annals of improbable research

Annals of Improbable Research

The 'Annals of Improbable Research' is a bi-monthly magazine devoted to scientific humor, in the form of a satirical take on the standard academic journal. 'AIR', published six times a year since 1995, usually showcases at least one piece of scientific research being done on a strange or unexpected topic, but most of their articles concern real or fictional absurd experiments, such as a comparison of apples and oranges using infrared spectroscopy. Wikipedia*

On the C-SPAN Networks: Annals of Improbable Research has hosted 1 event in the C-SPAN Video Library; the first program was a 1996 Ceremony .

Recent Programs

1996 Ig Nobel Awards

Harvard University faculty and students and some former Nobel laureates participated in the 6th annual Ig Nobel prize ceremon…

Improbable Research and the Ig Nobel Prizes

Wednesday, February 19, 2020 | 3:00 to 4:00 p.m. ET

Marc Abrahams

Writer/Editor

Annals of Improbable Research

Marc Abrahams founded the annual Ig Nobel Prize ceremony, in 1991. He is editor of the magazine Annals of Improbable Research , and former editor of the Journal of Irreproducible Research . He has written 24 mini-operas (about heart repair, bacterial space exploration, atomic/human romance, species mixing, coffee chemistry, the Atkins Diet, human/sheep cloning, cockroaches, incompetence, and much else). He invents ways to make people curious about things they might otherwise avoid.

This page was last updated on Wednesday, August 11, 2021

WALS 2024–2025 WALS Season season poster

Skip to main content
Keyboard shortcuts for audio player

LISTEN & FOLLOW
Apple Podcasts
Amazon Music
Amazon Alexa

Your support helps make our show possible and unlocks access to our sponsor-free feed.

Marc Abrahams Makes Science Improbably Funny

From farting fish, to the laws of stupidity, Marc Abrahams (editor and co-founder of The Annals of Improbable Research) has a knack for finding science that "makes you laugh, and then makes you think." Abrahams discusses some improbable research, and why science that might at first seem absurd, matters.

Internet Archive Audio

This Just In
Grateful Dead
Old Time Radio
78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
Audio Books & Poetry
Computers, Technology and Science
Music, Arts & Culture
News & Public Affairs
Spirituality & Religion
Radio News Archive

Flickr Commons
Occupy Wall Street Flickr
NASA Images
Solar System Collection
Ames Research Center

All Software
Old School Emulation
MS-DOS Games
Historical Software
Classic PC Games
Software Library
Kodi Archive and Support File
Vintage Software
CD-ROM Software
CD-ROM Software Library
Software Sites
Tucows Software Library
Shareware CD-ROMs
Software Capsules Compilation
CD-ROM Images
ZX Spectrum
DOOM Level CD

Smithsonian Libraries
FEDLINK (US)
Lincoln Collection
American Libraries
Canadian Libraries
Universal Library
Project Gutenberg
Children's Library
Biodiversity Heritage Library
Books by Language
Additional Collections

Prelinger Archives
Democracy Now!
Occupy Wall Street
TV NSA Clip Library
Animation & Cartoons
Arts & Music
Computers & Technology
Cultural & Academic Films
Ephemeral Films
Sports Videos
Videogame Videos
Youth Media

Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet.

Mobile Apps

Wayback Machine (iOS)
Wayback Machine (Android)

Browser Extensions

Archive-it subscription.

Explore the Collections
Build Collections

Save Page Now

Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future.

Please enter a valid web address

Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape

Ig Nobel prizes : the annals of improbable research

Bookreader item preview, share or embed this item, flag this item for.

Graphic Violence
Explicit Sexual Content
Hate Speech
Misinformation/Disinformation
Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata

plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews

34 Previews

3 Favorites

Better World Books

DOWNLOAD OPTIONS

No suitable files to display here.

EPUB and PDF access not available for this item.

IN COLLECTIONS

Uploaded by station63.cebu on October 7, 2020

The Ig Nobels: The Lighter Side of Scientific Research

What exactly are the Ig Nobels? And what can we learn from the Journal of Irreproducible Results and the Annals of Improbable Results?

It’s that time of year again, when scientists from around the world gather to receive awards for the most groundbreaking, meaningful, and important scientific discoveries of the year. But this award is no Nobel Prize . These are the Ig Nobels , a ceremony devoted to the lighter side of science. Some of this year’s winners examined such vital topics as the fluid dynamics of cats, how to cure snoring with a didgeridoo, and the effect of crocodiles on gambling preferences. Uh, what?

The concept behind the Ignobel Prize (The Igs) began in 1955 with the Journal of Irreproducible Results , a science humor magazine. Publishing and sales problems led to a temporary end to the journal in 1994 (it now continues with a new publisher) but it was replaced with a successor, the Annals of Improbable Results . The Journal and subsequently the Annals share the stated goal of proving that research can be fun and interesting at the same time. Most of the research is culled from the general scientific literature, but the Annals also publishes some original results.

The Igs were started in 1991 to highlight some of the best of the fun science—the research that “can’t and shouldn’t be reproduced.” Good-natured, actual Nobel Prize winners hand out the awards to the lucky winners. One of the earliest winners was Vice President Dan Quayle, “consumer of time and occupier of space,” for proving that politicians really should have science education.

Sexual references are quite common in the Annals , and among Ig nominees. An entry from 1997 , originally published in the Journal of Urology , has the memorable title “Re-establishment of Male Sexual Function and Appearance 23 Years After Alligator Induced Traumatic Orchiectomy and Penile Lacerations.” (Translation: Miraculous recovery decades after an alligator bite to a man’s nether regions.) There are several entries like that—not exactly funny, but definitely not reproducible. (FYI, apparently you can contract gonorrhea from a blow-up doll. But no one recommends trying to reproduce those particular results.)

There are no set categories. The 1994 prize for literature went to a paper that had 972 authors ; each author contributed exactly two words to the finished manuscript. The anatomy prize that year demonstrated that chimpanzees can recognize each other from photos. Of each others’ butts .

The Annals have wide readership. A raid on a terrorist safe house in Afghanistan found blueprints for a nuclear bomb made with plutonium and rubber cement. The design was a joke from a 1979 issue of the journal , but it isn’t clear whether the would-be bombers knew that or not.

Some of the most interesting entries are those that test something odd but well-known. For example, one winner used his own fingers to prove that cracking knuckles is harmless . Another classic entry took aim at the rhetorical trick of comparing apples and oranges . A study comparing apples and oranges was originally published in the Annals and then accidentally recreated years later in BMJ . The researcher (a) found a standardized method for comparing the two fruits using a mass spectrometer and then (b) compared them. The result? Apples and oranges are really not very different. The work did not win an Ig, alas, but it makes you think. Which is really the point.

JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers, and students. JSTOR Daily readers can access the original research behind our articles for free on JSTOR.

Get Our Newsletter

Get your fix of JSTOR Daily’s best stories in your inbox each Thursday.

Finding Caves on the Moon Is Great. On Mars? Even Better.

Nature Morte Aux Citrons, 1918 by Pierre-Auguste Renoir

When French Citrus Colonized Algeria

Support JSTOR Daily

The Ig Nobel Prizes: The Annals of Improbable Research

Marc abrahams. dutton books, $18.95 (240pp) isbn 978-0-525-94753-0.

Reviewed on: 09/01/2003

Genre: Nonfiction

Apple Books
Barnes & Noble

More By and About this Author chevron_right

Featured Nonfiction Reviews

Humor & Entertainment

Sorry, there was a problem.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

The Ig Nobel Prizes : The Annals of Improbable Research

To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the author

The Ig Nobel Prizes : The Annals of Improbable Research Paperback – January 1, 2003

PAST WINNERS: Peter Fong's experiment in which he fed Prozac to clams on the basis that if they chilled out more they'd taste better. Harold Hillman's report on 'The Possible Pain Experienced during Execution by Different Methods'...

Print length 432 pages
Language English
Publisher Orion
Publication date January 1, 2003
Dimensions 4.37 x 1.22 x 7.05 inches
ISBN-10 0752842617
ISBN-13 978-0752842615
See all details

Editorial Reviews

About the author, product details.

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Orion (January 1, 2003)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 432 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0752842617
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0752842615
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 8.6 ounces
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 4.37 x 1.22 x 7.05 inches
#2,346 in Scientific Research
#6,635 in Humor Essays (Books)

About the author

Marc abrahams.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 5 star 79% 12% 9% 0% 0% 79%
5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 4 star 79% 12% 9% 0% 0% 12%
5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 3 star 79% 12% 9% 0% 0% 9%
5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 2 star 79% 12% 9% 0% 0% 0%
5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 1 star 79% 12% 9% 0% 0% 0%

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

About Amazon
Investor Relations
Amazon Devices
Amazon Science
Sell products on Amazon
Sell on Amazon Business
Sell apps on Amazon
Become an Affiliate
Advertise Your Products
Self-Publish with Us
Host an Amazon Hub
› See More Make Money with Us
Amazon Business Card
Shop with Points
Reload Your Balance
Amazon Currency Converter
Amazon and COVID-19
Your Account
Your Orders
Shipping Rates & Policies
Returns & Replacements
Manage Your Content and Devices

Conditions of Use
Privacy Notice
Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
Your Ads Privacy Choices

Prizes For Science That Makes You Laugh, Then Think

16:39 minutes

Read Transcript
More from this episode

Prizes went to researchers for analyzing what makes legal documents unnecessarily difficult to understand. And for creating a moose crash-test dummy. And for explaining, mathematically, why success most often goes not to the most talented people, but instead to the luckiest. If that sounds like a strange set of awards—that’s because it’s the Ignobel Prize Ceremony. This year, for the 32nd year in a row, laureates gathered (virtually) to be recognized for their unusual contributions to the world of science and engineering. In the words of Marc Abrahams, editor of the Annals of Improbable Research and awards ceremony ringleader, “It’s not about good or bad. If you win an Ignobel Prize, it means you’ve done something that will immediately cause anyone who hears about it to laugh, and then to think about it for the next few days or weeks.” Abrahams joins Ira to talk about the backstory of the awards, and to introduce some highlights from this year’s online prize ceremony.

Donate To Science Friday

Invest in quality science journalism by making a donation to Science Friday.

Segment Guests

Marc Abrahams is the editor and co-founder of Annals of Improbable Research and the founder and master of ceremonies for the Ig Nobel Awards Ceremony in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Segment Transcript

IRA FLATOW: This is Science Friday. I’m Ira Flatow. It’s our holiday tradition, a post-Thanksgiving palate cleanser with highlights from the Ig Nobel Prize ceremony, awards for science that first makes you laugh and then makes you think.

This is the award ceremony’s 32nd first annual year. And here to navigate the awards and explain the silliness is Marc Abrahams, Editor of the Annals of improbable Research and ringleader of the awards ceremony. Welcome back, Marc.

MARC ABRAHAMS: Hello, Ira. It’s nice to hear your voice again.

IRA FLATOW: Thank you. Congratulations on 32 years.

MARC ABRAHAMS: Yeah. I don’t know how this happened.

IRA FLATOW: [LAUGHS]

MARC ABRAHAMS: But it keeps on, and we’re working hard to keep going.

IRA FLATOW: For listeners who are hearing us for the first time– and I find that hard to believe– what do you have to do to earn an Ig?

MARC ABRAHAMS: It’s a matter of luck. This is a prize unlike any other that I know of because it’s not about good or bad. If you win an Ig Nobel Prize, that means you’ve done something that will immediately cause anyone who hears about it to first laugh and then to think about it for the next few days or weeks. They can’t get it out of their head.

IRA FLATOW: Yeah. And this year, you had it online again, correct?

MARC ABRAHAMS: Yeah. We normally do it in a big theater with people coming and throwing paper airplanes and all that stuff. But because of the pandemic, haven’t been able to do that.

So for the third year, we recorded it secretly in bits and pieces. The winners are scattered all around the world, AND so are the Nobel laureates who are handing out the prizes. So this involved a lot of logistics.

IRA FLATOW: Mm-hmm. And I understand that someone who is an Ig Nobel Prize presenter this year is getting his own real Nobel Prize?

MARC ABRAHAMS: Yeah. We had, I think, eight Nobel Prize winners handing out the Ig Nobel Prizes to the Ig Nobel Prize winners. One of those Nobel Prize winners, Barry Sharpless, handed out two Ig Nobel Prize winners. And then a few weeks later, it was announced that he, Barry Sharpless, is going to be awarded a second Nobel Prize this year in chemistry.

IRA FLATOW: Does he attribute it to his Ig Nobel success?

MARC ABRAHAMS: I hope not. He seems [INAUDIBLE].

IRA FLATOW: [LAUGHS] All right, let’s get right into the prizes. First, let me ask you, do you have a favorite award this year?

MARC ABRAHAMS: No, I do not. One prize that seems to really appeal to an awful lot of people that I’ve heard from is the Economics Prize. It was given to a team of three scientists in the University of Catania in Sicily, Italy for an analysis they did that shows that success in life, in professions, in almost anything– success is far more a matter of luck than talent. I’ll let them explain it.

SPEAKER 1: Our starting point, which is the most important factor to reach success– talent or luck? On one hand, talent, like IQ and the other human features, is a Gaussian distribution.

SPEAKER 2: On the other hand, measuring success with money, one finds a parallel distribution of wealth with many poor people in a very few billionaires, as discovered by Pareto many years ago.

SPEAKER 1: So could luck be the missing factor to get a very big success? To answer this question, we simulated the careers of dozens of people in a virtual world full of random lucky opportunities and bad accidents.

SPEAKER 2: The simple dynamics of our computational model reproduces the real Pareto’s law and also shows that the moderately talented but very lucky individuals are always much more successful than very talented but unlucky ones.

SPEAKER 1: We also show that it’s possible to adopt efficient redistribution strategies in order to favor the success of the most talented people and to foster new ideas.

IRA FLATOW: Hmm. And I think that’s both sad and wonderful to hear. Louis Pasteur said, luck prefers the prepared mind, which means if you’re thinking about something all the time, you’re going to be the lucky one who gets the answer.

Let’s talk about Literature Prize. I thought that was really cool. Tell me about that one.

MARC ABRAHAMS: This was a team of three people published a paper in which they analyzed what makes legal documents unnecessarily difficult to understand.

SPEAKER 3: Why is legal language so hard to understand? We set out by comparing the language in legal documents, things that people actually read, and what people are actually saying. Turns out, legal texts contain far more difficult-to-process features than other language.

SPEAKER 4: To evaluate whether these factors affect people’s comprehension and retention, we conducted an experiment.

SPEAKER 3: We had people read a simplified contract excerpt or a legalese version. We found that people had worse comprehension and retention of the legalese.

SPEAKER 4: While this may not be shocking, it’s important to know how difficult these features make language processing and why it’s happening in the first place.

SPEAKER 3: This way we can advocate for tractable and beneficial changes to society.

IRA FLATOW: Wow. That is deserving of some kind of prize.

MARC ABRAHAMS: Yeah. And now it’s got one.

IRA FLATOW: Let’s move on to another favorite of mine in medicine. A whole bunch of folks from Poland got awards here.

MARC ABRAHAMS: They showed through experiments that when patients undergo certain forms of toxic chemotherapy, those patients will suffer fewer harmful side effects when ice cream is used in place of what were the traditional components of the procedure.

SPEAKER 5: This work is about preventing a common complication of high-dose chemotherapy that you use prior to the Bone Marrow Transplantation. You can prevent mucositis by sucking ice cubes, but who wants to suck ice cubes for many hours? We discovered that actually you can use ice cream– cool the mucosal tissue, and get the same effect. So we would like to thank our restaurant for providing us with free ice cream for this work.

I would like to also thank all of the members of our team who first made sure that every patient prior to the transplant got the ice cream to prevent mucositis and later prepared the publication and were able to publish it with high-impact factor. So thank you all. And remember, ice cream to prevent mucositis.

It’s not an ignoble joke. It’s actually evidence-based medicine. Thank you for that work.

IRA FLATOW: That’s really cool because ice cream, we all scream for, right?

MARC ABRAHAMS: Yeah. Nice bad pun there about the cool. They say that this really has been helpful, that this kind of chemotherapy does damage to the patients. And it’s really uncomfortable, and the patients don’t want to go through it. And their whole memory of the experience is usually just a horror.

But using the ice cream, it turned into an almost pleasant experience. So it turned out to really make a difference and also to prevent some of the physical damage that was happening to those patients. So yay, ice cream.

IRA FLATOW: Tell me how people get selected for this honor, if you will. We had it we had a story recently about cat purring. And one of the researchers had won an Ig Nobel and was very excited to have it.

MARC ABRAHAMS: Yeah. The organizers are always looking around at science journals, and news reports, and talking to lots of people. But mostly, we get nominations flooding in every day from around the world. People hear about something, maybe they know the scientist who did it, maybe they are the scientist who did it, or maybe they’ve just read about it, or whatever. And they tell us about it and give us enough information that we can go and track it down.

And in a typical year, we get something like 10,000 new nominations for Ig Nobel Prizes. And then we do a lot of digging and a lot of arguing. We also look at some of the older things because the Prize is not necessarily for things during the past year.

And we argue a lot ourselves, and we choose 10. And for each of those, in most cases, we get in touch with them very quietly. We offer them the Prize. We give them the chance to decline the honor if they want to turn it down. But happily, most people who are offered an Ig Nobel Prize say yes.

IRA FLATOW: Mm-hmm. Let’s go back to some of the prizes here. There was a Prize given to a whole bunch of people for developing an algorithm to help gossipers decide when to tell the truth and went to lie, really.

MARC ABRAHAMS: Really.

IRA FLATOW: It’s a algorithm that would work by analyzing what was said?

MARC ABRAHAMS: Yeah. It has a lot to do with who you’re gossiping to, and who you’re gossiping about, and whether your gossiping is liable to simply be a pleasantry, or whether it might even help the friendship, or whether you might be doing some real damage to the person you’re gossiping about or to the person that you’re gossiping to.

SPEAKER 6: I have some exciting news. We’ve won the Ig Nobel Prize for a mobile phone honest and this one is gossip.

SPEAKER 7: Why us?

SPEAKER 6: It must be because a mathematical model on gossip makes you first smile and then think.

SPEAKER 7: Gossip is important in social life. It’s how we learn about others’ good or bad actions, and it’s crucial for human cooperation. The latest gossip is that we received the Ig Nobel Prize.

SPEAKER 6: Is this gossip honest or misleading?

SPEAKER 7: I trust it. I’m going to prove it. Yay.

SPEAKER 6: Sometimes people malign each others. Our motives just like gossip can be honest or dishonest, depending on how much they value the targets and recipients of gossip.

SPEAKER 7: Hey, I heard our research got the Ig Nobel Prize. I don’t know if I trust this. Yeah, you have too much stake in us believing that. We are friends. I care about you. According to our model, I’ll only tell you the truth. OK, I believe it now. Our paper with whom we got the Nobel Prize.

SPEAKER 6: Wow. If so, we should definitely work with her again. But I know that you value her, Paul. And this story really benefits her. Is it really true?

SPEAKER 7: Well, OK. I may have been slightly dishonest.

SPEAKER 6: Overall, our model is the most brilliant paper in the last 50 years.

SPEAKER 7: OK, now that’s dishonest.

IRA FLATOW: Interesting. And one other I want to point out– because I think this strikes me as kind of seasonal– the Safety Engineering Prize for developing a moose crash test dummy. Did we know we needed one until he asked and developed it?

MARC ABRAHAMS: Well, maybe you didn’t. But if you live in a place where there are a lot of mooses wandering around, you would know this. He did this about 20 years ago or so. This was his master’s thesis work in Sweden. And in Sweden, there are a lot of mooses throughout the country.

And there are a fair number of collisions between a moose and a car. And when that happens, that’s not a good thing for the moose or the car. So he developed a crash test dummy, which apparently worked pretty well. And several car manufacturers around the world now have been using this for 20 years, this dummy–

IRA FLATOW: Wow.

MARC ABRAHAMS: –in tests about how do you build cars so that if they are in that kind of collision, maybe people will survive?

MAGNUS JENS: Hi, guys. This is Magnus Jens from the Swedish West Coast, really close to the automotive Mecca of Gothenburg in Sweden. First of all, I would like to thank Marc with team for this fantastic recognition and to also tell you how big of an energy boost it is to accept this Prize. When I first started out, this was a really important topic that we knew very little about.

And what’s also important to understand is that the whole outset of creating this moose crash test dummy is to understand what kind of damages can be done to vehicles by these large animals out on the Swedish roads– or not only Swedish roads, but all the parts in the world where these big animals resides. So thanks once again for this fantastic recognition. And yeah, take care.

IRA FLATOW: This is Science Friday from WNYC Studios. In case you’re just joining us, we’re talking with Marc Abrahams, Editor of the Annals of Improbable Research and ringleader of the awards ceremony who is talking about all the great Ig Nobels that were handed out this year. And you can see a recording of the ceremony on our website at sciencefriday.com/ignobel. I understand that you just got a big science communication Prize in Europe. Tell us about that.

MARC ABRAHAMS: Yeah. This is surprising to me. The Heinz Oberhummer Award is given every year by a group in Austria. And it’s for, they say, outstanding science communication.

So they’ve decided this year they’re giving it to the Ig Nobel Prize. And I’m going to go over to Austria, and several Ig Nobel winners are as well. And we will expect have a fine, old time.

IRA FLATOW: That’s terrific. Do you see the Ig Nobels as a teaching tool?

MARC ABRAHAMS: I hope, always, the Ig Nobel is something that makes people a lot more curious about a lot more things and a lot more eager to do a little bit of thinking on their own about what those things might be and what those things might mean.

IRA FLATOW: One more Prize I want to get to– the Engineering Prize for trying to discover the most efficient way for people to use their fingers when turning a knob.

MARC ABRAHAMS: This is done by a professor in Japan whose whole career has been in designing objects, including things like doorknobs and control knobs. It’s something that, at least, I had never thought about and I think most people haven’t given any thought to about. If you’re the person who’s making the machine or the whatever that has knobs on it, how big are you going to make these knobs, and where are you going to put them?

Because if they’re too big, or too small, or in an awkward place, people are going to have a tough time using them, and they’re going to hate your machine and maybe not use it. So that’s what this research was about– how, in practice, when people, not thinking about it, they just reach their hand and their fingers out– how do those fingers and that knob interact? Here’s the recording of what they said.

SPEAKER 8: I’m very honored to receive this wonderful award. I’m a design researcher and also a product designer. How many fingers do you use to pinch and turn anything of this size? How about this? How about this? And how about this? We have a statistically clarified the answer of these questions.

The diameter that changes from 2 to 3 is 10 to 11 millimeters. From 3 to 4 is 23 to 26 millimeter. And from 4 to 5 is 45 to 50 millimeter. Furthermore, aligning some points straight, the other four fingers draw quadratic curves.

In the field of design, there are many researchers studying such an unconscious human behavior. I hope that more designers will receive this award. Thank you very much.

MARC ABRAHAMS: The winner was very pleased because, I guess, industrial designers, if they do their job well, nobody who uses the thing they design ever thinks about the fact that somebody went to a lot of trouble to make this easy to use.

IRA FLATOW: Marc, tell me, if folks have an idea for someone who deserves a Prize, how do they get in touch?

MARC ABRAHAMS: Just go to our website, improbable.com, and you can get in touch with us very easily there. If you do run across– I’m talking to anybody who’s listening to this– if you run across somebody or some group that you think deserves an Ig Nobel Prize, tell us about it, please. And also, tell us where we can find out the detailed information about it because this is not just a random thing we do. When we choose these people to win the prizes, we really dig into it. We want to make sure they truly deserve it.

IRA FLATOW: Well, Marc, once again, you’ve enlightened us about your prizes, and I thank you for taking time to be with us today.

MARC ABRAHAMS: Thank you, Ira. And happy day after Thanksgiving.

IRA FLATOW: Marc Abrahams, Editor of the Annals of Improbable Research and Master of Ceremonies for the Ig Nobel Prize ceremony.

Copyright © 2022 Science Friday Initiative. All rights reserved. Science Friday transcripts are produced on a tight deadline by 3Play Media. Fidelity to the original aired/published audio or video file might vary, and text might be updated or amended in the future. For the authoritative record of Science Friday’s programming, please visit the original aired/published recording. For terms of use and more information, visit our policies pages at http://www.sciencefriday.com/about/policies/.

Meet the Producers and Host

About charles bergquist.

As Science Friday’s director and senior producer, Charles Bergquist channels the chaos of a live production studio into something sounding like a radio program. Favorite topics include planetary sciences, chemistry, materials, and shiny things with blinking lights.

About Ira Flatow

Ira Flatow is the host and executive producer of Science Friday . His green thumb has revived many an office plant at death’s door.

Explore More

Annual prizes honor the stranger side of science.

The IgNobel Prizes salute unusual research, such as an investigation of dung beetle navigation.

From Tiny Krill To Concrete Jungles: 2022’s Best Science Books For Kids

Go with a classic for holiday gifts this year: Books! Check out our favorite science books for the young scientists on your list.

Privacy Overview

Cookie	Duration	Description
_abck	1 year	This cookie is used to detect and defend when a client attempt to replay a cookie.This cookie manages the interaction with online bots and takes the appropriate actions.
ASP.NET_SessionId	session	Issued by Microsoft's ASP.NET Application, this cookie stores session data during a user's website visit.
AWSALBCORS	7 days	This cookie is managed by Amazon Web Services and is used for load balancing.
bm_sz	4 hours	This cookie is set by the provider Akamai Bot Manager. This cookie is used to manage the interaction with the online bots. It also helps in fraud preventions
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement	1 year	Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category .
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
csrftoken	past	This cookie is associated with Django web development platform for python. Used to help protect the website against Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks
JSESSIONID	session	The JSESSIONID cookie is used by New Relic to store a session identifier so that New Relic can monitor session counts for an application.
nlbi_972453	session	A load balancing cookie set to ensure requests by a client are sent to the same origin server.
PHPSESSID	session	This cookie is native to PHP applications. The cookie is used to store and identify a users' unique session ID for the purpose of managing user session on the website. The cookie is a session cookies and is deleted when all the browser windows are closed.
TiPMix	1 hour	The TiPMix cookie is set by Azure to determine which web server the users must be directed to.
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
visid_incap_972453	1 year	SiteLock sets this cookie to provide cloud-based website security services.
X-Mapping-fjhppofk	session	This cookie is used for load balancing purposes. The cookie does not store any personally identifiable data.
x-ms-routing-name	1 hour	Azure sets this cookie for routing production traffic by specifying the production slot.

Cookie	Duration	Description
__cf_bm	30 minutes	This cookie, set by Cloudflare, is used to support Cloudflare Bot Management.
bcookie	2 years	LinkedIn sets this cookie from LinkedIn share buttons and ad tags to recognize browser ID.
bscookie	2 years	LinkedIn sets this cookie to store performed actions on the website.
lang	session	LinkedIn sets this cookie to remember a user's language setting.
lidc	1 day	LinkedIn sets the lidc cookie to facilitate data center selection.
S	1 hour	Used by Yahoo to provide ads, content or analytics.
sp_landing	1 day	The sp_landing is set by Spotify to implement audio content from Spotify on the website and also registers information on user interaction related to the audio content.
sp_t	1 year	The sp_t cookie is set by Spotify to implement audio content from Spotify on the website and also registers information on user interaction related to the audio content.
UserMatchHistory	1 month	LinkedIn sets this cookie for LinkedIn Ads ID syncing.

Cookie	Duration	Description
__jid	30 minutes	Cookie used to remember the user's Disqus login credentials across websites that use Disqus.
_gat	1 minute	This cookie is installed by Google Universal Analytics to restrain request rate and thus limit the collection of data on high traffic sites.
_gat_UA-28243511-22	1 minute	A variation of the _gat cookie set by Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager to allow website owners to track visitor behaviour and measure site performance. The pattern element in the name contains the unique identity number of the account or website it relates to.
AWSALB	7 days	AWSALB is an application load balancer cookie set by Amazon Web Services to map the session to the target.
countryCode	session	This cookie is used for storing country code selected from country selector.

Cookie	Duration	Description
_fbp	3 months	This cookie is set by Facebook to display advertisements when either on Facebook or on a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising, after visiting the website.
fr	3 months	Facebook sets this cookie to show relevant advertisements to users by tracking user behaviour across the web, on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE	1 year 24 days	Google DoubleClick IDE cookies are used to store information about how the user uses the website to present them with relevant ads and according to the user profile.
NID	6 months	NID cookie, set by Google, is used for advertising purposes; to limit the number of times the user sees an ad, to mute unwanted ads, and to measure the effectiveness of ads.
personalization_id	2 years	Twitter sets this cookie to integrate and share features for social media and also store information about how the user uses the website, for tracking and targeting.
test_cookie	15 minutes	The test_cookie is set by doubleclick.net and is used to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
vglnk.Agent.p	1 year	VigLink sets this cookie to track the user behaviour and also limit the ads displayed, in order to ensure relevant advertising.
vglnk.PartnerRfsh.p	1 year	VigLink sets this cookie to show users relevant advertisements and also limit the number of adverts that are shown to them.
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE	5 months 27 days	A cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface.
YSC	session	YSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.
yt-remote-connected-devices	never	YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt-remote-device-id	never	YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt.innertube::nextId	never	This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
yt.innertube::requests	never	This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.

Cookie	Duration	Description
_dc_gtm_UA-28243511-20	1 minute	No description
abtest-identifier	1 year	No description
AnalyticsSyncHistory	1 month	No description
ARRAffinityCU	session	No description available.
ccc	1 month	No description
COMPASS	1 hour	No description
cookies.js_dtest	session	No description
debug	never	No description available.
donation-identifier	1 year	No description
f	never	No description available.
GFE_RTT	5 minutes	No description available.
incap_ses_1185_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_1185_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_1185_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_1319_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_1319_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_1319_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_1364_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_1364_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_1364_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_1580_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_1580_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_1580_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_198_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_198_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_198_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_340_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_340_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_340_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_374_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_374_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_374_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_375_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_375_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_375_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_455_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_455_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_455_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_8076_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_8076_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_8076_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_867_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_867_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_867_972453	session	No description
incap_ses_9117_2233503	session	No description
incap_ses_9117_823975	session	No description
incap_ses_9117_972453	session	No description
li_gc	2 years	No description
loglevel	never	No description available.
msToken	10 days	No description

The 33rd First Annual Ig Nobel Prizes:

The 33rd First Annual Ig Nobel Prizes ceremony (September 14, 2023, Webcast)

The 33rd First Annual Ig Nobel Prize ceremony happened on Thursday, September 14, 2023, at 6:00 pm (US eastern time). The 2023 ceremony happened entirely as a webcast, not in a theatre.

Watch video of the ceremony:

Video of the ceremony with captions in Japanese.

The ceremony itself included these and other traditional elements:

Winners — Ten new Ig Nobel Prize winners were introduced. Each winner (or winning team) has done something that makes people LAUGH, then THINK
Frances Arnold (chemistry, 2018)
Marty Chalfie (chemistry 2008)
Peter Doherty (physiology or medicine 1996)
Esther Duflo (economics 2019)
Jerry Friedman (physics 1990)
Wolfgang Ketterle (physics, 2001)
Eric Maskin (economics 2007)
Ardem Patapoutian (physiology or medicine, 2021)
Al Roth (economics 2012)
Rich Roberts (physiology or medicine 1993)
Barry Sharpless (chemistry 2001 and chemistry 2022)
Theme — the theme of the 2023 ceremony, evinced in the non-opera and other bits, was: WATER .
Alexey Eliseev , book
Ivan Gusev , piano
Barbara Allen Hill , soprano
Thomas Michel , accordion
Julie Reimann , cello
Scott Taylor , baritone (also trombone)
Nadia Dominici & Alberto Minetti & Yury Ivanenko — TOPIC: Running on water on the moon
David Hu — TOPIC: Water in the human body
Erika Johnson — TOPIC: Hydrodynamics
Jasmine Nirody — TOPIC: Gekkos running on water
Andrea Sella — TOPIC: Medium density amorphous ice
Paper Airplanes — Paper airplanes were thrown by people in many countries and many walks of life.
Welcome, Goodbye — The traditional Welcome, Welcome Speech and the traditional Goodbye, Goodbye Speech — both delivered by Jean Berko Gleason — maintained the standard for what welcome speeches and goodbye speeches should be.
And other things

Also of interest: Glance at press accounts of the new winners, and watch some enhanced acceptance speeches

A partial history of the paper airplanes in the 2023 Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony

Ig Nobel Face-to-Face 2023 (Saturday evening, November 11, 2023, 7:00 pm, The MIT Museum, Cambridge)

A New, Additional Event Two Months After the Ceremony : there was a new, companion event called Ig Nobel Face-to-Face. The new Ig Nobel Prize winners and other researchers asked each other questions about their work. Many of the new winners were part of this event — specifically winners of the:

Literature Prize
Mechanical Engineering Prize
Public Health Prize
Communication Prize
Medicine Prize
Nutrition Prize
Education Prize
Physics Prize

This new event happened in the new MIT Museum in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, on Saturday evening, November 11, 2023, at 7:00 pm .

This was something of a joyous homecoming for us. The very first Ig Nobel Prize ceremony was held in the MIT Museum (in their old building) in 1991. Here is edited video:

Some of the new winners also participated in public events at Imperial College London (on November 18) and at Miraikan in Tokyo (on December 17 ).

We Ask for Your Help

As per tradition, the ceremony is funded on a shoestring. If you or your organization would like to help, please donate to the Ig .