion um. |
Datenschutzerklärung | |
Host(s) | ip-api.com |
Cookie Name | georedirect |
Cookie Laufzeit | 1 Jahr |
Name | |
---|---|
Anbieter | Playcanvas |
Zweck | Display our 3D product animations |
Datenschutzerklärung | |
Host(s) | playcanv.as, playcanvas.as, playcanvas.com |
Cookie Laufzeit | 1 Jahr |
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
Akzeptieren | |
---|---|
Name | |
Anbieter | Google Ireland Limited, Gordon House, Barrow Street, Dublin 4, Ireland |
Zweck | Cookie von Google zur Steuerung der erweiterten Script- und Ereignisbehandlung. |
Datenschutzerklärung | |
Cookie Name | _ga,_gat,_gid |
Cookie Laufzeit | 2 Jahre |
Content from video platforms and social media platforms is blocked by default. If External Media cookies are accepted, access to those contents no longer requires manual consent.
Akzeptieren | |
---|---|
Name | |
Anbieter | Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, 4 Grand Canal Square, Dublin 2, Ireland |
Zweck | Wird verwendet, um Facebook-Inhalte zu entsperren. |
Datenschutzerklärung | |
Host(s) | .facebook.com |
Akzeptieren | |
---|---|
Name | |
Anbieter | Google Ireland Limited, Gordon House, Barrow Street, Dublin 4, Ireland |
Zweck | Wird zum Entsperren von Google Maps-Inhalten verwendet. |
Datenschutzerklärung | |
Host(s) | .google.com |
Cookie Name | NID |
Cookie Laufzeit | 6 Monate |
Akzeptieren | |
---|---|
Name | |
Anbieter | Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, 4 Grand Canal Square, Dublin 2, Ireland |
Zweck | Wird verwendet, um Instagram-Inhalte zu entsperren. |
Datenschutzerklärung | |
Host(s) | .instagram.com |
Cookie Name | pigeon_state |
Cookie Laufzeit | Sitzung |
Akzeptieren | |
---|---|
Name | |
Anbieter | Openstreetmap Foundation, St John’s Innovation Centre, Cowley Road, Cambridge CB4 0WS, United Kingdom |
Zweck | Wird verwendet, um OpenStreetMap-Inhalte zu entsperren. |
Datenschutzerklärung | |
Host(s) | .openstreetmap.org |
Cookie Name | _osm_location, _osm_session, _osm_totp_token, _osm_welcome, _pk_id., _pk_ref., _pk_ses., qos_token |
Cookie Laufzeit | 1-10 Jahre |
Akzeptieren | |
---|---|
Name | |
Anbieter | Twitter International Company, One Cumberland Place, Fenian Street, Dublin 2, D02 AX07, Ireland |
Zweck | Wird verwendet, um Twitter-Inhalte zu entsperren. |
Datenschutzerklärung | |
Host(s) | .twimg.com, .twitter.com |
Cookie Name | __widgetsettings, local_storage_support_test |
Cookie Laufzeit | Unbegrenzt |
Akzeptieren | |
---|---|
Name | |
Anbieter | Vimeo Inc., 555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, USA |
Zweck | Wird verwendet, um Vimeo-Inhalte zu entsperren. |
Datenschutzerklärung | |
Host(s) | player.vimeo.com |
Cookie Name | vuid |
Cookie Laufzeit | 2 Jahre |
Akzeptieren | |
---|---|
Name | |
Anbieter | Google Ireland Limited, Gordon House, Barrow Street, Dublin 4, Ireland |
Zweck | Wird verwendet, um YouTube-Inhalte zu entsperren. |
Datenschutzerklärung | |
Host(s) | google.com |
Cookie Name | NID |
Cookie Laufzeit | 6 Monate |
Privacy Policy Imprint
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
Methodology
Research methods are specific procedures for collecting and analyzing data. Developing your research methods is an integral part of your research design . When planning your methods, there are two key decisions you will make.
First, decide how you will collect data . Your methods depend on what type of data you need to answer your research question :
Second, decide how you will analyze the data .
Methods for collecting data, examples of data collection methods, methods for analyzing data, examples of data analysis methods, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about research methods.
Data is the information that you collect for the purposes of answering your research question . The type of data you need depends on the aims of your research.
Your choice of qualitative or quantitative data collection depends on the type of knowledge you want to develop.
For questions about ideas, experiences and meanings, or to study something that can’t be described numerically, collect qualitative data .
If you want to develop a more mechanistic understanding of a topic, or your research involves hypothesis testing , collect quantitative data .
Qualitative | to broader populations. . | |
---|---|---|
Quantitative | . |
You can also take a mixed methods approach , where you use both qualitative and quantitative research methods.
Primary research is any original data that you collect yourself for the purposes of answering your research question (e.g. through surveys , observations and experiments ). Secondary research is data that has already been collected by other researchers (e.g. in a government census or previous scientific studies).
If you are exploring a novel research question, you’ll probably need to collect primary data . But if you want to synthesize existing knowledge, analyze historical trends, or identify patterns on a large scale, secondary data might be a better choice.
Primary | . | methods. |
---|---|---|
Secondary |
In descriptive research , you collect data about your study subject without intervening. The validity of your research will depend on your sampling method .
In experimental research , you systematically intervene in a process and measure the outcome. The validity of your research will depend on your experimental design .
To conduct an experiment, you need to be able to vary your independent variable , precisely measure your dependent variable, and control for confounding variables . If it’s practically and ethically possible, this method is the best choice for answering questions about cause and effect.
Descriptive | . . | |
---|---|---|
Experimental |
Research method | Primary or secondary? | Qualitative or quantitative? | When to use |
---|---|---|---|
Primary | Quantitative | To test cause-and-effect relationships. | |
Primary | Quantitative | To understand general characteristics of a population. | |
Interview/focus group | Primary | Qualitative | To gain more in-depth understanding of a topic. |
Observation | Primary | Either | To understand how something occurs in its natural setting. |
Secondary | Either | To situate your research in an existing body of work, or to evaluate trends within a research topic. | |
Either | Either | To gain an in-depth understanding of a specific group or context, or when you don’t have the resources for a large study. |
Your data analysis methods will depend on the type of data you collect and how you prepare it for analysis.
Data can often be analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. For example, survey responses could be analyzed qualitatively by studying the meanings of responses or quantitatively by studying the frequencies of responses.
Qualitative analysis is used to understand words, ideas, and experiences. You can use it to interpret data that was collected:
Qualitative analysis tends to be quite flexible and relies on the researcher’s judgement, so you have to reflect carefully on your choices and assumptions and be careful to avoid research bias .
Quantitative analysis uses numbers and statistics to understand frequencies, averages and correlations (in descriptive studies) or cause-and-effect relationships (in experiments).
You can use quantitative analysis to interpret data that was collected either:
Because the data is collected and analyzed in a statistically valid way, the results of quantitative analysis can be easily standardized and shared among researchers.
Research method | Qualitative or quantitative? | When to use |
---|---|---|
Quantitative | To analyze data collected in a statistically valid manner (e.g. from experiments, surveys, and observations). | |
Meta-analysis | Quantitative | To statistically analyze the results of a large collection of studies. Can only be applied to studies that collected data in a statistically valid manner. |
Qualitative | To analyze data collected from interviews, , or textual sources. To understand general themes in the data and how they are communicated. | |
Either | To analyze large volumes of textual or visual data collected from surveys, literature reviews, or other sources. Can be quantitative (i.e. frequencies of words) or qualitative (i.e. meanings of words). |
Discover proofreading & editing
If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Research bias
Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.
Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.
In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .
A sample is a subset of individuals from a larger population . Sampling means selecting the group that you will actually collect data from in your research. For example, if you are researching the opinions of students in your university, you could survey a sample of 100 students.
In statistics, sampling allows you to test a hypothesis about the characteristics of a population.
The research methods you use depend on the type of data you need to answer your research question .
Methodology refers to the overarching strategy and rationale of your research project . It involves studying the methods used in your field and the theories or principles behind them, in order to develop an approach that matches your objectives.
Methods are the specific tools and procedures you use to collect and analyze data (for example, experiments, surveys , and statistical tests ).
In shorter scientific papers, where the aim is to report the findings of a specific study, you might simply describe what you did in a methods section .
In a longer or more complex research project, such as a thesis or dissertation , you will probably include a methodology section , where you explain your approach to answering the research questions and cite relevant sources to support your choice of methods.
Other students also liked, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples.
I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”
The research variables, of any scientific experiment or research process, are factors that can be manipulated and measured.
Any factor that can take on different values is a scientific variable and influences the outcome of experimental research .
Most scientific experiments measure quantifiable factors, such as time or weight, but this is not essential for a component to be classed as a variable.
As an example, most of us have filled in surveys where a researcher asks questions and asks you to rate answers. These responses generally have a numerical range, from ‘1 - Strongly Agree’ through to ‘5 - Strongly Disagree’. This type of measurement allows opinions to be statistically analyzed and evaluated.
The key to designing any experiment is to look at what research variables could affect the outcome.
There are many types of variable but the most important, for the vast majority of research methods, are the independent and dependent variables.
The independent variable is the core of the experiment and is isolated and manipulated by the researcher. The dependent variable is the measurable outcome of this manipulation, the results of the experimental design . For many physical experiments , isolating the independent variable and measuring the dependent is generally easy.
If you designed an experiment to determine how quickly a cup of coffee cools, the manipulated independent variable is time and the dependent measured variable is temperature.
In other fields of science, the variables are often more difficult to determine and an experiment needs a robust design. Operationalization is a useful tool to measure fuzzy concepts which do not have one obvious variable.
In biology , social science and geography, for example, isolating a single independent variable is more difficult and any experimental design must consider this.
For example, in a social research setting, you might wish to compare the effect of different foods upon hyperactivity in children. The initial research and inductive reasoning leads you to postulate that certain foods and additives are a contributor to increased hyperactivity. You decide to create a hypothesis and design an experiment , to establish if there is solid evidence behind the claim.
The type of food is an independent variable, as is the amount eaten, the period of time and the gender and age of the child. All of these factors must be accounted for during the experimental design stage. Randomization and controls are generally used to ensure that only one independent variable is manipulated.
To eradicate some of these research variables and isolate the process, it is essential to use various scientific measurements to nullify or negate them.
For example, if you wanted to isolate the different types of food as the manipulated variable, you should use children of the same age and gender.
The test groups should eat the same amount of the food at the same times and the children should be randomly assigned to groups. This will minimize the physiological differences between children. A control group , acting as a buffer against unknown research variables, might involve some children eating a food type with no known links to hyperactivity.
In this experiment, the dependent variable is the level of hyperactivity, with the resulting statistical tests easily highlighting any correlation . Depending upon the results , you could try to measure a different variable, such as gender, in a follow up experiment.
Ensuring that certain research variables are controlled increases the reliability and validity of the experiment, by ensuring that other causal effects are eliminated. This safeguard makes it easier for other researchers to repeat the experiment and comprehensively test the results.
What you are trying to do, in your scientific design, is to change most of the variables into constants, isolating the independent variable. Any scientific research does contain an element of compromise and inbuilt error , but eliminating other variables will ensure that the results are robust and valid .
Martyn Shuttleworth (Aug 9, 2008). Research Variables. Retrieved Jun 22, 2024 from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/research-variables
The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) .
This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page.
That is it. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page. You can use it freely (with some kind of link), and we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations (with clear attribution).
Get all these articles in 1 guide.
Want the full version to study at home, take to school or just scribble on?
Whether you are an academic novice, or you simply want to brush up your skills, this book will take your academic writing skills to the next level.
Download electronic versions: - Epub for mobiles and tablets - For Kindle here - For iBooks here - PDF version here
Don't have time for it all now? No problem, save it as a course and come back to it later.
Quantitative variables.
Because quantitative methodology requires measurement, the concepts being investigated need to be defined in a way that can be measured. Organizational change, reading comprehension, emergency response, or depression are concepts but they cannot be measured as such. Frequency of organizational change, reading comprehension scores, emergency response time, or types of depression can be measured. They are variables (concepts that can vary).
Quantitative research involves many kinds of variables. There are four main types:
Each is discussed below.
Independent variables (IV) are those that are suspected of being the cause in a causal relationship. If you are asking a cause and effect question, your IV will be the variable (or variables if more than one) that you suspect causes the effect.
There are two main sorts of IV, active independent variables and attribute independent variables:
Independent variables are frequently called different things depending on the nature of the research question. In predictive questions where a variable is thought to predict another but it is not yet appropriate to ask whether it causes the other, the IV is usually called a predictor or criterion variable rather than an independent variable.
Dependent variables are those that are influenced by the independent variables. If you ask,"Does A cause [or predict or influence or affect, and so on] B?," then B is the dependent variable (DV).
In questions where full causation is not assumed, such as a predictive question or a question about differences between groups but no manipulation of an IV, the dependent variables are usually called outcome variables , and the independent variables are usually called the predictor or criterion variables.
In some studies, some characteristic of the participants must be measured for some reason, but that characteristic is not the IV or the DV. In this case, these are called sample variables. For example, suppose you are investigating whether servant leadership style affects organizational performance and successful financial outcomes. In order to obtain a sample of servant leaders, a standard test of leadership style will be administered. So the presence or absence of servant leadership style will be a sample variable. That score is not used as an IV or a DV, but simply to get the appropriate people into the sample.
When there is no measure of a characteristic of the participants, the characteristic is called a "sample characteristic." When the characteristic must be measured, it is called a "sample variable."
Extraneous variables are not of interest to the study but may influence the dependent variable. For this reason, most quantitative studies attempt to control extraneous variables. The literature should inform you what extraneous variables to account for.
There is a special class of extraneous variables called confounding variables. These are variables that can cause the effect we are looking for if they are not controlled for, resulting in a false finding that the IV is effective when it is not. In a study of changes in skill levels in a group of workers after a training program, if the follow-up measure is taken relatively late after the training, the simple effect of practicing the skills might explain improved scores, and the training might be mistakenly thought to be successful when it was not.
There are many details about variables not covered in this handout. Please consult any text on research methods for a more comprehensive review.
Doc. reference: phd_t2_sobt_u02s2_h01_quantvar.html.html
PHILO-notes
Free Online Learning Materials
In research, variables are crucial components that help to define and measure the concepts and phenomena under investigation. Variables are defined as any characteristic or attribute that can vary or change in some way. They can be measured, manipulated, or controlled to investigate the relationship between different factors and their impact on the research outcomes. In this essay, I will discuss the importance of variables in research, highlighting their role in defining research questions, designing studies, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions.
Defining Research Questions
Variables play a critical role in defining research questions. Research questions are formulated based on the variables that are under investigation. These questions guide the entire research process, including the selection of research methods, data collection procedures, and data analysis techniques. Variables help researchers to identify the key concepts and phenomena that they wish to investigate, and to formulate research questions that are specific, measurable, and relevant to the research objectives.
For example, in a study on the relationship between exercise and stress, the variables would be exercise and stress. The research question might be: “What is the relationship between the frequency of exercise and the level of perceived stress among young adults?”
Designing Studies
Variables also play a crucial role in the design of research studies. The selection of variables determines the type of research design that will be used, as well as the methods and procedures for collecting and analyzing data. Variables can be independent, dependent, or moderator variables, depending on their role in the research design.
Independent variables are the variables that are manipulated or controlled by the researcher. They are used to determine the effect of a particular factor on the dependent variable. Dependent variables are the variables that are measured or observed to determine the impact of the independent variable. Moderator variables are the variables that influence the relationship between the independent and dependent variables.
For example, in a study on the effect of caffeine on athletic performance, the independent variable would be caffeine, and the dependent variable would be athletic performance. The moderator variables could include factors such as age, gender, and fitness level.
Analyzing Data
Variables are also essential in the analysis of research data. Statistical methods are used to analyze the data and determine the relationships between the variables. The type of statistical analysis that is used depends on the nature of the variables, their level of measurement, and the research design.
For example, if the variables are categorical or nominal, chi-square tests or contingency tables can be used to determine the relationships between them. If the variables are continuous, correlation analysis or regression analysis can be used to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between them.
Drawing Conclusions
Finally, variables are crucial in drawing conclusions from research studies. The results of the study are based on the relationship between the variables and the conclusions drawn depend on the validity and reliability of the research methods and the accuracy of the statistical analysis. Variables help to establish the cause-and-effect relationships between different factors and to make predictions about the outcomes of future events.
For example, in a study on the effect of smoking on lung cancer, the independent variable would be smoking, and the dependent variable would be lung cancer. The conclusion would be that smoking is a risk factor for lung cancer, based on the strength and direction of the relationship between the variables.
In conclusion, variables play a crucial role in research across different fields and disciplines. They help to define research questions, design studies, analyze data, and draw conclusions. By understanding the importance of variables in research, researchers can design studies that are relevant, accurate, and reliable, and can provide valuable insights into the phenomena under investigation. Therefore, it is essential to consider variables carefully when designing, conducting, and interpreting research studies.
Home » Research Methods – Types, Examples and Guide
Table of Contents
Definition:
Research Methods refer to the techniques, procedures, and processes used by researchers to collect , analyze, and interpret data in order to answer research questions or test hypotheses. The methods used in research can vary depending on the research questions, the type of data that is being collected, and the research design.
Types of Research Methods are as follows:
Qualitative research methods are used to collect and analyze non-numerical data. This type of research is useful when the objective is to explore the meaning of phenomena, understand the experiences of individuals, or gain insights into complex social processes. Qualitative research methods include interviews, focus groups, ethnography, and content analysis.
Quantitative research methods are used to collect and analyze numerical data. This type of research is useful when the objective is to test a hypothesis, determine cause-and-effect relationships, and measure the prevalence of certain phenomena. Quantitative research methods include surveys, experiments, and secondary data analysis.
Mixed Method Research refers to the combination of both qualitative and quantitative research methods in a single study. This approach aims to overcome the limitations of each individual method and to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research topic. This approach allows researchers to gather both quantitative data, which is often used to test hypotheses and make generalizations about a population, and qualitative data, which provides a more in-depth understanding of the experiences and perspectives of individuals.
The following Table shows the key differences between Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Research Methods
Research Method | Quantitative | Qualitative | Mixed Methods |
---|---|---|---|
To measure and quantify variables | To understand the meaning and complexity of phenomena | To integrate both quantitative and qualitative approaches | |
Typically focused on testing hypotheses and determining cause and effect relationships | Typically exploratory and focused on understanding the subjective experiences and perspectives of participants | Can be either, depending on the research design | |
Usually involves standardized measures or surveys administered to large samples | Often involves in-depth interviews, observations, or analysis of texts or other forms of data | Usually involves a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods | |
Typically involves statistical analysis to identify patterns and relationships in the data | Typically involves thematic analysis or other qualitative methods to identify themes and patterns in the data | Usually involves both quantitative and qualitative analysis | |
Can provide precise, objective data that can be generalized to a larger population | Can provide rich, detailed data that can help understand complex phenomena in depth | Can combine the strengths of both quantitative and qualitative approaches | |
May not capture the full complexity of phenomena, and may be limited by the quality of the measures used | May be subjective and may not be generalizable to larger populations | Can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, and may require specialized skills | |
Typically focused on testing hypotheses and determining cause-and-effect relationships | Surveys, experiments, correlational studies | Interviews, focus groups, ethnography | Sequential explanatory design, convergent parallel design, explanatory sequential design |
Examples of Research Methods are as follows:
Qualitative Research Example:
A researcher wants to study the experience of cancer patients during their treatment. They conduct in-depth interviews with patients to gather data on their emotional state, coping mechanisms, and support systems.
Quantitative Research Example:
A company wants to determine the effectiveness of a new advertisement campaign. They survey a large group of people, asking them to rate their awareness of the product and their likelihood of purchasing it.
Mixed Research Example:
A university wants to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching method in improving student performance. They collect both quantitative data (such as test scores) and qualitative data (such as feedback from students and teachers) to get a complete picture of the impact of the new method.
Research methods are used in various fields to investigate, analyze, and answer research questions. Here are some examples of how research methods are applied in different fields:
Research methods serve several purposes, including:
Research methods are used when you need to gather information or data to answer a question or to gain insights into a particular phenomenon.
Here are some situations when research methods may be appropriate:
Research methods provide several advantages, including:
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
Higher Education News , Tips for Online Students , Tips for Students
Updated: June 19, 2024
Published: June 15, 2024
When embarking on a research project, selecting the right methodology can be the difference between success and failure. With various methods available, each suited to different types of research, it’s essential you make an informed choice. This blog post will provide tips on how to choose a research methodology that best fits your research goals .
We’ll start with definitions: Research is the systematic process of exploring, investigating, and discovering new information or validating existing knowledge. It involves defining questions, collecting data, analyzing results, and drawing conclusions.
Meanwhile, a research methodology is a structured plan that outlines how your research is to be conducted. A complete methodology should detail the strategies, processes, and techniques you plan to use for your data collection and analysis.
The first step of a research methodology is to identify a focused research topic, which is the question you seek to answer. By setting clear boundaries on the scope of your research, you can concentrate on specific aspects of a problem without being overwhelmed by information. This will produce more accurate findings.
Along with clarifying your research topic, your methodology should also address your research methods. Let’s look at the four main types of research: descriptive, correlational, experimental, and diagnostic.
Descriptive research is an approach designed to describe the characteristics of a population systematically and accurately. This method focuses on answering “what” questions by providing detailed observations about the subject. Descriptive research employs surveys, observational studies , and case studies to gather qualitative or quantitative data.
A real-world example of descriptive research is a survey investigating consumer behavior toward a competitor’s product. By analyzing the survey results, the company can gather detailed insights into how consumers perceive a competitor’s product, which can inform their marketing strategies and product development.
Correlational research examines the statistical relationship between two or more variables to determine whether a relationship exists. Correlational research is particularly useful when ethical or practical constraints prevent experimental manipulation. It is often employed in fields such as psychology, education, and health sciences to provide insights into complex real-world interactions, helping to develop theories and inform further experimental research.
An example of correlational research is the study of the relationship between smoking and lung cancer. Researchers observe and collect data on individuals’ smoking habits and the incidence of lung cancer to determine if there is a correlation between the two variables. This type of research helps identify patterns and relationships, indicating whether increased smoking is associated with higher rates of lung cancer.
Experimental research is a scientific approach where researchers manipulate one or more independent variables to observe their effect on a dependent variable. This method is designed to establish cause-and-effect relationships. Fields like psychology , medicine, and social sciences frequently employ experimental research to test hypotheses and theories under controlled conditions.
A real-world example of experimental research is Pavlov’s Dog experiment. In this experiment, Ivan Pavlov demonstrated classical conditioning by ringing a bell each time he fed his dogs. After repeating this process multiple times, the dogs began to salivate just by hearing the bell, even when no food was presented. This experiment helped to illustrate how certain stimuli can elicit specific responses through associative learning.
Diagnostic research tries to accurately diagnose a problem by identifying its underlying causes. This type of research is crucial for understanding complex situations where a precise diagnosis is necessary for formulating effective solutions. It involves methods such as case studies and data analysis and often integrates both qualitative and quantitative data to provide a comprehensive view of the issue at hand.
An example of diagnostic research is studying the causes of a specific illness outbreak. During an outbreak of a respiratory virus, researchers might conduct diagnostic research to determine the factors contributing to the spread of the virus. This could involve analyzing patient data, testing environmental samples, and evaluating potential sources of infection. The goal is to identify the root causes and contributing factors to develop effective containment and prevention strategies.
Using an established research method is imperative, no matter if you are researching for marketing , technology , healthcare , engineering, or social science. A methodology lends legitimacy to your research by ensuring your data is both consistent and credible. A well-defined methodology also enhances the reliability and validity of the research findings, which is crucial for drawing accurate and meaningful conclusions.
Additionally, methodologies help researchers stay focused and on track, limiting the scope of the study to relevant questions and objectives. This not only improves the quality of the research but also ensures that the study can be replicated and verified by other researchers, further solidifying its scientific value.
Choosing the best research methodology for your project involves several key steps to ensure that your approach aligns with your research goals and questions. Here’s a simplified guide to help you make the best choice.
Clearly define the objectives of your research. What do you aim to discover, prove, or understand? Understanding your goals helps in selecting a methodology that aligns with your research purpose.
Determine whether your research will involve numerical data, textual data, or both. Quantitative methods are best for numerical data, while qualitative methods are suitable for textual or thematic data.
Becoming familiar with the four types of research – descriptive, correlational, experimental, and diagnostic – will enable you to select the most appropriate method for your research. Many times, you will want to use a combination of methods to gather meaningful data.
Consider the resources available to you, including time, budget, and access to data. Some methodologies may require more resources or longer timeframes to implement effectively.
Look at previous research in your field to see which methodologies were successful. This can provide insights and help you choose a proven approach.
By following these steps, you can select a research methodology that best fits your project’s requirements and ensures robust, credible results.
Upon completing your research, the next critical step is to analyze and interpret the data you’ve collected. This involves summarizing the key findings, identifying patterns, and determining how these results address your initial research questions. By thoroughly examining the data, you can draw meaningful conclusions that contribute to the body of knowledge in your field.
It’s essential that you present these findings clearly and concisely, using charts, graphs, and tables to enhance comprehension. Furthermore, discuss the implications of your results, any limitations encountered during the study, and how your findings align with or challenge existing theories.
Your research project should conclude with a strong statement that encapsulates the essence of your research and its broader impact. This final section should leave readers with a clear understanding of the value of your work and inspire continued exploration and discussion in the field.
Now that you know how to perform quality research , it’s time to get started! Applying the right research methodologies can make a significant difference in the accuracy and reliability of your findings. Remember, the key to successful research is not just in collecting data, but in analyzing it thoughtfully and systematically to draw meaningful conclusions. So, dive in, explore, and contribute to the ever-growing body of knowledge with confidence. Happy researching!
At UoPeople, our blog writers are thinkers, researchers, and experts dedicated to curating articles relevant to our mission: making higher education accessible to everyone.
Studying protein isoforms is an essential step in biomedical research; at present, the main approach for analyzing proteins is via bottom-up mass spectrometry proteomics, which return peptide identifications, that are indirectly used to infer the presence of protein isoforms. However, the detection and quantification processes are noisy; in particular, peptides may be erroneously detected, and most peptides, known as shared peptides, are associated to multiple protein isoforms. As a consequence, studying individual protein isoforms is challenging, and inferred protein results are often abstracted to the gene-level or to groups of protein isoforms. Here, we introduce IsoBayes , a novel statistical method to perform inference at the isoform level. Our method enhances the information available, by integrating mass spectrometry proteomics and transcriptomics data in a Bayesian probabilistic framework. To account for the uncertainty in the measurement process, we propose a two-layer latent variable approach: first, we sample if a peptide has been correctly detected (or, alternatively filter peptides); second, we allocate the abundance of such selected peptides across the protein(s) they are compatible with. This enables us, starting from peptide-level data, to recover protein-level data; in particular, we: i) infer the presence/absence of each protein isoform (via a posterior probability), ii) estimate its abundance (and credible interval), and iii) target isoforms where transcript and protein relative abundances significantly differ. We benchmarked our approach in simulations, and in two multi-protease real datasets: our method displays good sensitivity and specificity when detecting protein isoforms, its estimated abundances highly correlate with the ground truth, and can detect changes between protein and transcript relative abundances. IsoBayes is freely distributed as a Bioconductor R package, and is accompanied by an example usage vignette.
The authors have declared no competing interest.
↵ * e-mail: gs9yr{at}virginia.edu
View the discussion thread.
Supplementary Material
Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.
NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.
Explore all metrics
Maintaining water quality in aquatic habitats is critical for the health of aquatic species, particularly fish. This study pioneers an innovative method to water quality classification, leveraging IoT-driven data acquisition and meticulous data labelling with the Aqua-Enviro Index (AEI) by considering the fish habitats. Existing mechanisms fail to capture complex temporal dynamics and depend largely on large amounts of labelled data, exposing fundamental limits. In response, we describe the Deep learning based Convolutional Gated Recurrent Unit Tempo Fusion Network (CGTFN) model, which represents a considerable development in the evaluation of water quality. The model addresses these restrictions by seamlessly merging Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for spatial pattern recognition and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) for temporal interactions. The Tempo Fusion mechanism combines spatial, temporal, and contextual data harmoniously, allowing for more sophisticated classifications by recognizing subtle interdependencies among environmental elements. The pioneering CGTFN model outperforms previous models, achieving 99.71 and 99.81% accuracy on both public-env and real-time-env datasets, respectively, exceeding established models at 98.2%. These remarkable findings highlight CGTFN’s disruptive potential in water quality evaluation, bridging the gap between technology and environmental management, with ramifications ranging from aquaculture to resource sustainability.
In this paper we are working with IoT enabled deep learning based CGFTN model for water quality classification considering impact of environmental variables.
The data collected through IoT is labelled using an innovative AEI-driven approach specifically designed for fish habitats.
CGTFN model integrates CNNs and GRUs, tackling temporal dynamics limitations.
Introduce sophisticated Tempo Fusion, harmonizing spatial, temporal, and contextual data.
CGTFN demonstrates disruptive potential, achieving superior accuracy (99.71 and 99.81%) on public and real-time datasets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
The data used in this study is publicly available and can be accessed at the following link: Kaggle - Ponds Data. This dataset includes comprehensive information relevant to the research conducted and is openly accessible for further analysis and verification.
Aghel B, Rezaei A, Mohadesi M (2019) Modeling and prediction of water quality parameters using a hybrid particle swarm optimization-neural fuzzy approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(8):4823–4832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1896-3
Article Google Scholar
Ahmed U, Mumtaz R, Anwar H, Shah AA, Irfan R, García-Nieto J (2019) Efficient water quality prediction using supervised machine learning. Water 11(11):2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112210
Article CAS Google Scholar
Alonso Á, Gómez-de-Prado G, Romero-Blanco A (2022) Behavioural variables to assess the toxicity of unionized ammonia in aquatic snails: integrating movement and feeding parameters. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 82(3):429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-022-00920-z
Alvi M et al (2023) Deep learning in wastewater treatment: a critical review. Water Res 245:120518
Baek S-S, Pyo J, Chun JA (2020) Prediction of water level and water quality using a CNN-LSTM combined deep learning approach. Water 12(12):3399
Barzegar R, Aalami MT, Adamowski J (2020) Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 34(2):415–433
Bisht AK, Singh R, Bhatt A, Bhutiani R (2017) Development of an automated water quality classification model for the River Ganga. In: International conference on next generation computing technologies. Springer, Singapore, pp 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8657-1_15
Cao S, Zhou L, Zhang Z (2021) Prediction of dissolved oxygen content in aquaculture based on clustering and improved ELM. IEEE Access 9:40372–40387. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3064029
CPCB|Central Pollution Control Board (2019) CPCB | Central Pollution Control Board; cpcb.nic.in. https://cpcb.nic.in/wqstandards/ . Accessed 5 May 2021
CWC. Central Water Commission (2022) Dataset on aquatic parameters. http://www.cwc.gov.in/water-quality-inforamtion
Data.gov.in (2017) https://data.gov.in/catalog/water-quality-india-2013?filters%5Bfield_catalog_reference%5D=2914901&format=json&offset=0&limit=6&sort%5Bcreated%5D=desc . Accessed 5 May 2021
Dilmi S, Ladjal M (2021) A novel approach for water quality classification based on the integration of deep learning and feature extraction techniques. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 214:104329
El-Shebli M, Sharrab Y, Al-Fraihat D (2023) Prediction and modeling of water quality using deep neural networks. Environ Dev Sustain 26:11397–11430
FAO (2020) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. [Online]. https://www.fao.org/state-of-fisheries-aquaculture/2020/en
FAO (2022) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022: Data Collection|Natural resources|Aquasat. [Online]. FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization, statistics
Hu Z et al (2019) A water quality prediction method based on the deep LSTM network considering correlation in smart mariculture. Sensors 19(6):1420
Jairam NK, Peda GA, (2023) Water quality fish, Retrieved 1st April 2023, from https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/apgopi/water-quality-fish
Li L et al (2019) Water quality prediction based on recurrent neural network and improved evidence theory: a case study of Qiantang River, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:19879–19896
Li W et al (2021) Prediction of dissolved oxygen in a fishery pond based on gated recurrent unit (GRU). Inf Process Agric 8(1):185–193
Google Scholar
Nicholaus IT et al (2021) Anomaly detection of water level using deep autoencoder. Sensors 21(19):6679
Oga T et al (2018) River water quality estimation based on convolutional neural network. 2018 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC). IEEE
Tallar RY, Suen JP (2016) Aquaculture water quality index: a low-cost index to accelerate aquaculture development in Indonesia. Aquacult Int 24(1):295–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-015-9926-3
Talukdar S, Ahmed S, Naikoo MW, Rahman A, Mallik S, Ningthoujam S, Ramana GV (2023) Predicting lake water quality index with sensitivity-uncertainty analysis using deep learning algorithms. J Clean Prod 406:136885
TNAU, The Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. [Online] 2022. http://www.agritech.tnau.ac.in/fishery
Zhang H et al (2022a) Online water quality monitoring based on UV–Vis spectrometry and artificial neural networks in a river confluence near Sherfield-on-Loddon. Environ Monit Assess 194(9):630
Zhang Q et al (2022b) A watershed water quality prediction model based on attention mechanism and Bi-LSTM. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(50):75664–75680
Zheng J et al (2019) Convolutional neural networks for water content classification and prediction with ground penetrating radar. IEEE Access 7:185385–185392
Download references
It’s not funded by any agency/organization either technically or financially.
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, National Institute of Technology Raipur, Raipur, India
Peda Gopi Arepalli & K. Jairam Naik
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, B.V. Raju Institute of Technology, Narsapur, India
Jagan Amgoth
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Peda Gopi Arepalli: concepts, development of methodologies, Sensor and Arduino board Design & Assembling, Dataset collection & creation, Experimentation, results analysis, and writing of the original draft; K Jairam Naik: concepts, experimentation, results analysis, writing, document review, editing and overall supervision. All authors read before submission and approved the final manuscript for submission. Jagan Amgoth: document editing and overall supervision.
Correspondence to Peda Gopi Arepalli .
Ethical approval.
All authors have seen and agreed with the contents of the manuscript and are looking forward to publishing this paper in this journal.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Arepalli, P.G., Naik, K.J. & Amgoth, J. An IoT Based Water Quality Classification Framework for Aqua-Ponds Through Water and Environmental Variables Using CGTFN Model. Int J Environ Res 18 , 73 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00625-2
Download citation
Received : 15 January 2024
Revised : 23 April 2024
Accepted : 06 June 2024
Published : 21 June 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00625-2
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Categorical Variable. This is a variable that can take on a limited number of values or categories. Categorical variables can be nominal or ordinal. Nominal variables have no inherent order, while ordinal variables have a natural order. Examples of categorical variables include gender, race, and educational level.
Examples. Discrete variables (aka integer variables) Counts of individual items or values. Number of students in a class. Number of different tree species in a forest. Continuous variables (aka ratio variables) Measurements of continuous or non-finite values. Distance.
Examples. Discrete variables (aka integer variables) Counts of individual items or values. Number of students in a class. Number of different tree species in a forest. Continuous variables (aka ratio variables) Measurements of continuous or non-finite values. Distance.
The independent variable is the cause. Its value is independent of other variables in your study. The dependent variable is the effect. Its value depends on changes in the independent variable. Example: Independent and dependent variables. You design a study to test whether changes in room temperature have an effect on math test scores.
The two main types of variables in psychology are the independent variable and the dependent variable. Both variables are important in the process of collecting data about psychological phenomena. This article discusses different types of variables that are used in psychology research. It also covers how to operationalize these variables when ...
In research design, understanding the types of variables and their roles is crucial for developing hypotheses, designing methods, and interpreting results. This article outlines the the types of variables in research, including their definitions and examples, to provide a clear understanding of their use and significance in research studies.
The Role of Variables in Research. In scientific research, variables serve several key functions: Define Relationships: Variables allow researchers to investigate the relationships between different factors and characteristics, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms that drive phenomena and outcomes. Establish Comparisons: By manipulating and comparing variables, scientists can ...
Research; Moderator Variable: The moderator variable affects the cause-and-effect relationship between the independent and dependent variables. As a result, the influence of the independent variable is in the presence of the moderator variable. Gender; Race; Class; Suppose you want to conduct a study, educational awareness of a specific area.
A variable in research simply refers to a person, place, thing, or phenomenon that you are trying to measure in some way. ... The process of examining a research problem in the social and behavioral sciences is often framed around methods of analysis that compare, contrast, correlate, average, or integrate relationships between or among ...
Variables in Research. The definition of a variable in the context of a research study is some feature with the potential to change, typically one that may influence or reflect a relationship or ...
Qualitative Variables. An important distinction between variables is the qualitative and quantitative variables. Qualitative variables are those that express a qualitative attribute, such as hair color, religion, race, gender, social status, method of payment, and so on.The values of a qualitative variable do not imply a meaningful numerical ordering.
Within research, especially scientific research, variables form the foundation of studies, as researchers are often interested in how one variable impacts another, and the relationships between different variables. For example: How someone's age impacts their sleep quality; How different teaching methods impact learning outcomes
The purpose of research is to describe and explain variance in the world, that is, variance that. occurs naturally in the world or chang e that we create due to manipulation. Variables are ...
Research methods are specific procedures for collecting and analysing data. ... For quantitative data, you can use statistical analysis methods to test relationships between variables. For qualitative data, you can use methods such as thematic analysis to interpret patterns and meanings in the data. Table of contents.
Suitable statistical design represents a critical factor in permitting inferences from any research or scientific study.[1] Numerous statistical designs are implementable due to the advancement of software available for extensive data analysis.[1] Healthcare providers must possess some statistical knowledge to interpret new studies and provide up-to-date patient care. We present an overview of ...
Variables. What is a variable?[1,2] To put it in very simple terms, a variable is an entity whose value varies.A variable is an essential component of any statistical data. It is a feature of a member of a given sample or population, which is unique, and can differ in quantity or quantity from another member of the same sample or population.
Or, the variable agreement might be defined as having five attributes: 1 = strongly disagree. 2 = disagree. 3 = neutral. 4 = agree. 5 = strongly agree. Another important distinction having to do with the term 'variable' is the distinction between an independent and dependent variable.
A variable is an attribute of an item of analysis in research. The types of variables in research can be categorized into: independent vs. dependent, or categorical vs. quantitative. The types of variables in research (correlational) can be classified into predictor or outcome variables. Other types of variables in research are confounding ...
Research methods are specific procedures for collecting and analyzing data. Developing your research methods is an integral part of your research design. When planning your methods, there are two key decisions you will make. First, decide how you will collect data. Your methods depend on what type of data you need to answer your research question:
Research Variables. The research variables, of any scientific experiment or research process, are factors that can be manipulated and measured. Any factor that can take on different values is a scientific variable and influences the outcome of experimental research. Gender, color and country are all perfectly acceptable variables, because they ...
Frequency of organizational change, reading comprehension scores, emergency response time, or types of depression can be measured. They are variables (concepts that can vary). Quantitative research involves many kinds of variables. There are four main types: Independent variables (IV). Dependent variables (DV).
Variables also play a crucial role in the design of research studies. The selection of variables determines the type of research design that will be used, as well as the methods and procedures for collecting and analyzing data. Variables can be independent, dependent, or moderator variables, depending on their role in the research design.
Quantitative research methods are used to collect and analyze numerical data. This type of research is useful when the objective is to test a hypothesis, determine cause-and-effect relationships, and measure the prevalence of certain phenomena. Quantitative research methods include surveys, experiments, and secondary data analysis.
Research Methods. The first step of a research methodology is to identify a focused research topic, which is the question you seek to answer. By setting clear boundaries on the scope of your research, you can concentrate on specific aspects of a problem without being overwhelmed by information. This will produce more accurate findings.
Research Tijunaitis et al. (2019) shows social media usage as a mediating variable for virtuality in the workplace toward social capital. The results show that social media usage is a significant mediator in the relationship between virtuality in the workplace and social capital as a whole (partial mediation).
Environmental variable analysis provides the underlying reasons for the pattern and distribution of plant communities on landscapes. Thus, the assessment of the spatial variation of environmental variables is important to recognize the factors leading to the distribution of plant communities.
Studying protein isoforms is an essential step in biomedical research; at present, the main approach for analyzing proteins is via bottom-up mass spectrometry proteomics, which return peptide identifications, that are indirectly used to infer the presence of protein isoforms. However, the detection and quantification processes are noisy; in particular, peptides may be erroneously detected, and ...
Maintaining water quality in aquatic habitats is critical for the health of aquatic species, particularly fish. This study pioneers an innovative method to water quality classification, leveraging IoT-driven data acquisition and meticulous data labelling with the Aqua-Enviro Index (AEI) by considering the fish habitats. Existing mechanisms fail to capture complex temporal dynamics and depend ...